Epidemiology, management, and prevention of exit site infections in peritoneal dialysis patients

Exit site infection (ESI) is a leading complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), at an incidence of 0.6 episodes per year in the United States, and a major risk factor for catheter removal and peritonitis. An estimated 20% of all peritonitis cases are preceded by an ESI, with up to 50% of Staphyloco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis 2022-04, Vol.26 (2), p.275-287
Hauptverfasser: Sachar, Moniyka, Shah, Ankur
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 287
container_issue 2
container_start_page 275
container_title Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis
container_volume 26
creator Sachar, Moniyka
Shah, Ankur
description Exit site infection (ESI) is a leading complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), at an incidence of 0.6 episodes per year in the United States, and a major risk factor for catheter removal and peritonitis. An estimated 20% of all peritonitis cases are preceded by an ESI, with up to 50% of Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis associated with ESI. Gram‐negative ESIs are less associated with succeeding peritonitis than their gram‐positive counterparts, though when present, are associated with a lower peritonitis cure rate. The rate of catheter removal for refractory ESI is relatively highest in ESI due to mycobacteria (up to 40%), S. aureus (35%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28%), followed by Corynebacterium, Serratia, and fungi. In review of relevant literature, we found no prophylactic benefit of dressings over nondressings, specific antiseptics over normal saline, or topical honey over topical antibiotic prophylaxis, and thus recommend individualized exit site hygiene. We found topical gentamicin effective for prevention of most ESIs, including gram‐negative ESIs, and thus recommend consideration of prophylactic topical gentamicin in areas of high gram‐negative peritonitis incidence. With long‐term use, observational studies detect up to 25% of gram‐positive and 14% of gram‐negative ESIs may be mupirocin and gentamicin resistant, respectively. We review empiric and targeted ESI management, including indications for ultrasound, anti‐VMRSA, anti‐Pseudomonal, and anti‐mycobacterial antibiotic use, and catheter removal. We recommend further investigation into the earlier use of second‐line treatment agents and the utility of treating post‐infectious exit site colonization as avenues to decrease refractory and repeat ESI.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1744-9987.13726
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564944315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2564944315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-f7a9f5c669aa7edd590e04072379dc3ad4b9a2f3db8988871113e7fe81126f923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsyGPDE0bx04cj1VVPqRKMJTZuPG5MkriEKdA_j0Oha548d3puVe6B6FrEs9IeHPCGYuEyPmMUJ5kJ2h8nJweay5G6ML7tzhOEkbpORpRxmjKKRuj11VjNVTWlW7XT3GlarWDCupuilWtcdPCR2isq7EzGL5sh73tANvaQDGMfShxA63tXA2qxNqqsvfW40Z1Nmz6S3RmVOnh6vefoJe71Wb5EK2f7h-Xi3VU0IxnkeFKmLTIMqEUB61TEUPMYp5QLnRBlWZboRJD9TYXeZ7zcDwFbiAnJMmMSOgE3R5ym9a978F3srK-gLJUNbi9l0maMRHOJmlA5we0aJ33LRjZtLZSbS9JLAetchAnB4nyR2vYuPkN328r0Ef-z2MA0gPwaUvo_8uTm8XzIfgbbtOC4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2564944315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiology, management, and prevention of exit site infections in peritoneal dialysis patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sachar, Moniyka ; Shah, Ankur</creator><creatorcontrib>Sachar, Moniyka ; Shah, Ankur</creatorcontrib><description>Exit site infection (ESI) is a leading complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), at an incidence of 0.6 episodes per year in the United States, and a major risk factor for catheter removal and peritonitis. An estimated 20% of all peritonitis cases are preceded by an ESI, with up to 50% of Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis associated with ESI. Gram‐negative ESIs are less associated with succeeding peritonitis than their gram‐positive counterparts, though when present, are associated with a lower peritonitis cure rate. The rate of catheter removal for refractory ESI is relatively highest in ESI due to mycobacteria (up to 40%), S. aureus (35%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28%), followed by Corynebacterium, Serratia, and fungi. In review of relevant literature, we found no prophylactic benefit of dressings over nondressings, specific antiseptics over normal saline, or topical honey over topical antibiotic prophylaxis, and thus recommend individualized exit site hygiene. We found topical gentamicin effective for prevention of most ESIs, including gram‐negative ESIs, and thus recommend consideration of prophylactic topical gentamicin in areas of high gram‐negative peritonitis incidence. With long‐term use, observational studies detect up to 25% of gram‐positive and 14% of gram‐negative