Electrophysiological signatures of conceptual and lexical retrieval from semantic memory

Retrieval from semantic memory of conceptual and lexical information is essential for producing speech. It is unclear whether there are differences in the neural mechanisms of conceptual and lexical retrieval when spreading activation through semantic memory is initiated by verbal or nonverbal setti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychologia 2021-10, Vol.161, p.107988-107988, Article 107988
Hauptverfasser: Hustá, Cecília, Zheng, Xiaochen, Papoutsi, Christina, Piai, Vitória
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 107988
container_issue
container_start_page 107988
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 161
creator Hustá, Cecília
Zheng, Xiaochen
Papoutsi, Christina
Piai, Vitória
description Retrieval from semantic memory of conceptual and lexical information is essential for producing speech. It is unclear whether there are differences in the neural mechanisms of conceptual and lexical retrieval when spreading activation through semantic memory is initiated by verbal or nonverbal settings. The same twenty participants took part in two EEG experiments. The first experiment examined conceptual and lexical retrieval following nonverbal settings, whereas the second experiment was a replication of previous studies examining conceptual and lexical retrieval following verbal settings. Target pictures were presented after constraining and nonconstraining contexts. In the nonverbal settings, contexts were provided as two priming pictures (e.g., constraining: nest, feather; nonconstraining: anchor, lipstick; target picture: BIRD). In the verbal settings, contexts were provided as sentences (e.g., constraining: “The farmer milked a …“; nonconstraining: “The child drew a …“; target picture: COW). Target pictures were named faster following constraining contexts in both experiments, indicating that conceptual preparation starts before target picture onset in constraining conditions. In the verbal experiment, we replicated the alpha-beta power decreases in constraining relative to nonconstraining conditions before target picture onset. No such power decreases were found in the nonverbal experiment. Power decreases in constraining relative to nonconstraining conditions were significantly different between experiments. Our findings suggest that participants engage in conceptual preparation following verbal and nonverbal settings, albeit differently. The retrieval of a target word, initiated by verbal settings, is associated with alpha-beta power decreases. By contrast, broad conceptual preparation alone, prompted by nonverbal settings, does not seem enough to elicit alpha-beta power decreases. These findings have implications for theories of oscillations and semantic memory. •Context modality influences conceptual and lexical retrieval from semantic memory.•Nonverbal context only allows for broad conceptual retrieval of several concepts.•Verbal context allows for conceptual and lexical retrieval of a single word.•Retrieval of a single word is reflected in alpha beta desynchronization.•Broad conceptual retrieval is only reflected in ERPs, not in brain oscillations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107988
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2561482574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393221002414</els_id><sourcerecordid>2561482574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-94ecfa188f728cd35798c912f74464d8ae5b38688d74796141bc71a8955e97553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLwzAUx4MoOKffoSfx0pmkSZNeBBnTCQMvCt5Clr5uGW1Tk3bYb29mPXny9B68__vx3g-hW4IXBJP8_rBoYfCuC6PZu9rtrF5QTEkcikLKMzQjUmRpxgk7RzOMqUyzIqOX6CqEA8aYcSpn6GNVg-kjZT8G-0Mxuk6C3bW6HzyExFWJca2Brh_iQLdlUsPXT8hD7y0cY1d51yQBGt321iQNNM6P1-ii0nWAm986R-9Pq7flOt28Pr8sHzepyfKiTwsGptJEykpQacqMx9tNQWglGMtZKTXwbSZzKUvBRJETRrZGEC0LzqEQnGdzdDdxO-8-Bwi9amwwUNe6BTcERXlckpQLFqMPU9R4F4KHSnXeNtqPimB1UqoO6q9SdVKqJqURsJ4AEB86WvAqGAtRTml9tKhKZ_-L-gamh4vv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561482574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrophysiological signatures of conceptual and lexical retrieval from semantic memory</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hustá, Cecília ; Zheng, Xiaochen ; Papoutsi, Christina ; Piai, Vitória</creator><creatorcontrib>Hustá, Cecília ; Zheng, Xiaochen ; Papoutsi, Christina ; Piai, Vitória</creatorcontrib><description>Retrieval from semantic memory of conceptual and lexical information is essential for producing speech. It is unclear whether there are differences in the neural mechanisms of conceptual and lexical retrieval when spreading activation through semantic memory is initiated by verbal or nonverbal settings. The same twenty participants took part in two EEG experiments. The first experiment examined conceptual and lexical retrieval following nonverbal settings, whereas the second experiment was a replication of previous studies examining conceptual and lexical retrieval following verbal settings. Target pictures were presented after constraining and nonconstraining contexts. In the nonverbal settings, contexts were provided as two priming pictures (e.g., constraining: nest, feather; nonconstraining: anchor, lipstick; target picture: BIRD). In the verbal settings, contexts were provided