Marginal support for a trophic cascade among sympatric canids in peripheral wolf range

Trophic cascades reportedly structure ecological communities through indirect species interactions. Though the predator–herbivore–autotroph relationship has received much attention, mechanistic evidence supporting intraguild trophic cascades is rare. We established 348 remote camera sites (1 August–...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 2021-11, Vol.102 (11), p.1-11
Hauptverfasser: Fowler, Nicholas L., Kautz, Todd M., Petroelje, Tyler R., Wilton, Clay M., Kellner, Kenneth F., O’Brien, Daniel J., Parsons, Bill, Beyer, Dean E., Belant, Jerrold L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 102
creator Fowler, Nicholas L.
Kautz, Todd M.
Petroelje, Tyler R.
Wilton, Clay M.
Kellner, Kenneth F.
O’Brien, Daniel J.
Parsons, Bill
Beyer, Dean E.
Belant, Jerrold L.
description Trophic cascades reportedly structure ecological communities through indirect species interactions. Though the predator–herbivore–autotroph relationship has received much attention, mechanistic evidence supporting intraguild trophic cascades is rare. We established 348 remote camera sites (1 August–5 September 2019) across seven study areas of varying wolf (Canis lupus) density including one study area where wolves were absent in northern Michigan, USA. Using multi-species occupancy modeling at species-relevant spatial scales, we evaluated the hypothesis that increased wolf occurrence suppresses coyote (C. latrans) occurrence with corresponding increased red fox (Vulpes vulpes) occurrence mediated by land cover edge density, human presence, and temporal partitioning. Remote cameras recorded >600,000 images and included 6,370, 10,137, and 4,876 detections of wolves, coyotes, and foxes, respectively. Fox occupancy probability was more than three times as high (0.29) at camera sites where wolves were present, relative to sites wolves were absent (0.09). Pairwise species interactions supported expected size-based dominance patterns among canids and insignificant effects were directionally consistent with reported reduced strength of top-down effects in peripheral wolf range. Increased edge density also increased co-occurrence of coyote and wolves, likely a function of increased prey availability and refugia for coyotes. Though foxes occurred in spatial proximity to wolves, competition was limited by greater temporal partitioning than observed between coyotes and foxes that were spatially segregated. Collectively, our results provide marginal support for the reported trophic cascade among wolves, coyotes, and foxes wherein topdown effects may be reduced near the edge of current wolf distributions. As predators continue to recolonize portions of their historic range, knowledge of the effects on intraguild predators has implications for species management and predicting prey population responses.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ecy.3494
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2555348538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27090970</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27090970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3484-e3d71eb417698f1dc070b97eca2cb0a42fa7012b93c3f9d79d890844bab8ac1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgCs4p-AWEgBcvnUmTLslRxvwDEy8qeAppmmwdbROTjtFvb-aGgmAugfDjed88AFxiNMEI5bdGDxNCBT0CIyyIyARm6BiMEMJ5JqYFPwVnMa5ROpjyEXh_VmFZd6qBceO9Cz20LkAF--D8qtZQq6hVZaBqXbeEcWi96sP3e1dXEdYd9CbUfmVCiti6xsKguqU5BydWNdFcHO4xeLufv84es8XLw9PsbpFpQjnNDKkYNiXFbCq4xZVGDJWCGa1yXSJFc6tYWrwURBMrKiYqLhCntFQlVxpbMgY3-1wf3OfGxF62ddSmaVRn3CbKvCiKNKkgPNHrP3TtNiH9fKcEwlMuKPsN1MHFGIyVPtStCoPESO4KlqlguSs40WxPt3Vjhn-dnM8-Dv5q79exd-HH5wwJJBgiX3m4hdc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2590168947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marginal support for a trophic cascade among sympatric canids in peripheral wolf range</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Fowler, Nicholas L. ; Kautz, Todd M. ; Petroelje, Tyler R. ; Wilton, Clay M. ; Kellner, Kenneth F. ; O’Brien, Daniel J. ; Parsons, Bill ; Beyer, Dean E. ; Belant, Jerrold L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Nicholas L. ; Kautz, Todd M. ; Petroelje, Tyler R. ; Wilton, Clay M. ; Kellner, Kenneth F. ; O’Brien, Daniel J. ; Parsons, Bill ; Beyer, Dean E. ; Belant, Jerrold L.</creatorcontrib><description>Trophic cascades reportedly structure ecological communities through indirect species interactions. Though the predator–herbivore–autotroph relationship has received much attention, mechanistic evidence supporting intraguild trophic cascades is rare. We established 348 remote camera sites (1 August–5 September 2019) across seven study areas of varying wolf (Canis lupus) density including one study area where wolves were absent in northern Michigan, USA. Using multi-species occupancy modeling at species-relevant spatial scales, we evaluated the hypothesis that increased wolf occurrence suppresses coyote (C. latrans) occurrence with corresponding increased red fox (Vulpes vulpes) occurrence mediated by land cover edge density, human presence, and temporal partitioning. Remote cameras recorded &gt;600,000 images and included 6,370, 10,137, and 4,876 detections of wolves, coyotes, and foxes, respectively. Fox occupancy probability was more than three times as high (0.29) at camera sites where wolves were present, relative to sites wolves were absent (0.09). Pairwise species interactions supported expected size-based dominance patterns among canids and insignificant effects were directionally consistent with reported reduced strength of top-down effects in peripheral wolf range. Increased edge density also increased co-occurrence of coyote and wolves, likely a function of increased prey availability and refugia for coyotes. Though foxes occurred in spatial proximity to wolves, competition was limited by greater temporal partitioning than observed between coyotes and foxes that were spatially segregated. Collectively, our results provide marginal support for the reported trophic cascade among wolves, coyotes, and foxes wherein topdown effects may be reduced near the edge of current wolf distributions. As predators continue to recolonize portions of their historic range, knowledge of the effects on intraguild predators has implications for species management and predicting prey population responses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brooklyn: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cameras ; Canidae ; Canis latrans ; Canis lupus ; Cascades ; coyote ; Coyotes ; Density ; Foxes ; interference competition ; intraguild ; Land cover ; Land use ; niche partitioning ; Occupancy ; Partitioning ; Predators ; Prey ; red fox ; Refugia ; Species ; Sympatric populations ; Vulpes vulpes ; wolf ; Wolves</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2021-11, Vol.102 (11), p.1-11</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2021 Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3484-e3d71eb417698f1dc070b97eca2cb0a42fa7012b93c3f9d79d890844bab8ac1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3484-e3d71eb417698f1dc070b97eca2cb0a42fa7012b93c3f9d79d890844bab8ac1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27090970$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27090970$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Nicholas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kautz, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petroelje, Tyler R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilton, Clay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellner, Kenneth F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyer, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belant, Jerrold L.</creatorcontrib><title>Marginal support for a trophic cascade among sympatric canids in peripheral wolf range</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Trophic cascades reportedly structure ecological communities through indirect species interactions. Though the predator–herbivore–autotroph relationship has received much attention, mechanistic evidence supporting intraguild trophic cascades is rare. We established 348 remote camera sites (1 August–5 September 2019) across seven study areas of varying wolf (Canis lupus) density including one study area where wolves were absent in northern Michigan, USA. Using multi-species occupancy modeling at species-relevant spatial scales, we evaluated the hypothesis that increased wolf occurrence suppresses coyote (C. latrans) occurrence with corresponding increased red fox (Vulpes vulpes) occurrence mediated by land cover edge density, human presence, and temporal partitioning. Remote cameras recorded &gt;600,000 images and included 6,370, 10,137, and 4,876 detections of wolves, coyotes, and foxes, respectively. Fox occupancy probability was more than three times as high (0.29) at camera sites where wolves were present, relative to sites wolves were absent (0.09). Pairwise species interactions supported expected size-based dominance patterns among canids and insignificant effects were directionally consistent with reported reduced strength of top-down effects in peripheral wolf range. Increased edge density also increased co-occurrence of coyote and wolves, likely a function of increased prey availability and refugia for coyotes. Though foxes occurred in spatial proximity to wolves, competition was limited by greater temporal partitioning than observed between coyotes and foxes that were spatially segregated. Collectively, our results provide marginal support for the reported trophic cascade among wolves, coyotes, and foxes wherein topdown effects may be reduced near the edge of current wolf distributions. As predators continue to recolonize portions of their historic range, knowledge of the effects on intraguild predators has implications for species management and predicting prey population responses.</description><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Canidae</subject><subject>Canis latrans</subject><subject>Canis lupus</subject><subject>Cascades</subject><subject>coyote</subject><subject>Coyotes</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Foxes</subject><subject>interference competition</subject><subject>intraguild</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>niche partitioning</subject><subject>Occupancy</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>red fox</subject><subject>Refugia</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sympatric populations</subject><subject>Vulpes vulpes</subject><subject>wolf</subject><subject>Wolves</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgCs4p-AWEgBcvnUmTLslRxvwDEy8qeAppmmwdbROTjtFvb-aGgmAugfDjed88AFxiNMEI5bdGDxNCBT0CIyyIyARm6BiMEMJ5JqYFPwVnMa5ROpjyEXh_VmFZd6qBceO9Cz20LkAF--D8qtZQq6hVZaBqXbeEcWi96sP3e1dXEdYd9CbUfmVCiti6xsKguqU5BydWNdFcHO4xeLufv84es8XLw9PsbpFpQjnNDKkYNiXFbCq4xZVGDJWCGa1yXSJFc6tYWrwURBMrKiYqLhCntFQlVxpbMgY3-1wf3OfGxF62ddSmaVRn3CbKvCiKNKkgPNHrP3TtNiH9fKcEwlMuKPsN1MHFGIyVPtStCoPESO4KlqlguSs40WxPt3Vjhn-dnM8-Dv5q79exd-HH5wwJJBgiX3m4hdc</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Fowler, Nicholas L.