A comparison of techniques for extracting emissivity information from thermal infrared data for geologic studies

This article evaluates three techniques developed to extract emissivity information from multispectral thermal infrared data. The techniques are the assumed Channel 6 emittance model, thermal log residuals, and alpha residuals. These techniques were applied to calibrated, atmospherically corrected t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing of environment 1992-11, Vol.42 (2), p.123-135
Hauptverfasser: Hook, Simon J, Gabell, A.R, Green, A.A, Kealy, P.S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 2
container_start_page 123
container_title Remote sensing of environment
container_volume 42
creator Hook, Simon J
Gabell, A.R
Green, A.A
Kealy, P.S
description This article evaluates three techniques developed to extract emissivity information from multispectral thermal infrared data. The techniques are the assumed Channel 6 emittance model, thermal log residuals, and alpha residuals. These techniques were applied to calibrated, atmospherically corrected thermal infrared multispectral scanner (TIMS) data acquired over Cuprite, Nevada in September 1990. Results indicate that the two new techniques (thermal log residuals and alpha residuals) provide two distinct advantages over the assumed Channel 6 emittance model. First, they permit emissivity information to be derived from all six TIMS channels. The assumed Channel 6 emittance model only permits emissivity values to be derived from five of the six TIMS channels. Second, both techniques are less susceptible to noise than the assumed Channel 6 emittance model. The disadvantage of both techniques is that laboratory data must be converted to thermal log residuals or alpha residuals to facilitate comparison with similarly processed image data. An additional advantage of the alpha residual technique is that the processed data are scene-independent unlike those obtained with the other techniques.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90096-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25579706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0034425792900963</els_id><sourcerecordid>25579706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-bcd7016d05c5e7de4c319beac079f057676ee06a9bc5fdbb94926f6959f538e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFr3DAUhEVpoZu0_yAHnUpzcPpkW9a-SyGEpCkEemnPQpaeNiq2tZW0IfvvK2dDjz2JxzczaIaxCwFXAsTwBaDrm76V6jO2lwiAQ9O9YRuxVdiAgv4t2_yTvGdnOf8GEHKrxIbtr7mN896kkOPCo-eF7OMS_hwocx8Tp-eSjC1h2XGaQ87hKZQjD0tlsymhenyKMy-PVO9pBckkctyZYl4CdhSnuAuW53JwgfIH9s6bKdPH1_ec_bq7_Xlz3zz8-Pb95vqhMZ3C0ozWqVrNgbSSlKPedgJHMhYUepBqUAMRDAZHK70bR-yxHfyAEr3stjR05-zTKXef4tqm6Pp9S9NkFoqHrFspFSpYhf1JaFPMOZHX-xRmk45agF7n1et2et1OY6tf5tVdtV2cbIvJRi8lZS0Qu6oFbEXFX0-YasenQElnG2ix5EIiW7SL4f_5fwF_4IzM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>25579706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of techniques for extracting emissivity information from thermal infrared data for geologic studies</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Hook, Simon J ; Gabell, A.R ; Green, A.A ; Kealy, P.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Hook, Simon J ; Gabell, A.R ; Green, A.A ; Kealy, P.S</creatorcontrib><description>This article evaluates three techniques developed to extract emissivity information from multispectral thermal infrared data. The techniques are the assumed Channel 6 emittance model, thermal log residuals, and alpha residuals. These techniques were applied to calibrated, atmospherically corrected thermal infrared multispectral scanner (TIMS) data acquired over Cuprite, Nevada in September 1990. Results indicate that the two new techniques (thermal log residuals and alpha residuals) provide two distinct advantages over the assumed Channel 6 emittance model. First, they permit emissivity information to be derived from all six TIMS channels. The assumed Channel 6 emittance model only permits emissivity values to be derived from five of the six TIMS channels. Second, both techniques are less susceptible to noise than the assumed Channel 6 emittance model. The disadvantage of both techniques is that laboratory data must be converted to thermal log residuals or alpha residuals to facilitate comparison with similarly processed image data. An additional advantage of the alpha residual technique is that the processed data are scene-independent unlike those obtained with the other techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90096-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Legacy CDMS: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Earth Resources And Remote Sensing</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 1992-11, Vol.42 (2), p.123-135</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-bcd7016d05c5e7de4c319beac079f057676ee06a9bc5fdbb94926f6959f538e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-bcd7016d05c5e7de4c319beac079f057676ee06a9bc5fdbb94926f6959f538e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0034425792900963$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hook, Simon J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabell, A.