Comparison of EMG signal of the flexor hallucis longus recorded using surface and intramuscular electrodes during walking

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of intramuscular (iEMG) and surface (sEMG) electromyography electrodes to record flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle activity during walking, and describe the role of the FHL. Muscle activity was recorded in 12 participants using sEMG and iEMG during...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electromyography and kinesiology 2021-10, Vol.60, p.102574-102574, Article 102574
Hauptverfasser: Knox, Jessica, Gupta, Amitabh, Banwell, Helen A., Matricciani, Lisa, Turner, Deborah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102574
container_issue
container_start_page 102574
container_title Journal of electromyography and kinesiology
container_volume 60
creator Knox, Jessica
Gupta, Amitabh
Banwell, Helen A.
Matricciani, Lisa
Turner, Deborah
description The purpose of this study was to compare the use of intramuscular (iEMG) and surface (sEMG) electromyography electrodes to record flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle activity during walking, and describe the role of the FHL. Muscle activity was recorded in 12 participants using sEMG and iEMG during treadmill and overground walking. Inter-tester reliability for visual detection of onset and offset of muscle activity was high (ICC = 1.00). During the loading period, the number of bursts of muscle activity was statistically significantly greater using iEMG compared to sEMG when treadmill walking (p = 0.016), and the duration of muscle activity was significantly greater for iEMG (p = 0.01) on both walking surfaces. There were no differences for peak and mean root mean squared (p ≥ 0.07). The FHL activity observed during the loading period (heel strike to forefoot strike) supports the function of the FHL to act as a dynamic ankle stabiliser of the rearfoot, as well as contributing to propulsion during the latter part of stance. The choice of electrodes to detect FHL activity should be dependent on whether the loading and propulsive periods are of interest, and whether treadmill or overground walking will be examined.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jelekin.2021.102574
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2552982657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1050641121000614</els_id><sourcerecordid>2552982657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-830eec868cd5a14560e40823bf3fb8b0ec37f7c3659b2c487322f18a79bf5d9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9vGyEQxVdVKyV1-hEicexlXWCXXXyKIstNK7nKJTkjFgYHB4PLLGnz7Ytl33uaP3rvaebXNLeMLhllw7f9cg8BXn1ccspZ3XEx9h-aaybHrhUjYx9rTwVth56xq-Yz4p5SNlJJr5v3dTocdfaYIkmObH49EPS7qMNpml-AuAB_UyYvOoRiPJKQ4q4gyWBStmBJQR93BEt22gDR0RIf56wPBU0JOpN6mZlzsoDElnzS_tGh3rq7aT45HRC-XOqief6-eVr_aLePDz_X99vW9ELMrewogJGDNFZo1ouBQk8l7ybXuUlOFEw3utF0g1hN3PT1Zc4dk3pcTU7YlekWzddz7jGn3wVwVgePBkLQEVJBxYXgK8kHMVapOEtNTogZnDpmf9D5XTGqTqjVXl1QqxNqdUZdfXdnH9Q_3jxkhcZDNGB95TQrm_x_Ev4BIpGMVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552982657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of EMG signal of the flexor hallucis longus recorded using surface and intramuscular electrodes during walking</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Knox, Jessica ; Gupta, Amitabh ; Banwell, Helen A. ; Matricciani, Lisa ; Turner, Deborah</creator><creatorcontrib>Knox, Jessica ; Gupta, Amitabh ; Banwell, Helen A. ; Matricciani, Lisa ; Turner, Deborah</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the use of intramuscular (iEMG) and surface (sEMG) electromyography electrodes to record flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle activity during walking, and describe the role of the FHL. Muscle activity was recorded in 12 participants using sEMG and iEMG during treadmill and overground walking. Inter-tester reliability for visual detection of onset and offset of muscle activity was high (ICC = 1.00). During the loading period, the number of bursts of muscle activity was statistically significantly greater using iEMG compared to sEMG when treadmill walking (p = 0.016), and the duration of muscle activity was significantly greater for iEMG (p = 0.01) on both walking surfaces. There were no differences for peak and mean root mean squared (p ≥ 0.07). The FHL activity observed during the loading period (heel strike to forefoot strike) supports the function of the FHL to act as a dynamic ankle stabiliser of the rearfoot, as well as contributing to propulsion during the latter part of stance. The choice of electrodes to detect FHL activity should be dependent on whether the loading and propulsive periods are of interest, and whether treadmill or overground walking will be examined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-6411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2021.102574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Finewire ; Gait ; Loading ; Over-ground ; Propulsion ; Treadmill</subject><ispartof>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2021-10, Vol.60, p.102574-102574, Article 102574</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-830eec868cd5a14560e40823bf3fb8b0ec37f7c3659b2c487322f18a79bf5d9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-830eec868cd5a14560e40823bf3fb8b0ec37f7c3659b2c487322f18a79bf5d9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641121000614$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knox, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Amitabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banwell, Helen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matricciani, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Deborah</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of EMG signal of the flexor hallucis longus recorded using surface and intramuscular electrodes during walking</title><title>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</title><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the use of intramuscular (iEMG) and surface (sEMG) electromyography electrodes to record flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle activity during walking, and describe the role of the FHL. Muscle activity was recorded in 12 participants using sEMG and iEMG during treadmill and overground walking. Inter-tester reliability for visual detection of onset and offset of muscle activity was high (ICC = 1.00). During the loading period, the number of bursts of muscle activity was statistically significantly greater using iEMG compared to sEMG when treadmill walking (p = 0.016), and the duration of muscle activity was significantly greater for iEMG (p = 0.01) on both walking surfaces. There were no differences for peak and mean root mean squared (p ≥ 0.07). The FHL activity observed during the loading period (heel strike to forefoot strike) supports the function of the FHL to act as a dynamic ankle stabiliser of the rearfoot, as well as contributing to propulsion during the latter part of stance. The choice of electrodes to detect FHL activity should be dependent on whether the loading and propulsive periods are of interest, and whether treadmill or overground walking will be examined.</description><subject>Finewire</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Loading</subject><subject>Over-ground</subject><subject>Propulsion</subject><subject>Treadmill</subject><issn>1050-6411</issn><issn>1873-5711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9vGyEQxVdVKyV1-hEicexlXWCXXXyKIstNK7nKJTkjFgYHB4PLLGnz7Ytl33uaP3rvaebXNLeMLhllw7f9cg8BXn1ccspZ3XEx9h-aaybHrhUjYx9rTwVth56xq-Yz4p5SNlJJr5v3dTocdfaYIkmObH49EPS7qMNpml-AuAB_UyYvOoRiPJKQ4q4gyWBStmBJQR93BEt22gDR0RIf56wPBU0JOpN6mZlzsoDElnzS_tGh3rq7aT45HRC-XOqief6-eVr_aLePDz_X99vW9ELMrewogJGDNFZo1ouBQk8l7ybXuUlOFEw3utF0g1hN3PT1Zc4dk3pcTU7YlekWzddz7jGn3wVwVgePBkLQEVJBxYXgK8kHMVapOEtNTogZnDpmf9D5XTGqTqjVXl1QqxNqdUZdfXdnH9Q_3jxkhcZDNGB95TQrm_x_Ev4BIpGMVA</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Knox, Jessica</creator><creator>Gupta, Amitabh</creator><creator>Banwell, Helen A.</creator><creator>Matricciani, Lisa</creator><creator>Turner, Deborah</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Comparison of EMG signal of the flexor hallucis longus recorded using surface and intramuscular electrodes during walking</title><author>Knox, Jessica ; Gupta, Amitabh ; Banwell, Helen A. ; Matricciani, Lisa ; Turner, Deborah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-830eec868cd5a14560e40823bf3fb8b0ec37f7c3659b2c487322f18a79bf5d9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Finewire</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Loading</topic><topic>Over-ground</topic><topic>Propulsion</topic><topic>Treadmill</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knox, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Amitabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banwell, Helen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matricciani, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Deborah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knox, Jessica</au><au>Gupta, Amitabh</au><au>Banwell, Helen A.</au><au>Matricciani, Lisa</au><au>Turner, Deborah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of EMG signal of the flexor hallucis longus recorded using surface and intramuscular electrodes during walking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>60</volume><spage>102574</spage><epage>102574</epage><pages>102574-102574</pages><artnum>102574</artnum><issn>1050-6411</issn><eissn>1873-5711</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to compare the use of intramuscular (iEMG) and surface (sEMG) electromyography electrodes to record flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle activity during walking, and describe the role of the FHL. Muscle activity was recorded in 12 participants using sEMG and iEMG during treadmill and overground walking. Inter-tester reliability for visual detection of onset and offset of muscle activity was high (ICC = 1.00). During the loading period, the number of bursts of muscle activity was statistically significantly greater using iEMG compared to sEMG when treadmill walking (p = 0.016), and the duration of muscle activity was significantly greater for iEMG (p = 0.01) on both walking surfaces. There were no differences for peak and mean root mean squared (p ≥ 0.07). The FHL activity observed during the loading period (heel strike to forefoot strike) supports the function of the FHL to act as a dynamic ankle stabiliser of the rearfoot, as well as contributing to propulsion during the latter part of stance. The choice of electrodes to detect FHL activity should be dependent on whether the loading and propulsive periods are of interest, and whether treadmill or overground walking will be examined.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jelekin.2021.102574</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-6411
ispartof Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2021-10, Vol.60, p.102574-102574, Article 102574
issn 1050-6411
1873-5711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2552982657
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Finewire
Gait
Loading
Over-ground
Propulsion
Treadmill
title Comparison of EMG signal of the flexor hallucis longus recorded using surface and intramuscular electrodes during walking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T18%3A29%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20EMG%20signal%20of%20the%20flexor%20hallucis%20longus%20recorded%20using%20surface%20and%20intramuscular%20electrodes%20during%20walking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electromyography%20and%20kinesiology&rft.au=Knox,%20Jessica&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=60&rft.spage=102574&rft.epage=102574&rft.pages=102574-102574&rft.artnum=102574&rft.issn=1050-6411&rft.eissn=1873-5711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelekin.2021.102574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552982657%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552982657&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1050641121000614&rfr_iscdi=true