Effects of anthropogenic landscapes on population maintenance of waterbirds
Anthropogenic impacts have reduced natural areas but increased the area of anthropogenic landscapes. There is debate about whether anthropogenic landscapes (e.g., farmlands, orchards, and fish ponds) provide alternatives to natural habitat and under what circumstances. We considered whether anthropo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2022-04, Vol.36 (2), p.e13808-n/a |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | n/a |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | e13808 |
| container_title | Conservation biology |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Wang, Xiaodan Li, Xinhai Ren, Xiaotong Jackson, Micha V. Fuller, Richard A. Melville, David S. Amano, Tatsuya Ma, Zhijun |
| description | Anthropogenic impacts have reduced natural areas but increased the area of anthropogenic landscapes. There is debate about whether anthropogenic landscapes (e.g., farmlands, orchards, and fish ponds) provide alternatives to natural habitat and under what circumstances. We considered whether anthropogenic landscapes can mitigate population declines for waterbirds. We collected data on population trends and biological traits of 1203 populations of 579 species across the planet. Using Bayesian generalized linear mixed models, we tested whether the ability of a species to use an anthropogenic landscape can predict population trends of waterbird globally and of species of conservation concern. Anthropogenic landscapes benefited population maintenance of common but not less‐common species. Conversely, the use of anthropogenic landscapes was associated with population declines for threatened species. Our findings delineate some limitations to the ability of anthropogenic landscapes to mitigate population declines, suggesting that the maintenance of global waterbird populations depends on protecting remaining natural areas and improving the habitat quality in anthropogenic landscapes.
Article impact statement: Protecting natural areas and improving the quality of anthropogenic landscapes as habitat are both needed to achieve effective conservation.
Efectos de los Paisajes Antropogénicos sobre la Conservación de Poblaciones de Aves Acuáticas
Resumen
Los impactos antropogénicos han reducido las áreas naturales, pero han incrementado el área de los paisajes antropogénicos. Existe un debate sobre si los paisajes antropogénicos (p. ej.: campos de cultivo, huertos, estanques de peces) proporcionan alternativas al hábitat natural y bajo cuáles circunstancias. Consideramos si los paisajes antropogénicos pueden mitigar las declinaciones poblacionales de las aves acuáticas. Recolectamos datos sobre las tendencias poblacionales y las características biológicas de 1203 poblaciones de 579 especies de aves de todo el mundo. Mediante modelos bayesianos generalizados lineales mixtos, analizamos si la habilidad de una especie para usar un paisaje antropogénico puede pronosticar las tendencias poblacionales de las aves acuáticas a nivel mundial y de las especies de interés para la conservación. Los paisajes antropogénicos beneficiaron a la conservación de las poblaciones de especies comunes, pero no para las especies menos comunes. Por otro lado, el uso de paisajes antropogénicos e |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cobi.13808 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2555641496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2650065667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-dd0d6f64bc9aa306ef60d7ea248b132adf13a71d2197bf3e62bc142717ddd1473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlYv_gApeBFhaybZZLNHLVWLhV70HLL50C3bzZrsUvrv3drqwYNzmYF55mF4EboEPIG-7rQvyglQgcURGgIjNIGM5sdoiIUQiRA5GaCzGFcY45xBeooGNKVAKeND9DJzzuo2jr0bq7r9CL7x77Yu9bhStYlaNbbf1ePGN12l2rIf16qsW1urWtvd1Ua1NhRlMPEcnThVRXtx6CP09jh7nT4ni-XTfHq_SDRlmUiMwYY7nhY6V4pibh3HJrOKpKIASpRxQFUGhkCeFY5aTgoNKckgM8ZAmtERutl7m-A_OxtbuS6jtlX_sfVdlIQxxlNIc96j13_Qle9C3X8nCWcYc8b5Tni7p3TwMQbrZBPKtQpbCVjuIpa7iOV3xD18dVB2xdqaX_Qn0x6APbApK7v9RyWny4f5XvoFQyyGVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2650065667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of anthropogenic landscapes on population maintenance of waterbirds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wang, Xiaodan ; Li, Xinhai ; Ren, Xiaotong ; Jackson, Micha V. ; Fuller, Richard A. ; Melville, David S. ; Amano, Tatsuya ; Ma, Zhijun</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaodan ; Li, Xinhai ; Ren, Xiaotong ; Jackson, Micha V. ; Fuller, Richard A. ; Melville, David S. ; Amano, Tatsuya ; Ma, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><description>Anthropogenic impacts have reduced natural areas but increased the area of anthropogenic landscapes. There is debate about whether anthropogenic landscapes (e.g., farmlands, orchards, and fish ponds) provide alternatives to natural habitat and under what circumstances. We considered whether anthropogenic landscapes can mitigate population declines for waterbirds. We collected data on population trends and biological traits of 1203 populations of 579 species across the planet. Using Bayesian generalized linear mixed models, we tested whether the ability of a species to use an anthropogenic landscape can predict population trends of waterbird globally and of species of conservation concern. Anthropogenic landscapes benefited population maintenance of common but not less‐common species. Conversely, the use of anthropogenic landscapes was associated with population declines for threatened species. Our findings delineate some limitations to the ability of anthropogenic landscapes to mitigate population declines, suggesting that the maintenance of global waterbird populations depends on protecting remaining natural areas and improving the habitat quality in anthropogenic landscapes.
Article impact statement: Protecting natural areas and improving the quality of anthropogenic landscapes as habitat are both needed to achieve effective conservation.
Efectos de los Paisajes Antropogénicos sobre la Conservación de Poblaciones de Aves Acuáticas
Resumen
Los impactos antropogénicos han reducido las áreas naturales, pero han incrementado el área de los paisajes antropogénicos. Existe un debate sobre si los paisajes antropogénicos (p. ej.: campos de cultivo, huertos, estanques de peces) proporcionan alternativas al hábitat natural y bajo cuáles circunstancias. Consideramos si los paisajes antropogénicos pueden mitigar las declinaciones poblacionales de las aves acuáticas. Recolectamos datos sobre las tendencias poblacionales y las características biológicas de 1203 poblaciones de 579 especies de aves de todo el mundo. Mediante modelos bayesianos generalizados lineales mixtos, analizamos si la habilidad de una especie para usar un paisaje antropogénico puede pronosticar las tendencias poblacionales de las aves acuáticas a nivel mundial y de las especies de interés para la conservación. Los paisajes antropogénicos beneficiaron a la conservación de las poblaciones de especies comunes, pero no para las especies menos comunes. Por otro lado, el uso de paisajes antropogénicos estuvo asociado con las declinaciones poblacionales en las especies amenazadas. Nuestros descubrimientos delinean algunas limitaciones que tienen los paisajes antropogénicos para mitigar las declinaciones poblacionales, lo que sugiere que la conservación mundial de las poblaciones de aves acuáticas depende de la protección de las áreas naturales remanentes y del mejoramiento de la calidad del hábitat en los paisajes antropogénicos.
人工景观对水鸟种群维持的影响
人类活动导致自然景观的面积不断减少而人工景观的面积不断增加。关于人工景观 (例如农田、果园、鱼塘) 能否为野生生物提供替代自然景观的栖息地, 以及在什么情况下可以提供适宜的栖息地, 目前仍存在争论。我们收集了全球 579 种水鸟 1203 个种群的数量变化趋势和生物学特性数据, 探讨了水鸟利用人工景观是否有助于其维持种群数量。利用贝叶斯广义线性混合模型, 我们分别针对全球水鸟和受胁水鸟检验了物种是否利用人工景观与其种群趋势的关系。利用人工景观有助于数量较多的常见种的种群维持, 但对数量较少的不常见种的种群维持没有显著影响。相反, 利用人工景观的受胁物种更倾向于表现出种群下降的趋势。本研究结果指出了人工景观在减缓种群数量下降方面存在一定局限性, 表明了维持全球水鸟种群稳定不仅需要保护自然景观, 而且需要改善人工景观的栖息地质量.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13808</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34313356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Animals ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic birds ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Biological traits ; conservación ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Ecosystem ; Endangered & extinct species ; Environmental quality ; especie amenazada ; Fish ; Fish culture ; Fish farms ; Fish ponds ; habitat management ; Habitats ; Human influences ; humedales ; hábitat natural ; Landscape preservation ; Maintenance ; manejo de hábitat ; Mathematical models ; natural habitat ; Orchards ; Population ; Population decline ; Population Dynamics ; population trends ; Populations ; Probability theory ; Statistical models ; tendencias poblacionales ; Threatened species ; Trends ; Waterfowl ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2022-04, Vol.36 (2), p.e13808-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2021 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2022, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-dd0d6f64bc9aa306ef60d7ea248b132adf13a71d2197bf3e62bc142717ddd1473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-dd0d6f64bc9aa306ef60d7ea248b132adf13a71d2197bf3e62bc142717ddd1473</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4514-0149 ; 0000-0001-6576-3410 ; 0000-0001-7459-9448 ; 0000-0001-5714-0395 ; 0000-0001-9468-9678 ; 0000-0002-8857-6463 ; 0000-0002-5150-2962</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcobi.13808$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcobi.13808$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaodan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Micha V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melville, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amano, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of anthropogenic landscapes on population maintenance of waterbirds</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Anthropogenic impacts have reduced natural areas but increased the area of anthropogenic landscapes. There is debate about whether anthropogenic landscapes (e.g., farmlands, orchards, and fish ponds) provide alternatives to natural habitat and under what circumstances. We considered whether anthropogenic landscapes can mitigate population declines for waterbirds. We collected data on population trends and biological traits of 1203 populations of 579 species across the planet. Using Bayesian generalized linear mixed models, we tested whether the ability of a species to use an anthropogenic landscape can predict population trends of waterbird globally and of species of conservation concern. Anthropogenic landscapes benefited population maintenance of common but not less‐common species. Conversely, the use of anthropogenic landscapes was associated with population declines for threatened species. Our findings delineate some limitations to the ability of anthropogenic landscapes to mitigate population declines, suggesting that the maintenance of global waterbird populations depends on protecting remaining natural areas and improving the habitat quality in anthropogenic landscapes.
Article impact statement: Protecting natural areas and improving the quality of anthropogenic landscapes as habitat are both needed to achieve effective conservation.
Efectos de los Paisajes Antropogénicos sobre la Conservación de Poblaciones de Aves Acuáticas
Resumen
Los impactos antropogénicos han reducido las áreas naturales, pero han incrementado el área de los paisajes antropogénicos. Existe un debate sobre si los paisajes antropogénicos (p. ej.: campos de cultivo, huertos, estanques de peces) proporcionan alternativas al hábitat natural y bajo cuáles circunstancias. Consideramos si los paisajes antropogénicos pueden mitigar las declinaciones poblacionales de las aves acuáticas. Recolectamos datos sobre las tendencias poblacionales y las características biológicas de 1203 poblaciones de 579 especies de aves de todo el mundo. Mediante modelos bayesianos generalizados lineales mixtos, analizamos si la habilidad de una especie para usar un paisaje antropogénico puede pronosticar las tendencias poblacionales de las aves acuáticas a nivel mundial y de las especies de interés para la conservación. Los paisajes antropogénicos beneficiaron a la conservación de las poblaciones de especies comunes, pero no para las especies menos comunes. Por otro lado, el uso de paisajes antropogénicos estuvo asociado con las declinaciones poblacionales en las especies amenazadas. Nuestros descubrimientos delinean algunas limitaciones que tienen los paisajes antropogénicos para mitigar las declinaciones poblacionales, lo que sugiere que la conservación mundial de las poblaciones de aves acuáticas depende de la protección de las áreas naturales remanentes y del mejoramiento de la calidad del hábitat en los paisajes antropogénicos.
