Time marches on, but do the causal pathways driving instream habitat and biology remain consistent?

Stream ecosystems are complex networks of interacting terrestrial and aquatic drivers. To untangle these ecological networks, efforts evaluating the direct and indirect effects of landscape, climate, and instream predictors on biological condition through time are needed. We used structural equation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2021-10, Vol.789, p.147985-147985, Article 147985
Hauptverfasser: Walker, Richard H., Ashton, Matthew J., Cashman, Matthew J., Fanelli, Rosemary M., Krause, Kevin P., Noe, Gregory B., Maloney, Kelly O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147985
container_issue
container_start_page 147985
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 789
creator Walker, Richard H.
Ashton, Matthew J.
Cashman, Matthew J.
Fanelli, Rosemary M.
Krause, Kevin P.
Noe, Gregory B.
Maloney, Kelly O.
description Stream ecosystems are complex networks of interacting terrestrial and aquatic drivers. To untangle these ecological networks, efforts evaluating the direct and indirect effects of landscape, climate, and instream predictors on biological condition through time are needed. We used structural equation modeling and leveraged a stream survey program to identify and compare important predictors driving condition of benthic macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages. We used data resampled 14 years apart at 252 locations across Maryland, USA. Sample locations covered a wide range of conditions that varied spatiotemporally. Overall, the relationship directions were consistent between sample periods, but their relative strength varied temporally. For benthic macroinvertebrates, we found that the total effect of natural landscape (e.g., elevation, longitude, latitude, geology) and land use (i.e., forest, development, agriculture) predictors was 1.4 and 1.5 times greater in the late 2010s compared to the 2000s. Moreover, the total effect of water quality (e.g., total nitrogen and conductivity) and habitat (e.g., embeddedness, riffle quality) was 1.2 and 4.8 times lower in the 2010s, respectively. For fish assemblage condition, the total effect of land use-land cover predictors was 2.3 times greater in the 2010s compared to the 2000s, while the total effect of local habitat was 1.4 times lower in the 2010s, respectively. As expected, we found biological assemblages in catchments with more agriculture and urban development were generally comprised of tolerant, generalist species, while assemblages in catchments with greater forest cover had more-specialized, less-tolerant species (e.g., Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera taxa, clingers, benthic and lithophilic spawning fishes). Changes in the relative importance of landscape and land-use predictors suggest other correlated, yet unmeasured, proximal factors became more important over time. By untangling these ecological networks, stakeholders can gain a better understanding of the spatiotemporal relationships driving biological condition to implement management practices aimed at improving stream condition. [Display omitted] •We evaluated temporal consistency in biological stream condition at resampled sites.•Structural equation models revealed a complex network of interacting predictors.•Overall, the direction of effect was consistent after 14 years.•But the strength and relative importance of those relationships
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147985
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2556385674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969721030564</els_id><sourcerecordid>2556385674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-9ce4e1669c205c95012077658609a6e9163f8e2b61e76358c2cfca8b4101ba03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAQxy0EglL4CuCRgRTbSfyYEEK8JCSW7pbjXFtXiV1sp6jfnlQFVm655f-4-yF0TcmMEsrv1rNkXQ4Z_HbGCKMzWgkl6yM0oVKoghLGj9GEkEoWiitxhs5TWpNxhKSn6KysSlZKVk6QnbsecG-iXUHCwd_iZsi4DTivAFszJNPhjcmrL7NLuI1u6_wSO59yBNPjlWlcNhkb3-LGhS4sdzhCb5zHNvjk0nhgvr9AJwvTJbj82VM0f36aP74W7x8vb48P74WtGMmFslAB5VxZRmqrakIZEYLXkhNlOCjKy4UE1nAKgpe1tMwurJFNNRJpDCmn6OYQu4nhc4CUde-Sha4zHsKQNKtrXsqai2qUioPUxpBShIXeRDdC2GlK9B6wXus_wHoPWB8Aj86rn5Kh6aH98_0SHQUPBwGMn24dxH0QeAuti2CzboP7t-Qb5hiRFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556385674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Time marches on, but do the causal pathways driving instream habitat and biology remain consistent?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Walker, Richard H. ; Ashton, Matthew J. ; Cashman, Matthew J. ; Fanelli, Rosemary M. ; Krause, Kevin P. ; Noe, Gregory B. ; Maloney, Kelly O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Walker, Richard H. ; Ashton, Matthew J. ; Cashman, Matthew J. ; Fanelli, Rosemary M. ; Krause, Kevin P. ; Noe, Gregory B. ; Maloney, Kelly O.</creatorcontrib><description>Stream ecosystems are complex networks of interacting terrestrial and aquatic drivers. To untangle these ecological networks, efforts evaluating the direct and indirect effects of landscape, climate, and instream predictors on biological condition through time are needed. We used structural equation modeling and leveraged a stream survey program to identify and compare important predictors driving condition of benthic macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages. We used data resampled 14 years apart at 252 locations across Maryland, USA. Sample locations covered a wide range of conditions that varied spatiotemporally. Overall, the relationship directions were consistent between sample periods, but their relative strength varied temporally. For benthic macroinvertebrates, we found that the total effect of natural landscape (e.g., elevation, longitude, latitude, geology) and land use (i.e., forest, development, agriculture) predictors was 1.4 and 