Loaded Inter-set Stretching for Muscular Adaptations in Trained Males: Is the Hype Real?
Abstract The study examined the effects of adding a loaded stretch in the inter-set rest period (ISS) compared to traditional resistance training (TR) on muscular adaptations in resistance-trained males. Twenty-six subjects were randomly assigned into two groups (ISS: n=12; TR: n=14) and underwent a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of sports medicine 2022-02, Vol.43 (2), p.168-176 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 176 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 168 |
| container_title | International journal of sports medicine |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Wadhi, Tanuj Barakat, Christopher Evangelista, Alexandre L. Pearson, Jeremy R. Anand, Ashmeet S. Morrison, Taylor E A O'Sullivan, Jay Walters, Joseph Souza, Eduardo Oliveira De |
| description | Abstract
The study examined the effects of adding a loaded stretch in the inter-set rest period (ISS) compared to traditional resistance training (TR) on muscular adaptations in resistance-trained males. Twenty-six subjects were randomly assigned into two groups (ISS: n=12; TR: n=14) and underwent an 8-week training regimen. Subjects in ISS underwent an additional loaded stretch for 30 s at 15% of their working load from the prior set during the inter-set rest periods. Muscle thickness of the pectoralis major at the belly (BMT) and lateral (LMT) portions, One-repetition maximum (1RM) and repetitions-to-failure (RTF) on the bench press exercise were measured at baseline and post 8 weeks of training. Additionally, volume load and perceptual parameters for exertion and recovery were measured. Both groups had similar total volume load and average perceptual parameters (p>0.05). There was a main time effect (p0.05). Our results suggest that addition of a loaded ISS does not affect muscular adaptations either positively or negatively in resistance-trained males. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1055/a-1529-6281 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2560296275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630945100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bd164b9b7e740d5dfc7c6cf81a1b9e5b3ca65c55734d9118384babf339d1fde73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0MlLAzEUBvAgitbl5F0CXkQZzT6NFynFpdAiuIC3kEne2JHpTE0yB_97p9QFxNO7_N73Hh9Ch5ScUyLlhc2oZDpTbEg30IAKrjOuldhEA0JzlgnF2A7ajfGNECo05dtohwueS63JAL1MW-vB40mTIGQREn5MAZKbV80rLtuAZ110XW0DHnm7TDZVbRNx1eCnYKumX5zZGuIlnkSc5oDvPpaAH8DWV_toq7R1hIOvuYeeb66fxnfZ9P52Mh5NM8clS1nhqRKFLnLIBfHSly53ypVDammhQRbcWSWdlDkXXlM65ENR2KLkXHtaesj5HjpZ5y5D-95BTGZRRQd1bRtou2iYVIRpxXLZ0-M_9K3tQtN_Z5jiRAtJCenV2Vq50MYYoDTLUC1s-DCUmFXhxppV4WZVeK-PvjK7YgH-x3433IPTNUjzChbwe_K_tE_tNobr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630945100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Loaded Inter-set Stretching for Muscular Adaptations in Trained Males: Is the Hype Real?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Wadhi, Tanuj ; Barakat, Christopher ; Evangelista, Alexandre L. ; Pearson, Jeremy R. ; Anand, Ashmeet S. ; Morrison, Taylor E A ; O'Sullivan, Jay ; Walters, Joseph ; Souza, Eduardo Oliveira De</creator><creatorcontrib>Wadhi, Tanuj ; Barakat, Christopher ; Evangelista, Alexandre L. ; Pearson, Jeremy R. ; Anand, Ashmeet S. ; Morrison, Taylor E A ; O'Sullivan, Jay ; Walters, Joseph ; Souza, Eduardo Oliveira De</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
The study examined the effects of adding a loaded stretch in the inter-set rest period (ISS) compared to traditional resistance training (TR) on muscular adaptations in resistance-trained males. Twenty-six subjects were randomly assigned into two groups (ISS: n=12; TR: n=14) and underwent an 8-week training regimen. Subjects in ISS underwent an additional loaded stretch for 30 s at 15% of their working load from the prior set during the inter-set rest periods. Muscle thickness of the pectoralis major at the belly (BMT) and lateral (LMT) portions, One-repetition maximum (1RM) and repetitions-to-failure (RTF) on the bench press exercise were measured at baseline and post 8 weeks of training. Additionally, volume load and perceptual parameters for exertion and recovery were measured. Both groups had similar total volume load and average perceptual parameters (p>0.05). There was a main time effect (p<0.01) for all but one dependent variable indicating that both groups responded similarly across time [(∆BMT: ISS=2.7±1.7 mm; TR = 3.0±2.2 mm), (∆LMT: ISS=3.2±1.6 mm; TR=2.8±1.7 mm, (∆1RM: ISS=6.6±3.8 kg; TR=7.5±5.7 kg). Repetitions-to-failure did not change in either group (∆RTF: ISS=0.0±2.1 repetitions; TR=0.0±2.3 repetitions, p>0.05). Our results suggest that addition of a loaded ISS does not affect muscular adaptations either positively or negatively in resistance-trained males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0172-4622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-3964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/a-1529-6281</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34375990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag KG</publisher><subject>Exercise ; Humans ; Male ; Muscle Strength ; Muscle, Skeletal ; Resistance Training ; Rest ; Training & Testing</subject><ispartof>International journal of sports medicine, 2022-02, Vol.43 (2), p.168-176</ispartof><rights>Thieme. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart Feb 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bd164b9b7e740d5dfc7c6cf81a1b9e5b3ca65c55734d9118384babf339d1fde73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bd164b9b7e740d5dfc7c6cf81a1b9e5b3ca65c55734d9118384babf339d1fde73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3352-5527</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-1529-6281.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-1529-6281$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3018,3019,27929,27930,54564,54565</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34375990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wadhi, Tanuj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barakat, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evangelista, Alexandre L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Jeremy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Ashmeet S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Taylor E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Eduardo Oliveira De</creatorcontrib><title>Loaded Inter-set Stretching for Muscular Adaptations in Trained Males: Is the Hype Real?</title><title>International journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Abstract
The study examined the effects of adding a loaded stretch in the inter-set rest period (ISS) compared to traditional resistance training (TR) on muscular adaptations in resistance-trained males. Twenty-six subjects were randomly assigned into two groups (ISS: n=12; TR: n=14) and underwent an 8-week training regimen. Subjects in ISS underwent an additional loaded stretch for 30 s at 15% of their working load from the prior set during the inter-set rest periods. Muscle thickness of the pectoralis major at the belly (BMT) and lateral (LMT) portions, One-repetition maximum (1RM) and repetitions-to-failure (RTF) on the bench press exercise were measured at baseline and post 8 weeks of training. Additionally, volume load and perceptual parameters for exertion and recovery were measured. Both groups had similar total volume load and average perceptual parameters (p>0.05). There was a main time effect (p<0.01) for all but one dependent variable indicating that both groups responded similarly across time [(∆BMT: ISS=2.7±1.7 mm; TR = 3.0±2.2 mm), (∆LMT: ISS=3.2±1.6 mm; TR=2.8±1.7 mm, (∆1RM: ISS=6.6±3.8 kg; TR=7.5±5.7 kg). Repetitions-to-failure did not change in either group (∆RTF: ISS=0.0±2.1 repetitions; TR=0.0±2.3 repetitions, p>0.05). Our results suggest that addition of a loaded ISS does not affect muscular adaptations either positively or negatively in resistance-trained males.</description><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal</subject><subject>Resistance Training</subject><subject>Rest</subject><subject>Training & Testing</subject><issn>0172-4622</issn><issn>1439-3964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0MlLAzEUBvAgitbl5F0CXkQZzT6NFynFpdAiuIC3kEne2JHpTE0yB_97p9QFxNO7_N73Hh9Ch5ScUyLlhc2oZDpTbEg30IAKrjOuldhEA0JzlgnF2A7ajfGNECo05dtohwueS63JAL1MW-vB40mTIGQREn5MAZKbV80rLtuAZ110XW0DHnm7TDZVbRNx1eCnYKumX5zZGuIlnkSc5oDvPpaAH8DWV_toq7R1hIOvuYeeb66fxnfZ9P52Mh5NM8clS1nhqRKFLnLIBfHSly53ypVDammhQRbcWSWdlDkXXlM65ENR2KLkXHtaesj5HjpZ5y5D-95BTGZRRQd1bRtou2iYVIRpxXLZ0-M_9K3tQtN_Z5jiRAtJCenV2Vq50MYYoDTLUC1s-DCUmFXhxppV4WZVeK-PvjK7YgH-x3433IPTNUjzChbwe_K_tE_tNobr</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Wadhi, Tanuj</creator><creator>Barakat, Christopher</creator><creator>Evangelista, Alexandre L.</creator><creator>Pearson, Jeremy R.</creator><creator>Anand, Ashmeet S.