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kealy, P.S</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of techniques for extracting emissivity information from thermal infrared data for geologic studies</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>This article evaluates three techniques developed to extract emissivity information from multispectral thermal infrared data. The techniques are the assumed Channel 6 emittance model, thermal log residuals, and alpha residuals. These techniques were applied to calibrated, atmospherically corrected thermal infrared multispectral scanner (TIMS) data acquired over Cuprite, Nevada in September 1990. Results indicate that the two new techniques (thermal log residuals and alpha residuals) provide two distinct advantages over the assumed Channel 6 emittance model. First, they permit emissivity information to be derived from all six TIMS channels. The assumed Channel 6 emittance model only permits emissivity values to be derived from five of the six TIMS channels. Second, both techniques are less susceptible to noise than the assumed Channel 6 emittance model. The disadvantage of both techniques is that laboratory data must be converted to thermal log residuals or alpha residuals to facilitate comparison with similarly processed image data. An additional advantage of the alpha residual technique is that the processed data are scene-independent unlike those obtained with the other techniques.</description><subject>Earth Resources And Remote Sensing</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFr3DAUhEVpoZu0_yAHnUpzcPpkW9a-SyGEpCkEemnPQpaeNiq2tZW0IfvvK2dDjz2JxzczaIaxCwFXAsTwBaDrm76V6jO2lwiAQ9O9YRuxVdiAgv4t2_yTvGdnOf8GEHKrxIbtr7mN896kkOPCo-eF7OMS_hwocx8Tp-eSjC1h2XGaQ87hKZQjD0tlsymhenyKMy-PVO9pBckkctyZYl4CdhSnuAuW53JwgfIH9s6bKdPH1_ec_bq7_Xlz3zz8-Pb95vqhMZ3C0ozWqVrNgbSSlKPedgJHMhYUepBqUAMRDAZHK70bR-yxHfyAEr3stjR05-zTKXef4tqm6Pp9S9NkFoqHrFspFSpYhf1JaFPMOZHX-xRmk45agF7n1et2et1OY6tf5tVdtV2cbIvJRi8lZS0Qu6oFbEXFX0-YasenQElnG2ix5EIiW7SL4f_5fwF_4IzM</recordid><startdate>19921101</startdate><enddate>19921101</enddate><creator>Hook, Simon J</creator><creator>Gabell, A.R</creator><creator>Green, A.A</creator><creator>Kealy, P.S</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921101</creationdate><title>A comparison of techniques for extracting emissivity information from thermal infrared data for geologic studies</title><author>Hook, Simon J ; Gabell, A.R ; Green, A.A ; Kealy, P.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-bcd7016d05c5e7de4c319beac079f057676ee06a9bc5fdbb94926f6959f538e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Earth Resources And Remote Sensing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hook, Simon J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabell, A.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kealy, P.S</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hook, Simon J</au><au>Gabell, A.R</au><au>Green, A.A</au><au>Kealy, P.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of techniques for extracting emissivity information from thermal infrared data for geologic studies</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>1992-11-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>123-135</pages><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><abstract>This article evaluates three techniques developed to extract emissivity information from multispectral thermal infrared data. The techniques are the assumed Channel 6 emittance model, thermal log residuals, and alpha residuals. These techniques were applied to calibrated, atmospherically corrected thermal infrared multispectral scanner (TIMS) data acquired over Cuprite, Nevada in September 1990. Results indicate that the two new techniques (thermal log residuals and alpha residuals) provide two distinct advantages over the assumed Channel 6 emittance model. First, they permit emissivity information to be derived from all six TIMS channels. The assumed Channel 6 emittance model only permits emissivity values to be derived from five of the six TIMS channels. Second, both techniques are less susceptible to noise than the assumed Channel 6 emittance model. The disadvantage of both techniques is that laboratory data must be converted to thermal log residuals or alpha residuals to facilitate comparison with similarly processed image data. An additional advantage of the alpha residual technique is that the processed data are scene-independent unlike those obtained with the other techniques.</abstract><cop>Legacy CDMS</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0034-4257(92)90096-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-4257
ispartof Remote sensing of environment, 1992-11, Vol.42 (2), p.123-135
issn 0034-4257
1879-0704
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25579706
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Earth Resources And Remote Sensing
title A comparison of techniques for extracting emissivity information from thermal infrared data for geologic studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A24%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20techniques%20for%20extracting%20emissivity%20information%20from%20thermal%20infrared%20data%20for%20geologic%20studies&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Hook,%20Simon%20J&rft.date=1992-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=123-135&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0034-4257(92)90096-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E25579706%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=25579706&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0034425792900963&rfr_iscdi=true