Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes
Summary The foliar surface forms one of the largest aboveground habitats on Earth and maintains plant‐fungus relationships that greatly affect ecosystem functioning. Despite many studies with particular plant species, the foliar epiphytic mycobiome has not been studied across a large number of plant...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental microbiology 2021-10, Vol.23 (10), p.6210-6222 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6222 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 6210 |
container_title | Environmental microbiology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Zhu, Ting Yao, Jia Liu, Hao Zhou, Chen‐Hao Liu, Yuan‐Zhan Wang, Zheng‐Wei Quan, Zhe‐Xue Li, Bo Yang, Ji Huang, Wei‐Chang Nie, Ming |
description | Summary
The foliar surface forms one of the largest aboveground habitats on Earth and maintains plant‐fungus relationships that greatly affect ecosystem functioning. Despite many studies with particular plant species, the foliar epiphytic mycobiome has not been studied across a large number of plant species from different taxa. Using high‐throughput sequencing, we assessed epiphytic mycobiomes on leaf surfaces of 592 plant species in a botanical garden. Plants of angiosperms, gymnosperms, and pteridophytes were involved. Plant taxonomy, leaf side, growing environment, and evolutionary relationships were considered. We found that pteridophytes showed the higher fungal species diversity, stronger mutualistic fungal interactions, and a greater percentage of putative pathogens than gymnosperms and angiosperms. Plant taxonomic group, leaf side, and growing environment were significantly associated with the foliar epiphytic mycobiome, but the similarity of the mycobiomes among plants was not directly related to the distance of the host evolutionary tree. Our results provide a general understanding of the foliar fungal mycobiomes from pteridophytes to angiosperms. These findings will facilitate our understanding of foliar fungal epiphytes and their roles in plant communities and ecosystems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1462-2920.15703 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2558092709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2585152499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-c6090b7f9629f0d8cbe01cbee212144a9b256aab0551880fb04490b47c8b00993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFOwzAQhi0EoqUws6FILCyhZ8euY4kFVQUqFbHAbNmuA6mSOsSNUDYegWfkSXCa0oEFD2ef9d0v-0PoHMM1DmuM6YTERJDQMg7JARrubw73Z0wG6MT7FQDmCYdjNEhoQnnC2BDdTGvn_ffnV_XWbtxr7ZoqUt5b70u73kQuizJX5KqObJV3SG6isjVO5660_hQdZarw9my3j9DL3ex5-hAvnu7n09tFbBKOk9hMQIDmmZgQkcEyNdoCDsUSTDClSmjCJkppYAynKWQaKA0DlJtUAwiRjNBVn1vV7r2xfiPL3BtbFGptXeMlYSwFQTh06OUfdOWaeh1eF6iUYUboNnDcU6b7fW0zWdV5qepWYpCdWNmpk51GuRUbJi52uY0u7XLP_5oMAOuBj7yw7X95cvY474N_AFLFgac</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2585152499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zhu, Ting ; Yao, Jia ; Liu, Hao ; Zhou, Chen‐Hao ; Liu, Yuan‐Zhan ; Wang, Zheng‐Wei ; Quan, Zhe‐Xue ; Li, Bo ; Yang, Ji ; Huang, Wei‐Chang ; Nie, Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ting ; Yao, Jia ; Liu, Hao ; Zhou, Chen‐Hao ; Liu, Yuan‐Zhan ; Wang, Zheng‐Wei ; Quan, Zhe‐Xue ; Li, Bo ; Yang, Ji ; Huang, Wei‐Chang ; Nie, Ming</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The foliar surface forms one of the largest aboveground habitats on Earth and maintains plant‐fungus relationships that greatly affect ecosystem functioning. Despite many studies with particular plant species, the foliar epiphytic mycobiome has not been studied across a large number of plant species from different taxa. Using high‐throughput sequencing, we assessed epiphytic mycobiomes on leaf surfaces of 592 plant species in a botanical garden. Plants of angiosperms, gymnosperms, and pteridophytes were involved. Plant taxonomy, leaf side, growing environment, and evolutionary relationships were considered. We found that pteridophytes showed the higher fungal species diversity, stronger mutualistic fungal interactions, and a greater percentage of putative pathogens than gymnosperms and angiosperms. Plant taxonomic group, leaf side, and growing environment were significantly associated with the foliar epiphytic mycobiome, but the similarity of the