Reverse osmosis concentrate treatment by microbubble ozonation-biological activated carbon process: Organics removal performance and environmental impact assessment

Reverse osmosis (RO) is being used in many water reclamation facilities to produce high quality water that can be reused for different purposes. As a part of the RO process, a reject stream is produced as the reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC), which contains elevated levels of contaminants compared...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2021-12, Vol.798, p.149289-149289, Article 149289
Hauptverfasser: Loh, W.H., Cai, Q.Q., Li, R., Jothinathan, L., Lee, B.C.Y., Ng, O.H., Guo, J., Ong, S.L., Hu, J.Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149289
container_issue
container_start_page 149289
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 798
creator Loh, W.H.
Cai, Q.Q.
Li, R.
Jothinathan, L.
Lee, B.C.Y.
Ng, O.H.
Guo, J.
Ong, S.L.
Hu, J.Y.
description Reverse osmosis (RO) is being used in many water reclamation facilities to produce high quality water that can be reused for different purposes. As a part of the RO process, a reject stream is produced as the reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC), which contains elevated levels of contaminants compared to the source water. Effective treatment and safe disposal of ROC via cost-effective means is very challenging. This study aims to develop a robust microbubble ozonation–biological process for industrial ROC treatment with a target effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD) lower than 60 mg/L. As compared to macrobubble ozonation, microbubble ozonation exhibited better ozone dissolution and 29% higher COD removal efficiency with the same ozone dosage. Under the optimum operating conditions with ozone dosage of 30 mg/L, ROC natural pH of 8.67 and ozonation duration of 1 h, microbubble ozonation achieved 42% COD removal efficiency while increasing the BOD5/COD ratio (ratio of biological oxygen demand over 5 days to the corresponding chemical oxygen demand) in ROC from 0.042 to 0.216. A biological activated carbon (BAC) column with an empty bed contact time (EBCT) of 120 min was combined with microbubble ozonation for continuous ROC treatment. Over the 100-day operation, the combined system performed consistent organics removal with an average effluent COD of 45 mg/L. Both LC-OCD data and fluorescence EEM spectra confirmed humic substances were the dominant organic species in ROC. Ozone pre-treatment could achieve significant removal of humic substances in raw ROC. ATP analysis found that ozone pre-treatment enhanced BAC biofilm activity by around 5 folds. 5 min acute toxicity assessment with Aliivibrio fischeri showed 4 times reduction of bioluminescence inhibition in ozone treated ROC. From the environmental point of view, Life cycle assessment (LCA) results demonstrated that Ozone-BAC system had significant environmental burdens on climate change and human toxicity due to the electricity production process. These environmental impacts can be mitigated by optimizing the ozonation process with reduced ozone dosage or utilizing renewable energy sources for electricity generation. [Display omitted] •Microbubble ozone-BAC for ROC treatment obtained an average effluent COD of 45 mg/L.•Ozone enhanced ROC's biodegradability by 4 times, reduced its toxicity by 4 folds.•Microbubble ozone pre-treatment enhanced the biofilm formation in BAC system.•Electricity production in micr
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149289
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557536171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004896972104362X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2557536171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e78569f85fbfd2afe605954997e00aa65c8f7f6e6ff07bb32e947fff50f1e9193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KHCEUhSUkkM4kzzAus6kerS61zG4Y8gcDAyFZi1rXwaZKO167YPI8edCx6DDbuBH1O-de7yHkmrM9Z1zeHPfoY80V0rrvWc_3fND9qF-RHR-V7jjr5WuyY2wYOy21ekveIR5ZW2rkO_L3B6xQEGjGJWNE6nPykGqxFWgtYOvSTtQ90SX6kt3ZubnBf3KyNebUuZjn_Bi9nan1Na5NNlFvi8uJnkr2gPiJPpRHm6JHWmDJa0NPUEIui22lqE0Tbb3HktNWqr3G5dS8qEVs6u3uPXkT7Izw4d9-RX59-fzz7lt3__D1-93tfecPw1g7UKOQOowiuDD1NoBkQotBawWMWSuFH4MKEmQITDl36EEPKoQgWOCguT5ckY8X39b57zNgNUtED_NsE-Qzml4IJQ6SK95QdUHbUBALBHMqcbHlyXBmtlzM0bzkYrZczCWXpry9KKH9ZI1QNg7aJKZYwFcz5fhfj2e-bKIj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557536171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reverse osmosis concentrate treatment by microbubble ozonation-biological activated carbon process: Organics removal performance and environmental impact assessment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Loh, W.H. ; Cai, Q.Q. ; Li, R. ; Jothinathan, L. ; Lee, B.C.Y. ; Ng, O.H. ; Guo, J. ; Ong, S.L. ; Hu, J.Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Loh, W.H. ; Cai, Q.Q. ; Li, R. ; Jothinathan, L. ; Lee, B.C.Y. ; Ng, O.H. ; Guo, J. ; Ong, S.L. ; Hu, J.Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Reverse osmosis (RO) is being used in many water reclamation facilities to produce high quality water that can be reused for different purposes. As a part of the RO process, a reject stream is produced as the reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC), which contains elevated levels of contaminants compared to the source water. Effective treatment and safe disposal of ROC via cost-effective means is very challenging. This study aims to develop a robust microbubble ozonation–biological process for industrial ROC treatment with a target effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD) lower than 60 mg/L. As compared to macrobubble ozonation, microbubble ozonation exhibited better ozone dissolution and 29% higher COD removal efficiency with the same ozone dosage. Under the optimum operating conditions with ozone dosage of 30 mg/L, ROC natural pH of 8.67 and ozonation duration of 1 h, microbubble ozonation achieved 42% COD removal efficiency while increasing the BOD5/COD ratio (ratio of biological oxygen demand over 5 days to the corresponding chemical oxygen demand) in ROC from 0.042 to 0.216. A biological activated carbon (BAC) column with an empty bed contact time (EBCT) of 120 min was combined with microbubble ozonation for continuous ROC treatment. Over the 100-day operation, the combined system performed consistent organics removal with an average effluent COD of 45 mg/L. Both LC-OCD data and fluorescence EEM spectra confirmed humic substances were the dominant organic species in ROC. Ozone pre-treatment could achieve significant removal of humic substances in raw ROC. ATP analysis found that ozone pre-treatment enhanced BAC biofilm activity by around 5 folds. 5 min acute toxicity assessment with Aliivibrio fischeri showed 4 times reduction of bioluminescence inhibition in ozone treated ROC. From the environmental point of view, Life cycle assessment (LCA) results demonstrated that Ozone-BAC system had significant environmental burdens on climate change and human toxicity due to the electricity production process. These environmental impacts can be mitigated by optimizing the ozonation process with reduced ozone dosage or utilizing renewable energy sources for electricity generation. [Display omitted] •Microbubble ozone-BAC for ROC treatment obtained an average effluent COD of 45 mg/L.•Ozone enhanced ROC's biodegradability by 4 times, reduced its toxicity by 4 folds.•Microbubble ozone pre-treatment enhanced the biofilm formation in BAC system.•Electricity production in microbubble ozone-BAC had a high burden on climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biofilm ; Biological activated carbon ; Life cycle assessment ; Microbubble ozonation ; Organics removal ; Reverse osmosis concentrate</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2021-12, Vol.798, p.149289-149289, Article 149289</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e78569f85fbfd2afe605954997e00aa65c8f7f6e6ff07bb32e947fff50f1e9193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e78569f85fbfd2afe605954997e00aa65c8f7f6e6ff07bb32e947fff50f1e9193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149289$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loh, W.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Q.Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jothinathan, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, B.C.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, O.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, S.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, J.Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Reverse osmosis concentrate treatment by microbubble ozonation-biological activated carbon process: Organics removal performance and environmental impact assessment</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><description>Reverse osmosis (RO) is being used in many water reclamation facilities to produce high quality water that can be reused for different purposes. As a part of the RO process, a reject stream is produced as the reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC), which contains elevated levels of contaminants compared to the source water. Effective treatment and safe disposal of ROC via cost-effective means is very challenging. This study aims to develop a robust microbubble ozonation–biological process for industrial ROC treatment with a target effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD) lower than 60 mg/L. As compared to macrobubble ozonation, microbubble ozonation exhibited better ozone dissolution and 29% higher COD removal efficiency with the same ozone dosage. Under the optimum operating conditions with ozone dosage of 30 mg/L, ROC natural pH of 8.67 and ozonation duration of 1 h, microbubble ozonation achieved 42% COD removal efficiency while increasing the BOD5/COD ratio (ratio of biological oxygen demand over 5 days to the corresponding chemical oxygen demand) in ROC from 0.042 to 0.216. A biological activated carbon (BAC) column with an empty bed contact time (EBCT) of 120 min was combined with microbubble ozonation for continuous ROC treatment. Over the 100-day operation, the combined system performed consistent organics removal with an average effluent COD of 45 mg/L. Both LC-OCD data and fluorescence EEM spectra confirmed humic substances were the dominant organic species in ROC. Ozone pre-treatment could achieve significant removal of humic substances in raw ROC. ATP analysis found that ozone pre-treatment enhanced BAC biofilm activity by around 5 folds. 5 min acute toxicity assessment with Aliivibrio fischeri showed 4 times reduction of bioluminescence inhibition in ozone treated ROC. From the environmental point of view, Life cycle assessment (LCA) results demonstrated that Ozone-BAC system had significant environmental burdens on climate change and human toxicity due to the electricity production process. These environmental impacts can be mitigated by optimizing the ozonation process with reduced ozone dosage or utilizing renewable energy sources for electricity generation. [Display omitted] •Microbubble ozone-BAC for ROC treatment obtained an average effluent COD of 45 mg/L.•Ozone enhanced ROC's biodegradability by 4 times, reduced its toxicity by 4 folds.•Microbubble ozone pre-treatment enhanced the biofilm formation in BAC system.•Electricity production in microbubble ozone-BAC had a high burden on climate change.</description><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biological activated carbon</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Microbubble ozonation</subject><subject>Organics removal</subject><subject>Reverse osmosis concentrate</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2KHCEUhSUkkM4kzzAus6kerS61zG4Y8gcDAyFZi1rXwaZKO167YPI8edCx6DDbuBH1O-de7yHkmrM9Z1zeHPfoY80V0rrvWc_3fND9qF-RHR-V7jjr5WuyY2wYOy21ekveIR5ZW2rkO_L3B6xQEGjGJWNE6nPykGqxFWgtYOvSTtQ90SX6kt3ZubnBf3KyNebUuZjn_Bi9nan1Na5NNlFvi8uJnkr2gPiJPpRHm6JHWmDJa0NPUEIui22lqE0Tbb3HktNWqr3G5dS8qEVs6u3uPXkT7Izw4d9-RX59-fzz7lt3__D1-93tfecPw1g7UKOQOowiuDD1NoBkQotBawWMWSuFH4MKEmQITDl36EEPKoQgWOCguT5ckY8X39b57zNgNUtED_NsE-Qzml4IJQ6SK95QdUHbUBALBHMqcbHlyXBmtlzM0bzkYrZczCWXpry9KKH9ZI1QNg7aJKZYwFcz5fhfj2e-bKIj</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Loh, W.H.</creator><creator>Cai, Q.Q.</creator><creator>Li, R.</creator><creator>Jothinathan, L.</creator><creator>Lee, B.C.Y.</creator><creator>Ng, O.H.</creator><creator>Guo, J.</creator><creator>Ong, S.L.</creator><creator>Hu, J.Y.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Reverse osmosis concentrate treatment by microbubble ozonation-biological activated carbon process: Organics removal performance and environmental impact assessment</title><author>Loh, W.H. ; Cai, Q.Q. ; Li, R. ; Jothinathan, L. ; Lee, B.C.Y. ; Ng, O.H. ; Guo, J. ; Ong, S.L. ; Hu, J.Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e78569f85fbfd2afe605954997e00aa65c8f7f6e6ff07bb32e947fff50f1e9193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biological activated carbon</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Microbubble ozonation</topic><topic>Organics removal</topic><topic>Reverse osmosis concentrate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loh, W.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Q.Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jothinathan, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, B.C.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, O.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, S.