Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes

This study evaluates the reduction in dentin permeability (P) and the expression of nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces made with universal adhesives, comparing the self-etch mode of application with the etch-and-rinse mode of application. To measure dentin P at the baseline and after adhesive po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Operative dentistry 2021-05, Vol.46 (3), p.293-305
Hauptverfasser: Cruz, Jmms, Silva, Algbm, Eira, Rmrf, Sousa, Bmpr, Lopes, Mmn, Cavalheiro, Ajccs
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 305
container_issue 3
container_start_page 293
container_title Operative dentistry
container_volume 46
creator Cruz, Jmms
Silva, Algbm
Eira, Rmrf
Sousa, Bmpr
Lopes, Mmn
Cavalheiro, Ajccs
description This study evaluates the reduction in dentin permeability (P) and the expression of nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces made with universal adhesives, comparing the self-etch mode of application with the etch-and-rinse mode of application. To measure dentin P at the baseline and after adhesive polymerization, 80 extracted noncarious human third molars (N=80) were sectioned to obtain 0.7-mm-thick midcoronal dentin disks. The specimens were randomly assigned to 8 groups according to the different adhesive systems and application modes used: Scotchbond Universal (SBU; etch-and-rinse [ER] mode vs self-etch [SE] mode), OptiBond XTR (OPT; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CL; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), and Adhese Universal (ADH; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode). A two-way analysis of variance with interaction was used to evaluate the P reduction differences among the groups (α=0.05). Sixteen additional 0.7-mm-thick dentin disks were similarly prepared and treated, immersed in 50 wt% ammoniacal silver nitrate, and then processed according to conventional methods for analysis under transmission electron microscopy. The differences in P reduction among the adhesives were significant (p=0.029). For OPT and ADH (p=0.0304 and p=0.0120, respectively), the P reduction was higher in the ER mode than in the SE mode. For CL and SBU, no differences in P reduction was observed between the two application modes (p>0.05). All the groups showed some pattern of nanoleakage. No adhesive system completely reduced dentin P. Dentin sealing was higher for OPT and ADH in the ER mode, while for SBU and CL, there was no difference between the two modes. All the adhesive systems showed nanoleakage.
doi_str_mv 10.2341/19-276-L
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564131282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2564131282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-f5f7be652e78df15b59f123ab3061541bfca9b72864e5d33f64c04d5bfe36bb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqUg8QXISzaG-JlkWZUWkMJDgq4tOxnTQB7FTiv17zGiwGp0R2euNAehc5pcMS7oNc0JSxUpDtCYShlDpvghGidcUZKmXIzQSQjvSSKkkPIYjbgQTOQ5HSN9A91Qd_gZfAvG1k097LDpKvxour4B82HeAPcOL7t6Cz6YBk-rFYQYAo5n86FckYgTX3cB8DbgF2gcgbjGD30F4RQdOdMEONvPCVou5q-zO1I83d7PpgUpWcYH4qRLLSjJIM0qR6WVuaOMG8sTRaWg1pUmt2n8S4CsOHdKlImopHXAlbWUT9DlT-_a958bCINu61BC05gO-k3QTCpBOWUZ-0dL34fgwem1r1vjd5om-lunprmOOnUR0Yt968a2UP2Bv_74F4FAb0E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2564131282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cruz, Jmms ; Silva, Algbm ; Eira, Rmrf ; Sousa, Bmpr ; Lopes, Mmn ; Cavalheiro, Ajccs</creator><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Jmms ; Silva, Algbm ; Eira, Rmrf ; Sousa, Bmpr ; Lopes, Mmn ; Cavalheiro, Ajccs</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluates the reduction in dentin permeability (P) and the expression of nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces made with universal adhesives, comparing the self-etch mode of application with the etch-and-rinse mode of application. To measure dentin P at the baseline and after adhesive polymerization, 80 extracted noncarious human third molars (N=80) were sectioned to obtain 0.7-mm-thick midcoronal dentin disks. The specimens were randomly assigned to 8 groups according to the different adhesive systems and application modes used: Scotchbond Universal (SBU; etch-and-rinse [ER] mode vs self-etch [SE] mode), OptiBond XTR (OPT; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CL; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), and Adhese Universal (ADH; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode). A two-way analysis of variance with interaction was used to evaluate the P reduction differences among the groups (α=0.05). Sixteen additional 0.7-mm-thick dentin disks were similarly prepared and treated, immersed in 50 wt% ammoniacal silver nitrate, and then processed according to conventional methods for analysis under transmission electron microscopy. The differences in P reduction among the adhesives were significant (p=0.029). For OPT and ADH (p=0.0304 and p=0.0120, respectively), the P reduction was higher in the ER mode than in the SE mode. For CL and SBU, no differences in P reduction was observed between the two application modes (p&gt;0.05). All the groups showed some pattern of nanoleakage. No adhesive system completely reduced dentin P. Dentin sealing was higher for OPT and ADH in the ER mode, while for SBU and CL, there was no difference between the two modes. All the adhesive systems showed nanoleakage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-7734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2341/19-276-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34424991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Dental Bonding ; Dental Cements ; Dentin ; Dentin Permeability ; Dentin-Bonding Agents ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Random Allocation ; Resin Cements ; Tensile Strength</subject><ispartof>Operative dentistry, 2021-05, Vol.46 (3), p.293-305</ispartof><rights>Operative Dentistry, 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-f5f7be652e78df15b59f123ab3061541bfca9b72864e5d33f64c04d5bfe36bb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-f5f7be652e78df15b59f123ab3061541bfca9b72864e5d33f64c04d5bfe36bb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34424991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Jmms</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Algbm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eira, Rmrf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Bmpr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Mmn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalheiro, Ajccs</creatorcontrib><title>Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes</title><title>Operative dentistry</title><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><description>This study evaluates the reduction in dentin permeability (P) and the expression of nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces made with universal adhesives, comparing the self-etch mode of application with the etch-and-rinse mode of application. To measure dentin P at the baseline and after adhesive polymerization, 80 extracted noncarious human third molars (N=80) were sectioned to obtain 0.7-mm-thick midcoronal dentin disks. The specimens were randomly assigned to 8 groups according to the different adhesive systems and application modes used: Scotchbond Universal (SBU; etch-and-rinse [ER] mode vs self-etch [SE] mode), OptiBond XTR (OPT; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CL; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), and Adhese Universal (ADH; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode). A two-way analysis of variance with interaction was used to evaluate the P reduction differences among the groups (α=0.05). Sixteen additional 0.7-mm-thick dentin disks were similarly prepared and treated, immersed in 50 wt% ammoniacal silver nitrate, and then processed according to conventional methods for analysis under transmission electron microscopy. The differences in P reduction among the adhesives were significant (p=0.029). For OPT and ADH (p=0.0304 and p=0.0120, respectively), the P reduction was higher in the ER mode than in the SE mode. For CL and SBU, no differences in P reduction was observed between the two application modes (p&gt;0.05). All the groups showed some pattern of nanoleakage. No adhesive system completely reduced dentin P. Dentin sealing was higher for OPT and ADH in the ER mode, while for SBU and CL, there was no difference between the two modes. All the adhesive systems showed nanoleakage.