mycobiomes among plants was not directly related to the distance of the host evolutionary tree. Our results provide a general understanding of the foliar fungal mycobiomes from pteridophytes to angiosperms. These findings will facilitate our understanding of foliar fungal epiphytes and their roles in plant communities and ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-2912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-2920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15703</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34347355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Angiosperms ; Botanical gardens ; Ecological function ; Ecosystem ; Epiphytes ; Flowers & plants ; Fungi ; Fungi - genetics ; Gymnosperms ; Herbivores ; Leaves ; Mycobiome ; Pathogens ; Plant communities ; Plant species ; Plants ; Sequences ; Species diversity ; Symbiosis ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Environmental microbiology, 2021-10, Vol.23 (10), p.6210-6222</ispartof><rights>2021 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-c6090b7f9629f0d8cbe01cbee212144a9b256aab0551880fb04490b47c8b00993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-c6090b7f9629f0d8cbe01cbee212144a9b256aab0551880fb04490b47c8b00993</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6266-7511</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1462-2920.15703$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1462-2920.15703$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34347355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Chen‐Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuan‐Zhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zheng‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Zhe‐Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wei‐Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes</title><title>Environmental microbiology</title><addtitle>Environ Microbiol</addtitle><description>Summary
The foliar surface forms one of the largest aboveground habitats on Earth and maintains plant‐fungus relationships that greatly affect ecosystem functioning. Despite many studies with particular plant species, the foliar epiphytic mycobiome has not been studied across a large number of plant species from different taxa. Using high‐throughput sequencing, we assessed epiphytic mycobiomes on leaf surfaces of 592 plant species in a botanical garden. Plants of angiosperms, gymnosperms, and pteridophytes were involved. Plant taxonomy, leaf side, growing environment, and evolutionary relationships were considered. We found that pteridophytes showed the higher fungal species diversity, stronger mutualistic fungal interactions, and a greater percentage of putative pathogens than gymnosperms and angiosperms. Plant taxonomic group, leaf side, and growing environment were significantly associated with the foliar epiphytic mycobiome, but the similarity of the mycobiomes among plants was not directly related to the distance of the host evolutionary tree. Our results provide a general understanding of the foliar fungal mycobiomes from pteridophytes to angiosperms. These findings will facilitate our understanding of foliar fungal epiphytes and their roles in plant communities and ecosystems.</description><subject>Angiosperms</subject><subject>Botanical gardens</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Epiphytes</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fungi - genetics</subject><subject>Gymnosperms</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Mycobiome</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Sequences</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>1462-2912</issn><issn>1462-2920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLFOwzAQhi0EoqUws6FILCyhZ8euY4kFVQUqFbHAbNmuA6mSOsSNUDYegWfkSXCa0oEFD2ef9d0v-0PoHMM1DmuM6YTERJDQMg7JARrubw73Z0wG6MT7FQDmCYdjNEhoQnnC2BDdTGvn_ffnV_XWbtxr7ZoqUt5b70u73kQuizJX5KqObJV3SG6isjVO5660_hQdZarw9my3j9DL3ex5-hAvnu7n09tFbBKOk9hMQIDmmZgQkcEyNdoCDsUSTDClSmjCJkppYAynKWQaKA0DlJtUAwiRjNBVn1vV7r2xfiPL3BtbFGptXeMlYSwFQTh06OUfdOWaeh1eF6iUYUboNnDcU6b7fW0zWdV5qepWYpCdWNmpk51GuRUbJi52uY0u7XLP_5oMAOuBj7yw7X95cvY474N_AFLFgac</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Zhu, Ting</creator><creator>Yao, Jia</creator><creator>Liu, Hao</creator><creator>Zhou, Chen‐Hao</creator><creator>Liu, Yuan‐Zhan</creator><creator>Wang, Zheng‐Wei</creator><creator>Quan, Zhe‐Xue</creator><creator>Li, Bo</creator><creator>Yang, Ji</creator><creator>Huang, Wei‐Chang</creator><creator>Nie, Ming</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-7511</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes</title><author>Zhu, Ting ; Yao, Jia ; Liu, Hao ; Zhou, Chen‐Hao ; Liu, Yuan‐Zhan ; Wang, Zheng‐Wei ; Quan, Zhe‐Xue ; Li, Bo ; Yang, Ji ; Huang, Wei‐Chang ; Nie, Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-c6090b7f9629f0d8cbe01cbee212144a9b256aab0551880fb04490b47c8b00993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Angiosperms</topic><topic>Botanical gardens</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Epiphytes</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fungi - genetics</topic><topic>Gymnosperms</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Mycobiome</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Sequences</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Chen‐Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuan‐Zhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zheng‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Zhe‐Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wei‐Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Ting</au><au>Yao, Jia</au><au>Liu, Hao</au><au>Zhou, Chen‐Hao</au><au>Liu, Yuan‐Zhan</au><au>Wang, Zheng‐Wei</au><au>Quan, Zhe‐Xue</au><au>Li, Bo</au><au>Yang, Ji</au><au>Huang, Wei‐Chang</au><au>Nie, Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes</atitle><jtitle>Environmental microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>6210</spage><epage>6222</epage><pages>6210-6222</pages><issn>1462-2912</issn><eissn>1462-2920</eissn><abstract>Summary
The foliar surface forms one of the largest aboveground habitats on Earth and maintains plant‐fungus relationships that greatly affect ecosystem functioning. Despite many studies with particular plant species, the foliar epiphytic mycobiome has not been studied across a large number of plant species from different taxa. Using high‐throughput sequencing, we assessed epiphytic mycobiomes on leaf surfaces of 592 plant species in a botanical garden. Plants of angiosperms, gymnosperms, and pteridophytes were involved. Plant taxonomy, leaf side, growing environment, and evolutionary relationships were considered. We found that pteridophytes showed the higher fungal species diversity, stronger mutualistic fungal interactions, and a greater percentage of putative pathogens than gymnosperms and angiosperms. Plant taxonomic group, leaf side, and growing environment were significantly associated with the foliar epiphytic mycobiome, but the similarity of the mycobiomes among plants was not directly related to the distance of the host evolutionary tree. Our results provide a general understanding of the foliar fungal mycobiomes from pteridophytes to angiosperms. These findings will facilitate our understanding of foliar fungal epiphytes and their roles in plant communities and ecosystems.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34347355</pmid><doi>10.1111/1462-2920.15703</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-7511</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-2912 |
ispartof | Environmental microbiology, 2021-10, Vol.23 (10), p.6210-6222 |
issn | 1462-2912 1462-2920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2558092709 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Angiosperms Botanical gardens Ecological function Ecosystem Epiphytes Flowers & plants Fungi Fungi - genetics Gymnosperms Herbivores Leaves Mycobiome Pathogens Plant communities Plant species Plants Sequences Species diversity Symbiosis Taxonomy |
title | Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T22%3A13%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross%E2%80%90phytogroup%20assessment%20of%20foliar%20epiphytic%20mycobiomes&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20microbiology&rft.au=Zhu,%20Ting&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=6210&rft.epage=6222&rft.pages=6210-6222&rft.issn=1462-2912&rft.eissn=1462-2920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1462-2920.15703&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2585152499%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2585152499&rft_id=info:pmid/34347355&rfr_iscdi=true |