Critical Assessment of ACI 318 Eq. (18-3) for Prestressing Steel Stress at Ultimate Flexure

Critical Assessment of ACI 318 Eq. (18-3) for Prestressing Steel Stress at Ultimate Flexure

An attempt is made by the authors to explore the background and feasibility of Eq. (18-3) of the ACI Code 318-89. Advantages and disadvantages of the equation are discussed in detail, and results of laboratory testing conducted by the authors on 270-ksi low-relaxation strands for the Precast/Prestre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACI structural journal 1992-09, Vol.89 (5), p.538-546
Hauptverfasser: Devalapura, Ravi K, Tadros, Maher K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 546
container_issue 5
container_start_page 538
container_title ACI structural journal
container_volume 89
creator Devalapura, Ravi K
Tadros, Maher K
description An attempt is made by the authors to explore the background and feasibility of Eq. (18-3) of the ACI Code 318-89. Advantages and disadvantages of the equation are discussed in detail, and results of laboratory testing conducted by the authors on 270-ksi low-relaxation strands for the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute also are included. A lower-bound curve based on 56 actual stress-strain curves is compared with other prediction methods, and an alternative approach for calculating prestressing steel stress at ultimate flexure is proposed. Recommendations are made to revise some of the existing Building Code and Commentary sections. Two design examples are presented to show the versatility of the iterative strain-compatibility method and to show the invalidity of Eq. (18-3) for use in some practical cases.
doi_str_mv 10.14359/9641
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25590672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>25590672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-ed6a2abfda8b6c1ba647f6fd4050d246ce5ce236bea1120946380ecdd2f9bc783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUM1Kw0AY3IOCtfYd9qLoIXX_stkcS2i1UFDQnjyEzeZbiWybdr8N6NubWg8zw8AwDEPIjLM5VzIvH0ut-AWZMGPKTArFr8g14hdjkgmpJuSjil3qnA10gQiIO9gn2nu6qNZUckOXxzm95yaTD9T3kb5GwDQCu_0nfUsAYeSTpzbRbUjdziagqwDfQ4QbcultQJj965RsV8v36jnbvDytq8UmcyJnKYNWW2Eb31rTaMcbq1XhtW8Vy1krlHaQOxBSN2A5F6xUWhoGrm2FLxtXGDkld-feQ-yPwziw3nXoIAS7h37AWuR5yXQhxuDtOehijxjB14c4Lo4_NWf131316S75C6iOXMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>25590672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical Assessment of ACI 318 Eq. (18-3) for Prestressing Steel Stress at Ultimate Flexure</title><source>American Concrete Institute Online Journal Archives</source><creator>Devalapura, Ravi K ; Tadros, Maher K</creator><creatorcontrib>Devalapura, Ravi K ; Tadros, Maher K</creatorcontrib><description>An attempt is made by the authors to explore the background and feasibility of Eq. (18-3) of the ACI Code 318-89. Advantages and disadvantages of the equation are discussed in detail, and results of laboratory testing conducted by the authors on 270-ksi low-relaxation strands for the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute also are included. A lower-bound curve based on 56 actual stress-strain curves is compared with other prediction methods, and an alternative approach for calculating prestressing steel stress at ultimate flexure is proposed. Recommendations are made to revise some of the existing Building Code and Commentary sections. Two design examples are presented to show the versatility of the iterative strain-compatibility method and to show the invalidity of Eq. (18-3) for use in some practical cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-3241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14359/9641</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>ACI structural journal, 1992-09, Vol.89 (5), p.538-546</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-ed6a2abfda8b6c1ba647f6fd4050d246ce5ce236bea1120946380ecdd2f9bc783</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Devalapura, Ravi K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tadros, Maher K</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Assessment of ACI 318 Eq. (18-3) for Prestressing Steel Stress at Ultimate Flexure</title><title>ACI structural journal</title><description>An attempt is made by the authors to explore the background and feasibility of Eq. (18-3) of the ACI Code 318-89. Advantages and disadvantages of the equation are discussed in detail, and results of laboratory testing conducted by the authors on 270-ksi low-relaxation strands for the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute also are included. A lower-bound curve based on 56 actual stress-strain curves is compared with other prediction methods, and an alternative approach for calculating prestressing steel stress at ultimate flexure is proposed. Recommendations are made to revise some of the existing Building Code and Commentary sections. Two design examples are presented to show the versatility of the iterative strain-compatibility method and to show the invalidity of Eq. (18-3) for use in some practical cases.</description><issn>0889-3241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUM1Kw0AY3IOCtfYd9qLoIXX_stkcS2i1UFDQnjyEzeZbiWybdr8N6NubWg8zw8AwDEPIjLM5VzIvH0ut-AWZMGPKTArFr8g14hdjkgmpJuSjil3qnA10gQiIO9gn2nu6qNZUckOXxzm95yaTD9T3kb5GwDQCu_0nfUsAYeSTpzbRbUjdziagqwDfQ4QbcultQJj965RsV8v36jnbvDytq8UmcyJnKYNWW2Eb31rTaMcbq1XhtW8Vy1krlHaQOxBSN2A5F6xUWhoGrm2FLxtXGDkld-feQ-yPwziw3nXoIAS7h37AWuR5yXQhxuDtOehijxjB14c4Lo4_NWf131316S75C6iOXMQ</recordid><startdate>19920901</startdate><enddate>19920901</enddate><creator>Devalapura, Ravi K</creator><creator>Tadros, Maher K</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920901</creationdate><title>Critical Assessment of ACI 318 Eq. (18-3) for Prestressing Steel Stress at Ultimate Flexure</title><author>Devalapura, Ravi K ; Tadros, Maher K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-ed6a2abfda8b6c1ba647f6fd4050d246ce5ce236bea1120946380ecdd2f9bc783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Devalapura, Ravi K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tadros, Maher K</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>ACI structural journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Devalapura, Ravi K</au><au>Tadros, Maher K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical Assessment of ACI 318 Eq. (18-3) for Prestressing Steel Stress at Ultimate Flexure</atitle><jtitle>ACI structural journal</jtitle><date>1992-09-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>538</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>538-546</pages><issn>0889-3241</issn><abstract>An attempt is made by the authors to explore the background and feasibility of Eq. (18-3) of the ACI Code 318-89. Advantages and disadvantages of the equation are discussed in detail, and results of laboratory testing conducted by the authors on 270-ksi low-relaxation strands for the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute also are included. A lower-bound curve based on 56 actual stress-strain curves is compared with other prediction methods, and an alternative approach for calculating prestressing steel stress at ultimate flexure is proposed. Recommendations are made to revise some of the existing Building Code and Commentary sections. Two design examples are presented to show the versatility of the iterative strain-compatibility method and to show the invalidity of Eq. (18-3) for use in some practical cases.</abstract><doi>10.14359/9641</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-3241
ispartof ACI structural journal, 1992-09, Vol.89 (5), p.538-546
issn 0889-3241
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25590672
source American Concrete Institute Online Journal Archives
title Critical Assessment of ACI 318 Eq. (18-3) for Prestressing Steel Stress at Ultimate Flexure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A16%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Assessment%20of%20ACI%20318%20Eq.%20(18-3)%20for%20Prestressing%20Steel%20Stress%20at%20Ultimate%20Flexure&rft.jtitle=ACI%20structural%20journal&rft.au=Devalapura,%20Ravi%20K&rft.date=1992-09-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=538&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=538-546&rft.issn=0889-3241&rft_id=info:doi/10.14359/9641&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E25590672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=25590672&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true