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentin Permeability</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><issn>0361-7734</issn><issn>1559-2863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqUg8QXISzaG-JlkWZUWkMJDgq4tOxnTQB7FTiv17zGiwGp0R2euNAehc5pcMS7oNc0JSxUpDtCYShlDpvghGidcUZKmXIzQSQjvSSKkkPIYjbgQTOQ5HSN9A91Qd_gZfAvG1k097LDpKvxour4B82HeAPcOL7t6Cz6YBk-rFYQYAo5n86FckYgTX3cB8DbgF2gcgbjGD30F4RQdOdMEONvPCVou5q-zO1I83d7PpgUpWcYH4qRLLSjJIM0qR6WVuaOMG8sTRaWg1pUmt2n8S4CsOHdKlImopHXAlbWUT9DlT-_a958bCINu61BC05gO-k3QTCpBOWUZ-0dL34fgwem1r1vjd5om-lunprmOOnUR0Yt968a2UP2Bv_74F4FAb0E</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Cruz, Jmms</creator><creator>Silva, Algbm</creator><creator>Eira, Rmrf</creator><creator>Sousa, Bmpr</creator><creator>Lopes, Mmn</creator><creator>Cavalheiro, Ajccs</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes</title><author>Cruz, Jmms ; Silva, Algbm ; Eira, Rmrf ; Sousa, Bmpr ; Lopes, Mmn ; Cavalheiro, Ajccs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-f5f7be652e78df15b59f123ab3061541bfca9b72864e5d33f64c04d5bfe36bb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentin Permeability</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cruz, Jmms</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Algbm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eira, Rmrf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Bmpr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Mmn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalheiro, Ajccs</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cruz, Jmms</au><au>Silva, Algbm</au><au>Eira, Rmrf</au><au>Sousa, Bmpr</au><au>Lopes, Mmn</au><au>Cavalheiro, Ajccs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes</atitle><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>293-305</pages><issn>0361-7734</issn><eissn>1559-2863</eissn><abstract>This study evaluates the reduction in dentin permeability (P) and the expression of nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces made with universal adhesives, comparing the self-etch mode of application with the etch-and-rinse mode of application. To measure dentin P at the baseline and after adhesive polymerization, 80 extracted noncarious human third molars (N=80) were sectioned to obtain 0.7-mm-thick midcoronal dentin disks. The specimens were randomly assigned to 8 groups according to the different adhesive systems and application modes used: Scotchbond Universal (SBU; etch-and-rinse [ER] mode vs self-etch [SE] mode), OptiBond XTR (OPT; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CL; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode), and Adhese Universal (ADH; etch-and-rinse mode vs self-etch mode). A two-way analysis of variance with interaction was used to evaluate the P reduction differences among the groups (α=0.05). Sixteen additional 0.7-mm-thick dentin disks were similarly prepared and treated, immersed in 50 wt% ammoniacal silver nitrate, and then processed according to conventional methods for analysis under transmission electron microscopy. The differences in P reduction among the adhesives were significant (p=0.029). For OPT and ADH (p=0.0304 and p=0.0120, respectively), the P reduction was higher in the ER mode than in the SE mode. For CL and SBU, no differences in P reduction was observed between the two application modes (p&gt;0.05). All the groups showed some pattern of nanoleakage. No adhesive system completely reduced dentin P. Dentin sealing was higher for OPT and ADH in the ER mode, while for SBU and CL, there was no difference between the two modes. All the adhesive systems showed nanoleakage.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>34424991</pmid><doi>10.2341/19-276-L</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-7734
ispartof Operative dentistry, 2021-05, Vol.46 (3), p.293-305
issn 0361-7734
1559-2863
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564131282
source MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adhesives
Dental Bonding
Dental Cements
Dentin
Dentin Permeability
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Humans
Materials Testing
Random Allocation
Resin Cements
Tensile Strength
title Dentin Permeability and Nanoleakage of Universal Adhesives in Etch-and-rinse vs Self-etch Modes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A27%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dentin%20Permeability%20and%20Nanoleakage%20of%20Universal%20Adhesives%20in%20Etch-and-rinse%20vs%20Self-etch%20Modes&rft.jtitle=Operative%20dentistry&rft.au=Cruz,%20Jmms&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=293-305&rft.issn=0361-7734&rft.eissn=1559-2863&rft_id=info:doi/10.2341/19-276-L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2564131282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2564131282&rft_id=info:pmid/34424991&rfr_iscdi=true