Comparison between dynamic whole-body FDG-PET and early-delayed imaging for the assessment of motion in focal uptake in colorectal area

Objectives Serial changes of focal uptake in whole-body dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were assessed and compared with those in early-delayed imaging to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake in the colorectal area, based on the change in uptake shape. Method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of nuclear medicine 2021-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1305-1311
Hauptverfasser: Kotani, Tomoya, Nishimura, Motoki, Tamaki, Nagara, Matsushima, Shigenori, Akiyama, Shimpei, Kanayama, Taisei, Bamba, Chisa, Tanada, Yasutomo, Nii, Takeshi, Yamada, Kei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1311
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1305
container_title Annals of nuclear medicine
container_volume 35
creator Kotani, Tomoya
Nishimura, Motoki
Tamaki, Nagara
Matsushima, Shigenori
Akiyama, Shimpei
Kanayama, Taisei
Bamba, Chisa
Tanada, Yasutomo
Nii, Takeshi
Yamada, Kei
description Objectives Serial changes of focal uptake in whole-body dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were assessed and compared with those in early-delayed imaging to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake in the colorectal area, based on the change in uptake shape. Methods In 60 patients with at least 1 pathologically diagnosed colorectal cancer or adenoma, a serial 3 min dynamic whole-body PET/computed tomography imaging was performed four times around 60 min after the administration of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to create a conventional (early) image by summation. Delayed imaging was performed separately at 110 min after FDG administration. High focal uptake lesions in the colorectal area were visually assessed as “changed” or “unchanged” on serial dynamic imaging and early-delayed imaging, based on the alteration in uptake shape over time. These criteria on the images were used to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake. Results In this study, 334 lesions with high focal FDG uptake were observed. Among 73 histologically proven pathological FDG uptakes, no change was observed in 69 on serial dynamic imaging and 72 on early-delayed imaging (sensitivity of 95 vs. 99%, respectively; ns). In contrast, out of 261 physiological FDG uptakes, a change in uptake shape was seen in 159 on dynamic PET imaging and 66 on early-delayed imaging (specificity of 61 vs. 25%, respectively; p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12149-021-01671-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564135562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2589193051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-fcd36b0c4fc96d16743d3eab71e152f43d983d941770e24b20c278063dc029c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctO3TAQhq2qVTnQvgCLylI3bEx9i-Ms0Sk3CaksYG059uQQmtgHOxHKE_S1MRxoJRZdWKPxfPOPxz9Ch4weM0rrH5lxJhtCOSOUqZqR5QNaMa0kUVKIj2hFGyZJzXS9h_ZzvqeU60rzz2hPSMmVbugK_VnHcWtTn2PALUyPAAH7Jdixd_jxLg5A2ugXfPbznFyf3mAbPAabhoV4GOwCHvej3fRhg7uY8HQH2OYMOY8QJhw7PMapL8p9KHVnBzxvJ_sbnnMXh5jATeXSJrBf0KfODhm-vsYDdHt2erO-IFe_zi_XJ1fEVZxOpHNeqJY62blG-bK0FF6AbWsGrOJdyRpdjmR1TYHLllPHa02V8I7yxmlxgI52utsUH2bIkxn77GAYbIA4Z8MrJZmoKsUL-v0deh_nFMrrCqUb1ghasULxHeVSzDlBZ7ap_ElaDKPm2Sazs8kUm8yLTWYpTd9eped2BP-35c2XAogdkEspbCD9m_0f2SfcMp4_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2589193051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between dynamic whole-body FDG-PET and early-delayed imaging for the assessment of motion in focal uptake in colorectal area</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kotani, Tomoya ; Nishimura, Motoki ; Tamaki, Nagara ; Matsushima, Shigenori ; Akiyama, Shimpei ; Kanayama, Taisei ; Bamba, Chisa ; Tanada, Yasutomo ; Nii, Takeshi ; Yamada, Kei</creator><creatorcontrib>Kotani, Tomoya ; Nishimura, Motoki ; Tamaki, Nagara ; Matsushima, Shigenori ; Akiyama, Shimpei ; Kanayama, Taisei ; Bamba, Chisa ; Tanada, Yasutomo ; Nii, Takeshi ; Yamada, Kei</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Serial changes of focal uptake in whole-body dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were assessed and compared with those in early-delayed imaging to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake in the colorectal area, based on the change in uptake shape. Methods In 60 patients with at least 1 pathologically diagnosed colorectal cancer or adenoma, a serial 3 min dynamic whole-body PET/computed tomography imaging was performed four times around 60 min after the administration of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to create a conventional (early) image by summation. Delayed imaging was performed separately at 110 min after FDG administration. High focal uptake lesions in the colorectal area were visually assessed as “changed” or “unchanged” on serial dynamic imaging and early-delayed imaging, based on the alteration in uptake shape over time. These criteria on the images were used to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake. Results In this study, 334 lesions with high focal FDG uptake were observed. Among 73 histologically proven pathological FDG uptakes, no change was observed in 69 on serial dynamic imaging and 72 on early-delayed imaging (sensitivity of 95 vs. 99%, respectively; ns). In contrast, out of 261 physiological FDG uptakes, a change in uptake shape was seen in 159 on dynamic PET imaging and 66 on early-delayed imaging (specificity of 61 vs. 25%, respectively; p  &lt; 0.01). High and similar negative predictive values for identifying pathological uptake were obtained by both methods (98 vs 99%, respectively). Thus, the overall accuracy for differentiating pathological from physiological FDG uptake based on change in uptake shape tended to be higher on serial dynamic imaging (68%) than on early-delayed imaging (41%; p  &lt; 0.01). Conclusions Dynamic whole-body FDG imaging enables differentiation of pathological uptake from physiological