Can family physicians accurately screen for AAA with point-of-care ultrasound?
Likely yes. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by nonradiologist physicians is 98% sensitive and 99% specific, compared with imaging performed by radiologists (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies mostly involvi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of Family Practice 2021-07, Vol.70 (6), p.304-307 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 307 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 304 |
| container_title | The Journal of Family Practice |
| container_volume | 70 |
| creator | Cade, Nathan Granath, Brad Neher, Jon O Safranek, Sarah |
| description | Likely yes. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by nonradiologist physicians is 98% sensitive and 99% specific, compared with imaging performed by radiologists (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies mostly involving emergency medicine physicians). European family physicians demonstrated 100% concordance with radiologist readings (SOR: C, very small subsequent diagnostic accuracy studies). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.12788/jfp.0231 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564488977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2564488977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1951-d7844f40073e442e5747d220930a9a9dddc86487ec276d44f2a438283ddf91b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90M1LwzAYx_EgiJvTg_-A5KiHzrx1SU5Sim8w9KLnkOWFZbRNTVpk_73VTU8PPHz4Hb4AXGG0xIQLcbfz_RIRik_AHJeUFpxINgPnOe8QwpRjdgZmlDGKOZdz8FrrDnrdhmYP--0-BxN0l6E2Zkx6cNM3m-TcZGKCVVXBrzBsYR9DNxTRF0YnB8dmSDrHsbP3F-DU6ya7y-NdgI_Hh_f6uVi_Pb3U1bowWJa4sFww5hlCnDrGiCs545YQJCnSUktrrRErJrgzhK_sRIlmVBBBrfUSbwhdgJvDbp_i5-jyoNqQjWsa3bk4ZkXKFWNCSM4nenugJsWck_OqT6HVaa8wUr_J1JRM_SSb7PVxdty0zv7Lv170G4hCZ7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2564488977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can family physicians accurately screen for AAA with point-of-care ultrasound?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cade, Nathan ; Granath, Brad ; Neher, Jon O ; Safranek, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Cade, Nathan ; Granath, Brad ; Neher, Jon O ; Safranek, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>Likely yes. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by nonradiologist physicians is 98% sensitive and 99% specific, compared with imaging performed by radiologists (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies mostly involving emergency medicine physicians). European family physicians demonstrated 100% concordance with radiologist readings (SOR: C, very small subsequent diagnostic accuracy studies).</description><identifier>EISSN: 1533-7294</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12788/jfp.0231</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34431779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening - standards ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Physicians, Family - standards ; Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data ; Point-of-Care Systems - standards ; Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Radiologists - standards ; Radiologists - statistics & numerical data ; Risk Factors ; Ultrasonography - standards ; Ultrasonography - statistics & numerical data ; United States]]></subject><ispartof>The Journal of Family Practice, 2021-07, Vol.70 (6), p.304-307</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34431779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cade, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granath, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neher, Jon O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safranek, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Can family physicians accurately screen for AAA with point-of-care ultrasound?</title><title>The Journal of Family Practice</title><addtitle>J Fam Pract</addtitle><description>Likely yes. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by nonradiologist physicians is 98% sensitive and 99% specific, compared with imaging performed by radiologists (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies mostly involving emergency medicine physicians). European family physicians demonstrated 100% concordance with radiologist readings (SOR: C, very small subsequent diagnostic accuracy studies).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - standards</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems - standards</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Radiologists - standards</subject><subject>Radiologists - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - standards</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1533-7294</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo90M1LwzAYx_EgiJvTg_-A5KiHzrx1SU5Sim8w9KLnkOWFZbRNTVpk_73VTU8PPHz4Hb4AXGG0xIQLcbfz_RIRik_AHJeUFpxINgPnOe8QwpRjdgZmlDGKOZdz8FrrDnrdhmYP--0-BxN0l6E2Zkx6cNM3m-TcZGKCVVXBrzBsYR9DNxTRF0YnB8dmSDrHsbP3F-DU6ya7y-NdgI_Hh_f6uVi_Pb3U1bowWJa4sFww5hlCnDrGiCs545YQJCnSUktrrRErJrgzhK_sRIlmVBBBrfUSbwhdgJvDbp_i5-jyoNqQjWsa3bk4ZkXKFWNCSM4nenugJsWck_OqT6HVaa8wUr_J1JRM_SSb7PVxdty0zv7Lv170G4hCZ7g</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Cade, Nathan</creator><creator>Granath, Brad</creator><creator>Neher, Jon O</creator><creator>Safranek, Sarah</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Can family physicians accurately screen for AAA with point-of-care ultrasound?</title><author>Cade, Nathan ; Granath, Brad ; Neher, Jon O ; Safranek, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1951-d7844f40073e442e5747d220930a9a9dddc86487ec276d44f2a438283ddf91b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - standards</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems - standards</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Radiologists - standards</topic><topic>Radiologists - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - standards</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cade, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granath, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neher, Jon O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safranek, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of Family Practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cade, Nathan</au><au>Granath, Brad</au><au>Neher, Jon O</au><au>Safranek, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can family physicians accurately screen for AAA with point-of-care ultrasound?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of Family Practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Fam Pract</addtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>304-307</pages><eissn>1533-7294</eissn><abstract>Likely yes. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by nonradiologist physicians is 98% sensitive and 99% specific, compared with imaging performed by radiologists (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies mostly involving emergency medicine physicians). European family physicians demonstrated 100% concordance with radiologist readings (SOR: C, very small subsequent diagnostic accuracy studies).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>34431779</pmid><doi>10.12788/jfp.0231</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | EISSN: 1533-7294 |
| ispartof | The Journal of Family Practice, 2021-07, Vol.70 (6), p.304-307 |
| issn | 1533-7294 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564488977 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis Clinical Competence - standards Clinical Competence - statistics & numerical data Humans Male Mass Screening - standards Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Middle Aged Physicians, Family - standards Physicians, Family - statistics & numerical data Point-of-Care Systems - standards Point-of-Care Systems - statistics & numerical data Practice Guidelines as Topic Radiologists - standards Radiologists - statistics & numerical data Risk Factors Ultrasonography - standards Ultrasonography - statistics & numerical data United States |
| title | Can family physicians accurately screen for AAA with point-of-care ultrasound? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A18%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20family%20physicians%20accurately%20screen%20for%20AAA%20with%20point-of-care%20ultrasound?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20Family%20Practice&rft.au=Cade,%20Nathan&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=304-307&rft.eissn=1533-7294&rft_id=info:doi/10.12788/jfp.0231&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2564488977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2564488977&rft_id=info:pmid/34431779&rfr_iscdi=true |