Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes
This study evaluates the reduction in dentin permeability (P) and the expression of nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces made with universal adhesives, comparing the self-etch mode of application with the etch-and-rinse mode of application. To measure dentin P at the baseline and after adhesive po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Operative dentistry 2021-05, Vol.46 (3), p.293-305 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 305 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 293 |
container_title | Operative dentistry |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Cruz, Jmms Silva, Algbm Eira, Rmrf Sousa, Bmpr Lopes, Mmn Cavalheiro, Ajccs |
description | This study evaluates the reduction in dentin permeability (P) and the expression of nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces made with universal adhesives, comparing the self-etch mode of application with the etch-and-rinse mode of application.
To measure dentin P at the baseline and after adhesive polymerization, 80 extracted noncarious human third molars (N=80) were sectioned to obtain 0.7-mm-thick midcoronal dentin disks. The specimens were randomly assigned to 8 groups according to the different adhesive systems and application modes used: Scotchbond Universal (SBU; etch-and-rinse [ER] mode vs self-etch [SE] mode), OptiBond XTR (OPT; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CL; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), and Adhese Universal (ADH; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode). A two-way analysis of variance with interaction was used to evaluate the P reduction differences among the groups (α=0.05). Sixteen additional 0.7-mm-thick dentin disks were similarly prepared and treated, immersed in 50 wt% ammoniacal silver nitrate, and then processed according to conventional methods for analysis under transmission electron microscopy.
The differences in P reduction among the adhesives were significant (p=0.029). For OPT and ADH (p=0.0304 and p=0.0120, respectively), the P reduction was higher in the ER mode than in the SE mode. For CL and SBU, no differences in P reduction was observed between the two application modes (p>0.05). All the groups showed some pattern of nanoleakage.
No adhesive system completely reduced dentin P. Dentin sealing was higher for OPT and ADH in the ER mode, while for SBU and CL, there was no difference between the two modes. All the adhesive systems showed nanoleakage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2341/19-276-L |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564131282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2564131282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-f5f7be652e78df15b59f123ab3061541bfca9b72864e5d33f64c04d5bfe36bb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqUg8QXISzaG-JlkWZUWkMJDgq4tOxnTQB7FTiv17zGiwGp0R2euNAehc5pcMS7oNc0JSxUpDtCYShlDpvghGidcUZKmXIzQSQjvSSKkkPIYjbgQTOQ5HSN9A91Qd_gZfAvG1k097LDpKvxour4B82HeAPcOL7t6Cz6YBk-rFYQYAo5n86FckYgTX3cB8DbgF2gcgbjGD30F4RQdOdMEONvPCVou5q-zO1I83d7PpgUpWcYH4qRLLSjJIM0qR6WVuaOMG8sTRaWg1pUmt2n8S4CsOHdKlImopHXAlbWUT9DlT-_a958bCINu61BC05gO-k3QTCpBOWUZ-0dL34fgwem1r1vjd5om-lunprmOOnUR0Yt968a2UP2Bv_74F4FAb0E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2564131282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cruz, Jmms ; Silva, Algbm ; Eira, Rmrf ; Sousa, Bmpr ; Lopes, Mmn ; Cavalheiro, Ajccs</creator><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Jmms ; Silva, Algbm ; Eira, Rmrf ; Sousa, Bmpr ; Lopes, Mmn ; Cavalheiro, Ajccs</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluates the reduction in dentin permeability (P) and the expression of nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces made with universal adhesives, comparing the self-etch mode of application with the etch-and-rinse mode of application.
To measure dentin P at the baseline and after adhesive polymerization, 80 extracted noncarious human third molars (N=80) were sectioned to obtain 0.7-mm-thick midcoronal dentin disks. The specimens were randomly assigned to 8 groups according to the different adhesive systems and application modes used: Scotchbond Universal (SBU; etch-and-rinse [ER] mode vs self-etch [SE] mode), OptiBond XTR (OPT; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CL; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), and Adhese Universal (ADH; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode). A two-way analysis of variance with interaction was used to evaluate the P reduction differences among the groups (α=0.05). Sixteen additional 0.7-mm-thick dentin disks were similarly prepared and treated, immersed in 50 wt% ammoniacal silver nitrate, and then processed according to conventional methods for analysis under transmission electron microscopy.
The differences in P reduction among the adhesives were significant (p=0.029). For OPT and ADH (p=0.0304 and p=0.0120, respectively), the P reduction was higher in the ER mode than in the SE mode. For CL and SBU, no differences in P reduction was observed between the two application modes (p>0.05). All the groups showed some pattern of nanoleakage.
No adhesive system completely reduced dentin P. Dentin sealing was higher for OPT and ADH in the ER mode, while for SBU and CL, there was no difference between the two modes. All the adhesive systems showed nanoleakage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-7734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2341/19-276-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34424991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Dental Bonding ; Dental Cements ; Dentin ; Dentin Permeability ; Dentin-Bonding Agents ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Random Allocation ; Resin Cements ; Tensile Strength</subject><ispartof>Operative dentistry, 2021-05, Vol.46 (3), p.293-305</ispartof><rights>Operative Dentistry, 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-f5f7be652e78df15b59f123ab3061541bfca9b72864e5d33f64c04d5bfe36bb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-f5f7be652e78df15b59f123ab3061541bfca9b72864e5d33f64c04d5bfe36bb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34424991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Jmms</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Algbm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eira, Rmrf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Bmpr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Mmn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalheiro, Ajccs</creatorcontrib><title>Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes</title><title>Operative dentistry</title><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><description>This study evaluates the reduction in dentin permeability (P) and the expression of nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces made with universal adhesives, comparing the self-etch mode of application with the etch-and-rinse mode of application.
