Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model

This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ASAIO journal (1992) 2022-04, Vol.68 (4), p.531-540
Hauptverfasser: Packer, Erik J. S., Solholm, Atle, Omdal, Tom Roar, Stangeland, Lodve, Zhang, Liqun, Mongstad, Arve, Urban, Malte, Wentzel-Larsen, Tore, Haaverstad, Rune, Slettom, Grete, Nordrehaug, Jan Erik, Grong, Ketil, Tuseth, Vegard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 540
container_issue 4
container_start_page 531
container_title ASAIO journal (1992)
container_volume 68
creator Packer, Erik J. S.
Solholm, Atle
Omdal, Tom Roar
Stangeland, Lodve
Zhang, Liqun
Mongstad, Arve
Urban, Malte
Wentzel-Larsen, Tore
Haaverstad, Rune
Slettom, Grete
Nordrehaug, Jan Erik
Grong, Ketil
Tuseth, Vegard
description This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three groups given different modes of circulatory assistgroup 1ECMO 72 ml/kg/min and LVAD; group 2ECMO 36 ml/kg/min and LVAD; and group 3ECMO 72 ml/kg/min. During CA and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), mean left ventricular pressure (mLVP) was lower in group 1 (p = 0.013) and in group 2 (p = 0.003) versus group 3. Mean aortic pressure (mAP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) were higher in group 1 compared with the other groups. In group 3, mean pulmonary artery flow (mPAf) was lower versus group 1 (p = 0.003) and group 2 (p = 0.039). If the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after defibrillation, up to 180 minutes of unsupported observation followed. All subjects in groups 1 and 3, and 5 subjects in group 2 had ROSC. All subjects in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3 had sustained cardiac function after 3 hours of spontaneous circulation. Subjects that did not achieve ROSC or maintained cardiac function post-ROSC had lower mAP (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001528
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2555111427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2555111427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2313-81b20b59a3ca2999e304d8480ce59f5bf69acbdefb5eae5d7718785ab77eb1a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtu1DAQhi0EoqXwBgj5kpsUHzfxZbRdDtKuFqGCuIscZ9wasvEydmj3GXhpvLQchG_GI_3_Z8_8hDzn7JwzU7_atJfn7J_DtWgekFOuZVMZJT8_LHemm0oYvjghT1L6ctRIyR-TE6mEUQvFT8mPlffgcqLR03YYqu1E1-Az_QRTxuDm0SJtUwop0wv4HhzQHOnqNqN1EfcRwY50A7se7QR0e3u4gsnmECd6MWOYrugH8EWaIx7o0uIQrKMtIhRcmKil7yO6UJybOMD4lDzydkzw7L6ekY-vV5fLt9V6--bdsl1XTkguq4b3gvXaWOmsMMaAZGpoVMMcaON17xfGun4A32uwoIe65k3daNvXNfTcGnlGXt5x9xi_zeUv3S4kB-NYZohz6oTWmnOuRF2k6k7qMKaE4Ls9hp3FQ8dZd4yhKzF0_8dQbC_uX5j7HQx_TL_3_pd7E8cMmL6O8w1gd13Wma9_8UQZqBJMCKZKVx3JUv4E0rSUDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555111427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Packer, Erik J. S. ; Solholm, Atle ; Omdal, Tom Roar ; Stangeland, Lodve ; Zhang, Liqun ; Mongstad, Arve ; Urban, Malte ; Wentzel-Larsen, Tore ; Haaverstad, Rune ; Slettom, Grete ; Nordrehaug, Jan Erik ; Grong, Ketil ; Tuseth, Vegard</creator><creatorcontrib>Packer, Erik J. S. ; Solholm, Atle ; Omdal, Tom Roar ; Stangeland, Lodve ; Zhang, Liqun ; Mongstad, Arve ; Urban, Malte ; Wentzel-Larsen, Tore ; Haaverstad, Rune ; Slettom, Grete ; Nordrehaug, Jan Erik ; Grong, Ketil ; Tuseth, Vegard</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three groups given different modes of circulatory assistgroup 1ECMO 72 ml/kg/min and LVAD; group 2ECMO 36 ml/kg/min and LVAD; and group 3ECMO 72 ml/kg/min. During CA and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), mean left ventricular pressure (mLVP) was lower in group 1 (p = 0.013) and in group 2 (p = 0.003) versus group 3. Mean aortic pressure (mAP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) were higher in group 1 compared with the other groups. In group 3, mean pulmonary artery flow (mPAf) was lower versus group 1 (p = 0.003) and group 2 (p = 0.039). If the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after defibrillation, up to 180 minutes of unsupported observation followed. All subjects in groups 1 and 3, and 5 subjects in group 2 had ROSC. All subjects in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3 had sustained cardiac function after 3 hours of spontaneous circulation. Subjects that did not achieve ROSC or maintained cardiac function post-ROSC had lower mAP (p &lt; 0.001), CPP (p = 0.002), and mPAf (p = 0.004) during CA and ECPR. Add-on LVAD may improve hemodynamics compared with ECMO alone during refractory CA but could not substitute reduced ECMO flow. Increased mAP and CPP could be related to ROSC rate and sustained cardiac function. Increased mLVP was related to poor post-ROSC cardiac