as sentences (e.g., constraining: “The farmer milked a …“; nonconstraining: “The child drew a …“; target picture: COW). Target pictures were named faster following constraining contexts in both experiments, indicating that conceptual preparation starts before target picture onset in constraining conditions. In the verbal experiment, we replicated the alpha-beta power decreases in constraining relative to nonconstraining conditions before target picture onset. No such power decreases were found in the nonverbal experiment. Power decreases in constraining relative to nonconstraining conditions were significantly different between experiments. Our findings suggest that participants engage in conceptual preparation following verbal and nonverbal settings, albeit differently. The retrieval of a target word, initiated by verbal settings, is associated with alpha-beta power decreases. By contrast, broad conceptual preparation alone, prompted by nonverbal settings, does not seem enough to elicit alpha-beta power decreases. These findings have implications for theories of oscillations and semantic memory. •Context modality influences conceptual and lexical retrieval from semantic memory.•Nonverbal context only allows for broad conceptual retrieval of several concepts.•Verbal context allows for conceptual and lexical retrieval of a single word.•Retrieval of a single word is reflected in alpha beta desynchronization.•Broad conceptual retrieval is only reflected in ERPs, not in brain oscillations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Language production ; Oscillations ; Prediction ; Semantic retrieval ; Spreading activation ; Word planning</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2021-10, Vol.161, p.107988-107988, Article 107988</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-94ecfa188f728cd35798c912f74464d8ae5b38688d74796141bc71a8955e97553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-94ecfa188f728cd35798c912f74464d8ae5b38688d74796141bc71a8955e97553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107988$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hustá, Cecília</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiaochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papoutsi, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piai, Vitória</creatorcontrib><title>Electrophysiological signatures of conceptual and lexical retrieval from semantic memory</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><description>Retrieval from semantic memory of conceptual and lexical information is essential for producing speech. It is unclear whether there are differences in the neural mechanisms of conceptual and lexical retrieval when spreading activation through semantic memory is initiated by verbal or nonverbal settings. The same twenty participants took part in two EEG experiments. The first experiment examined conceptual and lexical retrieval following nonverbal settings, whereas the second experiment was a replication of previous studies examining conceptual and lexical retrieval following verbal settings. Target pictures were presented after constraining and nonconstraining contexts. In the nonverbal settings, contexts were provided as two priming pictures (e.g., constraining: nest, feather; nonconstraining: anchor, lipstick; target picture: BIRD). In the verbal settings, contexts were provided as sentences (e.g., constraining: “The farmer milked a …“; nonconstraining: “The child drew a …“; target picture: COW). Target pictures were named faster following constraining contexts in both experiments, indicating that conceptual preparation starts before target picture onset in constraining conditions. In the verbal experiment, we replicated the alpha-beta power decreases in constraining relative to nonconstraining conditions before target picture onset. No such power decreases were found in the nonverbal experiment. Power decreases in constraining relative to nonconstraining conditions were significantly different between experiments. Our findings suggest that participants engage in conceptual preparation following verbal and nonverbal settings, albeit differently. The retrieval of a target word, initiated by verbal settings, is associated with alpha-beta power decreases. By contrast, broad conceptual preparation alone, prompted by nonverbal settings, does not seem enough to elicit alpha-beta power decreases. These findings have implications for theories of oscillations and semantic memory. •Context modality influences conceptual and lexical retrieval from semantic memory.•Nonverbal context only allows for broad conceptual retrieval of several concepts.•Verbal context allows for conceptual and lexical retrieval of a single word.•Retrieval of a single word is reflected in alpha beta desynchronization.•Broad conceptual retrieval is only reflected in ERPs, not in brain oscillations.