</creator><creator>Morrison, Taylor E A</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, Jay</creator><creator>Walters, Joseph</creator><creator>Souza, Eduardo Oliveira De</creator><general>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</general><general>Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3352-5527</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Loaded Inter-set Stretching for Muscular Adaptations in Trained Males: Is the Hype Real?</title><author>Wadhi, Tanuj ; Barakat, Christopher ; Evangelista, Alexandre L. ; Pearson, Jeremy R. ; Anand, Ashmeet S. ; Morrison, Taylor E A ; O'Sullivan, Jay ; Walters, Joseph ; Souza, Eduardo Oliveira De</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bd164b9b7e740d5dfc7c6cf81a1b9e5b3ca65c55734d9118384babf339d1fde73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal</topic><topic>Resistance Training</topic><topic>Rest</topic><topic>Training & Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wadhi, Tanuj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barakat, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evangelista, Alexandre L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Jeremy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Ashmeet S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Taylor E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Eduardo Oliveira De</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wadhi, Tanuj</au><au>Barakat, Christopher</au><au>Evangelista, Alexandre L.</au><au>Pearson, Jeremy R.</au><au>Anand, Ashmeet S.</au><au>Morrison, Taylor E A</au><au>O'Sullivan, Jay</au><au>Walters, Joseph</au><au>Souza, Eduardo Oliveira De</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Loaded Inter-set Stretching for Muscular Adaptations in Trained Males: Is the Hype Real?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>168-176</pages><issn>0172-4622</issn><eissn>1439-3964</eissn><abstract>Abstract
The study examined the effects of adding a loaded stretch in the inter-set rest period (ISS) compared to traditional resistance training (TR) on muscular adaptations in resistance-trained males. Twenty-six subjects were randomly assigned into two groups (ISS: n=12; TR: n=14) and underwent an 8-week training regimen. Subjects in ISS underwent an additional loaded stretch for 30 s at 15% of their working load from the prior set during the inter-set rest periods. Muscle thickness of the pectoralis major at the belly (BMT) and lateral (LMT) portions, One-repetition maximum (1RM) and repetitions-to-failure (RTF) on the bench press exercise were measured at baseline and post 8 weeks of training. Additionally, volume load and perceptual parameters for exertion and recovery were measured. Both groups had similar total volume load and average perceptual parameters (p>0.05). There was a main time effect (p<0.01) for all but one dependent variable indicating that both groups responded similarly across time [(∆BMT: ISS=2.7±1.7 mm; TR = 3.0±2.2 mm), (∆LMT: ISS=3.2±1.6 mm; TR=2.8±1.7 mm, (∆1RM: ISS=6.6±3.8 kg; TR=7.5±5.7 kg). Repetitions-to-failure did not change in either group (∆RTF: ISS=0.0±2.1 repetitions; TR=0.0±2.3 repetitions, p>0.05). Our results suggest that addition of a loaded ISS does not affect muscular adaptations either positively or negatively in resistance-trained males.</abstract><cop>Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany</cop><pub>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</pub><pmid>34375990</pmid><doi>10.1055/a-1529-6281</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3352-5527</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0172-4622 |
| ispartof | International journal of sports medicine, 2022-02, Vol.43 (2), p.168-176 |
| issn | 0172-4622 1439-3964 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2560296275 |
| source | MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals |
| subjects | Exercise Humans Male Muscle Strength Muscle, Skeletal Resistance Training Rest Training & Testing |
| title | Loaded Inter-set Stretching for Muscular Adaptations in Trained Males: Is the Hype Real? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T05%3A57%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Loaded%20Inter-set%20Stretching%20for%20Muscular%20Adaptations%20in%20Trained%20Males:%20Is%20the%20Hype%20Real?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Wadhi,%20Tanuj&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=168-176&rft.issn=0172-4622&rft.eissn=1439-3964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/a-1529-6281&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2630945100%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630945100&rft_id=info:pmid/34375990&rfr_iscdi=true |