No room for males in caves: Female‐biased sex ratio in subterranean amphipods of the genus Niphargus
Sex allocation theory predicts that the proportion of daughters to sons will evolve in response to ecological conditions that determine the costs and benefits of producing each sex. All else being equal, the adult sex ratio (ASR) should also vary with ecological conditions. Many studies of subterran...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of evolutionary biology 2021-10, Vol.34 (10), p.1653-1661 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1661 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1653 |
container_title | Journal of evolutionary biology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Premate, Ester Borko, Špela Kralj‐Fišer, Simona Jennions, Michael Fišer, Žiga Balázs, Gergely Bíró, Anna Bračko, Gregor Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Denis Hrga, Nuša Herczeg, Gábor Rexhepi, Behare Zagmajster, Maja Zakšek, Valerija Fromhage, Lutz Fišer, Cene |
description | Sex allocation theory predicts that the proportion of daughters to sons will evolve in response to ecological conditions that determine the costs and benefits of producing each sex. All else being equal, the adult sex ratio (ASR) should also vary with ecological conditions. Many studies of subterranean species reported female‐biased ASR, but no systematic study has yet been conducted. We test the hypothesis that the ASR becomes more female‐biased with increased isolation from the surface. We compiled a data set of ASRs of 35 species in the subterranean amphipod Niphargus, each living in one of three distinct habitats (surface‐subterranean boundary, cave streams, phreatic lakes) representing an environmental gradient of increased isolation underground. The ASR was female‐biased in 27 of 35 species; the bias was statistically significant in 12 species. We found a significant difference in the ASR among habitats after correction for phylogeny. It is most weakly female‐biased at the surface‐subterranean boundary and most strongly female‐biased in phreatic lakes. Additional modelling suggests that the ASR has evolved towards a single value for both surface‐subterranean boundary and cave stream‐dwelling species, and another value for 9 of 11 phreatic lake dwellers. We suggest that a history of inbreeding in subterranean populations might lower inbreeding depression such that kin selection favours mating with siblings. This could select for a female‐biased offspring sex ratio due to local mate competition among brothers. The observed patterns in sex ratios in subterranean species make them a group worthy of more attention from those interested in sex allocation theory.
We tested the hypothesis that the ASR becomes more female‐biased with increased isolation from the surface, and found statistically significant female‐biased ASR in 12 species. After correction for phylogeny, ASR was most weakly female‐biased at the surface‐subterranean boundary and most strongly female‐biased in phreatic lakes. We suggest that a history of inbreeding in subterranean populations might lower inbreeding depression such that kin selection favours mating with siblings. This could select for a female‐biased offspring sex ratio due to local mate competition among brothers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jeb.13917 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2563716606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2563716606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-dbb3059e40ff42ca65b23d0bac98ebd53a7ac9da0a1dff56619f332bd55f418b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgiveFLyABN7romHun7nTwiuhGwV1J2hOnQ9vUZOpl5yP4jD6JGWd0IZhNDsnHz-FHaIeSAY3ncAJmQHlG0yW0TgUjSUYJXY4zoSQhij6soY0QJoRQJaRcRWtcCCZkJtaRvXHYO9dg6zxudA0BVy0u9DOEI3wGs5fP9w9T6QAlDvCKvZ5WbmZCb6bgvW5Bt1g33bjqXBmws3g6BvwIbR_wTdWNtX_swxZasboOsL24N9H92end6CK5vj2_HB1fJwUfDtOkNIYTmYEg1gpWaCUN4yUxusiGYErJdRrHUhNNS2ulUjSznLP4I62gQ8M30f48t_PuqYcwzZsqFFDXcU3Xh5xJxVOqFFGR7v2hE9f7Nm4XVZqxjKUsjepgrgrvQvBg885XjfZvOSX5rPw8lp9_lx_t7iKxNw2Uv_Kn7QgO5-ClquHt_6T86vRkHvkF_w-PHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579292727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No room for males in caves: Female‐biased sex ratio in subterranean amphipods of the genus Niphargus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>Wiley Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Premate, Ester ; Borko, Špela ; Kralj‐Fišer, Simona ; Jennions, Michael ; Fišer, Žiga ; Balázs, Gergely ; Bíró, Anna ; Bračko, Gregor ; Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Denis ; Hrga, Nuša ; Herczeg, Gábor ; Rexhepi, Behare ; Zagmajster, Maja ; Zakšek, Valerija ; Fromhage, Lutz ; Fišer, Cene</creator><creatorcontrib>Premate, Ester ; Borko, Špela ; Kralj‐Fišer, Simona ; Jennions, Michael ; Fišer, Žiga ; Balázs, Gergely ; Bíró, Anna ; Bračko, Gregor ; Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Denis ; Hrga, Nuša ; Herczeg, Gábor ; Rexhepi, Behare ; Zagmajster, Maja ; Zakšek, Valerija ; Fromhage, Lutz ; Fišer, Cene</creatorcontrib><description>Sex allocation theory predicts that the proportion of daughters to sons will evolve in response to ecological conditions that determine the costs and benefits of producing each sex. All else being equal, the adult sex ratio (ASR) should also vary with ecological conditions. Many studies of subterranean species reported female‐biased ASR, but no systematic study has yet been conducted. We test the hypothesis that the ASR becomes more female‐biased with increased isolation from the surface. We compiled a data set of ASRs of 35 species in the subterranean amphipod Niphargus, each living in one of three distinct habitats (surface‐subterranean boundary, cave streams, phreatic lakes) representing an environmental gradient of