Cryoprotectant agents for ovarian tissue vitrification: Systematic review

Studies on the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue usually compare slow freezing versus vitrification and aim to optimize protocols, evaluate combinations or concentrations of cryoprotectant agents (CPAs), exposure time, and the addition of synthetic polymers. This systematic review aimed to identify...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cryobiology 2021-12, Vol.103, p.7-14
Hauptverfasser: El Cury-Silva, Taynná, Nunes, Monique E.G., Casalechi, Maíra, Comim, Fabio V., Rodrigues, Jhenifer K., Reis, Fernando M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue
container_start_page 7
container_title Cryobiology
container_volume 103
creator El Cury-Silva, Taynná
Nunes, Monique E.G.
Casalechi, Maíra
Comim, Fabio V.
Rodrigues, Jhenifer K.
Reis, Fernando M.
description Studies on the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue usually compare slow freezing versus vitrification and aim to optimize protocols, evaluate combinations or concentrations of cryoprotectant agents (CPAs), exposure time, and the addition of synthetic polymers. This systematic review aimed to identify the different CPAs used for the vitrification of human or primate ovarian tissue and to compare their results in terms of follicular survival and functional preservation. We searched Pubmed and EMBASE for randomized clinical trials or cohort studies comparing CPAs for human and/or primate ovarian vitrification. The highest rate of morphologically normal follicles after cryopreservation was 98% and was obtained with a combination of 27% ethylene glycol (EG) plus 27% glycerol, in addition to non-permeable synthetic polymers. The use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in relatively low concentrations combined with EG and other CPAs yielded more than 90% of intact follicles after vitrification. The methods and outcomes varied largely among studies, making it difficult to combine their results. While there is no definite answer to what is the best combination of CPAs for vitrification of human ovarian tissue, the data reviewed here suggest that current vitrification techniques are able to preserve the integrity of most follicles.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2021.08.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2560058583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0011224021001413</els_id><sourcerecordid>2560058583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f557877dc20ca75a69502c59acce32ea6ad0775c27ba2f051c83a403bc6f60af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFv2zAMhYVixZpm-wuBj7vYpaRIsndaEWxtgQI9dDsLCk0XChIrk-QM-fdTkabXnggSj--RH2MLDg0Hrm82DcZjWPuwbQQI3kDbAPALNuPQQS1kJz6xWZnwWoglXLHrlDYAoI1cfmZXcikNdB2fsYdVsdnHkAmzG3PlXmjMqRpCrMLBRe_GKvuUJqoOPkc_eHTZh_F79XxMmXalwSrSwdO_L-xycNtEX9_qnP359fP36r5-fLp7WN0-1ih1m-tBKdMa06MAdEY53SkQqDqHSFKQ064HYxQKs3ZiAMWxlW4Jco160OAGOWffTr7l6r8TpWx3PiFtt26kMCUrlAZQrWplkeqTFGNIKdJg99HvXDxaDvYVo93YM0b7itFCawu0srh4y5jWO-rf187ciuDHSUDl0_J9tAk9jUi9j4Wk7YP_KOM_XeOIlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2560058583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cryoprotectant agents for ovarian tissue vitrification: Systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>El Cury-Silva, Taynná ; Nunes, Monique E.G. ; Casalechi, Maíra ; Comim, Fabio V. ; Rodrigues, Jhenifer K. ; Reis, Fernando M.</creator><creatorcontrib>El Cury-Silva, Taynná ; Nunes, Monique E.G. ; Casalechi, Maíra ; Comim, Fabio V. ; Rodrigues, Jhenifer K. ; Reis, Fernando M.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies on the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue usually compare slow freezing versus vitrification and aim to optimize protocols, evaluate combinations or concentrations of cryoprotectant agents (CPAs), exposure time, and the addition of synthetic polymers. This systematic review aimed to identify the different CPAs used for the vitrification of human or primate ovarian tissue and to compare their results in terms of follicular survival and functional preservation. We searched Pubmed and EMBASE for randomized clinical trials or cohort studies comparing CPAs for human and/or primate ovarian vitrification. The highest rate of morphologically normal follicles after cryopreservation was 98% and was obtained with a combination of 27% ethylene glycol (EG) plus 27% glycerol, in addition to non-permeable synthetic polymers. The use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in relatively low concentrations combined with EG and other CPAs yielded more than 90% of intact follicles after vitrification. The methods and outcomes varied largely among studies, making it difficult to combine their results. While there is no definite answer to what is the best combination of CPAs for vitrification of human ovarian tissue, the data reviewed here suggest that current vitrification techniques are able to preserve the integrity of most follicles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-2240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2021.08.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34370991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cryopreservation ; Cryopreservation - methods ; Cryoprotective agents ; Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology ; Dimethyl Sulfoxide ; Ethylene Glycol ; Female ; Human ; Methods ; Ovary ; Vitrification</subject><ispartof>Cryobiology, 2021-12, Vol.103, p.7-14</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f557877dc20ca75a69502c59acce32ea6ad0775c27ba2f051c83a403bc6f60af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f557877dc20ca75a69502c59acce32ea6ad0775c27ba2f051c83a403bc6f60af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2726-233X ; 0000-0002-9258-7472 ; 0000-0002-4291-9221</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2021.08.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El Cury-Silva, Taynná</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Monique E.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casalechi, Maíra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comim, Fabio V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Jhenifer K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Fernando M.