The effect of augmented reality on the accuracy and learning curve of external ventricular drain placement

OBJECTIVEThe traditional freehand technique for external ventricular drain (EVD) placement is most frequently used, but remains the primary risk factor for inaccurate drain placement. As this procedure could benefit from image guidance, the authors set forth to demonstrate the impact of augmented-re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurosurgical focus 2021-08, Vol.51 (2), p.E8-E8
Hauptverfasser: Van Gestel, Frederick, Frantz, Taylor, Vannerom, Cédric, Verhellen, Anouk, Gallagher, Anthony G., Elprama, Shirley A., Jacobs, An, Buyl, Ronald, Bruneau, Michaël, Jansen, Bart, Vandemeulebroucke, Jef, Scheerlinck, Thierry, Duerinck, Johnny
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E8
container_issue 2
container_start_page E8
container_title Neurosurgical focus
container_volume 51
creator Van Gestel, Frederick
Frantz, Taylor
Vannerom, Cédric
Verhellen, Anouk
Gallagher, Anthony G.
Elprama, Shirley A.
Jacobs, An
Buyl, Ronald
Bruneau, Michaël
Jansen, Bart
Vandemeulebroucke, Jef
Scheerlinck, Thierry
Duerinck, Johnny
description OBJECTIVEThe traditional freehand technique for external ventricular drain (EVD) placement is most frequently used, but remains the primary risk factor for inaccurate drain placement. As this procedure could benefit from image guidance, the authors set forth to demonstrate the impact of augmented-reality (AR) assistance on the accuracy and learning curve of EVD placement compared with the freehand technique. METHODSSixteen medical students performed a total of 128 EVD placements on a custom-made phantom head, both before and after receiving a standardized training session. They were guided by either the freehand technique or by AR, which provided an anatomical overlay and tailored guidance for EVD placement through inside-out infrared tracking. The outcome was quantified by the metric accuracy of EVD placement as well as by its clinical quality. RESULTSThe mean target error was significantly impacted by either AR (p = 0.003) or training (p = 0.02) in a direct comparison with the untrained freehand performance. Both untrained (11.9 ± 4.5 mm) and trained (12.2 ± 4.7 mm) AR performances were significantly better than the untrained freehand performance (19.9 ± 4.2 mm), which improved after training (13.5 ± 4.7 mm). The quality of EVD placement as assessed by the modified Kakarla scale (mKS) was significantly impacted by AR guidance (p = 0.005) but not by training (p = 0.07). Both untrained and trained AR performances (59.4% mKS grade 1 for both) were significantly better than the untrained freehand performance (25.0% mKS grade 1). Spatial aptitude testing revealed a correlation between perceptual ability and untrained AR-guided performance (r = 0.63). CONCLUSIONSCompared with the freehand technique, AR guidance for EVD placement yielded a higher outcome accuracy and quality for procedure novices. With AR, untrained individuals performed as well as trained individuals, which indicates that AR guidance not only improved performance but also positively impacted the learning curve. Future efforts will focus on the translation and evaluation of AR for EVD placement in the clinical setting.
doi_str_mv 10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21215
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557536787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557536787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-1a0bead52ad85cc2ab5163ecb78659a9581ec095200143ea2ccaac947221fa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLc9emnd2e3m4yjFqlDowXoO08mkpmw3dTcp9t-bUEFPMwzP-8I8QtyDmhpI4VErDVM7XazmH-8aNNgLMQKV64lKstnlv_1a3MS4U8pom9qR2K0_WXJVMbWyqSR22z37lksZGF3dnmTjZdsjSNQFpJNEX0rHGHztt7K_HXnI8XfLwaOTxz4dauocBlkGrL08OCQeSm_FVYUu8t3vHIv14nk9f50sVy9v86flhIyGdgKoNoyl1VhmlkjjxkJimDZpltgcc5sBk8qtVgpmhlETIVI-S7WGCsGMxcO59hCar45jW-zrSOwcem66WGjbP26SNEt7FM4ohSbGwFVxCPUew6kAVQxai0FrYYs_reYHqcRs2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557536787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of augmented reality on the accuracy and learning curve of external ventricular drain placement</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Van Gestel, Frederick ; Frantz, Taylor ; Vannerom, Cédric ; Verhellen, Anouk ; Gallagher, Anthony G. ; Elprama, Shirley A. ; Jacobs, An ; Buyl, Ronald ; Bruneau, Michaël ; Jansen, Bart ; Vandemeulebroucke, Jef ; Scheerlinck, Thierry ; Duerinck, Johnny</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Gestel, Frederick ; Frantz, Taylor ; Vannerom, Cédric ; Verhellen, Anouk ; Gallagher, Anthony G. ; Elprama, Shirley A. ; Jacobs, An ; Buyl, Ronald ; Bruneau, Michaël ; Jansen, Bart ; Vandemeulebroucke, Jef ; Scheerlinck, Thierry ; Duerinck, Johnny</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVEThe traditional freehand technique for external ventricular drain (EVD) placement is most frequently used, but remains the primary risk factor for inaccurate drain placement. As this procedure could benefit from image guidance, the authors set forth to demonstrate the impact of augmented-reality (AR) assistance on the accuracy and learning curve of EVD placement compared with the freehand technique. METHODSSixteen medical students performed a total of 128 EVD placements on a custom-made phantom head, both before and after receiving a standardized training session. They were guided by either the freehand technique or by AR, which provided an anatomical overlay