Attitude towards female circumcision among women in Ethiopia

•Attitude towards female circumcision differed by socioeconomic status and religion.•Educated and wealthy women were less likely to support female circumcision.•Muslim and circumcised women were more likely to support female circumcision. Female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is a global phen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexual & reproductive healthcare 2021-09, Vol.29, p.100647, Article 100647
Hauptverfasser: Alemu, Dawit G., Haile, Zelalem T., Conserve, Donaldson F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100647
container_title Sexual & reproductive healthcare
container_volume 29
creator Alemu, Dawit G.
Haile, Zelalem T.
Conserve, Donaldson F.
description •Attitude towards female circumcision differed by socioeconomic status and religion.•Educated and wealthy women were less likely to support female circumcision.•Muslim and circumcised women were more likely to support female circumcision. Female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is a global phenomenon mostly practiced in Africa, Asia, and the middle east. It involves the removal of the external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. The practice cuts across different ethnic and religious groups in Africa and is associated with several health complications. The following study assessed attitude towards the practice among Ethiopian women aged 15–49. Using the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey from 2016 as a data source, we analyzed a sample of 6984 women. We used the respectable femininity discourse to inform our variable selection. The main outcome variable assessed whether women supported or rejected the continuation of the practice. In the bivariate analysis, all the sociodemographic variables including women’s circumcision experience were strongly associated with the outcome variable. In the multiple logistic regression, only education, wealth, religion, and circumcision status were independently associated with women’s attitude towards FGM/C. For instance, compared to women with no education, women with at least a secondary education were more than 4 times (AOR 4.2, 95% CI 2.53–7.04, P-Value 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100647
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557536679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877575621000549</els_id><sourcerecordid>2557536679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-26168f7eabc9eadc0bf5d6d81bb7dd3ebd8af6c10c33d3832a4a2e739e1e86133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EolXpC3BAOXJJsePETqReqqr8SJW4wNly7A11FcfFdqh4e1KlcGQvu1rNjDQfQrcELwgm7GG_CH6nFhnOyPDALOcXaEpKztOCs_zy7y7YBM1D2ONhKMlLVl2jCc1pjjHhU7RcxWhiryGJ7ii9DkkDVraQKONVb5UJxnWJtK77SI7OQpeYLtnEnXEHI2_QVSPbAPPznqH3x83b-jndvj69rFfbVNGCxTRjhJUNB1mrCqRWuG4KzXRJ6pprTaHWpWyYIlhRqmlJM5nLDDitgEDJCKUzdD_mHrz77CFEYU1Q0LayA9cHkRVDT8oYrwZpNkqVdyF4aMTBGyv9tyBYnMCJvTiBEydwYgQ3mO7O-X1tQf9ZfjENguUogKHllwEvgjLQKdDGg4pCO_Nf_g9JoH8G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557536679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attitude towards female circumcision among women in Ethiopia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Alemu, Dawit G. ; Haile, Zelalem T. ; Conserve, Donaldson F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alemu, Dawit G. ; Haile, Zelalem T. ; Conserve, Donaldson F.</creatorcontrib><description>•Attitude towards female circumcision differed by socioeconomic status and religion.•Educated and wealthy women were less likely to support female circumcision.•Muslim and circumcised women were more likely to support female circumcision. Female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is a global phenomenon mostly practiced in Africa, Asia, and the middle east. It involves the removal of the external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. The practice cuts across different ethnic and religious groups in Africa and is associated with several health complications. The following study assessed attitude towards the practice among Ethiopian women aged 15–49. Using the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey from 2016 as a data source, we analyzed a sample of 6984 women. We used the respectable femininity discourse to inform our variable selection. The main outcome variable assessed whether women supported or rejected the continuation of the practice. In the bivariate analysis, all the sociodemographic variables including women’s circumcision experience were strongly associated with the outcome variable. In the multiple logistic regression, only education, wealth, religion, and circumcision status were independently associated with women’s attitude towards FGM/C. For instance, compared to women with no education, women with at least a secondary education were more than 4 times (AOR 4.2, 95% CI 2.53–7.04, P-Value &lt; 0.001) more likely to agree with the termination of the practice. Our findings suggest that changing attitudes towards FGM/C may require uplifting the social and economic status of women, working with those who have experienced FGM/C and collaborating with religious leaders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-5756</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1877-5764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-5764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100647</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34340017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Attitude ; Circumcision, Female ; Educational Status ; Ethiopia ; Female ; Female circumcision ; Female genital Cutting ; Female genital mutilation ; Humans ; Prevalence</subject><ispartof>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare, 2021-09, Vol.29, p.100647, Article 100647</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-26168f7eabc9eadc0bf5d6d81bb7dd3ebd8af6c10c33d3832a4a2e739e1e86133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-26168f7eabc9eadc0bf5d6d81bb7dd3ebd8af6c10c33d3832a4a2e739e1e86133</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8193-817X ; 0000-0002-2912-8564</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100647$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34340017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alemu, Dawit G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haile, Zelalem T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conserve, Donaldson F.</creatorcontrib><title>Attitude towards female circumcision among women in Ethiopia</title><title>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare</title><addtitle>Sex Reprod Healthc</addtitle><description>•Attitude towards female circumcision differed by socioeconomic status and religion.•Educated and wealthy women were less likely to support female circumcision.•Muslim and circumcised women were more likely to support female circumcision. Female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is a global phenomenon mostly practiced in Africa, Asia, and the middle east. It involves the removal of the external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. The practice cuts across different ethnic and religious groups in Africa and is associated with several health complications. The following study assessed attitude towards the practice among Ethiopian women aged 15–49. Using the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey from 2016 as a data source, we analyzed a sample of 6984 women. We used the respectable femininity discourse to inform our variable selection. The main outcome variable assessed whether women supported or rejected the continuation of the practice. In the bivariate analysis, all the sociodemographic variables including women’s circumcision experience were strongly associated with the outcome variable. In the multiple logistic regression, only education, wealth, religion, and circumcision status were independently associated with women’s attitude towards FGM/C. For instance, compared to women with no education, women with at least a secondary education were more than 4 times (AOR 4.2, 95% CI 2.53–7.04, P-Value &lt; 0.001) more likely to agree with the termination of the practice. Our findings suggest that changing attitudes towards FGM/C may require uplifting the social and economic status of women, working with those who have experienced FGM/C and collaborating with religious leaders.</description><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Circumcision, Female</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Ethiopia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female circumcision</subject><subject>Female genital Cutting</subject><subject>Female genital mutilation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><issn>1877-5756</issn><issn>1877-5764</issn><issn>1877-5764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EolXpC3BAOXJJsePETqReqqr8SJW4wNly7A11FcfFdqh4e1KlcGQvu1rNjDQfQrcELwgm7GG_CH6nFhnOyPDALOcXaEpKztOCs_zy7y7YBM1D2ONhKMlLVl2jCc1pjjHhU7RcxWhiryGJ7ii9DkkDVraQKONVb5UJxnWJtK77SI7OQpeYLtnEnXEHI2_QVSPbAPPznqH3x83b-jndvj69rFfbVNGCxTRjhJUNB1mrCqRWuG4KzXRJ6pprTaHWpWyYIlhRqmlJM5nLDDitgEDJCKUzdD_mHrz77CFEYU1Q0LayA9cHkRVDT8oYrwZpNkqVdyF4aMTBGyv9tyBYnMCJvTiBEydwYgQ3mO7O-X1tQf9ZfjENguUogKHllwEvgjLQKdDGg4pCO_Nf_g9JoH8G</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Alemu, Dawit G.</creator><creator>Haile, Zelalem T.</creator><creator>Conserve, Donaldson F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8193-817X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-8564</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Attitude towards female circumcision among women in Ethiopia</title><author>Alemu, Dawit G. ; Haile, Zelalem T. ; Conserve, Donaldson F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-26168f7eabc9eadc0bf5d6d81bb7dd3ebd8af6c10c33d3832a4a2e739e1e86133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Circumcision, Female</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Ethiopia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female circumcision</topic><topic>Female genital Cutting</topic><topic>Female genital mutilation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alemu, Dawit G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haile, Zelalem T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conserve, Donaldson F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alemu, Dawit G.</au><au>Haile, Zelalem T.</au><au>Conserve, Donaldson F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attitude towards female circumcision among women in Ethiopia</atitle><jtitle>Sexual &amp; reproductive healthcare</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Reprod Healthc</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><spage>100647</spage><pages>100647-</pages><artnum>100647</artnum><issn>1877-5756</issn><issn>1877-5764</issn><eissn>1877-5764</eissn><abstract>•Attitude towards female circumcision differed by socioeconomic status and religion.•Educated and wealthy women were less likely to support female circumcision.•Muslim and circumcised women were more likely to support female circumcision. Female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is a global phenomenon mostly practiced in Africa, Asia, and the middle east. It involves the removal of the external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. The practice cuts across different ethnic and religious groups in Africa and is associated with several health complications. The following study assessed attitude towards the practice among Ethiopian women aged 15–49. Using the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey from 2016 as a data source, we analyzed a sample of 6984 women. We used the respectable femininity discourse to inform our variable selection. The main outcome variable assessed whether women supported or rejected the continuation of the practice. In the bivariate analysis, all the sociodemographic variables including women’s circumcision experience were strongly associated with the outcome variable. In the multiple logistic regression, only education, wealth, religion, and circumcision status were independently associated with women’s attitude towards FGM/C. For instance, compared to women with no education, women with at least a secondary education were more than 4 times (AOR 4.2, 95% CI 2.53–7.04, P-Value &lt; 0.001) more likely to agree with the termination of the practice. Our findings suggest that changing attitudes towards FGM/C may require uplifting the social and economic status of women, working with those who have experienced FGM/C and collaborating with religious leaders.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34340017</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100647</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8193-817X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-8564</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-5756
ispartof Sexual & reproductive healthcare, 2021-09, Vol.29, p.100647, Article 100647
issn 1877-5756
1877-5764
1877-5764
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557536679
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Attitude
Circumcision, Female
Educational Status
Ethiopia
Female
Female circumcision
Female genital Cutting
Female genital mutilation
Humans
Prevalence
title Attitude towards female circumcision among women in Ethiopia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A01%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attitude%20towards%20female%20circumcision%20among%20women%20in%20Ethiopia&rft.jtitle=Sexual%20&%20reproductive%20healthcare&rft.au=Alemu,%20Dawit%20G.&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=29&rft.spage=100647&rft.pages=100647-&rft.artnum=100647&rft.issn=1877-5756&rft.eissn=1877-5764&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100647&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557536679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557536679&rft_id=info:pmid/34340017&rft_els_id=S1877575621000549&rfr_iscdi=true