</description><subject>Language production</subject><subject>Oscillations</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Semantic retrieval</subject><subject>Spreading activation</subject><subject>Word planning</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFLwzAUx4MoOKffoSfx0pmkSZNeBBnTCQMvCt5Clr5uGW1Tk3bYb29mPXny9B68__vx3g-hW4IXBJP8_rBoYfCuC6PZu9rtrF5QTEkcikLKMzQjUmRpxgk7RzOMqUyzIqOX6CqEA8aYcSpn6GNVg-kjZT8G-0Mxuk6C3bW6HzyExFWJca2Brh_iQLdlUsPXT8hD7y0cY1d51yQBGt321iQNNM6P1-ii0nWAm986R-9Pq7flOt28Pr8sHzepyfKiTwsGptJEykpQacqMx9tNQWglGMtZKTXwbSZzKUvBRJETRrZGEC0LzqEQnGdzdDdxO-8-Bwi9amwwUNe6BTcERXlckpQLFqMPU9R4F4KHSnXeNtqPimB1UqoO6q9SdVKqJqURsJ4AEB86WvAqGAtRTml9tKhKZ_-L-gamh4vv</recordid><startdate>20211015</startdate><enddate>20211015</enddate><creator>Hustá, Cecília</creator><creator>Zheng, Xiaochen</creator><creator>Papoutsi, Christina</creator><creator>Piai, Vitória</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211015</creationdate><title>Electrophysiological signatures of conceptual and lexical retrieval from semantic memory</title><author>Hustá, Cecília ; Zheng, Xiaochen ; Papoutsi, Christina ; Piai, Vitória</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-94ecfa188f728cd35798c912f74464d8ae5b38688d74796141bc71a8955e97553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Language production</topic><topic>Oscillations</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Semantic retrieval</topic><topic>Spreading activation</topic><topic>Word planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hustá, Cecília</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiaochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papoutsi, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piai, Vitória</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hustá, Cecília</au><au>Zheng, Xiaochen</au><au>Papoutsi, Christina</au><au>Piai, Vitória</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrophysiological signatures of conceptual and lexical retrieval from semantic memory</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><date>2021-10-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>161</volume><spage>107988</spage><epage>107988</epage><pages>107988-107988</pages><artnum>107988</artnum><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><abstract>Retrieval from semantic memory of conceptual and lexical information is essential for producing speech. It is unclear whether there are differences in the neural mechanisms of conceptual and lexical retrieval when spreading activation through semantic memory is initiated by verbal or nonverbal settings. The same twenty participants took part in two EEG experiments. The first experiment examined conceptual and lexical retrieval following nonverbal settings, whereas the second experiment was a replication of previous studies examining conceptual and lexical retrieval following verbal settings. Target pictures were presented after constraining and nonconstraining contexts. In the nonverbal settings, contexts were provided as two priming pictures (e.g., constraining: nest, feather; nonconstraining: anchor, lipstick; target picture: BIRD). In the verbal settings, contexts were provided as sentences (e.g., constraining: “The farmer milked a …“; nonconstraining: “The child drew a …“; target picture: COW). Target pictures were named faster following constraining contexts in both experiments, indicating that conceptual preparation starts before target picture onset in constraining conditions. In the verbal experiment, we replicated the alpha-beta power decreases in constraining relative to nonconstraining conditions before target picture onset. No such power decreases were found in the nonverbal experiment. Power decreases in constraining relative to nonconstraining conditions were significantly different between experiments. Our findings suggest that participants engage in conceptual preparation following verbal and nonverbal settings, albeit differently. The retrieval of a target word, initiated by verbal settings, is associated with alpha-beta power decreases. By contrast, broad conceptual preparation alone, prompted by nonverbal settings, does not seem enough to elicit alpha-beta power decreases. These findings have implications for theories of oscillations and semantic memory. •Context modality influences conceptual and lexical retrieval from semantic memory.•Nonverbal context only allows for broad conceptual retrieval of several concepts.•Verbal context allows for conceptual and lexical retrieval of a single word.•Retrieval of a single word is reflected in alpha beta desynchronization.•Broad conceptual retrieval is only reflected in ERPs, not in brain oscillations.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107988</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 2021-10, Vol.161, p.107988-107988, Article 107988
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2561482574
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Language production
Oscillations
Prediction
Semantic retrieval
Spreading activation
Word planning
title Electrophysiological signatures of conceptual and lexical retrieval from semantic memory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A25%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrophysiological%20signatures%20of%20conceptual%20and%20lexical%20retrieval%20from%20semantic%20memory&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Hust%C3%A1,%20Cec%C3%ADlia&rft.date=2021-10-15&rft.volume=161&rft.spage=107988&rft.epage=107988&rft.pages=107988-107988&rft.artnum=107988&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107988&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2561482574%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561482574&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0028393221002414&rfr_iscdi=true