and tailored guidance for EVD placement through inside-out infrared tracking. The outcome was quantified by the metric accuracy of EVD placement as well as by its clinical quality. RESULTSThe mean target error was significantly impacted by either AR (p = 0.003) or training (p = 0.02) in a direct comparison with the untrained freehand performance. Both untrained (11.9 ± 4.5 mm) and trained (12.2 ± 4.7 mm) AR performances were significantly better than the untrained freehand performance (19.9 ± 4.2 mm), which improved after training (13.5 ± 4.7 mm). The quality of EVD placement as assessed by the modified Kakarla scale (mKS) was significantly impacted by AR guidance (p = 0.005) but not by training (p = 0.07). Both untrained and trained AR performances (59.4% mKS grade 1 for both) were significantly better than the untrained freehand performance (25.0% mKS grade 1). Spatial aptitude testing revealed a correlation between perceptual ability and untrained AR-guided performance (r = 0.63). CONCLUSIONSCompared with the freehand technique, AR guidance for EVD placement yielded a higher outcome accuracy and quality for procedure novices. With AR, untrained individuals performed as well as trained individuals, which indicates that AR guidance not only improved performance but also positively impacted the learning curve. Future efforts will focus on the translation and evaluation of AR for EVD placement in the clinical setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-0684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1092-0684</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21215</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Neurosurgical focus, 2021-08, Vol.51 (2), p.E8-E8</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-1a0bead52ad85cc2ab5163ecb78659a9581ec095200143ea2ccaac947221fa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-1a0bead52ad85cc2ab5163ecb78659a9581ec095200143ea2ccaac947221fa13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Gestel, Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frantz, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vannerom, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhellen, Anouk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elprama, Shirley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buyl, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruneau, Michaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandemeulebroucke, Jef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheerlinck, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duerinck, Johnny</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of augmented reality on the accuracy and learning curve of external ventricular drain placement</title><title>Neurosurgical focus</title><description>OBJECTIVEThe traditional freehand technique for external ventricular drain (EVD) placement is most frequently used, but remains the primary risk factor for inaccurate drain placement. As this procedure could benefit from image guidance, the authors set forth to demonstrate the impact of augmented-reality (AR) assistance on the accuracy and learning curve of EVD placement compared with the freehand technique. METHODSSixteen medical students performed a total of 128 EVD placements on a custom-made phantom head, both before and after receiving a standardized training session. They were guided by either the freehand technique or by AR, which provided an anatomical overlay and tailored guidance for EVD placement through inside-out infrared tracking. The outcome was quantified by the metric accuracy of EVD placement as well as by its clinical quality. RESULTSThe mean target error was significantly impacted by either AR (p = 0.003) or training (p = 0.02) in a direct comparison with the untrained freehand performance. Both untrained (11.9 ± 4.5 mm) and trained (12.2 ± 4.7 mm) AR performances were significantly better than the untrained freehand performance (19.9 ± 4.2 mm), which improved after training (13.5 ± 4.7 mm). The quality of EVD placement as assessed by the modified Kakarla scale (mKS) was significantly impacted by AR guidance (p = 0.005) but not by training (p = 0.07). Both untrained and trained AR performances (59.4% mKS grade 1 for both) were significantly better than the untrained freehand performance (25.0% mKS grade 1). Spatial aptitude testing revealed a correlation between perceptual ability and untrained AR-guided performance (r = 0.63). CONCLUSIONSCompared with the freehand technique, AR guidance for EVD placement yielded a higher outcome accuracy and quality for procedure novices. With AR, untrained individuals performed as well as trained individuals, which indicates that AR guidance not only improved performance but also positively impacted the learning curve. Future efforts will focus on the translation and evaluation of AR for EVD placement in the clinical setting.</description><issn>1092-0684</issn><issn>1092-0684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLc9emnd2e3m4yjFqlDowXoO08mkpmw3dTcp9t-bUEFPMwzP-8I8QtyDmhpI4VErDVM7XazmH-8aNNgLMQKV64lKstnlv_1a3MS4U8pom9qR2K0_WXJVMbWyqSR22z37lksZGF3dnmTjZdsjSNQFpJNEX0rHGHztt7K_HXnI8XfLwaOTxz4dauocBlkGrL08OCQeSm_FVYUu8t3vHIv14nk9f50sVy9v86flhIyGdgKoNoyl1VhmlkjjxkJimDZpltgcc5sBk8qtVgpmhlETIVI-S7WGCsGMxcO59hCar45jW-zrSOwcem66WGjbP26SNEt7FM4ohSbGwFVxCPUew6kAVQxai0FrYYs_reYHqcRs2A</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Van Gestel, Frederick</creator><creator>Frantz, Taylor</creator><creator>Vannerom, Cédric</creator><creator>Verhellen, Anouk</creator><creator>Gallagher, Anthony G.