</creatorcontrib><title>Cryoprotectant agents for ovarian tissue vitrification: Systematic review</title><title>Cryobiology</title><addtitle>Cryobiology</addtitle><description>Studies on the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue usually compare slow freezing versus vitrification and aim to optimize protocols, evaluate combinations or concentrations of cryoprotectant agents (CPAs), exposure time, and the addition of synthetic polymers. This systematic review aimed to identify the different CPAs used for the vitrification of human or primate ovarian tissue and to compare their results in terms of follicular survival and functional preservation. We searched Pubmed and EMBASE for randomized clinical trials or cohort studies comparing CPAs for human and/or primate ovarian vitrification. The highest rate of morphologically normal follicles after cryopreservation was 98% and was obtained with a combination of 27% ethylene glycol (EG) plus 27% glycerol, in addition to non-permeable synthetic polymers. The use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in relatively low concentrations combined with EG and other CPAs yielded more than 90% of intact follicles after vitrification. The methods and outcomes varied largely among studies, making it difficult to combine their results. While there is no definite answer to what is the best combination of CPAs for vitrification of human ovarian tissue, the data reviewed here suggest that current vitrification techniques are able to preserve the integrity of most follicles.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - methods</subject><subject>Cryoprotective agents</subject><subject>Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dimethyl Sulfoxide</subject><subject>Ethylene Glycol</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Ovary</subject><subject>Vitrification</subject><issn>0011-2240</issn><issn>1090-2392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFv2zAMhYVixZpm-wuBj7vYpaRIsndaEWxtgQI9dDsLCk0XChIrk-QM-fdTkabXnggSj--RH2MLDg0Hrm82DcZjWPuwbQQI3kDbAPALNuPQQS1kJz6xWZnwWoglXLHrlDYAoI1cfmZXcikNdB2fsYdVsdnHkAmzG3PlXmjMqRpCrMLBRe_GKvuUJqoOPkc_eHTZh_F79XxMmXalwSrSwdO_L-xycNtEX9_qnP359fP36r5-fLp7WN0-1ih1m-tBKdMa06MAdEY53SkQqDqHSFKQ064HYxQKs3ZiAMWxlW4Jco160OAGOWffTr7l6r8TpWx3PiFtt26kMCUrlAZQrWplkeqTFGNIKdJg99HvXDxaDvYVo93YM0b7itFCawu0srh4y5jWO-rf187ciuDHSUDl0_J9tAk9jUi9j4Wk7YP_KOM_XeOIlQ</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>El Cury-Silva, Taynná</creator><creator>Nunes, Monique E.G.</creator><creator>Casalechi, Maíra</creator><creator>Comim, Fabio V.</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Jhenifer K.</creator><creator>Reis, Fernando M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2726-233X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9258-7472</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4291-9221</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Cryoprotectant agents for ovarian tissue vitrification: Systematic review</title><author>El Cury-Silva, Taynná ; Nunes, Monique E.G. ; Casalechi, Maíra ; Comim, Fabio V. ; Rodrigues, Jhenifer K. ; Reis, Fernando M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f557877dc20ca75a69502c59acce32ea6ad0775c27ba2f051c83a403bc6f60af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - methods</topic><topic>Cryoprotective agents</topic><topic>Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dimethyl Sulfoxide</topic><topic>Ethylene Glycol</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Ovary</topic><topic>Vitrification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El Cury-Silva, Taynná</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Monique E.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casalechi, Maíra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comim, Fabio V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Jhenifer K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Fernando M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cryobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El Cury-Silva, Taynná</au><au>Nunes, Monique E.G.</au><au>Casalechi, Maíra</au><au>Comim, Fabio V.</au><au>Rodrigues, Jhenifer K.</au><au>Reis, Fernando M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cryoprotectant agents for ovarian tissue vitrification: Systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Cryobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Cryobiology</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>103</volume><spage>7</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>7-14</pages><issn>0011-2240</issn><eissn>1090-2392</eissn><abstract>Studies on the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue usually compare slow freezing versus vitrification and aim to optimize protocols, evaluate combinations or concentrations of cryoprotectant agents (CPAs), exposure time, and the addition of synthetic polymers. This systematic review aimed to identify the different CPAs used for the vitrification of human or primate ovarian tissue and to compare their results in terms of follicular survival and functional preservation. We searched Pubmed and EMBASE for randomized clinical trials or cohort studies comparing CPAs for human and/or primate ovarian vitrification. The highest rate of morphologically normal follicles after cryopreservation was 98% and was obtained with a combination of 27% ethylene glycol (EG) plus 27% glycerol, in addition to non-permeable synthetic polymers. The use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in relatively low concentrations combined with EG and other CPAs yielded more than 90% of intact follicles after vitrification. The methods and outcomes varied largely among studies, making it difficult to combine their results. While there is no definite answer to what is the best combination of CPAs for vitrification of human ovarian tissue, the data reviewed here suggest that current vitrification techniques are able to preserve the integrity of most follicles.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34370991</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cryobiol.2021.08.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2726-233X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9258-7472</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4291-9221</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-2240
ispartof Cryobiology, 2021-12, Vol.103, p.7-14
issn 0011-2240
1090-2392
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2560058583
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Cryopreservation
Cryopreservation - methods
Cryoprotective agents
Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology
Dimethyl Sulfoxide
Ethylene Glycol
Female
Human
Methods
Ovary
Vitrification
title Cryoprotectant agents for ovarian tissue vitrification: Systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A30%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cryoprotectant%20agents%20for%20ovarian%20tissue%20vitrification:%20Systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Cryobiology&rft.au=El%20Cury-Silva,%20Taynn%C3%A1&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=103&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=7-14&rft.issn=0011-2240&rft.eissn=1090-2392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2021.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2560058583%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2560058583&rft_id=info:pmid/34370991&rft_els_id=S0011224021001413&rfr_iscdi=true