Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes

Summary The foliar surface forms one of the largest aboveground habitats on Earth and maintains plant‐fungus relationships that greatly affect ecosystem functioning. Despite many studies with particular plant species, the foliar epiphytic mycobiome has not been studied across a large number of plant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental microbiology 2021-10, Vol.23 (10), p.6210-6222
Hauptverfasser: Zhu, Ting, Yao, Jia, Liu, Hao, Zhou, Chen‐Hao, Liu, Yuan‐Zhan, Wang, Zheng‐Wei, Quan, Zhe‐Xue, Li, Bo, Yang, Ji, Huang, Wei‐Chang, Nie, Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6222
container_issue 10
container_start_page 6210
container_title Environmental microbiology
container_volume 23
creator Zhu, Ting
Yao, Jia
Liu, Hao
Zhou, Chen‐Hao
Liu, Yuan‐Zhan
Wang, Zheng‐Wei
Quan, Zhe‐Xue
Li, Bo
Yang, Ji
Huang, Wei‐Chang
Nie, Ming
description Summary The foliar surface forms one of the largest aboveground habitats on Earth and maintains plant‐fungus relationships that greatly affect ecosystem functioning. Despite many studies with particular plant species, the foliar epiphytic mycobiome has not been studied across a large number of plant species from different taxa. Using high‐throughput sequencing, we assessed epiphytic mycobiomes on leaf surfaces of 592 plant species in a botanical garden. Plants of angiosperms, gymnosperms, and pteridophytes were involved. Plant taxonomy, leaf side, growing environment, and evolutionary relationships were considered. We found that pteridophytes showed the higher fungal species diversity, stronger mutualistic fungal interactions, and a greater percentage of putative pathogens than gymnosperms and angiosperms. Plant taxonomic group, leaf side, and growing environment were significantly associated with the foliar epiphytic mycobiome, but the similarity of the mycobiomes among plants was not directly related to the distance of the host evolutionary tree. Our results provide a general understanding of the foliar fungal mycobiomes from pteridophytes to angiosperms. These findings will facilitate our understanding of foliar fungal epiphytes and their roles in plant communities and ecosystems.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1462-2920.15703
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2558092709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2585152499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-c6090b7f9629f0d8cbe01cbee212144a9b256aab0551880fb04490b47c8b00993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFOwzAQhi0EoqUws6FILCyhZ8euY4kFVQUqFbHAbNmuA6mSOsSNUDYegWfkSXCa0oEFD2ef9d0v-0PoHMM1DmuM6YTERJDQMg7JARrubw73Z0wG6MT7FQDmCYdjNEhoQnnC2BDdTGvn_ffnV_XWbtxr7ZoqUt5b70u73kQuizJX5KqObJV3SG6isjVO5660_hQdZarw9my3j9DL3ex5-hAvnu7n09tFbBKOk9hMQIDmmZgQkcEyNdoCDsUSTDClSmjCJkppYAynKWQaKA0DlJtUAwiRjNBVn1vV7r2xfiPL3BtbFGptXeMlYSwFQTh06OUfdOWaeh1eF6iUYUboNnDcU6b7fW0zWdV5qepWYpCdWNmpk51GuRUbJi52uY0u7XLP_5oMAOuBj7yw7X95cvY474N_AFLFgac</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2585152499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zhu, Ting ; Yao, Jia ; Liu, Hao ; Zhou, Chen‐Hao ; Liu, Yuan‐Zhan ; Wang, Zheng‐Wei ; Quan, Zhe‐Xue ; Li, Bo ; Yang, Ji ; Huang, Wei‐Chang ; Nie, Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ting ; Yao, Jia ; Liu, Hao ; Zhou, Chen‐Hao ; Liu, Yuan‐Zhan ; Wang, Zheng‐Wei ; Quan, Zhe‐Xue ; Li, Bo ; Yang, Ji ; Huang, Wei‐Chang ; Nie, Ming</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The foliar surface forms one of the largest aboveground habitats on Earth and maintains plant‐fungus relationships that greatly affect ecosystem functioning. Despite many studies with particular plant species, the foliar epiphytic mycobiome has not been studied across a large number of plant species from different taxa. Using high‐throughput sequencing, we assessed epiphytic mycobiomes on leaf surfaces of 592 plant species in a botanical garden. Plants of angiosperms, gymnosperms, and pteridophytes were involved. Plant taxonomy, leaf side, growing environment, and evolutionary relationships were considered. We found that pteridophytes showed the higher fungal species diversity, stronger mutualistic fungal interactions, and a greater percentage of putative pathogens than gymnosperms and angiosperms. Plant taxonomic group, leaf side, and growing environment were significantly associated with the foliar