function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001528</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34294641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Heart Arrest - therapy ; Heart-Assist Devices ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Swine</subject><ispartof>ASAIO journal (1992), 2022-04, Vol.68 (4), p.531-540</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © ASAIO 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2313-81b20b59a3ca2999e304d8480ce59f5bf69acbdefb5eae5d7718785ab77eb1a93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5958-9337 ; 0000-0002-5357-066 ; 0000-0002-7756-8433 ; 0000-0002-0318-4162 ; 0000-0002-3378-0336 ; 0000-0002-5357-066X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00002480-202204000-00013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4595,27903,27904,65209</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34294641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Packer, Erik J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solholm, Atle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omdal, Tom Roar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stangeland, Lodve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Liqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongstad, Arve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urban, Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wentzel-Larsen, Tore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaverstad, Rune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slettom, Grete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordrehaug, Jan Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grong, Ketil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuseth, Vegard</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model</title><title>ASAIO journal (1992)</title><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three groups given different modes of circulatory assistgroup 1ECMO 72 ml/kg/min and LVAD; group 2ECMO 36 ml/kg/min and LVAD; and group 3ECMO 72 ml/kg/min. During CA and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), mean left ventricular pressure (mLVP) was lower in group 1 (p = 0.013) and in group 2 (p = 0.003) versus group 3. Mean aortic pressure (mAP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) were higher in group 1 compared with the other groups. In group 3, mean pulmonary artery flow (mPAf) was lower versus group 1 (p = 0.003) and group 2 (p = 0.039). If the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after defibrillation, up to 180 minutes of unsupported observation followed. All subjects in groups 1 and 3, and 5 subjects in group 2 had ROSC. All subjects in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3 had sustained cardiac function after 3 hours of spontaneous circulation. Subjects that did not achieve ROSC or maintained cardiac function post-ROSC had lower mAP (p &lt; 0.001), CPP (p = 0.002), and mPAf (p = 0.004) during CA and ECPR. Add-on LVAD may improve hemodynamics compared with ECMO alone during refractory CA but could not substitute reduced ECMO flow. Increased mAP and CPP could be related to ROSC rate and sustained cardiac function. Increased mLVP was related to poor post-ROSC cardiac function.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Heart-Assist Devices</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>1058-2916</issn><issn>1538-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtu1DAQhi0EoqXwBgj5kpsUHzfxZbRdDtKuFqGCuIscZ9wasvEydmj3GXhpvLQchG_GI_3_Z8_8hDzn7JwzU7_atJfn7J_DtWgekFOuZVMZJT8_LHemm0oYvjghT1L6ctRIyR-TE6mEUQvFT8mPlffgcqLR03YYqu1E1-Az_QRTxuDm0SJtUwop0wv4HhzQHOnqNqN1EfcRwY50A7se7QR0e3u4gsnmECd6MWOYrugH8EWaIx7o0uIQrKMtIhRcmKil7yO6UJybOMD4lDzydkzw7L6ekY-vV5fLt9V6--bdsl1XTkguq4b3gvXaWOmsMMaAZGpoVMMcaON17xfGun4A32uwoIe65k3daNvXNfTcGnlGXt5x9xi_zeUv3S4kB-NYZohz6oTWmnOuRF2k6k7qMKaE4Ls9hp3FQ8dZd4yhKzF0_8dQbC_uX5j7HQx_TL_3_pd7E8cMmL6O8w1gd13Wma9_8UQZqBJMCKZKVx3JUv4E0rSUDg</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Packer, Erik J. S.</creator><creator>Solholm, Atle</creator><creator>Omdal, Tom Roar</creator><creator>Stangeland, Lodve</creator><creator>Zhang, Liqun</creator><creator>Mongstad, Arve</creator><creator>Urban, Malte</creator><creator>Wentzel-Larsen, Tore</creator><creator>Haaverstad, Rune</creator><creator>Slettom, Grete</creator><creator>Nordrehaug, Jan Erik</creator><creator>Grong, Ketil</creator><creator>Tuseth, Vegard</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-9337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5357-066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-8433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0318-4162</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3378-0336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5357-066X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model</title><author>Packer, Erik J. S. ; Solholm, Atle ; Omdal, Tom Roar ; Stangeland, Lodve ; Zhang, Liqun ; Mongstad, Arve ; Urban, Malte ; Wentzel-Larsen, Tore ; Haaverstad, Rune ; Slettom, Grete ; Nordrehaug, Jan Erik ; Grong, Ketil ; Tuseth, Vegard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2313-81b20b59a3ca2999e304d8480ce59f5bf69acbdefb5eae5d7718785ab77eb1a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Heart-Assist Devices</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Packer, Erik J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solholm, Atle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omdal, Tom Roar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stangeland, Lodve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Liqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongstad, Arve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urban, Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wentzel-Larsen, Tore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaverstad, Rune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slettom, Grete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordrehaug, Jan Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grong, Ketil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuseth, Vegard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Packer, Erik J. S.</au><au>Solholm, Atle</au><au>Omdal, Tom Roar</au><au>Stangeland, Lodve</au><au>Zhang, Liqun</au><au>Mongstad, Arve</au><au>Urban, Malte</au><au>Wentzel-Larsen, Tore</au><au>Haaverstad, Rune</au><au>Slettom, Grete</au><au>Nordrehaug, Jan Erik</au><au>Grong, Ketil</au><au>Tuseth, Vegard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model</atitle><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>531-540</pages><issn>1058-2916</issn><eissn>1538-943X</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three groups given different modes of circulatory assistgroup 1ECMO 72 ml/kg/min and LVAD; group 2ECMO 36 ml/kg/min and LVAD; and group 3ECMO 72 ml/kg/min. During CA and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), mean left ventricular pressure (mLVP) was lower in group 1 (p = 0.013) and in group 2 (p = 0.003) versus group 3. Mean aortic pressure (mAP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) were higher in group 1 compared with the other groups. In group 3, mean pulmonary artery flow (mPAf) was lower versus group 1 (p = 0.003) and group 2 (p = 0.039). If the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after defibrillation, up to 180 minutes of unsupported observation followed. All subjects in groups 1 and 3, and 5 subjects in group 2 had ROSC. All subjects in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3 had sustained cardiac function after 3 hours of spontaneous circulation. Subjects that did not achieve ROSC or maintained cardiac function post-ROSC had lower mAP (p &lt; 0.001), CPP (p = 0.002), and mPAf (p = 0.004) during CA and ECPR. Add-on LVAD may improve hemodynamics compared with ECMO alone during refractory CA but could not substitute reduced ECMO flow. Increased mAP and CPP could be related to ROSC rate and sustained cardiac function. Increased mLVP was related to poor post-ROSC cardiac function.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>34294641</pmid><doi>10.1097/MAT.0000000000001528</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-9337</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5357-066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-8433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0318-4162</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3378-0336</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5357-066X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2916
ispartof ASAIO journal (1992), 2022-04, Vol.68 (4), p.531-540
issn 1058-2916
1538-943X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2555111427
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animals
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Heart Arrest - therapy
Heart-Assist Devices
Hemodynamics
Humans
Swine
title Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A24%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Add-On%20Left%20Ventricular%20Assist%20Device%20to%20Extracorporeal%20Membrane%20Oxygenation%20During%20Refractory%20Cardiac%20Arrest%20in%20a%20Porcine%20Model&rft.jtitle=ASAIO%20journal%20(1992)&rft.au=Packer,%20Erik%20J.%20S.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=531-540&rft.issn=1058-2916&rft.eissn=1538-943X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001528&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2555111427%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555111427&rft_id=info:pmid/34294641&rfr_iscdi=true