Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model
This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ASAIO journal (1992) 2022-04, Vol.68 (4), p.531-540 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 540 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 531 |
container_title | ASAIO journal (1992) |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Packer, Erik J. S. Solholm, Atle Omdal, Tom Roar Stangeland, Lodve Zhang, Liqun Mongstad, Arve Urban, Malte Wentzel-Larsen, Tore Haaverstad, Rune Slettom, Grete Nordrehaug, Jan Erik Grong, Ketil Tuseth, Vegard |
description | This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three groups given different modes of circulatory assistgroup 1ECMO 72 ml/kg/min and LVAD; group 2ECMO 36 ml/kg/min and LVAD; and group 3ECMO 72 ml/kg/min. During CA and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), mean left ventricular pressure (mLVP) was lower in group 1 (p = 0.013) and in group 2 (p = 0.003) versus group 3. Mean aortic pressure (mAP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) were higher in group 1 compared with the other groups. In group 3, mean pulmonary artery flow (mPAf) was lower versus group 1 (p = 0.003) and group 2 (p = 0.039). If the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after defibrillation, up to 180 minutes of unsupported observation followed. All subjects in groups 1 and 3, and 5 subjects in group 2 had ROSC. All subjects in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3 had sustained cardiac function after 3 hours of spontaneous circulation. Subjects that did not achieve ROSC or maintained cardiac function post-ROSC had lower mAP (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001528 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2555111427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2555111427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2313-81b20b59a3ca2999e304d8480ce59f5bf69acbdefb5eae5d7718785ab77eb1a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtu1DAQhi0EoqXwBgj5kpsUHzfxZbRdDtKuFqGCuIscZ9wasvEydmj3GXhpvLQchG_GI_3_Z8_8hDzn7JwzU7_atJfn7J_DtWgekFOuZVMZJT8_LHemm0oYvjghT1L6ctRIyR-TE6mEUQvFT8mPlffgcqLR03YYqu1E1-Az_QRTxuDm0SJtUwop0wv4HhzQHOnqNqN1EfcRwY50A7se7QR0e3u4gsnmECd6MWOYrugH8EWaIx7o0uIQrKMtIhRcmKil7yO6UJybOMD4lDzydkzw7L6ekY-vV5fLt9V6--bdsl1XTkguq4b3gvXaWOmsMMaAZGpoVMMcaON17xfGun4A32uwoIe65k3daNvXNfTcGnlGXt5x9xi_zeUv3S4kB-NYZohz6oTWmnOuRF2k6k7qMKaE4Ls9hp3FQ8dZd4yhKzF0_8dQbC_uX5j7HQx_TL_3_pd7E8cMmL6O8w1gd13Wma9_8UQZqBJMCKZKVx3JUv4E0rSUDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555111427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Packer, Erik J. S. ; Solholm, Atle ; Omdal, Tom Roar ; Stangeland, Lodve ; Zhang, Liqun ; Mongstad, Arve ; Urban, Malte ; Wentzel-Larsen, Tore ; Haaverstad, Rune ; Slettom, Grete ; Nordrehaug, Jan Erik ; Grong, Ketil ; Tuseth, Vegard</creator><creatorcontrib>Packer, Erik J. S. ; Solholm, Atle ; Omdal, Tom Roar ; Stangeland, Lodve ; Zhang, Liqun ; Mongstad, Arve ; Urban, Malte ; Wentzel-Larsen, Tore ; Haaverstad, Rune ; Slettom, Grete ; Nordrehaug, Jan Erik ; Grong, Ketil ; Tuseth, Vegard</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three groups given different modes of circulatory assistgroup 1ECMO 72 ml/kg/min and LVAD; group 2ECMO 36 ml/kg/min and LVAD; and group 3ECMO 72 ml/kg/min. During CA and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), mean left ventricular pressure (mLVP) was lower in group 1 (p = 0.013) and in group 2 (p = 0.003) versus group 3. Mean aortic pressure (mAP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) were higher in group 1 compared with the other groups. In group 3, mean pulmonary artery flow (mPAf) was lower versus group 1 (p = 0.003) and group 2 (p = 0.039). If the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after defibrillation, up to 180 minutes of unsupported observation followed. All subjects in groups 1 and 3, and 5 subjects in group 2 had ROSC. All subjects in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3 had sustained cardiac function after 3 hours of spontaneous circulation. Subjects that did not achieve ROSC or maintained cardiac function post-ROSC had lower mAP (p < 0.001), CPP (p = 0.002), and mPAf (p = 0.004) during CA and ECPR. Add-on LVAD may improve hemodynamics compared with ECMO alone during refractory CA but could not substitute reduced ECMO flow. Increased mAP and CPP could be related to ROSC rate and sustained cardiac function. Increased mLVP was related to poor post-ROSC cardiac function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001528</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34294641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Heart Arrest - therapy ; Heart-Assist Devices ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Swine</subject><ispartof>ASAIO journal (1992), 2022-04, Vol.68 (4), p.531-540</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © ASAIO 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2313-81b20b59a3ca2999e304d8480ce59f5bf69acbdefb5eae5d7718785ab77eb1a93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5958-9337 ; 0000-0002-5357-066 ; 0000-0002-7756-8433 ; 0000-0002-0318-4162 ; 0000-0002-3378-0336 ; 0000-0002-5357-066X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00002480-202204000-00013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4595,27903,27904,65209</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34294641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Packer, Erik J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solholm, Atle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omdal, Tom Roar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stangeland, Lodve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Liqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongstad, Arve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urban, Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wentzel-Larsen, Tore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaverstad, Rune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slettom, Grete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordrehaug, Jan Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grong, Ketil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuseth, Vegard</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model</title><title>ASAIO journal (1992)</title><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three groups given different modes of circulatory assistgroup 1ECMO 72 ml/kg/min and LVAD; group 2ECMO 36 ml/kg/min and LVAD; and group 3ECMO 72 ml/kg/min. During CA and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), mean left ventricular pressure (mLVP) was lower in group 1 (p = 0.013) and in group 2 (p = 0.003) versus group 3. Mean aortic pressure (mAP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) were higher in group 1 compared with the other groups. In group 3, mean pulmonary artery flow (mPAf) was lower versus group 1 (p = 0.003) and group 2 (p = 0.039). If the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after defibrillation, up to 180 minutes of unsupported observation followed. All subjects in groups 1 and 3, and 5 subjects in group 2 had ROSC. All subjects in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3 had sustained cardiac function after 3 hours of spontaneous circulation. Subjects that did not achieve ROSC or maintained cardiac function post-ROSC had lower mAP (p < 0.001), CPP (p = 0.002), and mPAf (p = 0.004) during CA and ECPR. Add-on LVAD may improve hemodynamics compared with ECMO alone during refractory CA but could not substitute reduced ECMO flow. Increased mAP and CPP could be related to ROSC rate and sustained cardiac function. Increased mLVP was related to poor post-ROSC cardiac function.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Heart-Assist Devices</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>1058-2916</issn><issn>1538-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtu1DAQhi0EoqXwBgj5kpsUHzfxZbRdDtKuFqGCuIscZ9wasvEydmj3GXhpvLQchG_GI_3_Z8_8hDzn7JwzU7_atJfn7J_DtWgekFOuZVMZJT8_LHemm0oYvjghT1L6ctRIyR-TE6mEUQvFT8mPlffgcqLR03YYqu1E1-Az_QRTxuDm0SJtUwop0wv4HhzQHOnqNqN1EfcRwY50A7se7QR0e3u4gsnmECd6MWOYrugH8EWaIx7o0uIQrKMtIhRcmKil7yO6UJybOMD4lDzydkzw7L6ekY-vV5fLt9V6--bdsl1XTkguq4b3gvXaWOmsMMaAZGpoVMMcaON17xfGun4A32uwoIe65k3daNvXNfTcGnlGXt5x9xi_zeUv3S4kB-NYZohz6oTWmnOuRF2k6k7qMKaE4Ls9hp3FQ8dZd4yhKzF0_8dQbC_uX5j7HQx_TL_3_pd7E8cMmL6O8w1gd13Wma9_8UQZqBJMCKZKVx3JUv4E0rSUDg</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Packer, Erik J. S.</creator><creator>Solholm, Atle</creator><creator>Omdal, Tom Roar</creator><creator>Stangeland, Lodve</creator><creator>Zhang, Liqun</creator><creator>Mongstad, Arve</creator><creator>Urban, Malte</creator><creator>Wentzel-Larsen, Tore</creator><creator>Haaverstad, Rune</creator><creator>Slettom, Grete</creator><creator>Nordrehaug, Jan Erik</creator><creator>Grong, Ketil</creator><creator>Tuseth, Vegard</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-9337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5357-066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-8433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0318-4162</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3378-0336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5357-066X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model</title><author>Packer, Erik J. S. ; Solholm, Atle ; Omdal, Tom Roar ; Stangeland, Lodve ; Zhang, Liqun ; Mongstad, Arve ; Urban, Malte ; Wentzel-Larsen, Tore ; Haaverstad, Rune ; Slettom, Grete ; Nordrehaug, Jan Erik ; Grong, Ketil ; Tuseth, Vegard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2313-81b20b59a3ca2999e304d8480ce59f5bf69acbdefb5eae5d7718785ab77eb1a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Heart-Assist Devices</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Packer, Erik J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solholm, Atle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omdal, Tom Roar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stangeland, Lodve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Liqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongstad, Arve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urban, Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wentzel-Larsen, Tore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaverstad, Rune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slettom, Grete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordrehaug, Jan Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grong, Ketil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuseth, Vegard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Packer, Erik J. S.</au><au>Solholm, Atle</au><au>Omdal, Tom Roar</au><au>Stangeland, Lodve</au><au>Zhang, Liqun</au><au>Mongstad, Arve</au><au>Urban, Malte</au><au>Wentzel-Larsen, Tore</au><au>Haaverstad, Rune</au><au>Slettom, Grete</au><au>Nordrehaug, Jan Erik</au><au>Grong, Ketil</au><au>Tuseth, Vegard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model</atitle><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>531-540</pages><issn>1058-2916</issn><eissn>1538-943X</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three groups given different modes of circulatory assistgroup 1ECMO 72 ml/kg/min and LVAD; group 2ECMO 36 ml/kg/min and LVAD; and group 3ECMO 72 ml/kg/min. During CA and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), mean left ventricular pressure (mLVP) was lower in group 1 (p = 0.013) and in group 2 (p = 0.003) versus group 3. Mean aortic pressure (mAP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) were higher in group 1 compared with the other groups. In group 3, mean pulmonary artery flow (mPAf) was lower versus group 1 (p = 0.003) and group 2 (p = 0.039). If the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after defibrillation, up to 180 minutes of unsupported observation followed. All subjects in groups 1 and 3, and 5 subjects in group 2 had ROSC. All subjects in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3 had sustained cardiac function after 3 hours of spontaneous circulation. Subjects that did not achieve ROSC or maintained cardiac function post-ROSC had lower mAP (p < 0.001), CPP (p = 0.002), and mPAf (p = 0.004) during CA and ECPR. Add-on LVAD may improve hemodynamics compared with ECMO alone during refractory CA but could not substitute reduced ECMO flow. Increased mAP and CPP could be related to ROSC rate and sustained cardiac function. Increased mLVP was related to poor post-ROSC cardiac function.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>34294641</pmid><doi>10.1097/MAT.0000000000001528</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-9337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5357-066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-8433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0318-4162</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3378-0336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5357-066X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-2916 |
ispartof | ASAIO journal (1992), 2022-04, Vol.68 (4), p.531-540 |
issn | 1058-2916 1538-943X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2555111427 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Animals Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Heart Arrest - therapy Heart-Assist Devices Hemodynamics Humans Swine |
title | Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A24%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Add-On%20Left%20Ventricular%20Assist%20Device%20to%20Extracorporeal%20Membrane%20Oxygenation%20During%20Refractory%20Cardiac%20Arrest%20in%20a%20Porcine%20Model&rft.jtitle=ASAIO%20journal%20(1992)&rft.au=Packer,%20Erik%20J.%20S.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=531-540&rft.issn=1058-2916&rft.eissn=1538-943X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001528&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2555111427%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555111427&rft_id=info:pmid/34294641&rfr_iscdi=true |