Effect of mesh anchoring technique in uterine prolapse repair surgery: A finite element analysis

The female pelvic cavity involves muscles, ligaments, endopelvic fasciae and multiple organs where different pathologies may occur, namely the pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The synthetic implants are used for the reconstructive surgery of POP, but severe complications associated with their use have b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanics 2021-10, Vol.127, p.110649-110649, Article 110649
Hauptverfasser: Silva, M.E.T., Bessa, J.N.M., Parente, M.P.L., Mascarenhas, T., Natal Jorge, R.M., Fernandes, A.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110649
container_issue
container_start_page 110649
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 127
creator Silva, M.E.T.
Bessa, J.N.M.
Parente, M.P.L.
Mascarenhas, T.
Natal Jorge, R.M.
Fernandes, A.A.
description The female pelvic cavity involves muscles, ligaments, endopelvic fasciae and multiple organs where different pathologies may occur, namely the pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The synthetic implants are used for the reconstructive surgery of POP, but severe complications associated with their use have been reported, mainly related to their mechanical properties (e.g., implant stiffness) and microstructure. In this study, we mimicked a transvaginal reconstructive surgery to repair the apical ligaments (uterosacral ligaments (USLs) and cardinal ligaments (CLs)), by modeling, their impairment (90% and 50%) and/or total rupture. The implants to reinforce/replace these ligaments were built based on literature specifications and their mechanical properties were obtained through uniaxial tensile tests. The main aim of this study was to simulate the effect of mesh anchoring technique (simple stich and continuous stitch), and compare the displacement magnitude of the pelvic tissues, during Valsalva maneuver. The absence/presence of the synthetic implant was simulated when total rupture of the CLs and USLs occurs, causing a variation of the vaginal displacement (9% for the CLs and 27% for the USLs). Additionally, the simulations showed that there was a variation of the supero-inferior displacement of the vaginal wall between different anchoring techniques (simple stich and continuous stitch) being approximately of 10% for the simulation USLs and CLs implant. The computational simulation was able to mimic the biomechanical behavior of the USLs and CLs, in response to different anchoring techniques, which can be help improving the outcomes of the prolapse surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110649
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2560296512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929021004188</els_id><sourcerecordid>2578151284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ebaddf3d17afb7ff344b6730cb1eb3371e22b79dbb485d443cecc3d667d075063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWKuvIAE3bqbmMk1mXCniDQQ3uo65nLQZ5lKTGaFvb0p148bVgZzv_Pz5EDqnZEEJFVfNojFh6MCuF4wwuqCUiLI-QDNaSV4wXpFDNCN5U9SsJsfoJKWGECJLWc_Qx733YEc8eNxBWmPd2_UQQ7_CYw7sw-cEOPR4GiE_At7EodWbBDjCRoeI0xRXELfX-Bb70IcRMLTQQT_mIN1uU0in6MjrNsHZz5yj94f7t7un4uX18fnu9qWwXPKxAKOd89xRqb2R3vOyNEJyYg0Fw7mkwJiRtTOmrJauLLkFa7kTQjoil0TwObrc5-aKuXQaVReShbbVPQxTUmwpCKvFkrKMXvxBm2GKue-OkhXNTFVmSuwpG4eUIni1iaHTcasoUTvxqlG_4tVOvNqLz4c3-0PI3_0KEFWyAXoLLsSsWrkh_BfxDZj4kF4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2578151284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of mesh anchoring technique in uterine prolapse repair surgery: A finite element analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Silva, M.E.T. ; Bessa, J.N.M. ; Parente, M.P.L. ; Mascarenhas, T. ; Natal Jorge, R.M. ; Fernandes, A.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, M.E.T. ; Bessa, J.N.M. ; Parente, M.P.L. ; Mascarenhas, T. ; Natal Jorge, R.M. ; Fernandes, A.A.</creatorcontrib><description>The female pelvic cavity involves muscles, ligaments, endopelvic fasciae and multiple organs where different pathologies may occur, namely the pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The synthetic implants are used for the reconstructive surgery of POP, but severe complications associated with their use have been reported, mainly related to their mechanical properties (e.g., implant stiffness) and microstructure. In this study, we mimicked a transvaginal reconstructive surgery to repair the apical ligaments (uterosacral ligaments (USLs) and cardinal ligaments (CLs)), by modeling, their impairment (90% and 50%) and/or total rupture. The implants to reinforce/replace these ligaments were built based on literature specifications and their mechanical properties were obtained through uniaxial tensile tests. The main aim of this study was to simulate the effect of mesh anchoring technique (simple stich and continuous stitch), and compare the displacement magnitude of the pelvic tissues, during Valsalva maneuver. The absence/presence of the synthetic implant was simulated when total rupture of the CLs and USLs occurs, causing a variation of the vaginal displacement (9% for the CLs and 27% for the USLs). Additionally, the simulations showed that there was a variation of the supero-inferior displacement of the vaginal wall between different anchoring techniques (simple stich and continuous stitch) being approximately of 10% for the simulation USLs and CLs implant. The computational simulation was able to mimic the biomechanical behavior of the USLs and CLs, in response to different anchoring techniques, which can be help improving the outcomes of the prolapse surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110649</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anchoring Technique ; Biomechanics ; Computer applications ; Displacement ; Finite Element Method ; Implants ; Ligaments ; Mechanical properties ; Muscles ; Organs ; Pelvic Cavity ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse ; Pelvis ; Plastic surgery ; Reconstructive surgery ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; Simulation ; Stiffness ; Surgery ; Surgical Implants ; Surgical mesh ; Tensile tests ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Uterus ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2021-10, Vol.127, p.110649-110649, Article 110649</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ebaddf3d17afb7ff344b6730cb1eb3371e22b79dbb485d443cecc3d667d075063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ebaddf3d17afb7ff344b6730cb1eb3371e22b79dbb485d443cecc3d667d075063</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2016-7599 ; 0000-0003-2889-4969 ; 0000-0002-7146-9944</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929021004188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, M.E.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bessa, J.N.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parente, M.P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascarenhas, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natal Jorge, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, A.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of mesh anchoring technique in uterine prolapse repair surgery: A finite element analysis</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><description>The female pelvic cavity involves muscles, ligaments, endopelvic fasciae and multiple organs where different pathologies may occur, namely the pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The synthetic implants are used for the reconstructive surgery of POP, but severe complications associated with their use have been reported, mainly related to their mechanical properties (e.g., implant stiffness) and microstructure. In this study, we mimicked a transvaginal reconstructive surgery to repair the apical ligaments (uterosacral ligaments (USLs) and cardinal ligaments (CLs)), by modeling, their impairment (90% and 50%) and/or total rupture. The implants to reinforce/replace these ligaments were built based on literature specifications and their mechanical properties were obtained through uniaxial tensile tests. The main aim of this study was to simulate the effect of mesh anchoring technique (simple stich and continuous stitch), and compare the displacement magnitude of the pelvic tissues, during Valsalva maneuver. The absence/presence of the synthetic implant was simulated when total rupture of the CLs and USLs occurs, causing a variation of the vaginal displacement (9% for the CLs and 27% for the USLs). Additionally, the simulations showed that there was a variation of the supero-inferior displacement of the vaginal wall between different anchoring techniques (simple stich and continuous stitch) being approximately of 10% for the simulation USLs and CLs implant. The computational simulation was able to mimic the biomechanical behavior of the USLs and CLs, in response to different anchoring techniques, which can be help improving the outcomes of the prolapse surgery.</description><subject>Anchoring Technique</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Finite Element Method</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Organs</subject><subject>Pelvic Cavity</subject><subject>Pelvic Organ Prolapse</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Plastic surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive surgery</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Implants</subject><subject>Surgical mesh</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWKuvIAE3bqbmMk1mXCniDQQ3uo65nLQZ5lKTGaFvb0p148bVgZzv_Pz5EDqnZEEJFVfNojFh6MCuF4wwuqCUiLI-QDNaSV4wXpFDNCN5U9SsJsfoJKWGECJLWc_Qx733YEc8eNxBWmPd2_UQQ7_CYw7sw-cEOPR4GiE_At7EodWbBDjCRoeI0xRXELfX-Bb70IcRMLTQQT_mIN1uU0in6MjrNsHZz5yj94f7t7un4uX18fnu9qWwXPKxAKOd89xRqb2R3vOyNEJyYg0Fw7mkwJiRtTOmrJauLLkFa7kTQjoil0TwObrc5-aKuXQaVReShbbVPQxTUmwpCKvFkrKMXvxBm2GKue-OkhXNTFVmSuwpG4eUIni1iaHTcasoUTvxqlG_4tVOvNqLz4c3-0PI3_0KEFWyAXoLLsSsWrkh_BfxDZj4kF4</recordid><startdate>20211011</startdate><enddate>20211011</enddate><creator>Silva, M.E.T.</creator><creator>Bessa, J.N.M.</creator><creator>Parente, M.P.L.</creator><creator>Mascarenhas, T.</creator><creator>Natal Jorge, R.M.</creator><creator>Fernandes, A.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-7599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2889-4969</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-9944</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211011</creationdate><title>Effect of mesh anchoring technique in uterine prolapse repair surgery: A finite element analysis</title><author>Silva, M.E.T. ; Bessa, J.N.M. ; Parente, M.P.L. ; Mascarenhas, T. ; Natal Jorge, R.M. ; Fernandes, A.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ebaddf3d17afb7ff344b6730cb1eb3371e22b79dbb485d443cecc3d667d075063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anchoring Technique</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Finite Element Method</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Organs</topic><topic>Pelvic Cavity</topic><topic>Pelvic Organ Prolapse</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Plastic surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive surgery</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Implants</topic><topic>Surgical mesh</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, M.E.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bessa, J.N.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parente, M.P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascarenhas, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natal Jorge, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, A.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, M.E.T.</au><au>Bessa, J.N.M.</au><au>Parente, M.P.L.</au><au>Mascarenhas, T.</au><au>Natal Jorge, R.M.</au><au>Fernandes, A.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of mesh anchoring technique in uterine prolapse repair surgery: A finite element analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><date>2021-10-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>127</volume><spage>110649</spage><epage>110649</epage><pages>110649-110649</pages><artnum>110649</artnum><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>The female pelvic cavity involves muscles, ligaments, endopelvic fasciae and multiple organs where different pathologies may occur, namely the pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The synthetic implants are used for the reconstructive surgery of POP, but severe complications associated with their use have been reported, mainly related to their mechanical properties (e.g., implant stiffness) and microstructure. In this study, we mimicked a transvaginal reconstructive surgery to repair the apical ligaments (uterosacral ligaments (USLs) and cardinal ligaments (CLs)), by modeling, their impairment (90% and 50%) and/or total rupture. The implants to reinforce/replace these ligaments were built based on literature specifications and their mechanical properties were obtained through uniaxial tensile tests. The main aim of this study was to simulate the effect of mesh anchoring technique (simple stich and continuous stitch), and compare the displacement magnitude of the pelvic tissues, during Valsalva maneuver. The absence/presence of the synthetic implant was simulated when total rupture of the CLs and USLs occurs, causing a variation of the vaginal displacement (9% for the CLs and 27% for the USLs). Additionally, the simulations showed that there was a variation of the supero-inferior displacement of the vaginal wall between different anchoring techniques (simple stich and continuous stitch) being approximately of 10% for the simulation USLs and CLs implant. The computational simulation was able to mimic the biomechanical behavior of the USLs and CLs, in response to different anchoring techniques, which can be help improving the outcomes of the prolapse surgery.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110649</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-7599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2889-4969</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-9944</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2021-10, Vol.127, p.110649-110649, Article 110649
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2560296512
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anchoring Technique
Biomechanics
Computer applications
Displacement
Finite Element Method
Implants
Ligaments
Mechanical properties
Muscles
Organs
Pelvic Cavity
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Pelvis
Plastic surgery
Reconstructive surgery
Rupture
Rupturing
Simulation
Stiffness
Surgery
Surgical Implants
Surgical mesh
Tensile tests
Transplants & implants
Uterus
Vagina
title Effect of mesh anchoring technique in uterine prolapse repair surgery: A finite element analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A58%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20mesh%20anchoring%20technique%20in%20uterine%20prolapse%20repair%20surgery:%20A%20finite%20element%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Silva,%20M.E.T.&rft.date=2021-10-11&rft.volume=127&rft.spage=110649&rft.epage=110649&rft.pages=110649-110649&rft.artnum=110649&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2578151284%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2578151284&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0021929021004188&rfr_iscdi=true