Landscape‐level variation in Bt crops predict Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance in cotton agroecosystems
BACKGROUND Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) damage to Bt cotton and maize has increased as a result of widespread Bt resistance across the USA Cotton Belt. Our objective was to link Bt crop production patterns to cotton damage through a series of spatial and temporal surveys of commercial fields to understa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Pest management science 2021-12, Vol.77 (12), p.5454-5462 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 5462 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 5454 |
| container_title | Pest management science |
| container_volume | 77 |
| creator | Dorman, Seth J Hopperstad, Kristen A Reich, Brian J Majumder, Suman Kennedy, George Reisig, Dominic D Greene, Jeremy K Reay‐Jones, Francis PF Collins, Guy Bacheler, Jack S Huseth, Anders S |
| description | BACKGROUND
Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) damage to Bt cotton and maize has increased as a result of widespread Bt resistance across the USA Cotton Belt. Our objective was to link Bt crop production patterns to cotton damage through a series of spatial and temporal surveys of commercial fields to understand how Bt crop production relates to greater than expected H. zea damage to Bt cotton. To do this, we assembled longitudinal cotton damage data that spanned the Bt adoption period, collected cotton damage data since Bt resistance has been detected, and estimated local population susceptibility using replicated on‐farm studies that included all Bt pyramids marketed in cotton.
RESULTS
Significant year effects of H. zea damage frequency in commercial cotton were observed throughout the Bt adoption period, with a recent damage increase after 2012. Landscape‐level Bt crop production intensity over time was positively associated with the risk of H. zea damage in two‐ and three‐toxin pyramided Bt cotton. Helicoverpa zea damage also varied across Bt toxin types in spatially replicated on‐farm studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Landscape‐level predictors of H. zea damage in Bt cotton can be used to identify heightened Bt resistance risk areas and serves as a model to understand factors that drive pest resistance evolution to Bt toxins in the southeastern United States. These results provide a framework for more effective insect resistance management strategies to be used in combination with conventional pest management practices that improve Bt trait durability while minimizing the environmental footprint of row crop agriculture. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Areawide monitoring of Helicoverpa zea damage in Bt cotton (A) was conducted from 2018 to 2019 to create a geospatial risk model (B) based on landscape‐level Bt crop intensity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ps.6585 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557537001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2595330338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2525-c9f76bdd7956fbcc6d34cc1ef48f42ec994e8b6f9386f599e62ad97f85799dc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdFKwzAYhYsoOKf4CgFvJrKZNk3b3zsd6oShggrelSz5KxldE5N0MvHCR_AZfRI7Jl54dc7Fx8eBE0WHMR3FlCan1o8yXvCtqBfzJBumAMX2Xy-ed6M97-eUUgBIetHHVDTKS2Hx-_OrxiXWZCmcFkGbhuiGXAQinbGeWIdKy0AmWGtpluisIO8oyGCKVitjAzpxRm6NDK1WAo-JQ699EI3EtUeaEDqjeHEGpfErH3Dh96OdStQeD36zHz1dXT6OJ8Pp3fXN-Hw6tAlP-FBClWczpXLgWTWTMlMslTLGKi2qNEEJkGIxyypgRVZxAMwSoSCvCp4DKAmsHw02XuvMa4s-lAvtJda1aNC0vkw4zznLKY079OgfOjeta7p1HQWcMcpY0VEnG-pN17gqrdML4VZlTMv1BaX15fqC8v5hHewHYWN9yQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2595330338</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Landscape‐level variation in Bt crops predict Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance in cotton agroecosystems</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Dorman, Seth J ; Hopperstad, Kristen A ; Reich, Brian J ; Majumder, Suman ; Kennedy, George ; Reisig, Dominic D ; Greene, Jeremy K ; Reay‐Jones, Francis PF ; Collins, Guy ; Bacheler, Jack S ; Huseth, Anders S</creator><creatorcontrib>Dorman, Seth J ; Hopperstad, Kristen A ; Reich, Brian J ; Majumder, Suman ; Kennedy, George ; Reisig, Dominic D ; Greene, Jeremy K ; Reay‐Jones, Francis PF ; Collins, Guy ; Bacheler, Jack S ; Huseth, Anders S</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) damage to Bt cotton and maize has increased as a result of widespread Bt resistance across the USA Cotton Belt. Our objective was to link Bt crop production patterns to cotton damage through a series of spatial and temporal surveys of commercial fields to understand how Bt crop production relates to greater than expected H. zea damage to Bt cotton. To do this, we assembled longitudinal cotton damage data that spanned the Bt adoption period, collected cotton damage data since Bt resistance has been detected, and estimated local population susceptibility using replicated on‐farm studies that included all Bt pyramids marketed in cotton.
