Notifying donors when their deferral is ending: An effective donor retention strategy
Background The application of a temporary deferral often leads to donor lapse. Contributing factors may be donors not knowing when their deferral ends or not being contacted and asked to return. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a reminder message notifying donors that thei...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2021-10, Vol.61 (10), p.2930-2940 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2940 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2930 |
container_title | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Gemelli, Carley N. Thijsen, Amanda Van Dyke, Nina Kruse, Sarah P. Davison, Tanya E. |
description | Background
The application of a temporary deferral often leads to donor lapse. Contributing factors may be donors not knowing when their deferral ends or not being contacted and asked to return. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a reminder message notifying donors that their deferral is coming to an end in increasing donors' postdeferral return rates. We evaluated the optimal time, content, and mode of delivery of the reminder message.
Study Design and Methods
Two studies were conducted with deferred donors. Study 1: donors (n = 1676) were randomized to be sent a reminder message at one of three time points (4 weeks before, 1 week before, and 1 week after their deferral ended) or to a no contact control condition. Study 2: donors (n = 1973) were randomized to three message type conditions (emotive email, nonemotive email, nonemotive SMS). Attempted return behavior was extracted (appointments, attendances) at 1 month.
Results
In Study 1, being sent the reminder message increased odds of donors attempting to return within 3 months compared with the control group (OR:2.01). Sending the reminder 1 week before the deferral ended was the most effective time point. In Study 2, the nonemotive message increased the odds of attempting to return compared with the emotive message (OR:1.38). No differences were found between email and SMS messages.
Discussion
Sending a reminder message to donors when their deferral is coming to an end is a simple, effective, and cost‐effective method to retain donors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/trf.16613 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2559434843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2559434843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-17687502a3c7f878aa9a1c48e49c0a023beeb954509c12cb5971c8ff1c85e953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFKAzEQBuAgCtbqwTcIeNHDtslms5t4K8WqUBSknpc0nbQp22xNUsu-vdH1JDiHmcs3w_AjdE3JiKYaR29GtCwpO0EDylmV5VLyUzQgpKAZpSw_RxchbAkhuSR0gN5f2mhNZ90ar1rX-oCPG3A4bsB6vAID3qsG24DBrRK6xxOHwRjQ0X5Cv4I9RHDRtg6H6FWEdXeJzoxqAlz9ziFazB4W06ds_vr4PJ3MM80YYRmtSlFxkiumKyMqoZRUVBcCCqmJIjlbAiwlLziRmuZ6yWVFtTAmNQ6SsyG67c_ufftxgBDrnQ0amkY5aA-hzjmXBStEwRK9-UO37cG79FxSlSiFpLlI6q5X2rcheDD13tud8l1NSf2db53yrX_yTXbc26NtoPsf1ou3Wb_xBXBne80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2578689128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Notifying donors when their deferral is ending: An effective donor retention strategy</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Gemelli, Carley N. ; Thijsen, Amanda ; Van Dyke, Nina ; Kruse, Sarah P. ; Davison, Tanya E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gemelli, Carley N. ; Thijsen, Amanda ; Van Dyke, Nina ; Kruse, Sarah P. ; Davison, Tanya E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The application of a temporary deferral often leads to donor lapse. Contributing factors may be donors not knowing when their deferral ends or not being contacted and asked to return. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a reminder message notifying donors that their deferral is coming to an end in increasing donors' postdeferral return rates. We evaluated the optimal time, content, and mode of delivery of the reminder message.
Study Design and Methods
Two studies were conducted with deferred donors. Study 1: donors (n = 1676) were randomized to be sent a reminder message at one of three time points (4 weeks before, 1 week before, and 1 week after their deferral ended) or to a no contact control condition. Study 2: donors (n = 1973) were randomized to three message type conditions (emotive email, nonemotive email, nonemotive SMS). Attempted return behavior was extracted (appointments, attendances) at 1 month.
Results
In Study 1, being sent the reminder message increased odds of donors attempting to return within 3 months compared with the control group (OR:2.01). Sending the reminder 1 week before the deferral ended was the most effective time point. In Study 2, the nonemotive message increased the odds of attempting to return compared with the emotive message (OR:1.38). No differences were found between email and SMS messages.
Discussion
Sending a reminder message to donors when their deferral is coming to an end is a simple, effective, and cost‐effective method to retain donors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/trf.16613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>blood donation ; deferrals ; Electronic mail ; message‐type ; mode ; reminders ; retention</subject><ispartof>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2021-10, Vol.61 (10), p.2930-2940</ispartof><rights>2021 AABB.</rights><rights>2021 AABB</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-17687502a3c7f878aa9a1c48e49c0a023beeb954509c12cb5971c8ff1c85e953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-17687502a3c7f878aa9a1c48e49c0a023beeb954509c12cb5971c8ff1c85e953</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9581-5397 ; 0000-0003-3030-5086 ; 0000-0002-3310-2703</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftrf.16613$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftrf.16613$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gemelli, Carley N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijsen, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dyke, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Sarah P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davison, Tanya E.</creatorcontrib><title>Notifying donors when their deferral is ending: An effective donor retention strategy</title><title>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><description>Background
The application of a temporary deferral often leads to donor lapse. Contributing factors may be donors not knowing when their deferral ends or not being contacted and asked to return. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a reminder message notifying donors that their deferral is coming to an end in increasing donors' postdeferral return rates. We evaluated the optimal time, content, and mode of delivery of the reminder message.
Study Design and Methods
Two studies were conducted with deferred donors. Study 1: donors (n = 1676) were randomized to be sent a reminder message at one of three time points (4 weeks before, 1 week before, and 1 week after their deferral ended) or to a no contact control condition. Study 2: donors (n = 1973) were randomized to three message type conditions (emotive email, nonemotive email, nonemotive SMS). Attempted return behavior was extracted (appointments, attendances) at 1 month.
Results
In Study 1, being sent the reminder message increased odds of donors attempting to return within 3 months compared with the control group (OR:2.01). Sending the reminder 1 week before the deferral ended was the most effective time point. In Study 2, the nonemotive message increased the odds of attempting to return compared with the emotive message (OR:1.38). No differences were found between email and SMS messages.
Discussion
Sending a reminder message to donors when their deferral is coming to an end is a simple, effective, and cost‐effective method to retain donors.</description><subject>blood donation</subject><subject>deferrals</subject><subject>Electronic mail</subject><subject>message‐type</subject><subject>mode</subject><subject>reminders</subject><subject>retention</subject><issn>0041-1132</issn><issn>1537-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MFKAzEQBuAgCtbqwTcIeNHDtslms5t4K8WqUBSknpc0nbQp22xNUsu-vdH1JDiHmcs3w_AjdE3JiKYaR29GtCwpO0EDylmV5VLyUzQgpKAZpSw_RxchbAkhuSR0gN5f2mhNZ90ar1rX-oCPG3A4bsB6vAID3qsG24DBrRK6xxOHwRjQ0X5Cv4I9RHDRtg6H6FWEdXeJzoxqAlz9ziFazB4W06ds_vr4PJ3MM80YYRmtSlFxkiumKyMqoZRUVBcCCqmJIjlbAiwlLziRmuZ6yWVFtTAmNQ6SsyG67c_ufftxgBDrnQ0amkY5aA-hzjmXBStEwRK9-UO37cG79FxSlSiFpLlI6q5X2rcheDD13tud8l1NSf2db53yrX_yTXbc26NtoPsf1ou3Wb_xBXBne80</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Gemelli, Carley N.</creator><creator>Thijsen, Amanda</creator><creator>Van Dyke, Nina</creator><creator>Kruse, Sarah P.</creator><creator>Davison, Tanya E.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9581-5397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-5086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-2703</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Notifying donors when their deferral is ending: An effective donor retention strategy</title><author>Gemelli, Carley N. ; Thijsen, Amanda ; Van Dyke, Nina ; Kruse, Sarah P. ; Davison, Tanya E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-17687502a3c7f878aa9a1c48e49c0a023beeb954509c12cb5971c8ff1c85e953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>blood donation</topic><topic>deferrals</topic><topic>Electronic mail</topic><topic>message‐type</topic><topic>mode</topic><topic>reminders</topic><topic>retention</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gemelli, Carley N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijsen, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dyke, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Sarah P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davison, Tanya E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gemelli, Carley N.</au><au>Thijsen, Amanda</au><au>Van Dyke, Nina</au><au>Kruse, Sarah P.</au><au>Davison, Tanya E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Notifying donors when their deferral is ending: An effective donor retention strategy</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2930</spage><epage>2940</epage><pages>2930-2940</pages><issn>0041-1132</issn><eissn>1537-2995</eissn><abstract>Background
The application of a temporary deferral often leads to donor lapse. Contributing factors may be donors not knowing when their deferral ends or not being contacted and asked to return. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a reminder message notifying donors that their deferral is coming to an end in increasing donors' postdeferral return rates. We evaluated the optimal time, content, and mode of delivery of the reminder message.
Study Design and Methods
Two studies were conducted with deferred donors. Study 1: donors (n = 1676) were randomized to be sent a reminder message at one of three time points (4 weeks before, 1 week before, and 1 week after their deferral ended) or to a no contact control condition. Study 2: donors (n = 1973) were randomized to three message type conditions (emotive email, nonemotive email, nonemotive SMS). Attempted return behavior was extracted (appointments, attendances) at 1 month.
Results
In Study 1, being sent the reminder message increased odds of donors attempting to return within 3 months compared with the control group (OR:2.01). Sending the reminder 1 week before the deferral ended was the most effective time point. In Study 2, the nonemotive message increased the odds of attempting to return compared with the emotive message (OR:1.38). No differences were found between email and SMS messages.
Discussion
Sending a reminder message to donors when their deferral is coming to an end is a simple, effective, and cost‐effective method to retain donors.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/trf.16613</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9581-5397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-5086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-2703</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1132 |
ispartof | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2021-10, Vol.61 (10), p.2930-2940 |
issn | 0041-1132 1537-2995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2559434843 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | blood donation deferrals Electronic mail message‐type mode reminders retention |
title | Notifying donors when their deferral is ending: An effective donor retention strategy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A59%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Notifying%20donors%20when%20their%20deferral%20is%20ending:%20An%20effective%20donor%20retention%20strategy&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Gemelli,%20Carley%20N.&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2930&rft.epage=2940&rft.pages=2930-2940&rft.issn=0041-1132&rft.eissn=1537-2995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/trf.16613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2559434843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2578689128&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |