Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes
THE constant ' b value ' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, howev...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature (London) 1992-01, Vol.355 (6355), p.71-73 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 73 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6355 |
container_start_page | 71 |
container_title | Nature (London) |
container_volume | 355 |
creator | Pacheco, Javier F. Scholz, Christopher H. Sykes, Lynn R. |
description | THE constant '
b value
' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, however, that the seismic moment released in small earthquakes scales differently with rupture length than it does for large events
1,2
, where the crossover between small and large events is defined at a rupture dimension equal to the down-dip width of the seismogenic zone. A possible explanation for this contradiction is that frequency–size distributions are biased by small earthquakes. Small events dominate most global earthquake catalogues because of the short time-period covered. Another source of bias in size distributions is the saturation of earthquake magnitudes for large events. Here we correct biases in calculations of
b
values and present evidence for a change in
b
value in frequency–size distributions. We find that a break in self-similarity, from small to large earthquakes, occurs at a point where the dimension of the event equals the down-dip width of the seismogenic layer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/355071a0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25560464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16195623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-a614bdb052c472e44595bb9c09e8c32cd693b40de17421d782723acb5570ed713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1Ow0AUhFcIJEJA4gguEILCsP9rlygCghSJBmrreb1OHDZ2ss8uQsUduCEnYVGAhoJqivk0Gn2EnDJ6xajIroVS1DCge2TEpNGp1JnZJyNKeZbSTOhDcoS4pJQqZuSITCcLaOcOk6ZN6uA2g2vt9uPtHZtXlwTnoW-6FhfNOrbdKsEVeJ_0XeIhzF3iIPSLzQAvDo_JQQ0e3cl3jsnz3e3TZJrOHu8fJjezFIQRfQqaybIqqeJWGu6kVLkqy9zS3GVWcFvpXJSSVi6-46wyGTdcgC2VMtRVhokxOd_trkMX32JfrBq0zntoXTdgwZXSVGr5L8g0y5XmIoIXO9CGDjG4uliHZgVhWzBafDktfpxG9Ox7E9CCrwO0tsFfXkrDOOMRu9xhGJtoNxTLbght1PJ38hPt3YMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16195623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>Pacheco, Javier F. ; Scholz, Christopher H. ; Sykes, Lynn R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Javier F. ; Scholz, Christopher H. ; Sykes, Lynn R.</creatorcontrib><description>THE constant '
b value
' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, however, that the seismic moment released in small earthquakes scales differently with rupture length than it does for large events
1,2
, where the crossover between small and large events is defined at a rupture dimension equal to the down-dip width of the seismogenic zone. A possible explanation for this contradiction is that frequency–size distributions are biased by small earthquakes. Small events dominate most global earthquake catalogues because of the short time-period covered. Another source of bias in size distributions is the saturation of earthquake magnitudes for large events. Here we correct biases in calculations of
b
values and present evidence for a change in
b
value in frequency–size distributions. We find that a break in self-similarity, from small to large earthquakes, occurs at a point where the dimension of the event equals the down-dip width of the seismogenic layer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/355071a0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NATUAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquakes, seismology ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Internal geophysics ; letter ; multidisciplinary ; Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 1992-01, Vol.355 (6355), p.71-73</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 1992</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-a614bdb052c472e44595bb9c09e8c32cd693b40de17421d782723acb5570ed713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-a614bdb052c472e44595bb9c09e8c32cd693b40de17421d782723acb5570ed713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/355071a0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/355071a0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4471212$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Javier F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Christopher H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Lynn R.</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>THE constant '
b value
' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, however, that the seismic moment released in small earthquakes scales differently with rupture length than it does for large events
1,2
, where the crossover between small and large events is defined at a rupture dimension equal to the down-dip width of the seismogenic zone. A possible explanation for this contradiction is that frequency–size distributions are biased by small earthquakes. Small events dominate most global earthquake catalogues because of the short time-period covered. Another source of bias in size distributions is the saturation of earthquake magnitudes for large events. Here we correct biases in calculations of
b
values and present evidence for a change in
b
value in frequency–size distributions. We find that a break in self-similarity, from small to large earthquakes, occurs at a point where the dimension of the event equals the down-dip width of the seismogenic layer.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquakes, seismology</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1Ow0AUhFcIJEJA4gguEILCsP9rlygCghSJBmrreb1OHDZ2ss8uQsUduCEnYVGAhoJqivk0Gn2EnDJ6xajIroVS1DCge2TEpNGp1JnZJyNKeZbSTOhDcoS4pJQqZuSITCcLaOcOk6ZN6uA2g2vt9uPtHZtXlwTnoW-6FhfNOrbdKsEVeJ_0XeIhzF3iIPSLzQAvDo_JQQ0e3cl3jsnz3e3TZJrOHu8fJjezFIQRfQqaybIqqeJWGu6kVLkqy9zS3GVWcFvpXJSSVi6-46wyGTdcgC2VMtRVhokxOd_trkMX32JfrBq0zntoXTdgwZXSVGr5L8g0y5XmIoIXO9CGDjG4uliHZgVhWzBafDktfpxG9Ox7E9CCrwO0tsFfXkrDOOMRu9xhGJtoNxTLbght1PJ38hPt3YMk</recordid><startdate>19920102</startdate><enddate>19920102</enddate><creator>Pacheco, Javier F.</creator><creator>Scholz, Christopher H.</creator><creator>Sykes, Lynn R.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920102</creationdate><title>Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes</title><author>Pacheco, Javier F. ; Scholz, Christopher H. ; Sykes, Lynn R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a373t-a614bdb052c472e44595bb9c09e8c32cd693b40de17421d782723acb5570ed713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquakes, seismology</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Javier F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Christopher H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Lynn R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pacheco, Javier F.</au><au>Scholz, Christopher H.</au><au>Sykes, Lynn R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><date>1992-01-02</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>355</volume><issue>6355</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>71-73</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><coden>NATUAS</coden><abstract>THE constant '
b value
' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, however, that the seismic moment released in small earthquakes scales differently with rupture length than it does for large events
1,2
, where the crossover between small and large events is defined at a rupture dimension equal to the down-dip width of the seismogenic zone. A possible explanation for this contradiction is that frequency–size distributions are biased by small earthquakes. Small events dominate most global earthquake catalogues because of the short time-period covered. Another source of bias in size distributions is the saturation of earthquake magnitudes for large events. Here we correct biases in calculations of
b
values and present evidence for a change in
b
value in frequency–size distributions. We find that a break in self-similarity, from small to large earthquakes, occurs at a point where the dimension of the event equals the down-dip width of the seismogenic layer.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><doi>10.1038/355071a0</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-0836 |
ispartof | Nature (London), 1992-01, Vol.355 (6355), p.71-73 |
issn | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25560464 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Nature Journals Online |
subjects | Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Earthquakes, seismology Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Exact sciences and technology Humanities and Social Sciences Internal geophysics letter multidisciplinary Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc Science Science (multidisciplinary) |
title | Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A08%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20frequency%E2%80%93size%20relationship%20from%20small%20to%20large%20earthquakes&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=Pacheco,%20Javier%20F.&rft.date=1992-01-02&rft.volume=355&rft.issue=6355&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=71-73&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft.coden=NATUAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/355071a0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16195623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16195623&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |