A review on pesticides in flower production: A push to reduce human exposure and environmental contamination

In several countries, flower import regulations are restricted to food security, by establishing maximum residue limits (MRL) for pesticides in flower-based food products and biosafety, in order to limit the circulation of vectors, pests and exotic species across borders. In this context, the lack o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental pollution (1987) 2021-11, Vol.289, p.117817-117817, Article 117817
Hauptverfasser: Pereira, Patrícia C.G., Parente, Cláudio E.T., Carvalho, Gabriel O., Torres, João P.M., Meire, Rodrigo O., Dorneles, Paulo R., Malm, Olaf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 117817
container_issue
container_start_page 117817
container_title Environmental pollution (1987)
container_volume 289
creator Pereira, Patrícia C.G.
Parente, Cláudio E.T.
Carvalho, Gabriel O.
Torres, João P.M.
Meire, Rodrigo O.
Dorneles, Paulo R.
Malm, Olaf
description In several countries, flower import regulations are restricted to food security, by establishing maximum residue limits (MRL) for pesticides in flower-based food products and biosafety, in order to limit the circulation of vectors, pests and exotic species across borders. In this context, the lack of limits on pesticides in flower-products for ornamental purposes can influence the pesticide overuse in production areas, as well as the transfer of contaminated products between countries. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to discuss possible adverse effects on human and environmental health of pesticides used in floriculture, evaluating regulations on the use of these pesticides in the main importing and flower-producing countries. This review included 92 documents. The use of 201 compounds was identified by interviews and analytical measurements. Among them, 93 are banned by the European Union (EU), although 46.3 % of these compounds have been identified in samples from European countries. Latin American countries have a large number of scientific publications on pesticides in flower production (n = 51), while the EU and China have less studies (n = 24) and the United States and Japan have no studies. Regarding adverse health effects, poorer neurobehavioral development, reproductive disorders, congenital malformations and genotoxicity have been reported for residents of flower production areas and workers throughout the flower production cycle. Studies including water samples show overuse of pesticides, while environmental impacts are related to water and air contamination, soil degradation and adverse effects on the reproduction and development of non-target organisms. This review points out that the absence of MRL for non-edible flowers can be crucial for the trade of contaminated products across borders, including pesticides banned in importing countries. Furthermore, setting limits on flowers could reduce the use of pesticides in producing countries. [Display omitted] •Latin America has a high scientific production on pesticides in flower production.•Two hundred pesticides were identified by interviews and analytical measurements.•Importing countries do not set limits on pesticides in ornamental flowers.•Pesticide limits in flowers should reduce human exposure in exporting countries.•Cross-border trade of contaminated flower products deserves special attention. Setting pesticide limits for ornamental flowers can reduce human exposure and environm
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117817
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557539249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749121013993</els_id><sourcerecordid>2557539249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-7ed7b446f32eb1eaed0cc665300aff3a54fbddd906fa70a9077dfb5dc0dbf5b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxdZuumYNGkzdSEMgy8YcKPrkCY3TIY2qUnr49-boa5dHbjcczjnQ-iakhUltL49rMB_DqFblaSkK0rFmooTtKBrwYqal_wULUhZN4XgDT1HFykdCCGcMbZA3QZH-HTwhYPHA6TRaWcgYeex7cIXRDzEYCY9uuDv8AYPU9rjMWRTPgLeT73yGL6HkKYIWHmDcxUXg-_Bj6rDOmTpnVfHgEt0ZlWX4OpPl-j98eFt-1zsXp9etptdoRlrxkKAES3ntWUltBQUGKJ1XVeMEGUtUxW3rTGmIbVVgqiGCGFsWxlNTGurlrEluplzc_ePKY-SvUsauk55CFOSZVWJijUlb_Irn191DClFsHKIrlfxR1Iij3DlQc5w5RGunOFm2_1sgzwj44syaQdeg3ER9ChNcP8H_ALeEog-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557539249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review on pesticides in flower production: A push to reduce human exposure and environmental contamination</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pereira, Patrícia C.G. ; Parente, Cláudio E.T. ; Carvalho, Gabriel O. ; Torres, João P.M. ; Meire, Rodrigo O. ; Dorneles, Paulo R. ; Malm, Olaf</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Patrícia C.G. ; Parente, Cláudio E.T. ; Carvalho, Gabriel O. ; Torres, João P.M. ; Meire, Rodrigo O. ; Dorneles, Paulo R. ; Malm, Olaf</creatorcontrib><description>In several countries, flower import regulations are restricted to food security, by establishing maximum residue limits (MRL) for pesticides in flower-based food products and biosafety, in order to limit the circulation of vectors, pests and exotic species across borders. In this context, the lack of limits on pesticides in flower-products for ornamental purposes can influence the pesticide overuse in production areas, as well as the transfer of contaminated products between countries. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to discuss possible adverse effects on human and environmental health of pesticides used in floriculture, evaluating regulations on the use of these pesticides in the main importing and flower-producing countries. This review included 92 documents. The use of 201 compounds was identified by interviews and analytical measurements. Among them, 93 are banned by the European Union (EU), although 46.3 % of these compounds have been identified in samples from European countries. Latin American countries have a large number of scientific publications on pesticides in flower production (n = 51), while the EU and China have less studies (n = 24) and the United States and Japan have no studies. Regarding adverse health effects, poorer neurobehavioral development, reproductive disorders, congenital malformations and genotoxicity have been reported for residents of flower production areas and workers throughout the flower production cycle. Studies including water samples show overuse of pesticides, while environmental impacts are related to water and air contamination, soil degradation and adverse effects on the reproduction and development of non-target organisms. This review points out that the absence of MRL for non-edible flowers can be crucial for the trade of contaminated products across borders, including pesticides banned in importing countries. Furthermore, setting limits on flowers could reduce the use of pesticides in producing countries. [Display omitted] •Latin America has a high scientific production on pesticides in flower production.•Two hundred pesticides were identified by interviews and analytical measurements.•Importing countries do not set limits on pesticides in ornamental flowers.•Pesticide limits in flowers should reduce human exposure in exporting countries.•Cross-border trade of contaminated flower products deserves special attention. Setting pesticide limits for ornamental flowers can reduce human exposure and environmental contamination in producing countries and restrict cross-border trade in contaminated products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117817</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cut flowers ; Environmental pollution ; Fungicides ; Human health risks ; Insecticides</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2021-11, Vol.289, p.117817-117817, Article 117817</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-7ed7b446f32eb1eaed0cc665300aff3a54fbddd906fa70a9077dfb5dc0dbf5b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-7ed7b446f32eb1eaed0cc665300aff3a54fbddd906fa70a9077dfb5dc0dbf5b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9809-2772 ; 0000-0002-4977-1071 ; 0000-0002-4116-7160</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749121013993$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Patrícia C.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parente, Cláudio E.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Gabriel O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, João P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meire, Rodrigo O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorneles, Paulo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malm, Olaf</creatorcontrib><title>A review on pesticides in flower production: A push to reduce human exposure and environmental contamination</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><description>In several countries, flower import regulations are restricted to food security, by establishing maximum residue limits (MRL) for pesticides in flower-based food products and biosafety, in order to limit the circulation of vectors, pests and exotic species across borders. In this context, the lack of limits on pesticides in flower-products for ornamental purposes can influence the pesticide overuse in production areas, as well as the transfer of contaminated products between countries. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to discuss possible adverse effects on human and environmental health of pesticides used in floriculture, evaluating regulations on the use of these pesticides in the main importing and flower-producing countries. This review included 92 documents. The use of 201 compounds was identified by interviews and analytical measurements. Among them, 93 are banned by the European Union (EU), although 46.3 % of these compounds have been identified in samples from European countries. Latin American countries have a large number of scientific publications on pesticides in flower production (n = 51), while the EU and China have less studies (n = 24) and the United States and Japan have no studies. Regarding adverse health effects, poorer neurobehavioral development, reproductive disorders, congenital malformations and genotoxicity have been reported for residents of flower production areas and workers throughout the flower production cycle. Studies including water samples show overuse of pesticides, while environmental impacts are related to water and air contamination, soil degradation and adverse effects on the reproduction and development of non-target organisms. This review points out that the absence of MRL for non-edible flowers can be crucial for the trade of contaminated products across borders, including pesticides banned in importing countries. Furthermore, setting limits on flowers could reduce the use of pesticides in producing countries. [Display omitted] •Latin America has a high scientific production on pesticides in flower production.•Two hundred pesticides were identified by interviews and analytical measurements.•Importing countries do not set limits on pesticides in ornamental flowers.•Pesticide limits in flowers should reduce human exposure in exporting countries.•Cross-border trade of contaminated flower products deserves special attention. Setting pesticide limits for ornamental flowers can reduce human exposure and environmental contamination in producing countries and restrict cross-border trade in contaminated products.</description><subject>Cut flowers</subject><subject>Environmental pollution</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Human health risks</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxdZuumYNGkzdSEMgy8YcKPrkCY3TIY2qUnr49-boa5dHbjcczjnQ-iakhUltL49rMB_DqFblaSkK0rFmooTtKBrwYqal_wULUhZN4XgDT1HFykdCCGcMbZA3QZH-HTwhYPHA6TRaWcgYeex7cIXRDzEYCY9uuDv8AYPU9rjMWRTPgLeT73yGL6HkKYIWHmDcxUXg-_Bj6rDOmTpnVfHgEt0ZlWX4OpPl-j98eFt-1zsXp9etptdoRlrxkKAES3ntWUltBQUGKJ1XVeMEGUtUxW3rTGmIbVVgqiGCGFsWxlNTGurlrEluplzc_ePKY-SvUsauk55CFOSZVWJijUlb_Irn191DClFsHKIrlfxR1Iij3DlQc5w5RGunOFm2_1sgzwj44syaQdeg3ER9ChNcP8H_ALeEog-</recordid><startdate>20211115</startdate><enddate>20211115</enddate><creator>Pereira, Patrícia C.G.</creator><creator>Parente, Cláudio E.T.