Modeling Perceptual Confidence and the Confidence Forced-Choice Paradigm
Perceptual confidence is an evaluation of the validity of our perceptual decisions. We present here a complete generative model that describes how confidence judgments result from some confidence evidence. The model that generates confidence evidence has two main parameters, confidence noise and con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological review 2022-10, Vol.129 (5), p.976-998 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 998 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 976 |
container_title | Psychological review |
container_volume | 129 |
creator | Mamassian, Pascal de Gardelle, Vincent |
description | Perceptual confidence is an evaluation of the validity of our perceptual decisions. We present here a complete generative model that describes how confidence judgments result from some confidence evidence. The model that generates confidence evidence has two main parameters, confidence noise and confidence boost. Confidence noise reduces the sensitivity to the confidence evidence, and confidence boost accounts for information used for confidence judgment which was not used for the perceptual decision. The opposite effect of these two parameters creates a problem of confidence parameters indeterminacy, where the confidence in a perceptual decision is the same in spite of differences in confidence noise and confidence boost. When confidence is estimated for multiple stimulus strengths, both of these parameters can be recovered, thus allowing us to estimate whether confidence is generated using the same primary information that was used for the perceptual decision or some secondary information. We also describe a novel measure of confidence efficiency relative to the ideal confidence observer, as well as the estimate of one type of confidence bias. Finally, we apply the model to the confidence forced-choice paradigm, a paradigm that provides objective estimates of confidence, and we discuss how each parameter of the model can be recovered using this paradigm. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/rev0000312 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2556385106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2556385106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a450t-5b0cf688c7a1d9db9ab965ba2b59e3072462170a526068865744e9b2e43de9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1P3DAQBmALgWBLufAD0EpcKGpafyc-ohWwlRaVA4ferIk9ywZl49ROkPj3OFoKVQ_1ZeTRo9djDSGnjH5jVJTfIz7TfATje2TGjDAFkyXbJ7PcEwU36tcR-ZTS04SYMYfkSEjBharojCzvgse26R7n9xgd9sMI7XwRunXjsXM4h87Phw3-3boJGfpisQlNvt1DBN88bj-TgzW0CU_e6jF5uLl-WCyL1c_bH4urVQFS0aFQNXVrXVWuBOaNrw3URqsaeK0MClpyqTkrKSiuaWZalVKiqTlK4XMVx-TLLnYDre1js4X4YgM0dnm1slOPCqk40-qZZXuxs30Mv0dMg902yWHbQodhTJYrpUWlGNWZnv9Dn8IYu_wRy0tRaaq0Mv9VOYtKUcnp2cudcjGkFHH9PiejdlqY_VhYxmdvkWO9Rf9O_2wog687AD3YPr04iEPjWkxujBG7YQqzjBurrCm1eAV7TZxR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556043841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling Perceptual Confidence and the Confidence Forced-Choice Paradigm</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Mamassian, Pascal ; de Gardelle, Vincent</creator><contributor>Grigorenko, Elena L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mamassian, Pascal ; de Gardelle, Vincent ; Grigorenko, Elena L</creatorcontrib><description>Perceptual confidence is an evaluation of the validity of our perceptual decisions. We present here a complete generative model that describes how confidence judgments result from some confidence evidence. The model that generates confidence evidence has two main parameters, confidence noise and confidence boost. Confidence noise reduces the sensitivity to the confidence evidence, and confidence boost accounts for information used for confidence judgment which was not used for the perceptual decision. The opposite effect of these two parameters creates a problem of confidence parameters indeterminacy, where the confidence in a perceptual decision is the same in spite of differences in confidence noise and confidence boost. When confidence is estimated for multiple stimulus strengths, both of these parameters can be recovered, thus allowing us to estimate whether confidence is generated using the same primary information that was used for the perceptual decision or some secondary information. We also describe a novel measure of confidence efficiency relative to the ideal confidence observer, as well as the estimate of one type of confidence bias. Finally, we apply the model to the confidence forced-choice paradigm, a paradigm that provides objective estimates of confidence, and we discuss how each parameter of the model can be recovered using this paradigm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-295X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/rev0000312</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34323580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Bias ; Cognitive science ; Confidence ; Decision Making ; Forced Choice (Testing Method) ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Neuroscience ; Noise ; Noise Effects ; Paradigms ; Perception ; Psychology ; Simulation ; Stimulus ; Test Bias ; Visual Attention</subject><ispartof>Psychological review, 2022-10, Vol.129 (5), p.976-998</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2022</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a450t-5b0cf688c7a1d9db9ab965ba2b59e3072462170a526068865744e9b2e43de9b3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-1605-4607 ; 0000-0001-5977-5597</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34323580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://cnrs.hal.science/hal-03452165$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Grigorenko, Elena L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mamassian, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gardelle, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling Perceptual Confidence and the Confidence Forced-Choice Paradigm</title><title>Psychological review</title><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>Perceptual confidence is an evaluation of the validity of our perceptual decisions. We present here a complete generative model that describes how confidence judgments result from some confidence evidence. The model that generates confidence evidence has two main parameters, confidence noise and confidence boost. Confidence noise reduces the sensitivity to the confidence evidence, and confidence boost accounts for information used for confidence judgment which was not used for the perceptual decision. The opposite effect of these two parameters creates a problem of confidence parameters indeterminacy, where the confidence in a perceptual decision is the same in spite of differences in confidence noise and confidence boost. When confidence is estimated for multiple stimulus strengths, both of these parameters can be recovered, thus allowing us to estimate whether confidence is generated using the same primary information that was used for the perceptual decision or some secondary information. We also describe a novel measure of confidence efficiency relative to the ideal confidence observer, as well as the estimate of one type of confidence bias. Finally, we apply the model to the confidence forced-choice paradigm, a paradigm that provides objective estimates of confidence, and we discuss how each parameter of the model can be recovered using this paradigm.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Confidence</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Forced Choice (Testing Method)</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Noise Effects</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Test Bias</subject><subject>Visual Attention</subject><issn>0033-295X</issn><issn>1939-1471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1P3DAQBmALgWBLufAD0EpcKGpafyc-ohWwlRaVA4ferIk9ywZl49ROkPj3OFoKVQ_1ZeTRo9djDSGnjH5jVJTfIz7TfATje2TGjDAFkyXbJ7PcEwU36tcR-ZTS04SYMYfkSEjBharojCzvgse26R7n9xgd9sMI7XwRunXjsXM4h87Phw3-3boJGfpisQlNvt1DBN88bj-TgzW0CU_e6jF5uLl-WCyL1c_bH4urVQFS0aFQNXVrXVWuBOaNrw3URqsaeK0MClpyqTkrKSiuaWZalVKiqTlK4XMVx-TLLnYDre1js4X4YgM0dnm1slOPCqk40-qZZXuxs30Mv0dMg902yWHbQodhTJYrpUWlGNWZnv9Dn8IYu_wRy0tRaaq0Mv9VOYtKUcnp2cudcjGkFHH9PiejdlqY_VhYxmdvkWO9Rf9O_2wog687AD3YPr04iEPjWkxujBG7YQqzjBurrCm1eAV7TZxR</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Mamassian, Pascal</creator><creator>de Gardelle, Vincent</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1605-4607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-5597</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Modeling Perceptual Confidence and the Confidence Forced-Choice Paradigm</title><author>Mamassian, Pascal ; de Gardelle, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a450t-5b0cf688c7a1d9db9ab965ba2b59e3072462170a526068865744e9b2e43de9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Confidence</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Forced Choice (Testing Method)</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Noise Effects</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Test Bias</topic><topic>Visual Attention</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mamassian, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gardelle, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mamassian, Pascal</au><au>de Gardelle, Vincent</au><au>Grigorenko, Elena L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling Perceptual Confidence and the Confidence Forced-Choice Paradigm</atitle><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>976</spage><epage>998</epage><pages>976-998</pages><issn>0033-295X</issn><eissn>1939-1471</eissn><abstract>Perceptual confidence is an evaluation of the validity of our perceptual decisions. We present here a complete generative model that describes how confidence judgments result from some confidence evidence. The model that generates confidence evidence has two main parameters, confidence noise and confidence boost. Confidence noise reduces the sensitivity to the confidence evidence, and confidence boost accounts for information used for confidence judgment which was not used for the perceptual decision. The opposite effect of these two parameters creates a problem of confidence parameters indeterminacy, where the confidence in a perceptual decision is the same in spite of differences in confidence noise and confidence boost. When confidence is estimated for multiple stimulus strengths, both of these parameters can be recovered, thus allowing us to estimate whether confidence is generated using the same primary information that was used for the perceptual decision or some secondary information. We also describe a novel measure of confidence efficiency relative to the ideal confidence observer, as well as the estimate of one type of confidence bias. Finally, we apply the model to the confidence forced-choice paradigm, a paradigm that provides objective estimates of confidence, and we discuss how each parameter of the model can be recovered using this paradigm.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>34323580</pmid><doi>10.1037/rev0000312</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1605-4607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-5597</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-295X |
ispartof | Psychological review, 2022-10, Vol.129 (5), p.976-998 |
issn | 0033-295X 1939-1471 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2556385106 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Bias Cognitive science Confidence Decision Making Forced Choice (Testing Method) Human Humans Judgment Neuroscience Noise Noise Effects Paradigms Perception Psychology Simulation Stimulus Test Bias Visual Attention |
title | Modeling Perceptual Confidence and the Confidence Forced-Choice Paradigm |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A49%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20Perceptual%20Confidence%20and%20the%20Confidence%20Forced-Choice%20Paradigm&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20review&rft.au=Mamassian,%20Pascal&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=976&rft.epage=998&rft.pages=976-998&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.eissn=1939-1471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/rev0000312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2556385106%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556043841&rft_id=info:pmid/34323580&rfr_iscdi=true |