increased isolation underground. The ASR was female‐biased in 27 of 35 species; the bias was statistically significant in 12 species. We found a significant difference in the ASR among habitats after correction for phylogeny. It is most weakly female‐biased at the surface‐subterranean boundary and most strongly female‐biased in phreatic lakes. Additional modelling suggests that the ASR has evolved towards a single value for both surface‐subterranean boundary and cave stream‐dwelling species, and another value for 9 of 11 phreatic lake dwellers. We suggest that a history of inbreeding in subterranean populations might lower inbreeding depression such that kin selection favours mating with siblings. This could select for a female‐biased offspring sex ratio due to local mate competition among brothers. The observed patterns in sex ratios in subterranean species make them a group worthy of more attention from those interested in sex allocation theory.
We tested the hypothesis that the ASR becomes more female‐biased with increased isolation from the surface, and found statistically significant female‐biased ASR in 12 species. After correction for phylogeny, ASR was most weakly female‐biased at the surface‐subterranean boundary and most strongly female‐biased in phreatic lakes. We suggest that a history of inbreeding in subterranean populations might lower inbreeding depression such that kin selection favours mating with siblings. This could select for a female‐biased offspring sex ratio due to local mate competition among brothers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13917</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34424594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Amphipoda ; Amphipoda - genetics ; Animals ; Caves ; Cost benefit analysis ; Ecological conditions ; Ecosystem ; Environmental gradient ; extreme habitats ; Female ; Inbreeding ; Inbreeding depression ; Kin selection ; Lakes ; Male ; Offspring ; Phylogeny ; Sex ; sex allocation theory ; Sex Ratio ; Species ; Statistical analysis ; Underground caverns</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2021-10, Vol.34 (10), p.1653-1661</ispartof><rights>2021 European Society for Evolutionary Biology.</rights><rights>Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2021 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-dbb3059e40ff42ca65b23d0bac98ebd53a7ac9da0a1dff56619f332bd55f418b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-dbb3059e40ff42ca65b23d0bac98ebd53a7ac9da0a1dff56619f332bd55f418b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9221-2788 ; 0000-0003-1982-8724 ; 0000-0001-5560-6673 ; 0000-0002-6374-2365 ; 0000-0003-1323-9937 ; 0000-0002-8383-8778 ; 0000-0003-0441-342X ; 0000-0001-6604-2332 ; 0000-0001-6372-387X ; 0000-0003-4576-5173 ; 0000-0002-9388-1454</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjeb.13917$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjeb.13917$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34424594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Premate, Ester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borko, Špela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kralj‐Fišer, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennions, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fišer, Žiga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balázs, Gergely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bíró, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bračko, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hrga, Nuša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herczeg, Gábor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rexhepi, Behare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagmajster, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakšek, Valerija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fromhage, Lutz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fišer, Cene</creatorcontrib><title>No room for males in caves: Female‐biased sex ratio in subterranean amphipods of the genus Niphargus</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>Sex allocation theory predicts that the proportion of daughters to sons will evolve in response to ecological conditions that determine the costs and benefits of producing each sex. All else being equal, the adult sex ratio (ASR) should also vary with ecological conditions. Many studies of subterranean species reported female‐biased ASR, but no systematic study has yet been conducted. We test the hypothesis that the ASR becomes more female‐biased with increased isolation from the surface. We compiled a data set of ASRs of 35 species in the subterranean amphipod Niphargus, each living in one of three distinct habitats (surface‐subterranean boundary, cave streams, phreatic lakes) representing an environmental gradient of increased isolation underground. The ASR was female‐biased in 27 of 35 species; the bias was statistically significant in 12 species. We found a significant difference in the ASR among habitats after correction for phylogeny. It is most weakly female‐biased at the surface‐subterranean boundary and most strongly female‐biased in phreatic lakes. Additional modelling suggests that the ASR has evolved towards a single value for both surface‐subterranean boundary and cave stream‐dwelling species, and another value for 9 of 11 phreatic lake dwellers. We suggest that a history of inbreeding in subterranean populations might lower inbreeding depression such that kin selection favours mating with siblings. This could select for a female‐biased offspring sex ratio due to local mate competition among brothers. The observed patterns in sex ratios in subterranean species make them a group worthy of more attention from those interested in sex allocation theory.