</creator><creator>Carvalho, Gabriel O.</creator><creator>Torres, João P.M.</creator><creator>Meire, Rodrigo O.</creator><creator>Dorneles, Paulo R.</creator><creator>Malm, Olaf</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9809-2772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-1071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4116-7160</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211115</creationdate><title>A review on pesticides in flower production: A push to reduce human exposure and environmental contamination</title><author>Pereira, Patrícia C.G. ; Parente, Cláudio E.T. ; Carvalho, Gabriel O. ; Torres, João P.M. ; Meire, Rodrigo O. ; Dorneles, Paulo R. ; Malm, Olaf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-7ed7b446f32eb1eaed0cc665300aff3a54fbddd906fa70a9077dfb5dc0dbf5b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cut flowers</topic><topic>Environmental pollution</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Human health risks</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Patrícia C.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parente, Cláudio E.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Gabriel O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, João P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meire, Rodrigo O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorneles, Paulo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malm, Olaf</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira, Patrícia C.G.</au><au>Parente, Cláudio E.T.</au><au>Carvalho, Gabriel O.</au><au>Torres, João P.M.</au><au>Meire, Rodrigo O.</au><au>Dorneles, Paulo R.</au><au>Malm, Olaf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review on pesticides in flower production: A push to reduce human exposure and environmental contamination</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><date>2021-11-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>289</volume><spage>117817</spage><epage>117817</epage><pages>117817-117817</pages><artnum>117817</artnum><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><abstract>In several countries, flower import regulations are restricted to food security, by establishing maximum residue limits (MRL) for pesticides in flower-based food products and biosafety, in order to limit the circulation of vectors, pests and exotic species across borders. In this context, the lack of limits on pesticides in flower-products for ornamental purposes can influence the pesticide overuse in production areas, as well as the transfer of contaminated products between countries. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to discuss possible adverse effects on human and environmental health of pesticides used in floriculture, evaluating regulations on the use of these pesticides in the main importing and flower-producing countries. This review included 92 documents. The use of 201 compounds was identified by interviews and analytical measurements. Among them, 93 are banned by the European Union (EU), although 46.3 % of these compounds have been identified in samples from European countries. Latin American countries have a large number of scientific publications on pesticides in flower production (n = 51), while the EU and China have less studies (n = 24) and the United States and Japan have no studies. Regarding adverse health effects, poorer neurobehavioral development, reproductive disorders, congenital malformations and genotoxicity have been reported for residents of flower production areas and workers throughout the flower production cycle. Studies including water samples show overuse of pesticides, while environmental impacts are related to water and air contamination, soil degradation and adverse effects on the reproduction and development of non-target organisms. This review points out that the absence of MRL for non-edible flowers can be crucial for the trade of contaminated products across borders, including pesticides banned in importing countries. Furthermore, setting limits on flowers could reduce the use of pesticides in producing countries. [Display omitted] •Latin America has a high scientific production on pesticides in flower production.•Two hundred pesticides were identified by interviews and analytical measurements.•Importing countries do not set limits on pesticides in ornamental flowers.•Pesticide limits in flowers should reduce human exposure in exporting countries.•Cross-border trade of contaminated flower products deserves special attention. Setting pesticide limits for ornamental flowers can reduce human exposure and environmental contamination in producing countries and restrict cross-border trade in contaminated products.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117817</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9809-2772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-1071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4116-7160</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-7491
ispartof Environmental pollution (1987), 2021-11, Vol.289, p.117817-117817, Article 117817
issn 0269-7491
1873-6424
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557539249
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cut flowers
Environmental pollution
Fungicides
Human health risks
Insecticides
title A review on pesticides in flower production: A push to reduce human exposure and environmental contamination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A20%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20on%20pesticides%20in%20flower%20production:%20A%20push%20to%20reduce%20human%20exposure%20and%20environmental%20contamination&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Pereira,%20Patr%C3%ADcia%20C.G.&rft.date=2021-11-15&rft.volume=289&rft.spage=117817&rft.epage=117817&rft.pages=117817-117817&rft.artnum=117817&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117817&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557539249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557539249&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0269749121013993&rfr_iscdi=true