人工景观对水鸟种群维持的影响
人类活动导致自然景观的面积不断减少而人工景观的面积不断增加。关于人工景观 (例如农田、果园、鱼塘) 能否为野生生物提供替代自然景观的栖息地, 以及在什么情况下可以提供适宜的栖息地, 目前仍存在争论。我们收集了全球 579 种水鸟 1203 个种群的数量变化趋势和生物学特性数据, 探讨了水鸟利用人工景观是否有助于其维持种群数量。利用贝叶斯广义线性混合模型, 我们分别针对全球水鸟和受胁水鸟检验了物种是否利用人工景观与其种群趋势的关系。利用人工景观有助于数量较多的常见种的种群维持, 但对数量较少的不常见种的种群维持没有显著影响。相反, 利用人工景观的受胁物种更倾向于表现出种群下降的趋势。本研究结果指出了人工景观在减缓种群数量下降方面存在一定局限性, 表明了维持全球水鸟种群稳定不仅需要保护自然景观, 而且需要改善人工景观的栖息地质量.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biological traits</subject><subject>conservación</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>especie amenazada</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish culture</subject><subject>Fish farms</subject><subject>Fish ponds</subject><subject>habitat management</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>humedales</subject><subject>hábitat natural</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>manejo de hábitat</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>natural habitat</subject><subject>Orchards</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>population trends</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>tendencias poblacionales</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlYv_gApeBFhaybZZLNHLVWLhV70HLL50C3bzZrsUvrv3drqwYNzmYF55mF4EboEPIG-7rQvyglQgcURGgIjNIGM5sdoiIUQiRA5GaCzGFcY45xBeooGNKVAKeND9DJzzuo2jr0bq7r9CL7x77Yu9bhStYlaNbbf1ePGN12l2rIf16qsW1urWtvd1Ua1NhRlMPEcnThVRXtx6CP09jh7nT4ni-XTfHq_SDRlmUiMwYY7nhY6V4pibh3HJrOKpKIASpRxQFUGhkCeFY5aTgoNKckgM8ZAmtERutl7m-A_OxtbuS6jtlX_sfVdlIQxxlNIc96j13_Qle9C3X8nCWcYc8b5Tni7p3TwMQbrZBPKtQpbCVjuIpa7iOV3xD18dVB2xdqaX_Qn0x6APbApK7v9RyWny4f5XvoFQyyGVw</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Wang, Xiaodan</creator><creator>Li, Xinhai</creator><creator>Ren, Xiaotong</creator><creator>Jackson, Micha V.</creator><creator>Fuller, Richard A.</creator><creator>Melville, David S.</creator><creator>Amano, Tatsuya</creator><creator>Ma, Zhijun</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4514-0149</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-3410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-9448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5714-0395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-9678</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8857-6463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5150-2962</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Effects of anthropogenic landscapes on population maintenance of waterbirds</title><author>Wang, Xiaodan ; Li, Xinhai ; Ren, Xiaotong ; Jackson, Micha V. ; Fuller, Richard A. ; Melville, David S. ; Amano, Tatsuya ; Ma, Zhijun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-dd0d6f64bc9aa306ef60d7ea248b132adf13a71d2197bf3e62bc142717ddd1473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biological traits</topic><topic>conservación</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>especie amenazada</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish culture</topic><topic>Fish farms</topic><topic>Fish ponds</topic><topic>habitat management</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>humedales</topic><topic>hábitat natural</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>manejo de hábitat</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>natural habitat</topic><topic>Orchards</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>population trends</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>tendencias poblacionales</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaodan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Micha V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melville, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amano, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Zhijun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xiaodan</au><au>Li, Xinhai</au><au>Ren, Xiaotong</au><au>Jackson, Micha V.</au><au>Fuller, Richard A.</au><au>Melville, David S.</au><au>Amano, Tatsuya</au><au>Ma, Zhijun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of anthropogenic landscapes on population maintenance of waterbirds</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e13808</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13808-n/a</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Anthropogenic impacts have reduced natural areas but increased the area of anthropogenic landscapes. There is debate about whether anthropogenic landscapes (e.g., farmlands, orchards, and fish ponds) provide alternatives to natural habitat and under what circumstances. We considered whether anthropogenic landscapes can mitigate population declines for waterbirds. We collected data on population trends and biological traits of 1203 populations of 579 species across the planet. Using Bayesian generalized linear mixed models, we tested whether the ability of a species to use an anthropogenic landscape can predict population trends of waterbird globally and of species of conservation concern. Anthropogenic landscapes benefited population maintenance of common but not less‐common species. Conversely, the use of anthropogenic landscapes was associated with population declines for threatened species. Our findings delineate some limitations to the ability of anthropogenic landscapes to mitigate population declines, suggesting that the maintenance of global waterbird populations depends on protecting remaining natural areas and improving the habitat quality in anthropogenic landscapes.