uptake based on the serial changes in uptake shape in the colorectal area. It may provide greater diagnostic value than early-delayed PET imaging. Thus, this technique holds a promise for minimizing the need for delayed imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0914-7187</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1864-6433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1864-6433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01671-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34426890</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Adenoma ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological Transport ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism ; Computed tomography ; Emission analysis ; Female ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Humans ; Imaging ; Lesions ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Motion ; Movement ; Nuclear Medicine ; Original Article ; Physiology ; Positron emission ; Positron emission tomography ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Radiology ; Time Factors ; Tomography ; Whole Body Imaging - methods</subject><ispartof>Annals of nuclear medicine, 2021-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1305-1311</ispartof><rights>The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine.</rights><rights>The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-fcd36b0c4fc96d16743d3eab71e152f43d983d941770e24b20c278063dc029c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-fcd36b0c4fc96d16743d3eab71e152f43d983d941770e24b20c278063dc029c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12149-021-01671-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12149-021-01671-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34426890$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kotani, Tomoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimura, Motoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamaki, Nagara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsushima, Shigenori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akiyama, Shimpei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanayama, Taisei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamba, Chisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanada, Yasutomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nii, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Kei</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between dynamic whole-body FDG-PET and early-delayed imaging for the assessment of motion in focal uptake in colorectal area</title><title>Annals of nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Nucl Med</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Objectives Serial changes of focal uptake in whole-body dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were assessed and compared with those in early-delayed imaging to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake in the colorectal area, based on the change in uptake shape. Methods In 60 patients with at least 1 pathologically diagnosed colorectal cancer or adenoma, a serial 3 min dynamic whole-body PET/computed tomography imaging was performed four times around 60 min after the administration of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to create a conventional (early) image by summation. Delayed imaging was performed separately at 110 min after FDG administration. High focal uptake lesions in the colorectal area were visually assessed as “changed” or “unchanged” on serial dynamic imaging and early-delayed imaging, based on the alteration in uptake shape over time. These criteria on the images were used to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake. Results In this study, 334 lesions with high focal FDG uptake were observed. Among 73 histologically proven pathological FDG uptakes, no change was observed in 69 on serial dynamic imaging and 72 on early-delayed imaging (sensitivity of 95 vs. 99%, respectively; ns). In contrast, out of 261 physiological FDG uptakes, a change in uptake shape was seen in 159 on dynamic PET imaging and 66 on early-delayed imaging (specificity of 61 vs. 25%, respectively; p  &lt; 0.01). High and similar negative predictive values for identifying pathological uptake were obtained by both methods (98 vs 99%, respectively). Thus, the overall accuracy for differentiating pathological from physiological FDG uptake based on change in uptake shape tended to be higher on serial dynamic imaging (68%) than on early-delayed imaging (41%; p  &lt; 0.01). Conclusions Dynamic whole-body FDG imaging enables differentiation of pathological uptake from physiological uptake based on the serial changes in uptake shape in the colorectal area. It may provide greater diagnostic value than early-delayed PET imaging. Thus, this technique holds a promise for minimizing the need for delayed imaging.</description><subject>Adenoma</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological Transport</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Whole Body Imaging - methods</subject><issn>0914-7187</issn><issn>1864-6433</issn><issn>1864-6433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctO3TAQhq2qVTnQvgCLylI3bEx9i-Ms0Sk3CaksYG059uQQmtgHOxHKE_S1MRxoJRZdWKPxfPOPxz9Ch4weM0rrH5lxJhtCOSOUqZqR5QNaMa0kUVKIj2hFGyZJzXS9h_ZzvqeU60rzz2hPSMmVbugK_VnHcWtTn2PALUyPAAH7Jdixd_jxLg5A2ugXfPbznFyf3mAbPAabhoV4GOwCHvej3fRhg7uY8HQH2OYMOY8QJhw7PMapL8p9KHVnBzxvJ_sbnnMXh5jATeXSJrBf0KfODhm-vsYDdHt2erO-IFe_zi_XJ1fEVZxOpHNeqJY62blG-bK0FF6AbWsGrOJdyRpdjmR1TYHLllPHa02V8I7yxmlxgI52utsUH2bIkxn77GAYbIA4Z8MrJZmoKsUL-v0deh_nFMrrCqUb1ghasULxHeVSzDlBZ7ap_ElaDKPm2Sazs8kUm8yLTWYpTd9eped2BP-35c2XAogdkEspbCD9m_0f2SfcMp4_</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Kotani, Tomoya</creator><creator>Nishimura, Motoki</creator><creator>Tamaki, Nagara</creator><creator>Matsushima, Shigenori</creator><creator>Akiyama, Shimpei</creator><creator>Kanayama, Taisei</creator><creator>Bamba, Chisa</creator><creator>Tanada, Yasutomo</creator><creator>Nii, Takeshi</creator><creator>Yamada, Kei</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Comparison