We tested the hypothesis that the ASR becomes more female‐biased with increased isolation from the surface, and found statistically significant female‐biased ASR in 12 species. After correction for phylogeny, ASR was most weakly female‐biased at the surface‐subterranean boundary and most strongly female‐biased in phreatic lakes. We suggest that a history of inbreeding in subterranean populations might lower inbreeding depression such that kin selection favours mating with siblings. This could select for a female‐biased offspring sex ratio due to local mate competition among brothers.</description><subject>Amphipoda</subject><subject>Amphipoda - genetics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Caves</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Ecological conditions</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental gradient</subject><subject>extreme habitats</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Inbreeding depression</subject><subject>Kin selection</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>sex allocation theory</subject><subject>Sex Ratio</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Underground caverns</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgiveFLyABN7romHun7nTwiuhGwV1J2hOnQ9vUZOpl5yP4jD6JGWd0IZhNDsnHz-FHaIeSAY3ncAJmQHlG0yW0TgUjSUYJXY4zoSQhij6soY0QJoRQJaRcRWtcCCZkJtaRvXHYO9dg6zxudA0BVy0u9DOEI3wGs5fP9w9T6QAlDvCKvZ5WbmZCb6bgvW5Bt1g33bjqXBmws3g6BvwIbR_wTdWNtX_swxZasboOsL24N9H92end6CK5vj2_HB1fJwUfDtOkNIYTmYEg1gpWaCUN4yUxusiGYErJdRrHUhNNS2ulUjSznLP4I62gQ8M30f48t_PuqYcwzZsqFFDXcU3Xh5xJxVOqFFGR7v2hE9f7Nm4XVZqxjKUsjepgrgrvQvBg885XjfZvOSX5rPw8lp9_lx_t7iKxNw2Uv_Kn7QgO5-ClquHt_6T86vRkHvkF_w-PHA</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Premate, Ester</creator><creator>Borko, Špela</creator><creator>Kralj‐Fišer, Simona</creator><creator>Jennions, Michael</creator><creator>Fišer, Žiga</creator><creator>Balázs, Gergely</creator><creator>Bíró, Anna</creator><creator>Bračko, Gregor</creator><creator>Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Denis</creator><creator>Hrga, Nuša</creator><creator>Herczeg, Gábor</creator><creator>Rexhepi, Behare</creator><creator>Zagmajster, Maja</creator><creator>Zakšek, Valerija</creator><creator>Fromhage, Lutz</creator><creator>Fišer, Cene</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-2788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1982-8724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-6673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6374-2365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1323-9937</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8383-8778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0441-342X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-2332</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6372-387X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-5173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-1454</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>No room for males in caves: Female‐biased sex ratio in subterranean amphipods of the genus Niphargus</title><author>Premate, Ester ; Borko, Špela ; Kralj‐Fišer, Simona ; Jennions, Michael ; Fišer, Žiga ; Balázs, Gergely ; Bíró, Anna ; Bračko, Gregor ; Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Denis ; Hrga, Nuša ; Herczeg, Gábor ; Rexhepi, Behare ; Zagmajster, Maja ; Zakšek, Valerija ; Fromhage, Lutz ; Fišer, Cene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-dbb3059e40ff42ca65b23d0bac98ebd53a7ac9da0a1dff56619f332bd55f418b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amphipoda</topic><topic>Amphipoda - genetics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Caves</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Ecological conditions</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental gradient</topic><topic>extreme habitats</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Inbreeding depression</topic><topic>Kin selection</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>sex allocation theory</topic><topic>Sex Ratio</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Underground caverns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Premate, Ester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borko, Špela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kralj‐Fišer, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennions, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fišer, Žiga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balázs, Gergely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bíró, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bračko, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hrga, Nuša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herczeg, Gábor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rexhepi, Behare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagmajster, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakšek, Valerija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fromhage, Lutz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fišer, Cene</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Premate, Ester</au><au>Borko, Špela</au><au>Kralj‐Fišer, Simona</au><au>Jennions, Michael</au><au>Fišer, Žiga</au><au>Balázs, Gergely</au><au>Bíró, Anna</au><au>Bračko, Gregor</au><au>Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Denis</au><au>Hrga, Nuša</au><au>Herczeg, Gábor</au><au>Rexhepi, Behare</au><au>Zagmajster, Maja</au><au>Zakšek, Valerija</au><au>Fromhage, Lutz</au><au>Fišer, Cene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No