</creator><creator>Elprama, Shirley A.</creator><creator>Jacobs, An</creator><creator>Buyl, Ronald</creator><creator>Bruneau, Michaël</creator><creator>Jansen, Bart</creator><creator>Vandemeulebroucke, Jef</creator><creator>Scheerlinck, Thierry</creator><creator>Duerinck, Johnny</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>The effect of augmented reality on the accuracy and learning curve of external ventricular drain placement</title><author>Van Gestel, Frederick ; Frantz, Taylor ; Vannerom, Cédric ; Verhellen, Anouk ; Gallagher, Anthony G. ; Elprama, Shirley A. ; Jacobs, An ; Buyl, Ronald ; Bruneau, Michaël ; Jansen, Bart ; Vandemeulebroucke, Jef ; Scheerlinck, Thierry ; Duerinck, Johnny</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-1a0bead52ad85cc2ab5163ecb78659a9581ec095200143ea2ccaac947221fa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Gestel, Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frantz, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vannerom, Cédric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhellen, Anouk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elprama, Shirley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buyl, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruneau, Michaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandemeulebroucke, Jef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheerlinck, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duerinck, Johnny</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurosurgical focus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Gestel, Frederick</au><au>Frantz, Taylor</au><au>Vannerom, Cédric</au><au>Verhellen, Anouk</au><au>Gallagher, Anthony G.</au><au>Elprama, Shirley A.</au><au>Jacobs, An</au><au>Buyl, Ronald</au><au>Bruneau, Michaël</au><au>Jansen, Bart</au><au>Vandemeulebroucke, Jef</au><au>Scheerlinck, Thierry</au><au>Duerinck, Johnny</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of augmented reality on the accuracy and learning curve of external ventricular drain placement</atitle><jtitle>Neurosurgical focus</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>E8</spage><epage>E8</epage><pages>E8-E8</pages><issn>1092-0684</issn><eissn>1092-0684</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVEThe traditional freehand technique for external ventricular drain (EVD) placement is most frequently used, but remains the primary risk factor for inaccurate drain placement. As this procedure could benefit from image guidance, the authors set forth to demonstrate the impact of augmented-reality (AR) assistance on the accuracy and learning curve of EVD placement compared with the freehand technique. METHODSSixteen medical students performed a total of 128 EVD placements on a custom-made phantom head, both before and after receiving a standardized training session. They were guided by either the freehand technique or by AR, which provided an anatomical overlay and tailored guidance for EVD placement through inside-out infrared tracking. The outcome was quantified by the metric accuracy of EVD placement as well as by its clinical quality. RESULTSThe mean target error was significantly impacted by either AR (p = 0.003) or training (p = 0.02) in a direct comparison with the untrained freehand performance. Both untrained (11.9 ± 4.5 mm) and trained (12.2 ± 4.7 mm) AR performances were significantly better than the untrained freehand performance (19.9 ± 4.2 mm), which improved after training (13.5 ± 4.7 mm). The quality of EVD placement as assessed by the modified Kakarla scale (mKS) was significantly impacted by AR guidance (p = 0.005) but not by training (p = 0.07). Both untrained and trained AR performances (59.4% mKS grade 1 for both) were significantly better than the untrained freehand performance (25.0% mKS grade 1). Spatial aptitude testing revealed a correlation between perceptual ability and untrained AR-guided performance (r = 0.63). CONCLUSIONSCompared with the freehand technique, AR guidance for EVD placement yielded a higher outcome accuracy and quality for procedure novices. With AR, untrained individuals performed as well as trained individuals, which indicates that AR guidance not only improved performance but also positively impacted the learning curve. Future efforts will focus on the translation and evaluation of AR for EVD placement in the clinical setting.</abstract><doi>10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21215</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-0684
ispartof Neurosurgical focus, 2021-08, Vol.51 (2), p.E8-E8
issn 1092-0684
1092-0684
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557536787
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title The effect of augmented reality on the accuracy and learning curve of external ventricular drain placement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T02%3A13%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20augmented%20reality%20on%20the%20accuracy%20and%20learning%20curve%20of%20external%20ventricular%20drain%20placement&rft.jtitle=Neurosurgical%20focus&rft.au=Van%20Gestel,%20Frederick&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=E8&rft.epage=E8&rft.pages=E8-E8&rft.issn=1092-0684&rft.eissn=1092-0684&rft_id=info:doi/10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557536787%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557536787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true