To measure dentin P at the baseline and after adhesive polymerization, 80 extracted noncarious human third molars (N=80) were sectioned to obtain 0.7-mm-thick midcoronal dentin disks. The specimens were randomly assigned to 8 groups according to the different adhesive systems and application modes used: Scotchbond Universal (SBU; etch-and-rinse [ER] mode vs self-etch [SE] mode), OptiBond XTR (OPT; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CL; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), and Adhese Universal (ADH; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode). A two-way analysis of variance with interaction was used to evaluate the P reduction differences among the groups (α=0.05). Sixteen additional 0.7-mm-thick dentin disks were similarly prepared and treated, immersed in 50 wt% ammoniacal silver nitrate, and then processed according to conventional methods for analysis under transmission electron microscopy.
The differences in P reduction among the adhesives were significant (p=0.029). For OPT and ADH (p=0.0304 and p=0.0120, respectively), the P reduction was higher in the ER mode than in the SE mode. For CL and SBU, no differences in P reduction was observed between the two application modes (p>0.05). All the groups showed some pattern of nanoleakage.
No adhesive system completely reduced dentin P. Dentin sealing was higher for OPT and ADH in the ER mode, while for SBU and CL, there was no difference between the two modes. All the adhesive systems showed nanoleakage.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentin Permeability</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><issn>0361-7734</issn><issn>1559-2863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqUg8QXISzaG-JlkWZUWkMJDgq4tOxnTQB7FTiv17zGiwGp0R2euNAehc5pcMS7oNc0JSxUpDtCYShlDpvghGidcUZKmXIzQSQjvSSKkkPIYjbgQTOQ5HSN9A91Qd_gZfAvG1k097LDpKvxour4B82HeAPcOL7t6Cz6YBk-rFYQYAo5n86FckYgTX3cB8DbgF2gcgbjGD30F4RQdOdMEONvPCVou5q-zO1I83d7PpgUpWcYH4qRLLSjJIM0qR6WVuaOMG8sTRaWg1pUmt2n8S4CsOHdKlImopHXAlbWUT9DlT-_a958bCINu61BC05gO-k3QTCpBOWUZ-0dL34fgwem1r1vjd5om-lunprmOOnUR0Yt968a2UP2Bv_74F4FAb0E</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Cruz, Jmms</creator><creator>Silva, Algbm</creator><creator>Eira, Rmrf</creator><creator>Sousa, Bmpr</creator><creator>Lopes, Mmn</creator><creator>Cavalheiro, Ajccs</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes</title><author>Cruz, Jmms ; Silva, Algbm ; Eira, Rmrf ; Sousa, Bmpr ; Lopes, Mmn ; Cavalheiro, Ajccs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-f5f7be652e78df15b59f123ab3061541bfca9b72864e5d33f64c04d5bfe36bb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentin Permeability</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Jmms</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Algbm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eira, Rmrf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Bmpr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Mmn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalheiro, Ajccs</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cruz, Jmms</au><au>Silva, Algbm</au><au>Eira, Rmrf</au><au>Sousa, Bmpr</au><au>Lopes, Mmn</au><au>Cavalheiro, Ajccs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes</atitle><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>293-305</pages><issn>0361-7734</issn><eissn>1559-2863</eissn><abstract>This study evaluates the reduction in dentin permeability (P) and the expression of nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces made with universal adhesives, comparing the self-etch mode of application with the etch-and-rinse mode of application.
To measure dentin P at the baseline and after adhesive polymerization, 80 extracted noncarious human third molars (N=80) were sectioned to obtain 0.7-mm-thick midcoronal dentin disks. The specimens were randomly assigned to 8 groups according to the different adhesive systems and application modes used: Scotchbond Universal (SBU; etch-and-rinse [ER] mode vs self-etch [SE] mode), OptiBond XTR (OPT; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CL; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), and Adhese Universal (ADH; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode). A two-way analysis of variance with interaction was used to evaluate the P reduction differences among the groups (α=0.05). Sixteen additional 0.7-mm-thick dentin disks were similarly prepared and treated, immersed in 50 wt% ammoniacal silver nitrate, and then processed according to conventional methods for analysis under transmission electron microscopy.
The differences in P reduction among the adhesives were significant (p=0.029). For OPT and ADH (p=0.0304 and p=0.0120, respectively), the P reduction was higher in the ER mode than in the SE mode. For CL and SBU, no differences in P reduction was observed between the two application modes (p>0.05). All the groups showed some pattern of nanoleakage.
No adhesive system completely reduced dentin P. Dentin sealing was higher for OPT and ADH in the ER mode, while for SBU and CL, there was no difference between the two modes. All the adhesive systems showed nanoleakage.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>34424991</pmid><doi>10.2341/19-276-L</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-7734 |
ispartof | Operative dentistry, 2021-05, Vol.46 (3), p.293-305 |
issn | 0361-7734 1559-2863 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564131282 |
source | MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adhesives Dental Bonding Dental Cements Dentin Dentin Permeability Dentin-Bonding Agents Humans Materials Testing Random Allocation Resin Cements Tensile Strength |
title | Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A27%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dentin%20Permeability%20and%20Nanoleakage%20of%20Universal%20Adhesives%20in%20Etch-and-rinse%20vs%20Self-etch%20Modes&rft.jtitle=Operative%20dentistry&rft.au=Cruz,%20Jmms&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=293-305&rft.issn=0361-7734&rft.eissn=1559-2863&rft_id=info:doi/10.2341/19-276-L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2564131282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2564131282&rft_id=info:pmid/34424991&rfr_iscdi=true |