between dynamic whole-body FDG-PET and early-delayed imaging for the assessment of motion in focal uptake in colorectal area</title><author>Kotani, Tomoya ; Nishimura, Motoki ; Tamaki, Nagara ; Matsushima, Shigenori ; Akiyama, Shimpei ; Kanayama, Taisei ; Bamba, Chisa ; Tanada, Yasutomo ; Nii, Takeshi ; Yamada, Kei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-fcd36b0c4fc96d16743d3eab71e152f43d983d941770e24b20c278063dc029c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adenoma</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological Transport</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Whole Body Imaging - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kotani, Tomoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimura, Motoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamaki, Nagara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsushima, Shigenori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akiyama, Shimpei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanayama, Taisei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamba, Chisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanada, Yasutomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nii, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Kei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kotani, Tomoya</au><au>Nishimura, Motoki</au><au>Tamaki, Nagara</au><au>Matsushima, Shigenori</au><au>Akiyama, Shimpei</au><au>Kanayama, Taisei</au><au>Bamba, Chisa</au><au>Tanada, Yasutomo</au><au>Nii, Takeshi</au><au>Yamada, Kei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between dynamic whole-body FDG-PET and early-delayed imaging for the assessment of motion in focal uptake in colorectal area</atitle><jtitle>Annals of nuclear medicine</jtitle><stitle>Ann Nucl Med</stitle><addtitle>Ann Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1305</spage><epage>1311</epage><pages>1305-1311</pages><issn>0914-7187</issn><issn>1864-6433</issn><eissn>1864-6433</eissn><abstract>Objectives Serial changes of focal uptake in whole-body dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were assessed and compared with those in early-delayed imaging to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake in the colorectal area, based on the change in uptake shape. Methods In 60 patients with at least 1 pathologically diagnosed colorectal cancer or adenoma, a serial 3 min dynamic whole-body PET/computed tomography imaging was performed four times around 60 min after the administration of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to create a conventional (early) image by summation. Delayed imaging was performed separately at 110 min after FDG administration. High focal uptake lesions in the colorectal area were visually assessed as “changed” or “unchanged” on serial dynamic imaging and early-delayed imaging, based on the alteration in uptake shape over time. These criteria on the images were used to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake. Results In this study, 334 lesions with high focal FDG uptake were observed. Among 73 histologically proven pathological FDG uptakes, no change was observed in 69 on serial dynamic imaging and 72 on early-delayed imaging (sensitivity of 95 vs. 99%, respectively; ns). In contrast, out of 261 physiological FDG uptakes, a change in uptake shape was seen in 159 on dynamic PET imaging and 66 on early-delayed imaging (specificity of 61 vs. 25%, respectively; p  &lt; 0.01). High and similar negative predictive values for identifying pathological uptake were obtained by both methods (98 vs 99%, respectively). Thus, the overall accuracy for differentiating pathological from physiological FDG uptake based on change in uptake shape tended to be higher on serial dynamic imaging (68%) than on early-delayed imaging (41%; p  &lt; 0.01). Conclusions Dynamic whole-body FDG imaging enables differentiation of pathological uptake from physiological uptake based on the serial changes in uptake shape in the colorectal area. It may provide greater diagnostic value than early-delayed PET imaging. Thus, this technique holds a promise for minimizing the need for delayed imaging.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><pmid>34426890</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12149-021-01671-y</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0914-7187
ispartof Annals of nuclear medicine, 2021-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1305-1311
issn 0914-7187
1864-6433
1864-6433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564135562
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Adenoma
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological Transport
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism
Computed tomography
Emission analysis
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
Imaging
Lesions
Male
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Motion
Movement
Nuclear Medicine
Original Article
Physiology
Positron emission
Positron emission tomography
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Radiology
Time Factors
Tomography
Whole Body Imaging - methods
title Comparison between dynamic whole-body FDG-PET and early-delayed imaging for the assessment of motion in focal uptake in colorectal area
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T10%3A11%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20dynamic%20whole-body%20FDG-PET%20and%20early-delayed%20imaging%20for%20the%20assessment%20of%20motion%20in%20focal%20uptake%20in%20colorectal%20area&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Kotani,%20Tomoya&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1305&rft.epage=1311&rft.pages=1305-1311&rft.issn=0914-7187&rft.eissn=1864-6433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12149-021-01671-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2589193051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2589193051&rft_id=info:pmid/34426890&rfr_iscdi=true