ESIs may be mupirocin and gentamicin resistant, respectively. We review empiric and targeted ESI management, including indications for ultrasound, anti‐VMRSA, anti‐Pseudomonal, and anti‐mycobacterial antibiotic use, and catheter removal. We recommend further investigation into the earlier use of second‐line treatment agents and the utility of treating post‐infectious exit site colonization as avenues to decrease refractory and repeat ESI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-9979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-9987</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.13726</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34435734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Topical ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Catheter-Related Infections - epidemiology ; Catheter-Related Infections - microbiology ; Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects ; Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology ; exit site infection ; Humans ; peritoneal dialysis ; Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects ; peritonitis ; Peritonitis - epidemiology ; Peritonitis - etiology ; Peritonitis - prevention &amp; control ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Staphylococcus aureus</subject><ispartof>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis, 2022-04, Vol.26 (2), p.275-287</ispartof><rights>2021 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-f7a9f5c669aa7edd590e04072379dc3ad4b9a2f3db8988871113e7fe81126f923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-f7a9f5c669aa7edd590e04072379dc3ad4b9a2f3db8988871113e7fe81126f923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0811-6900</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1744-9987.13726$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1744-9987.13726$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34435734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sachar, Moniyka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Ankur</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiology, management, and prevention of exit site infections in peritoneal dialysis patients</title><title>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis</title><addtitle>Ther Apher Dial</addtitle><description>Exit site infection (ESI) is a leading complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), at an incidence of 0.6 episodes per year in the United States, and a major risk factor for catheter removal and peritonitis. An estimated 20% of all peritonitis cases are preceded by an ESI, with up to 50% of Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis associated with ESI. Gram‐negative ESIs are less associated with succeeding peritonitis than their gram‐positive counterparts, though when present, are associated with a lower peritonitis cure rate. The rate of catheter removal for refractory ESI is relatively highest in ESI due to mycobacteria (up to 40%), S. aureus (35%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28%), followed by Corynebacterium, Serratia, and fungi. In review of relevant literature, we found no prophylactic benefit of dressings over nondressings, specific antiseptics over normal saline, or topical honey over topical antibiotic prophylaxis, and thus recommend individualized exit site hygiene. We found topical gentamicin effective for prevention of most ESIs, including gram‐negative ESIs, and thus recommend consideration of prophylactic topical gentamicin in areas of high gram‐negative peritonitis incidence. With long‐term use, observational studies detect up to 25% of gram‐positive and 14% of gram‐negative ESIs may be mupirocin and gentamicin resistant, respectively. We review empiric and targeted ESI management, including indications for ultrasound, anti‐VMRSA, anti‐Pseudomonal, and anti‐mycobacterial antibiotic use, and catheter removal. We recommend further investigation into the earlier use of second‐line treatment agents and the utility of treating post‐infectious exit site colonization as avenues to decrease refractory and repeat ESI.</description><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology</subject><subject>exit site infection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>peritoneal dialysis</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects</subject><subject>peritonitis</subject><subject>Peritonitis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Peritonitis - etiology</subject><subject>Peritonitis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><issn>1744-9979</issn><issn>1744-9987</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsyGPDE0bx04cj1VVPqRKMJTZuPG5MkriEKdA_j0Oha548d3puVe6B6FrEs9IeHPCGYuEyPmMUJ5kJ2h8nJweay5G6ML7tzhOEkbpORpRxmjKKRuj11VjNVTWlW7XT3GlarWDCupuilWtcdPCR2isq7EzGL5sh73tANvaQDGMfShxA63tXA2qxNqqsvfW40Z1Nmz6S3RmVOnh6vefoJe71Wb5EK2f7h-Xi3VU0IxnkeFKmLTIMqEUB61TEUPMYp5QLnRBlWZboRJD9TYXeZ7zcDwFbiAnJMmMSOgE3R5ym9a978F3srK-gLJUNbi9l0maMRHOJmlA5we0aJ33LRjZtLZSbS9JLAetchAnB4nyR2vYuPkN328r0Ef-z2MA0gPwaUvo_8uTm8XzIfgbbtOC4g</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Sachar, Moniyka</creator><creator>Shah, Ankur</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0811-6900</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Epidemiology, management, and