1.5 times greater in the late 2010s compared to the 2000s. Moreover, the total effect of water quality (e.g., total nitrogen and conductivity) and habitat (e.g., embeddedness, riffle quality) was 1.2 and 4.8 times lower in the 2010s, respectively. For fish assemblage condition, the total effect of land use-land cover predictors was 2.3 times greater in the 2010s compared to the 2000s, while the total effect of local habitat was 1.4 times lower in the 2010s, respectively. As expected, we found biological assemblages in catchments with more agriculture and urban development were generally comprised of tolerant, generalist species, while assemblages in catchments with greater forest cover had more-specialized, less-tolerant species (e.g., Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera taxa, clingers, benthic and lithophilic spawning fishes). Changes in the relative importance of landscape and land-use predictors suggest other correlated, yet unmeasured, proximal factors became more important over time. By untangling these ecological networks, stakeholders can gain a better understanding of the spatiotemporal relationships driving biological condition to implement management practices aimed at improving stream condition. [Display omitted] •We evaluated temporal consistency in biological stream condition at resampled sites.•Structural equation models revealed a complex network of interacting predictors.•Overall, the direction of effect was consistent after 14 years.•But the strength and relative importance of those relationships varied temporally.•Assemblage condition in more disturbed catchments comprised tolerant, generalist taxa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147985</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34323823</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Benthic macroinvertebrates ; Fishes ; Maryland ; Streams ; Structural equation modeling ; Total effects</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2021-10, Vol.789, p.147985-147985, Article 147985</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-9ce4e1669c205c95012077658609a6e9163f8e2b61e76358c2cfca8b4101ba03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-9ce4e1669c205c95012077658609a6e9163f8e2b61e76358c2cfca8b4101ba03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721030564$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34323823$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walker, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashton, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cashman, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, Rosemary M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noe, Gregory B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maloney, Kelly O.</creatorcontrib><title>Time marches on, but do the causal pathways driving instream habitat and biology remain consistent?</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Stream ecosystems are complex networks of interacting terrestrial and aquatic drivers. To untangle these ecological networks, efforts evaluating the direct and indirect effects of landscape, climate, and instream predictors on biological condition through time are needed. We used structural equation modeling and leveraged a stream survey program to identify and compare important predictors driving condition of benthic macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages. We used data resampled 14 years apart at 252 locations across Maryland, USA. Sample locations covered a wide range of conditions that varied spatiotemporally. Overall, the relationship directions were consistent between sample periods, but their relative strength varied temporally. For benthic macroinvertebrates, we found that the total effect of natural landscape (e.g., elevation, longitude, latitude, geology) and land use (i.e., forest, development, agriculture) predictors was 1.4 and 1.5 times greater in the late 2010s compared to the 2000s. Moreover, the total effect of water quality (e.g., total nitrogen and conductivity) and habitat (e.g., embeddedness, riffle quality) was 1.2 and 4.8 times lower in the 2010s, respectively. For fish assemblage condition, the total effect of land use-land cover predictors was 2.3 times greater in the 2010s compared to the 2000s, while the total effect of local habitat was 1.4 times lower in the 2010s, respectively. As expected, we found biological assemblages in catchments with more agriculture and urban development were generally comprised of tolerant, generalist species, while assemblages in catchments with greater forest cover had more-specialized, less-tolerant species (e.g., Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera taxa, clingers, benthic and lithophilic spawning fishes). Changes in the relative importance of landscape and land-use predictors suggest other correlated, yet unmeasured, proximal factors became more important over time. By untangling these ecological networks, stakeholders can gain a better understanding of the spatiotemporal relationships driving biological condition to implement management practices aimed at improving stream condition. [Display omitted] •We evaluated temporal consistency in biological stream condition at resampled sites.•Structural equation models revealed a complex network of interacting predictors.•Overall, the direction of effect was consistent after 14 years.•But the strength and relative importance of those relationships varied temporally.•Assemblage condition in more disturbed catchments comprised tolerant, generalist taxa.</description><subject>Benthic macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Total effects</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAQxy0EglL4CuCRgRTbSfyYEEK8JCSW7pbjXFtXiV1sp6jfnlQFVm655f-4-yF0TcmMEsrv1rNkXQ4Z_HbGCKMzWgkl6yM0oVKoghLGj9GEkEoWiitxhs5TWpNxhKSn6KysSlZKVk6QnbsecG-iXUHCwd_iZsi4DTivAFszJNPhjcmrL7NLuI1u6_wSO59yBNPjlWlcNhkb3-LGhS4sdzhCb5zHNvjk0nhgvr9AJwvTJbj82VM0f36aP74W7x8vb48P74WtGMmFslAB5VxZRmqrakIZEYLXkhNlOCjKy4UE1nAKgpe1tMwurJFNNRJpDCmn6OYQu4nhc4CUde-Sha4zHsKQNKtrXsqai2qUioPUxpBShIXeRDdC2GlK9B6wXus_wHoPWB8Aj86rn5Kh6aH98_0SHQUPBwGMn24dxH0QeAuti2CzboP7t-Qb5hiRFQ</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Walker, Richard H.