epiphytic mycobiome, but the similarity of the mycobiomes among plants was not directly related to the distance of the host evolutionary tree. Our results provide a general understanding of the foliar fungal mycobiomes from pteridophytes to angiosperms. These findings will facilitate our understanding of foliar fungal epiphytes and their roles in plant communities and ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-2912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-2920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15703</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34347355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Angiosperms ; Botanical gardens ; Ecological function ; Ecosystem ; Epiphytes ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Fungi ; Fungi - genetics ; Gymnosperms ; Herbivores ; Leaves ; Mycobiome ; Pathogens ; Plant communities ; Plant species ; Plants ; Sequences ; Species diversity ; Symbiosis ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Environmental microbiology, 2021-10, Vol.23 (10), p.6210-6222</ispartof><rights>2021 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-c6090b7f9629f0d8cbe01cbee212144a9b256aab0551880fb04490b47c8b00993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-c6090b7f9629f0d8cbe01cbee212144a9b256aab0551880fb04490b47c8b00993</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6266-7511</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1462-2920.15703$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1462-2920.15703$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34347355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Chen‐Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuan‐Zhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zheng‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Zhe‐Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wei‐Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes</title><title>Environmental microbiology</title><addtitle>Environ Microbiol</addtitle><description>Summary The foliar surface forms one of the largest aboveground habitats on Earth and maintains plant‐fungus relationships that greatly affect ecosystem functioning. Despite many studies with particular plant species, the foliar epiphytic mycobiome has not been studied across a large number of plant species from different taxa. Using high‐throughput sequencing, we assessed epiphytic mycobiomes on leaf surfaces of 592 plant species in a botanical garden. Plants of angiosperms, gymnosperms, and pteridophytes were involved. Plant taxonomy, leaf side, growing environment, and evolutionary relationships were considered. We found that pteridophytes showed the higher fungal species diversity, stronger mutualistic fungal interactions, and a greater percentage of putative pathogens than gymnosperms and angiosperms. Plant taxonomic group, leaf side, and growing environment were significantly associated with the foliar epiphytic mycobiome, but the similarity of the mycobiomes among plants was not directly related to the distance of the host evolutionary tree. Our results provide a general understanding of the foliar fungal mycobiomes from pteridophytes to angiosperms. These findings will facilitate our understanding of foliar fungal epiphytes and their roles in plant communities and ecosystems.</description><subject>Angiosperms</subject><subject>Botanical gardens</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Epiphytes</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fungi - genetics</subject><subject>Gymnosperms</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Mycobiome</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Sequences</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>1462-2912</issn><issn>1462-2920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLFOwzAQhi0EoqUws6FILCyhZ8euY4kFVQUqFbHAbNmuA6mSOsSNUDYegWfkSXCa0oEFD2ef9d0v-0PoHMM1DmuM6YTERJDQMg7JARrubw73Z0wG6MT7FQDmCYdjNEhoQnnC2BDdTGvn_ffnV_XWbtxr7ZoqUt5b70u73kQuizJX5KqObJV3SG6isjVO5660_hQdZarw9my3j9DL3ex5-hAvnu7n09tFbBKOk9hMQIDmmZgQkcEyNdoCDsUSTDClSmjCJkppYAynKWQaKA0DlJtUAwiRjNBVn1vV7r2xfiPL3BtbFGptXeMlYSwFQTh06OUfdOWaeh1eF6iUYUboNnDcU6b7fW0zWdV5qepWYpCdWNmpk51GuRUbJi52uY0u7XLP_5oMAOuBj7yw7X95cvY474N_AFLFgac</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Zhu, Ting</creator><creator>Yao, Jia</creator><creator>Liu, Hao</creator><creator>Zhou, Chen‐Hao</creator><creator>Liu, Yuan‐Zhan</creator><creator>Wang, Zheng‐Wei</creator><creator>Quan, Zhe‐Xue</creator><creator>Li, Bo</creator><creator>Yang, Ji</creator><creator>Huang, Wei‐Chang</creator><creator>Nie, Ming</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-7511</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes</title><author>Zhu, Ting ; Yao, Jia ; Liu, Hao ; Zhou, Chen‐Hao ; Liu, Yuan‐Zhan ; Wang, Zheng‐Wei ; Quan, Zhe‐Xue ; Li, Bo ; Yang, Ji ; Huang, Wei‐Chang ; Nie, Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-c6090b7f9629f0d8cbe01cbee212144a9b256aab0551880fb04490b47c8b00993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Angiosperms</topic><topic>Botanical gardens</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Epiphytes</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fungi - genetics</topic><topic>Gymnosperms</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Mycobiome</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Sequences</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Chen‐Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuan‐Zhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zheng‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Zhe‐Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wei‐Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Ting</au><au>Yao, Jia</au><au>Liu, Hao</au><au>Zhou, Chen‐Hao</au><au>Liu, Yuan‐Zhan</au><au>Wang, Zheng‐Wei</au><au>Quan, Zhe‐Xue</au><au>Li, Bo</au><au>Yang, Ji</au><au>Huang, Wei‐Chang</au><au>Nie, Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes</atitle><jtitle>Environmental microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>6210</spage><epage>6222</epage><pages>6210-6222</pages><issn>1462-2912</issn><eissn>1462-2920</eissn><abstract>Summary The foliar surface forms one of the largest aboveground habitats on Earth and maintains plant‐fungus relationships that greatly affect ecosystem functioning. Despite many studies with particular plant species, the foliar epiphytic mycobiome has not been studied across a large number of plant species from different taxa. Using high‐throughput sequencing, we assessed epiphytic mycobiomes on leaf surfaces of 592 plant species in a botanical garden. Plants of angiosperms, gymnosperms, and pteridophytes were involved. Plant taxonomy, leaf side, growing environment, and evolutionary relationships were considered. We found that pteridophytes showed the higher fungal species diversity, stronger mutualistic fungal interactions, and a greater percentage of putative pathogens than gymnosperms and angiosperms. Plant taxonomic group, leaf side, and growing environment were significantly associated with the foliar epiphytic mycobiome, but the similarity of the mycobiomes among plants was not directly related to the distance of the host evolutionary tree. Our results provide a general understanding of the foliar fungal mycobiomes from pteridophytes to angiosperms. These findings will facilitate our understanding of foliar fungal epiphytes and their roles in plant communities and ecosystems.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34347355</pmid><doi>10.1111/1462-2920.15703</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-7511</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-2912
ispartof Environmental microbiology, 2021-10, Vol.23 (10), p.6210-6222
issn 1462-2912
1462-2920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2558092709
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Angiosperms
Botanical gardens
Ecological function
Ecosystem
Epiphytes
Flowers & plants
Fungi
Fungi - genetics
Gymnosperms
Herbivores
Leaves
Mycobiome
Pathogens
Plant communities
Plant species
Plants
Sequences
Species diversity
Symbiosis
Taxonomy
title Cross‐phytogroup assessment of foliar epiphytic mycobiomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T22%3A13%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross%E2%80%90phytogroup%20assessment%20of%20foliar%20epiphytic%20mycobiomes&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20microbiology&rft.au=Zhu,%20Ting&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=6210&rft.epage=6222&rft.pages=6210-6222&rft.issn=1462-2912&rft.eissn=1462-2920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1462-2920.15703&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2585152499%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2585152499&rft_id=info:pmid/34347355&rfr_iscdi=true