prevention of exit site infections in peritoneal dialysis patients</title><author>Sachar, Moniyka ; Shah, Ankur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-f7a9f5c669aa7edd590e04072379dc3ad4b9a2f3db8988871113e7fe81126f923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology</topic><topic>exit site infection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>peritoneal dialysis</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects</topic><topic>peritonitis</topic><topic>Peritonitis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Peritonitis - etiology</topic><topic>Peritonitis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sachar, Moniyka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Ankur</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sachar, Moniyka</au><au>Shah, Ankur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiology, management, and prevention of exit site infections in peritoneal dialysis patients</atitle><jtitle>Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis</jtitle><addtitle>Ther Apher Dial</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>275</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>275-287</pages><issn>1744-9979</issn><eissn>1744-9987</eissn><abstract>Exit site infection (ESI) is a leading complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), at an incidence of 0.6 episodes per year in the United States, and a major risk factor for catheter removal and peritonitis. An estimated 20% of all peritonitis cases are preceded by an ESI, with up to 50% of Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis associated with ESI. Gram‐negative ESIs are less associated with succeeding peritonitis than their gram‐positive counterparts, though when present, are associated with a lower peritonitis cure rate. The rate of catheter removal for refractory ESI is relatively highest in ESI due to mycobacteria (up to 40%), S. aureus (35%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28%), followed by Corynebacterium, Serratia, and fungi. In review of relevant literature, we found no prophylactic benefit of dressings over nondressings, specific antiseptics over normal saline, or topical honey over topical antibiotic prophylaxis, and thus recommend individualized exit site hygiene. We found topical gentamicin effective for prevention of most ESIs, including gram‐negative ESIs, and thus recommend consideration of prophylactic topical gentamicin in areas of high gram‐negative peritonitis incidence. With long‐term use, observational studies detect up to 25% of gram‐positive and 14% of gram‐negative ESIs may be mupirocin and gentamicin resistant, respectively. We review empiric and targeted ESI management, including indications for ultrasound, anti‐VMRSA, anti‐Pseudomonal, and anti‐mycobacterial antibiotic use, and catheter removal. We recommend further investigation into the earlier use of second‐line treatment agents and the utility of treating post‐infectious exit site colonization as avenues to decrease refractory and repeat ESI.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>34435734</pmid><doi>10.1111/1744-9987.13726</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0811-6900</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-9979
ispartof Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis, 2022-04, Vol.26 (2), p.275-287
issn 1744-9979
1744-9987
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564944315
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Administration, Topical
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Catheter-Related Infections - epidemiology
Catheter-Related Infections - microbiology
Catheter-Related Infections - prevention & control
Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects
Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology
exit site infection
Humans
peritoneal dialysis
Peritoneal Dialysis - adverse effects
peritonitis
Peritonitis - epidemiology
Peritonitis - etiology
Peritonitis - prevention & control
Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control
Staphylococcus aureus
title Epidemiology, management, and prevention of exit site infections in peritoneal dialysis patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A03%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology,%20management,%20and%20prevention%20of%20exit%20site%20infections%20in%20peritoneal%20dialysis%20patients&rft.jtitle=Therapeutic%20apheresis%20and%20dialysis&rft.au=Sachar,%20Moniyka&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=275-287&rft.issn=1744-9979&rft.eissn=1744-9987&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1744-9987.13726&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2564944315%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2564944315&rft_id=info:pmid/34435734&rfr_iscdi=true