Spiritual and Religious Competencies in Psychology
Religion and spirituality (R/S) are important aspects of human diversity that should be explicitly addressed in the field of psychology. The field has already included R/S in its definitions of multiculturalism, but while multicultural training is routinely included in doctoral level psychology cour...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American psychologist 2022-01, Vol.77 (1), p.26-38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 38 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | The American psychologist |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Vieten, Cassandra Lukoff, David |
description | Religion and spirituality (R/S) are important aspects of human diversity that should be explicitly addressed in the field of psychology. The field has already included R/S in its definitions of multiculturalism, but while multicultural training is routinely included in doctoral level psychology course work and internship programs, it rarely includes specific training in R/S diversity. Polls of the American public indicate that religion and spirituality are important in most people's lives, and hundreds of studies demonstrate empirical links between R/S and psychological health and well-being. In clinical practice, there is evidence that clients would prefer to have their R/S addressed in psychotherapy. However, R/S issues are typically neither discussed in psychotherapy nor included in assessment or treatment planning. In research, religion and spirituality are often assessed with a single item on religious affiliation. Psychologists receive little or no training in R/S issues, in part because no agreed upon set of spiritual competencies or training guidelines exist. This article summarizes the rationale for including religious and spiritual competencies in psychology training and practice, reviews research establishing a set of religious and spiritual competencies (attitudes, knowledge, and skills) that we propose all psychologists should demonstrate, and provides practical recommendations for inquiring about religion and spirituality.
Public Significance StatementThis article reviews links between mental health and religion/spirituality (R/S) and recommends specific ways that psychologists and other mental health professionals can ethically and effectively address R/S diversity in the practice of psychology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/amp0000821 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2552992614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2646756437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-f211ddd1a59524c2f5a13499efe4328999031a675789efe9f0e1ad0d1b09a3843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLAzEQhYMotlZf_AGy4IsIq5lkk2wepdQLFBQv0LeQ7mZryt5Mdh_6783SasEHh4Fhho_DmYPQOeAbwFTc6qrFoVICB2gMkrJYSrw4RONwpDHmfDFCJ96vw8pSCcdoRBPCEy7ZGJG31jrb9bqMdJ1Hr6a0K9v0Ppo2VWs6U2fW-MjW0YvfZJ9N2aw2p-io0KU3Z7s5QR_3s_fpYzx_fnia3s1jTUXaxQUByPMcNJOMJBkpmAaaSGkKk1CSyuCRguaCiXS4yQIb0DnOYYmlpmlCJ-hqq9u65qs3vlOV9ZkpS12b4FARxoiUhMOAXv5B103v6uBODY8KxhMq_qUYA0FC80Bdb6nMNd47U6jW2Uq7jQKshrzVPu8AX-wk-2Vl8l_0J-C9mm61akOG2nU2K43PeudM3Q1iSggFwSj9BtNjh4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2551721726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spiritual and Religious Competencies in Psychology</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Vieten, Cassandra ; Lukoff, David</creator><contributor>Cooper, Harris</contributor><creatorcontrib>Vieten, Cassandra ; Lukoff, David ; Cooper, Harris</creatorcontrib><description>Religion and spirituality (R/S) are important aspects of human diversity that should be explicitly addressed in the field of psychology. The field has already included R/S in its definitions of multiculturalism, but while multicultural training is routinely included in doctoral level psychology course work and internship programs, it rarely includes specific training in R/S diversity. Polls of the American public indicate that religion and spirituality are important in most people's lives, and hundreds of studies demonstrate empirical links between R/S and psychological health and well-being. In clinical practice, there is evidence that clients would prefer to have their R/S addressed in psychotherapy. However, R/S issues are typically neither discussed in psychotherapy nor included in assessment or treatment planning. In research, religion and spirituality are often assessed with a single item on religious affiliation. Psychologists receive little or no training in R/S issues, in part because no agreed upon set of spiritual competencies or training guidelines exist. This article summarizes the rationale for including religious and spiritual competencies in psychology training and practice, reviews research establishing a set of religious and spiritual competencies (attitudes, knowledge, and skills) that we propose all psychologists should demonstrate, and provides practical recommendations for inquiring about religion and spirituality.
Public Significance StatementThis article reviews links between mental health and religion/spirituality (R/S) and recommends specific ways that psychologists and other mental health professionals can ethically and effectively address R/S diversity in the practice of psychology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/amp0000821</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34264695</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Clinical medicine ; Cultural competence ; Cultural Diversity ; Cultural sensitivity ; Diversity ; Human ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Mental health ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Polls & surveys ; Professional Competence ; Psychological assessment ; Psychological well being ; Psychologists ; Psychology ; Psychotherapy ; Religion ; Religion and Psychology ; Religiosity ; Religious attitudes ; Religious beliefs ; Religious identity ; Religious Practices ; Spirituality ; Training ; Well being</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 2022-01, Vol.77 (1), p.26-38</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-f211ddd1a59524c2f5a13499efe4328999031a675789efe9f0e1ad0d1b09a3843</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3081-5174 ; 0000-0003-3053-8031</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264695$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Cooper, Harris</contributor><creatorcontrib>Vieten, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukoff, David</creatorcontrib><title>Spiritual and Religious Competencies in Psychology</title><title>The American psychologist</title><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><description>Religion and spirituality (R/S) are important aspects of human diversity that should be explicitly addressed in the field of psychology. The field has already included R/S in its definitions of multiculturalism, but while multicultural training is routinely included in doctoral level psychology course work and internship programs, it rarely includes specific training in R/S diversity. Polls of the American public indicate that religion and spirituality are important in most people's lives, and hundreds of studies demonstrate empirical links between R/S and psychological health and well-being. In clinical practice, there is evidence that clients would prefer to have their R/S addressed in psychotherapy. However, R/S issues are typically neither discussed in psychotherapy nor included in assessment or treatment planning. In research, religion and spirituality are often assessed with a single item on religious affiliation. Psychologists receive little or no training in R/S issues, in part because no agreed upon set of spiritual competencies or training guidelines exist. This article summarizes the rationale for including religious and spiritual competencies in psychology training and practice, reviews research establishing a set of religious and spiritual competencies (attitudes, knowledge, and skills) that we propose all psychologists should demonstrate, and provides practical recommendations for inquiring about religion and spirituality.
Public Significance StatementThis article reviews links between mental health and religion/spirituality (R/S) and recommends specific ways that psychologists and other mental health professionals can ethically and effectively address R/S diversity in the practice of psychology.</description><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Cultural competence</subject><subject>Cultural Diversity</subject><subject>Cultural sensitivity</subject><subject>Diversity</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>Psychological assessment</subject><subject>Psychological well being</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion and Psychology</subject><subject>Religiosity</subject><subject>Religious attitudes</subject><subject>Religious beliefs</subject><subject>Religious identity</subject><subject>Religious Practices</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLAzEQhYMotlZf_AGy4IsIq5lkk2wepdQLFBQv0LeQ7mZryt5Mdh_6783SasEHh4Fhho_DmYPQOeAbwFTc6qrFoVICB2gMkrJYSrw4RONwpDHmfDFCJ96vw8pSCcdoRBPCEy7ZGJG31jrb9bqMdJ1Hr6a0K9v0Ppo2VWs6U2fW-MjW0YvfZJ9N2aw2p-io0KU3Z7s5QR_3s_fpYzx_fnia3s1jTUXaxQUByPMcNJOMJBkpmAaaSGkKk1CSyuCRguaCiXS4yQIb0DnOYYmlpmlCJ-hqq9u65qs3vlOV9ZkpS12b4FARxoiUhMOAXv5B103v6uBODY8KxhMq_qUYA0FC80Bdb6nMNd47U6jW2Uq7jQKshrzVPu8AX-wk-2Vl8l_0J-C9mm61akOG2nU2K43PeudM3Q1iSggFwSj9BtNjh4E</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Vieten, Cassandra</creator><creator>Lukoff, David</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3081-5174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3053-8031</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Spiritual and Religious Competencies in Psychology</title><author>Vieten, Cassandra ; Lukoff, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-f211ddd1a59524c2f5a13499efe4328999031a675789efe9f0e1ad0d1b09a3843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Cultural competence</topic><topic>Cultural Diversity</topic><topic>Cultural sensitivity</topic><topic>Diversity</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>Psychological assessment</topic><topic>Psychological well being</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion and Psychology</topic><topic>Religiosity</topic><topic>Religious attitudes</topic><topic>Religious beliefs</topic><topic>Religious identity</topic><topic>Religious Practices</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vieten, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukoff, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vieten, Cassandra</au><au>Lukoff, David</au><au>Cooper, Harris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spiritual and Religious Competencies in Psychology</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>26-38</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><abstract>Religion and spirituality (R/S) are important aspects of human diversity that should be explicitly addressed in the field of psychology. The field has already included R/S in its definitions of multiculturalism, but while multicultural training is routinely included in doctoral level psychology course work and internship programs, it rarely includes specific training in R/S diversity. Polls of the American public indicate that religion and spirituality are important in most people's lives, and hundreds of studies demonstrate empirical links between R/S and psychological health and well-being. In clinical practice, there is evidence that clients would prefer to have their R/S addressed in psychotherapy. However, R/S issues are typically neither discussed in psychotherapy nor included in assessment or treatment planning. In research, religion and spirituality are often assessed with a single item on religious affiliation. Psychologists receive little or no training in R/S issues, in part because no agreed upon set of spiritual competencies or training guidelines exist. This article summarizes the rationale for including religious and spiritual competencies in psychology training and practice, reviews research establishing a set of religious and spiritual competencies (attitudes, knowledge, and skills) that we propose all psychologists should demonstrate, and provides practical recommendations for inquiring about religion and spirituality.
Public Significance StatementThis article reviews links between mental health and religion/spirituality (R/S) and recommends specific ways that psychologists and other mental health professionals can ethically and effectively address R/S diversity in the practice of psychology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>34264695</pmid><doi>10.1037/amp0000821</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3081-5174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3053-8031</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-066X |
ispartof | The American psychologist, 2022-01, Vol.77 (1), p.26-38 |
issn | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2552992614 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Clinical medicine Cultural competence Cultural Diversity Cultural sensitivity Diversity Human Humans Internship and Residency Mental health Multiculturalism & pluralism Polls & surveys Professional Competence Psychological assessment Psychological well being Psychologists Psychology Psychotherapy Religion Religion and Psychology Religiosity Religious attitudes Religious beliefs Religious identity Religious Practices Spirituality Training Well being |
title | Spiritual and Religious Competencies in Psychology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A22%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spiritual%20and%20Religious%20Competencies%20in%20Psychology&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Vieten,%20Cassandra&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=26-38&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/amp0000821&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2646756437%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2551721726&rft_id=info:pmid/34264695&rfr_iscdi=true |