</creator><creator>Ashton, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Cashman, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Fanelli, Rosemary M.</creator><creator>Krause, Kevin P.</creator><creator>Noe, Gregory B.</creator><creator>Maloney, Kelly O.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Time marches on, but do the causal pathways driving instream habitat and biology remain consistent?</title><author>Walker, Richard H. ; Ashton, Matthew J. ; Cashman, Matthew J. ; Fanelli, Rosemary M. ; Krause, Kevin P. ; Noe, Gregory B. ; Maloney, Kelly O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-9ce4e1669c205c95012077658609a6e9163f8e2b61e76358c2cfca8b4101ba03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Benthic macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Total effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashton, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cashman, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, Rosemary M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noe, Gregory B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maloney, Kelly O.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, Richard H.</au><au>Ashton, Matthew J.</au><au>Cashman, Matthew J.</au><au>Fanelli, Rosemary M.</au><au>Krause, Kevin P.</au><au>Noe, Gregory B.</au><au>Maloney, Kelly O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Time marches on, but do the causal pathways driving instream habitat and biology remain consistent?</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>789</volume><spage>147985</spage><epage>147985</epage><pages>147985-147985</pages><artnum>147985</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Stream ecosystems are complex networks of interacting terrestrial and aquatic drivers. To untangle these ecological networks, efforts evaluating the direct and indirect effects of landscape, climate, and instream predictors on biological condition through time are needed. We used structural equation modeling and leveraged a stream survey program to identify and compare important predictors driving condition of benthic macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages. We used data resampled 14 years apart at 252 locations across Maryland, USA. Sample locations covered a wide range of conditions that varied spatiotemporally. Overall, the relationship directions were consistent between sample periods, but their relative strength varied temporally. For benthic macroinvertebrates, we found that the total effect of natural landscape (e.g., elevation, longitude, latitude, geology) and land use (i.e., forest, development, agriculture) predictors was 1.4 and 1.5 times greater in the late 2010s compared to the 2000s. Moreover, the total effect of water quality (e.g., total nitrogen and conductivity) and habitat (e.g., embeddedness, riffle quality) was 1.2 and 4.8 times lower in the 2010s, respectively. For fish assemblage condition, the total effect of land use-land cover predictors was 2.3 times greater in the 2010s compared to the 2000s, while the total effect of local habitat was 1.4 times lower in the 2010s, respectively. As expected, we found biological assemblages in catchments with more agriculture and urban development were generally comprised of tolerant, generalist species, while assemblages in catchments with greater forest cover had more-specialized, less-tolerant species (e.g., Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera taxa, clingers, benthic and lithophilic spawning fishes). Changes in the relative importance of landscape and land-use predictors suggest other correlated, yet unmeasured, proximal factors became more important over time. By untangling these ecological networks, stakeholders can gain a better understanding of the spatiotemporal relationships driving biological condition to implement management practices aimed at improving stream condition. [Display omitted] •We evaluated temporal consistency in biological stream condition at resampled sites.•Structural equation models revealed a complex network of interacting predictors.•Overall, the direction of effect was consistent after 14 years.•But the strength and relative importance of those relationships varied temporally.•Assemblage condition in more disturbed catchments comprised tolerant, generalist taxa.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34323823</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147985</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2021-10, Vol.789, p.147985-147985, Article 147985
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2556385674
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Benthic macroinvertebrates
Fishes
Maryland
Streams
Structural equation modeling
Total effects
title Time marches on, but do the causal pathways driving instream habitat and biology remain consistent?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T04%3A01%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time%20marches%20on,%20but%20do%20the%20causal%20pathways%20driving%20instream%20habitat%20and%20biology%20remain%20consistent?&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Walker,%20Richard%20H.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=789&rft.spage=147985&rft.epage=147985&rft.pages=147985-147985&rft.artnum=147985&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147985&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2556385674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556385674&rft_id=info:pmid/34323823&rft_els_id=S0048969721030564&rfr_iscdi=true