room for males in caves: Female‐biased sex ratio in subterranean amphipods of the genus Niphargus</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1653</spage><epage>1661</epage><pages>1653-1661</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>Sex allocation theory predicts that the proportion of daughters to sons will evolve in response to ecological conditions that determine the costs and benefits of producing each sex. All else being equal, the adult sex ratio (ASR) should also vary with ecological conditions. Many studies of subterranean species reported female‐biased ASR, but no systematic study has yet been conducted. We test the hypothesis that the ASR becomes more female‐biased with increased isolation from the surface. We compiled a data set of ASRs of 35 species in the subterranean amphipod Niphargus, each living in one of three distinct habitats (surface‐subterranean boundary, cave streams, phreatic lakes) representing an environmental gradient of increased isolation underground. The ASR was female‐biased in 27 of 35 species; the bias was statistically significant in 12 species. We found a significant difference in the ASR among habitats after correction for phylogeny. It is most weakly female‐biased at the surface‐subterranean boundary and most strongly female‐biased in phreatic lakes. Additional modelling suggests that the ASR has evolved towards a single value for both surface‐subterranean boundary and cave stream‐dwelling species, and another value for 9 of 11 phreatic lake dwellers. We suggest that a history of inbreeding in subterranean populations might lower inbreeding depression such that kin selection favours mating with siblings. This could select for a female‐biased offspring sex ratio due to local mate competition among brothers. The observed patterns in sex ratios in subterranean species make them a group worthy of more attention from those interested in sex allocation theory.
We tested the hypothesis that the ASR becomes more female‐biased with increased isolation from the surface, and found statistically significant female‐biased ASR in 12 species. After correction for phylogeny, ASR was most weakly female‐biased at the surface‐subterranean boundary and most strongly female‐biased in phreatic lakes. We suggest that a history of inbreeding in subterranean populations might lower inbreeding depression such that kin selection favours mating with siblings. This could select for a female‐biased offspring sex ratio due to local mate competition among brothers.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34424594</pmid><doi>10.1111/jeb.13917</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-2788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1982-8724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-6673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6374-2365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1323-9937</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8383-8778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0441-342X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-2332</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6372-387X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-5173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-1454</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-061X |
ispartof | Journal of evolutionary biology, 2021-10, Vol.34 (10), p.1653-1661 |
issn | 1010-061X 1420-9101 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2563716606 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access; EZB Electronic Journals Library; Wiley Blackwell Journals |
subjects | Amphipoda Amphipoda - genetics Animals Caves Cost benefit analysis Ecological conditions Ecosystem Environmental gradient extreme habitats Female Inbreeding Inbreeding depression Kin selection Lakes Male Offspring Phylogeny Sex sex allocation theory Sex Ratio Species Statistical analysis Underground caverns |
title | No room for males in caves: Female‐biased sex ratio in subterranean amphipods of the genus Niphargus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A30%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20room%20for%20males%20in%20caves:%20Female%E2%80%90biased%20sex%20ratio%20in%20subterranean%20amphipods%20of%20the%20genus%20Niphargus&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=Premate,%20Ester&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1653&rft.epage=1661&rft.pages=1653-1661&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jeb.13917&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2563716606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579292727&rft_id=info:pmid/34424594&rfr_iscdi=true |