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, J.Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loh, W.H.</au><au>Cai, Q.Q.</au><au>Li, R.</au><au>Jothinathan, L.</au><au>Lee, B.C.Y.</au><au>Ng, O.H.</au><au>Guo, J.</au><au>Ong, S.L.</au><au>Hu, J.Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reverse osmosis concentrate treatment by microbubble ozonation-biological activated carbon process: Organics removal performance and environmental impact assessment</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>798</volume><spage>149289</spage><epage>149289</epage><pages>149289-149289</pages><artnum>149289</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Reverse osmosis (RO) is being used in many water reclamation facilities to produce high quality water that can be reused for different purposes. As a part of the RO process, a reject stream is produced as the reverse osmosis concentrate (ROC), which contains elevated levels of contaminants compared to the source water. Effective treatment and safe disposal of ROC via cost-effective means is very challenging. This study aims to develop a robust microbubble ozonation–biological process for industrial ROC treatment with a target effluent chemical oxygen demand (COD) lower than 60 mg/L. As compared to macrobubble ozonation, microbubble ozonation exhibited better ozone dissolution and 29% higher COD removal efficiency with the same ozone dosage. Under the optimum operating conditions with ozone dosage of 30 mg/L, ROC natural pH of 8.67 and ozonation duration of 1 h, microbubble ozonation achieved 42% COD removal efficiency while increasing the BOD5/COD ratio (ratio of biological oxygen demand over 5 days to the corresponding chemical oxygen demand) in ROC from 0.042 to 0.216. A biological activated carbon (BAC) column with an empty bed contact time (EBCT) of 120 min was combined with microbubble ozonation for continuous ROC treatment. Over the 100-day operation, the combined system performed consistent organics removal with an average effluent COD of 45 mg/L. Both LC-OCD data and fluorescence EEM spectra confirmed humic substances were the dominant organic species in ROC. Ozone pre-treatment could achieve significant removal of humic substances in raw ROC. ATP analysis found that ozone pre-treatment enhanced BAC biofilm activity by around 5 folds. 5 min acute toxicity assessment with Aliivibrio fischeri showed 4 times reduction of bioluminescence inhibition in ozone treated ROC. From the environmental point of view, Life cycle assessment (LCA) results demonstrated that Ozone-BAC system had significant environmental burdens on climate change and human toxicity due to the electricity production process. These environmental impacts can be mitigated by optimizing the ozonation process with reduced ozone dosage or utilizing renewable energy sources for electricity generation. [Display omitted] •Microbubble ozone-BAC for ROC treatment obtained an average effluent COD of 45 mg/L.•Ozone enhanced ROC's biodegradability by 4 times, reduced its toxicity by 4 folds.•Microbubble ozone pre-treatment enhanced the biofilm formation in BAC system.•Electricity production in microbubble ozone-BAC had a high burden on climate change.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149289</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2021-12, Vol.798, p.149289-149289, Article 149289
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2557536171
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biofilm
Biological activated carbon
Life cycle assessment
Microbubble ozonation
Organics removal
Reverse osmosis concentrate
title Reverse osmosis concentrate treatment by microbubble ozonation-biological activated carbon process: Organics removal performance and environmental impact assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A01%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reverse%20osmosis%20concentrate%20treatment%20by%20microbubble%20ozonation-biological%20activated%20carbon%20process:%20Organics%20removal%20performance%20and%20environmental%20impact%20assessment&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Loh,%20W.H.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=798&rft.spage=149289&rft.epage=149289&rft.pages=149289-149289&rft.artnum=149289&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149289&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557536171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557536171&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S004896972104362X&rfr_iscdi=true