RESULTS
Significant year effects of H. zea damage frequency in commercial cotton were observed throughout the Bt adoption period, with a recent damage increase after 2012. Landscape‐level Bt crop production intensity over time was positively associated with the risk of H. zea damage in two‐ and three‐toxin pyramided Bt cotton. Helicoverpa zea damage also varied across Bt toxin types in spatially replicated on‐farm studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Landscape‐level predictors of H. zea damage in Bt cotton can be used to identify heightened Bt resistance risk areas and serves as a model to understand factors that drive pest resistance evolution to Bt toxins in the southeastern United States. These results provide a framework for more effective insect resistance management strategies to be used in combination with conventional pest management practices that improve Bt trait durability while minimizing the environmental footprint of row crop agriculture. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Areawide monitoring of Helicoverpa zea damage in Bt cotton (A) was conducted from 2018 to 2019 to create a geospatial risk model (B) based on landscape‐level Bt crop intensity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ps.6585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; bollworm ; Bt resistance ; Cotton ; crop intensity ; Crop production ; Crops ; Damage patterns ; Ecological footprint ; Farms ; Helicoverpa zea ; Insects ; Landscape ; Local population ; Pest control ; Pest resistance ; Pests ; Public domain ; Pyramids ; Resistance factors ; risk assessment ; Toxins</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2021-12, Vol.77 (12), p.5454-5462</ispartof><rights>2021 Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-5273-8555 ; 0000-0001-7013-2795 ; 0000-0002-9979-5813</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fps.6585$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fps.6585$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dorman, Seth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopperstad, Kristen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reich, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majumder, Suman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reisig, Dominic D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Jeremy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reay‐Jones, Francis PF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacheler, Jack S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huseth, Anders S</creatorcontrib><title>Landscape‐level variation in Bt crops predict Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance in cotton agroecosystems</title><title>Pest management science</title><description>BACKGROUND
Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) damage to Bt cotton and maize has increased as a result of widespread Bt resistance across the USA Cotton Belt. Our objective was to link Bt crop production patterns to cotton damage through a series of spatial and temporal surveys of commercial fields to understand how Bt crop production relates to greater than expected H. zea damage to Bt cotton. To do this, we assembled longitudinal cotton damage data that spanned the Bt adoption period, collected cotton damage data since Bt resistance has been detected, and estimated local population susceptibility using replicated on‐farm studies that included all Bt pyramids marketed in cotton.
RESULTS
Significant year effects of H. zea damage frequency in commercial cotton were observed throughout the Bt adoption period, with a recent damage increase after 2012. Landscape‐level Bt crop production intensity over time was positively associated with the risk of H. zea damage in two‐ and three‐toxin pyramided Bt cotton. Helicoverpa zea damage also varied across Bt toxin types in spatially replicated on‐farm studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Landscape‐level predictors of H. zea damage in Bt cotton can be used to identify heightened Bt resistance risk areas and serves as a model to understand factors that drive pest resistance evolution to Bt toxins in the southeastern United States. These results provide a framework for more effective insect resistance management strategies to be used in combination with conventional pest management practices that improve Bt trait durability while minimizing the environmental footprint of row crop agriculture. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Areawide monitoring of Helicoverpa zea damage in Bt cotton (A) was conducted from 2018 to 2019 to create a geospatial risk model (B) based on landscape‐level Bt crop intensity.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>bollworm</subject><subject>Bt resistance</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>crop intensity</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Damage patterns</subject><subject>Ecological footprint</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Helicoverpa zea</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Local population</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pest resistance</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Public domain</subject><subject>Pyramids</subject><subject>Resistance factors</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkdFKwzAYhYsoOKf4CgFvJrKZNk3b3zsd6oShggrelSz5KxldE5N0MvHCR_AZfRI7Jl54dc7Fx8eBE0WHMR3FlCan1o8yXvCtqBfzJBumAMX2Xy-ed6M97-eUUgBIetHHVDTKS2Hx-_OrxiXWZCmcFkGbhuiGXAQinbGeWIdKy0AmWGtpluisIO8oyGCKVitjAzpxRm6NDK1WAo-JQ699EI3EtUeaEDqjeHEGpfErH3Dh96OdStQeD36zHz1dXT6OJ8Pp3fXN-Hw6tAlP-FBClWczpXLgWTWTMlMslTLGKi2qNEEJkGIxyypgRVZxAMwSoSCvCp4DKAmsHw02XuvMa4s-lAvtJda1aNC0vkw4zznLKY079OgfOjeta7p1HQWcMcpY0VEnG-pN17gqrdML4VZlTMv1BaX15fqC8v5hHewHYWN9yQ</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Dorman, Seth J</creator><creator>Hopperstad, Kristen A</creator><creator>Reich, Brian J</creator><creator>Majumder, Suman</creator><creator>Kennedy, George</creator><creator>Reisig, Dominic D</creator><creator>Greene, Jeremy K</creator><creator>Reay‐Jones, Francis PF</creator><creator>Collins, Guy</creator><creator>Bacheler, Jack S</creator><creator>Huseth, Anders S</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-8555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7013-2795</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9979-5813</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Landscape‐level variation in Bt crops predict Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance in cotton agroecosystems</title><author>Dorman, Seth J ; Hopperstad, Kristen A ; Reich, Brian J ; Majumder, Suman ; Kennedy, George ; Reisig, Dominic D ; Greene, Jeremy K ; Reay‐Jones, Francis PF ; Collins, Guy ; Bacheler, Jack S ; Huseth, Anders S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2525-c9f76bdd7956fbcc6d34cc1ef48f42ec994e8b6f9386f599e62ad97f85799dc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>bollworm</topic><topic>Bt resistance</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>crop intensity</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Damage patterns</topic><topic>Ecological footprint</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Helicoverpa zea</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Local population</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pest resistance</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Public domain</topic><topic>Pyramids</topic><topic>Resistance factors</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dorman, Seth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopperstad, Kristen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reich, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majumder, Suman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reisig, Dominic D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Jeremy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reay‐Jones, Francis PF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacheler, Jack S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huseth, Anders S</creatorcontrib><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dorman, Seth J</au><au>Hopperstad, Kristen A</au><au>Reich, Brian J</au><au>Majumder, Suman</au><au>Kennedy, George</au><au>Reisig, Dominic D</au><au>Greene, Jeremy K</au><au>Reay‐Jones, Francis PF</au><au>Collins, Guy</au><au>Bacheler, Jack S</au><au>Huseth, Anders S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Landscape‐level variation in Bt crops predict Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance in cotton agroecosystems</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5454</spage><epage>5462</epage><pages>5454-5462</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND
Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) damage to Bt cotton and maize has increased as a result of widespread Bt resistance across the USA Cotton Belt. Our objective was to link Bt crop production patterns to cotton damage through a series of spatial and temporal surveys of commercial fields to understand how Bt crop production relates to greater than expected H. zea damage to Bt cotton. To do this, we assembled longitudinal cotton damage data that spanned the Bt adoption period, collected cotton damage data since Bt resistance has been detected, and estimated local population susceptibility using replicated on‐farm studies that included all Bt pyramids marketed in cotton.
RESULTS
Significant year effects of H. zea damage frequency in commercial cotton were observed throughout the Bt adoption period, with a recent damage increase after 2012. Landscape‐level Bt crop production intensity over time was positively associated with the risk of H. zea damage in two‐ and three‐toxin pyramided Bt cotton. Helicoverpa zea damage also varied across Bt toxin types in spatially replicated on‐farm studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Landscape‐level predictors of H. zea damage in Bt cotton can be used to identify heightened Bt resistance risk areas and serves as a model to understand factors that drive pest resistance evolution to Bt toxins in the southeastern United States. These results provide a framework for more effective insect resistance management strategies to be used in combination with conventional pest management practices that improve Bt trait durability while minimizing the environmental footprint of row crop agriculture. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Areawide monitoring of Helicoverpa zea damage in Bt cotton (A) was conducted from 2018 to 2019 to create a geospatial risk model (B) based on landscape‐level Bt crop intensity.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ps.6585</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-8555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7013-2795</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9979-5813</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1526-498X |
| ispartof | Pest management science, 2021-12, Vol.77 (12), p.5454-5462 |
| issn | 1526-498X 1526-4998 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557537001 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Agricultural ecosystems bollworm Bt resistance Cotton crop intensity Crop production Crops Damage patterns Ecological footprint Farms Helicoverpa zea Insects Landscape Local population Pest control Pest resistance Pests Public domain Pyramids Resistance factors risk assessment Toxins |
| title | Landscape‐level variation in Bt crops predict Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance in cotton agroecosystems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T22%3A05%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Landscape%E2%80%90level%20variation%20in%20Bt%20crops%20predict%20Helicoverpa%20zea%20(Lepidoptera:%20Noctuidae)%20resistance%20in%20cotton%20agroecosystems&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Dorman,%20Seth%20J&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5454&rft.epage=5462&rft.pages=5454-5462&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ps.6585&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2595330338%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2595330338&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |