Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes

THE constant ' b value ' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, howev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature (London) 1992-01, Vol.355 (6355), p.71-73
Hauptverfasser: Pacheco, Javier F., Scholz, Christopher H., Sykes, Lynn R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 73
container_issue 6355
container_start_page 71
container_title Nature (London)
container_volume 355
creator Pacheco, Javier F.
Scholz, Christopher H.
Sykes, Lynn R.
description THE constant ' b value ' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, however, that the seismic moment released in small earthquakes scales differently with rupture length than it does for large events 1,2 , where the crossover between small and large events is defined at a rupture dimension equal to the down-dip width of the seismogenic zone. A possible explanation for this contradiction is that frequency–size distributions are biased by small earthquakes. Small events dominate most global earthquake catalogues because of the short time-period covered. Another source of bias in size distributions is the saturation of earthquake magnitudes for large events. Here we correct biases in calculations of b values and present evidence for a change in b value in frequency–size distributions. We find that a break in self-similarity, from small to large earthquakes, occurs at a point where the dimension of the event equals the down-dip width of the seismogenic layer.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/355071a0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25560464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16195623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-a614bdb052c472e44595bb9c09e8c32cd693b40de17421d782723acb5570ed713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1Ow0AUhFcIJEJA4gguEILCsP9rlygCghSJBmrreb1OHDZ2ss8uQsUduCEnYVGAhoJqivk0Gn2EnDJ6xajIroVS1DCge2TEpNGp1JnZJyNKeZbSTOhDcoS4pJQqZuSITCcLaOcOk6ZN6uA2g2vt9uPtHZtXlwTnoW-6FhfNOrbdKsEVeJ_0XeIhzF3iIPSLzQAvDo_JQQ0e3cl3jsnz3e3TZJrOHu8fJjezFIQRfQqaybIqqeJWGu6kVLkqy9zS3GVWcFvpXJSSVi6-46wyGTdcgC2VMtRVhokxOd_trkMX32JfrBq0zntoXTdgwZXSVGr5L8g0y5XmIoIXO9CGDjG4uliHZgVhWzBafDktfpxG9Ox7E9CCrwO0tsFfXkrDOOMRu9xhGJtoNxTLbght1PJ38hPt3YMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16195623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>Pacheco, Javier F. ; Scholz, Christopher H. ; Sykes, Lynn R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Javier F. ; Scholz, Christopher H. ; Sykes, Lynn R.</creatorcontrib><description>THE constant ' b value ' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, however, that the seismic moment released in small earthquakes scales differently with rupture length than it does for large events 1,2 , where the crossover between small and large events is defined at a rupture dimension equal to the down-dip width of the seismogenic zone. A possible explanation for this contradiction is that frequency–size distributions are biased by small earthquakes. Small events dominate most global earthquake catalogues because of the short time-period covered. Another source of bias in size distributions is the saturation of earthquake magnitudes for large events. Here we correct biases in calculations of b values and present evidence for a change in b value in frequency–size distributions. We find that a break in self-similarity, from small to large earthquakes, occurs at a point where the dimension of the event equals the down-dip width of the seismogenic layer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/355071a0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NATUAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquakes, seismology ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Internal geophysics ; letter ; multidisciplinary ; Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 1992-01, Vol.355 (6355), p.71-73</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 1992</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-a614bdb052c472e44595bb9c09e8c32cd693b40de17421d782723acb5570ed713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-a614bdb052c472e44595bb9c09e8c32cd693b40de17421d782723acb5570ed713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/355071a0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/355071a0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4471212$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Javier F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Christopher H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Lynn R.</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>THE constant ' b value ' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, however, that the seismic moment released in small earthquakes scales differently with rupture length than it does for large events 1,2 , where the crossover between small and large events is defined at a rupture dimension equal to the down-dip width of the seismogenic zone. A possible explanation for this contradiction is that frequency–size distributions are biased by small earthquakes. Small events dominate most global earthquake catalogues because of the short time-period covered. Another source of bias in size distributions is the saturation of earthquake magnitudes for large events. Here we correct biases in calculations of b values and present evidence for a change in b value in frequency–size distributions. We find that a break in self-similarity, from small to large earthquakes, occurs at a point where the dimension of the event equals the down-dip width of the seismogenic layer.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquakes, seismology</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1Ow0AUhFcIJEJA4gguEILCsP9rlygCghSJBmrreb1OHDZ2ss8uQsUduCEnYVGAhoJqivk0Gn2EnDJ6xajIroVS1DCge2TEpNGp1JnZJyNKeZbSTOhDcoS4pJQqZuSITCcLaOcOk6ZN6uA2g2vt9uPtHZtXlwTnoW-6FhfNOrbdKsEVeJ_0XeIhzF3iIPSLzQAvDo_JQQ0e3cl3jsnz3e3TZJrOHu8fJjezFIQRfQqaybIqqeJWGu6kVLkqy9zS3GVWcFvpXJSSVi6-46wyGTdcgC2VMtRVhokxOd_trkMX32JfrBq0zntoXTdgwZXSVGr5L8g0y5XmIoIXO9CGDjG4uliHZgVhWzBafDktfpxG9Ox7E9CCrwO0tsFfXkrDOOMRu9xhGJtoNxTLbght1PJ38hPt3YMk</recordid><startdate>19920102</startdate><enddate>19920102</enddate><creator>Pacheco, Javier F.</creator><creator>Scholz, Christopher H.</creator><creator>Sykes, Lynn R.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920102</creationdate><title>Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes</title><author>Pacheco, Javier F. ; Scholz, Christopher H. ; Sykes, Lynn R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-a614bdb052c472e44595bb9c09e8c32cd693b40de17421d782723acb5570ed713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquakes, seismology</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Javier F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Christopher H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Lynn R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pacheco, Javier F.</au><au>Scholz, Christopher H.</au><au>Sykes, Lynn R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><date>1992-01-02</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>355</volume><issue>6355</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>71-73</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><coden>NATUAS</coden><abstract>THE constant ' b value ' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, however, that the seismic moment released in small earthquakes scales differently with rupture length than it does for large events 1,2 , where the crossover between small and large events is defined at a rupture dimension equal to the down-dip width of the seismogenic zone. A possible explanation for this contradiction is that frequency–size distributions are biased by small earthquakes. Small events dominate most global earthquake catalogues because of the short time-period covered. Another source of bias in size distributions is the saturation of earthquake magnitudes for large events. Here we correct biases in calculations of b values and present evidence for a change in b value in frequency–size distributions. We find that a break in self-similarity, from small to large earthquakes, occurs at a point where the dimension of the event equals the down-dip width of the seismogenic layer.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><doi>10.1038/355071a0</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-0836
ispartof Nature (London), 1992-01, Vol.355 (6355), p.71-73
issn 0028-0836
1476-4687
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25560464
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Nature Journals Online
subjects Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Earthquakes, seismology
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Exact sciences and technology
Humanities and Social Sciences
Internal geophysics
letter
multidisciplinary
Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A08%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20frequency%E2%80%93size%20relationship%20from%20small%20to%20large%20earthquakes&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=Pacheco,%20Javier%20F.&rft.date=1992-01-02&rft.volume=355&rft.issue=6355&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=71-73&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft.coden=NATUAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/355071a0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16195623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16195623&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true