</creator><creator>Kautz, Todd M.</creator><creator>Petroelje, Tyler R.</creator><creator>Wilton, Clay M.</creator><creator>Kellner, Kenneth F.</creator><creator>O’Brien, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Parsons, Bill</creator><creator>Beyer, Dean E.</creator><creator>Belant, Jerrold L.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Marginal support for a trophic cascade among sympatric canids in peripheral wolf range</title><author>Fowler, Nicholas L. ; Kautz, Todd M. ; Petroelje, Tyler R. ; Wilton, Clay M. ; Kellner, Kenneth F. ; O’Brien, Daniel J. ; Parsons, Bill ; Beyer, Dean E. ; Belant, Jerrold L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3484-e3d71eb417698f1dc070b97eca2cb0a42fa7012b93c3f9d79d890844bab8ac1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Canidae</topic><topic>Canis latrans</topic><topic>Canis lupus</topic><topic>Cascades</topic><topic>coyote</topic><topic>Coyotes</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Foxes</topic><topic>interference competition</topic><topic>intraguild</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>niche partitioning</topic><topic>Occupancy</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>red fox</topic><topic>Refugia</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sympatric populations</topic><topic>Vulpes vulpes</topic><topic>wolf</topic><topic>Wolves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Nicholas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kautz, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petroelje, Tyler R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilton, Clay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellner, Kenneth F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyer, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belant, Jerrold L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fowler, Nicholas L.</au><au>Kautz, Todd M.</au><au>Petroelje, Tyler R.</au><au>Wilton, Clay M.</au><au>Kellner, Kenneth F.</au><au>O’Brien, Daniel J.</au><au>Parsons, Bill</au><au>Beyer, Dean E.</au><au>Belant, Jerrold L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marginal support for a trophic cascade among sympatric canids in peripheral wolf range</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>Trophic cascades reportedly structure ecological communities through indirect species interactions. Though the predator–herbivore–autotroph relationship has received much attention, mechanistic evidence supporting intraguild trophic cascades is rare. We established 348 remote camera sites (1 August–5 September 2019) across seven study areas of varying wolf (Canis lupus) density including one study area where wolves were absent in northern Michigan, USA. Using multi-species occupancy modeling at species-relevant spatial scales, we evaluated the hypothesis that increased wolf occurrence suppresses coyote (C. latrans) occurrence with corresponding increased red fox (Vulpes vulpes) occurrence mediated by land cover edge density, human presence, and temporal partitioning. Remote cameras recorded &gt;600,000 images and included 6,370, 10,137, and 4,876 detections of wolves, coyotes, and foxes, respectively. Fox occupancy probability was more than three times as high (0.29) at camera sites where wolves were present, relative to sites wolves were absent (0.09). Pairwise species interactions supported expected size-based dominance patterns among canids and insignificant effects were directionally consistent with reported reduced strength of top-down effects in peripheral wolf range. Increased edge density also increased co-occurrence of coyote and wolves, likely a function of increased prey availability and refugia for coyotes. Though foxes occurred in spatial proximity to wolves, competition was limited by greater temporal partitioning than observed between coyotes and foxes that were spatially segregated. Collectively, our results provide marginal support for the reported trophic cascade among wolves, coyotes, and foxes wherein topdown effects may be reduced near the edge of current wolf distributions. As predators continue to recolonize portions of their historic range, knowledge of the effects on intraguild predators has implications for species management and predicting prey population responses.</abstract><cop>Brooklyn</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ecy.3494</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2021-11, Vol.102 (11), p.1-11
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2555348538
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Cameras
Canidae
Canis latrans
Canis lupus
Cascades
coyote
Coyotes
Density
Foxes
interference competition
intraguild
Land cover
Land use
niche partitioning
Occupancy
Partitioning
Predators
Prey
red fox
Refugia
Species
Sympatric populations
Vulpes vulpes
wolf
Wolves
title Marginal support for a trophic cascade among sympatric canids in peripheral wolf range
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A40%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marginal%20support%20for%20a%20trophic%20cascade%20among%20sympatric%20canids%20in%20peripheral%20wolf%20range&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Fowler,%20Nicholas%20L.&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.3494&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27090970%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2590168947&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27090970&rfr_iscdi=true