Archerfish respond to a hunting robotic conspecific
While the unique hunting behavior of archerfish has received considerable scientific attention, the specific social cues that govern behaviors like intraspecific kleptoparasitism in the species are less understood. This paper asks whether the use of a robotic facsimile representing an archerfish can...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological cybernetics 2021-12, Vol.115 (6), p.585-598 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 598 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 585 |
container_title | Biological cybernetics |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | Brown, Alexander A. Brown, Michael F. Folk, Spencer R. Utter, Brent A. |
description | While the unique hunting behavior of archerfish has received considerable scientific attention, the specific social cues that govern behaviors like intraspecific kleptoparasitism in the species are less understood. This paper asks whether the use of a robotic facsimile representing an archerfish can elicit a social response if it approximates an archerfish’s appearance, along with key features of its hunting behavior. We found that the fish respond to the robot when it hunted, as indicated by decreasing distances between the robot and fish (and among the fish) during the robot’s hunting behavior sequence, as well as higher net transfer entropy when the robot was hunting. These effects were present even when the robot’s “hunt” was unproductive and did not result in food. The temporal pattern of fish approach to the robot and each other indicated that the segment of robot hunting behavior proximal to the robotic facsimile shot elicited fish behavior initially. However, earlier cues in the robot’s hunting sequence became important following more experience with a food contingency. This indicates that further studies could use a robotic facsimile to conduct a detailed stimulus analysis, changing aspects of the robot’s appearance and behavior to uncover the basic mechanisms of information transfer among individuals in a social hunting scenario. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00422-021-00885-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2552986448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552986448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3d2fe566dd6366e5d151c0b0032ea14f2dab39fff653533f821362e241e5694b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQJBaWwPn8lYwV4kuqxAKzlTh2m6qNi50M_HsMKSAxMFk6P-97p4eQcwrXFEDdRACOmAPSHKAoRK4OyJRylkZKwSGZAuOQUwSYkJMY1wBQoiiPyYRxVFjKYkrYPJiVDa6NqyzYuPNdk_U-q7LV0PVtt8yCr33fmsz4Lu6saV1rTsmRqzbRnu3fGXm9v3u5fcwXzw9Pt_NFbpgSfc4adFZI2TSSSWlFQwU1UAMwtBXlDpuqZqVzTgomGHMFUibRIqcpVfKazcjV2LsL_m2wsdfbNhq72VSd9UPUKASWheS8SOjlH3Tth9Cl6zRKEErRAmWicKRM8DEG6_QutNsqvGsK-lOpHpXqpFR_KdUqhS721UO9tc1P5NthAtgIxPTVLW343f1P7QeiNn8O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605771826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Archerfish respond to a hunting robotic conspecific</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Brown, Alexander A. ; Brown, Michael F. ; Folk, Spencer R. ; Utter, Brent A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Alexander A. ; Brown, Michael F. ; Folk, Spencer R. ; Utter, Brent A.</creatorcontrib><description>While the unique hunting behavior of archerfish has received considerable scientific attention, the specific social cues that govern behaviors like intraspecific kleptoparasitism in the species are less understood. This paper asks whether the use of a robotic facsimile representing an archerfish can elicit a social response if it approximates an archerfish’s appearance, along with key features of its hunting behavior. We found that the fish respond to the robot when it hunted, as indicated by decreasing distances between the robot and fish (and among the fish) during the robot’s hunting behavior sequence, as well as higher net transfer entropy when the robot was hunting. These effects were present even when the robot’s “hunt” was unproductive and did not result in food. The temporal pattern of fish approach to the robot and each other indicated that the segment of robot hunting behavior proximal to the robotic facsimile shot elicited fish behavior initially. However, earlier cues in the robot’s hunting sequence became important following more experience with a food contingency. This indicates that further studies could use a robotic facsimile to conduct a detailed stimulus analysis, changing aspects of the robot’s appearance and behavior to uncover the basic mechanisms of information transfer among individuals in a social hunting scenario.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-1200</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0770</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00422-021-00885-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34272968</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bioinformatics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Complex Systems ; Computer Appl. in Life Sciences ; Contingency ; Cues ; Entropy ; Fish ; Fish behavior ; Fishes - physiology ; Food ; Information transfer ; Kleptoparasitism ; Neurobiology ; Neurosciences ; Original Article ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; Robotics ; Robots ; Social behavior</subject><ispartof>Biological cybernetics, 2021-12, Vol.115 (6), p.585-598</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3d2fe566dd6366e5d151c0b0032ea14f2dab39fff653533f821362e241e5694b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3d2fe566dd6366e5d151c0b0032ea14f2dab39fff653533f821362e241e5694b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3945-7337</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00422-021-00885-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00422-021-00885-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34272968$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Alexander A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folk, Spencer R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utter, Brent A.</creatorcontrib><title>Archerfish respond to a hunting robotic conspecific</title><title>Biological cybernetics</title><addtitle>Biol Cybern</addtitle><addtitle>Biol Cybern</addtitle><description>While the unique hunting behavior of archerfish has received considerable scientific attention, the specific social cues that govern behaviors like intraspecific kleptoparasitism in the species are less understood. This paper asks whether the use of a robotic facsimile representing an archerfish can elicit a social response if it approximates an archerfish’s appearance, along with key features of its hunting behavior. We found that the fish respond to the robot when it hunted, as indicated by decreasing distances between the robot and fish (and among the fish) during the robot’s hunting behavior sequence, as well as higher net transfer entropy when the robot was hunting. These effects were present even when the robot’s “hunt” was unproductive and did not result in food. The temporal pattern of fish approach to the robot and each other indicated that the segment of robot hunting behavior proximal to the robotic facsimile shot elicited fish behavior initially. However, earlier cues in the robot’s hunting sequence became important following more experience with a food contingency. This indicates that further studies could use a robotic facsimile to conduct a detailed stimulus analysis, changing aspects of the robot’s appearance and behavior to uncover the basic mechanisms of information transfer among individuals in a social hunting scenario.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Complex Systems</subject><subject>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</subject><subject>Contingency</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish behavior</subject><subject>Fishes - physiology</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Information transfer</subject><subject>Kleptoparasitism</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><issn>0340-1200</issn><issn>1432-0770</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQJBaWwPn8lYwV4kuqxAKzlTh2m6qNi50M_HsMKSAxMFk6P-97p4eQcwrXFEDdRACOmAPSHKAoRK4OyJRylkZKwSGZAuOQUwSYkJMY1wBQoiiPyYRxVFjKYkrYPJiVDa6NqyzYuPNdk_U-q7LV0PVtt8yCr33fmsz4Lu6saV1rTsmRqzbRnu3fGXm9v3u5fcwXzw9Pt_NFbpgSfc4adFZI2TSSSWlFQwU1UAMwtBXlDpuqZqVzTgomGHMFUibRIqcpVfKazcjV2LsL_m2wsdfbNhq72VSd9UPUKASWheS8SOjlH3Tth9Cl6zRKEErRAmWicKRM8DEG6_QutNsqvGsK-lOpHpXqpFR_KdUqhS721UO9tc1P5NthAtgIxPTVLW343f1P7QeiNn8O</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Brown, Alexander A.</creator><creator>Brown, Michael F.</creator><creator>Folk, Spencer R.</creator><creator>Utter, Brent A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3945-7337</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Archerfish respond to a hunting robotic conspecific</title><author>Brown, Alexander A. ; Brown, Michael F. ; Folk, Spencer R. ; Utter, Brent A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-3d2fe566dd6366e5d151c0b0032ea14f2dab39fff653533f821362e241e5694b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Complex Systems</topic><topic>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</topic><topic>Contingency</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish behavior</topic><topic>Fishes - physiology</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Information transfer</topic><topic>Kleptoparasitism</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Alexander A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folk, Spencer R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utter, Brent A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological cybernetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Alexander A.</au><au>Brown, Michael F.</au><au>Folk, Spencer R.</au><au>Utter, Brent A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Archerfish respond to a hunting robotic conspecific</atitle><jtitle>Biological cybernetics</jtitle><stitle>Biol Cybern</stitle><addtitle>Biol Cybern</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>585</spage><epage>598</epage><pages>585-598</pages><issn>0340-1200</issn><eissn>1432-0770</eissn><abstract>While the unique hunting behavior of archerfish has received considerable scientific attention, the specific social cues that govern behaviors like intraspecific kleptoparasitism in the species are less understood. This paper asks whether the use of a robotic facsimile representing an archerfish can elicit a social response if it approximates an archerfish’s appearance, along with key features of its hunting behavior. We found that the fish respond to the robot when it hunted, as indicated by decreasing distances between the robot and fish (and among the fish) during the robot’s hunting behavior sequence, as well as higher net transfer entropy when the robot was hunting. These effects were present even when the robot’s “hunt” was unproductive and did not result in food. The temporal pattern of fish approach to the robot and each other indicated that the segment of robot hunting behavior proximal to the robotic facsimile shot elicited fish behavior initially. However, earlier cues in the robot’s hunting sequence became important following more experience with a food contingency. This indicates that further studies could use a robotic facsimile to conduct a detailed stimulus analysis, changing aspects of the robot’s appearance and behavior to uncover the basic mechanisms of information transfer among individuals in a social hunting scenario.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34272968</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00422-021-00885-7</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3945-7337</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-1200 |
ispartof | Biological cybernetics, 2021-12, Vol.115 (6), p.585-598 |
issn | 0340-1200 1432-0770 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2552986448 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Animals Bioinformatics Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Complex Systems Computer Appl. in Life Sciences Contingency Cues Entropy Fish Fish behavior Fishes - physiology Food Information transfer Kleptoparasitism Neurobiology Neurosciences Original Article Predation Predatory Behavior Robotics Robots Social behavior |
title | Archerfish respond to a hunting robotic conspecific |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A13%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Archerfish%20respond%20to%20a%20hunting%20robotic%20conspecific&rft.jtitle=Biological%20cybernetics&rft.au=Brown,%20Alexander%20A.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=585&rft.epage=598&rft.pages=585-598&rft.issn=0340-1200&rft.eissn=1432-0770&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00422-021-00885-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552986448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605771826&rft_id=info:pmid/34272968&rfr_iscdi=true |