Article impact statement: Protecting natural areas and improving the quality of anthropogenic landscapes as habitat are both needed to achieve effective conservation.
Efectos de los Paisajes Antropogénicos sobre la Conservación de Poblaciones de Aves Acuáticas
Resumen
Los impactos antropogénicos han reducido las áreas naturales, pero han incrementado el área de los paisajes antropogénicos. Existe un debate sobre si los paisajes antropogénicos (p. ej.: campos de cultivo, huertos, estanques de peces) proporcionan alternativas al hábitat natural y bajo cuáles circunstancias. Consideramos si los paisajes antropogénicos pueden mitigar las declinaciones poblacionales de las aves acuáticas. Recolectamos datos sobre las tendencias poblacionales y las características biológicas de 1203 poblaciones de 579 especies de aves de todo el mundo. Mediante modelos bayesianos generalizados lineales mixtos, analizamos si la habilidad de una especie para usar un paisaje antropogénico puede pronosticar las tendencias poblacionales de las aves acuáticas a nivel mundial y de las especies de interés para la conservación. Los paisajes antropogénicos beneficiaron a la conservación de las poblaciones de especies comunes, pero no para las especies menos comunes. Por otro lado, el uso de paisajes antropogénicos estuvo asociado con las declinaciones poblacionales en las especies amenazadas. Nuestros descubrimientos delinean algunas limitaciones que tienen los paisajes antropogénicos para mitigar las declinaciones poblacionales, lo que sugiere que la conservación mundial de las poblaciones de aves acuáticas depende de la protección de las áreas naturales remanentes y del mejoramiento de la calidad del hábitat en los paisajes antropogénicos.
人工景观对水鸟种群维持的影响
人类活动导致自然景观的面积不断减少而人工景观的面积不断增加。关于人工景观 (例如农田、果园、鱼塘) 能否为野生生物提供替代自然景观的栖息地, 以及在什么情况下可以提供适宜的栖息地, 目前仍存在争论。我们收集了全球 579 种水鸟 1203 个种群的数量变化趋势和生物学特性数据, 探讨了水鸟利用人工景观是否有助于其维持种群数量。利用贝叶斯广义线性混合模型, 我们分别针对全球水鸟和受胁水鸟检验了物种是否利用人工景观与其种群趋势的关系。利用人工景观有助于数量较多的常见种的种群维持, 但对数量较少的不常见种的种群维持没有显著影响。相反, 利用人工景观的受胁物种更倾向于表现出种群下降的趋势。本研究结果指出了人工景观在减缓种群数量下降方面存在一定局限性, 表明了维持全球水鸟种群稳定不仅需要保护自然景观, 而且需要改善人工景观的栖息地质量.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34313356</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.13808</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4514-0149</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-3410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-9448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5714-0395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-9678</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8857-6463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5150-2962</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
| ispartof | Conservation biology, 2022-04, Vol.36 (2), p.e13808-n/a |
| issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2555641496 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Agricultural land Animals Anthropogenic factors Aquatic birds Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Biological traits conservación Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources Ecosystem Endangered & extinct species Environmental quality especie amenazada Fish Fish culture Fish farms Fish ponds habitat management Habitats Human influences humedales hábitat natural Landscape preservation Maintenance manejo de hábitat Mathematical models natural habitat Orchards Population Population decline Population Dynamics population trends Populations Probability theory Statistical models tendencias poblacionales Threatened species Trends Waterfowl Wetlands |
| title | Effects of anthropogenic landscapes on population maintenance of waterbirds |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T16%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20anthropogenic%20landscapes%20on%20population%20maintenance%20of%20waterbirds&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Wang,%20Xiaodan&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e13808&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13808-n/a&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.13808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2650065667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2650065667&rft_id=info:pmid/34313356&rfr_iscdi=true |