Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China
•The study firstly compares dust emission ability of sand desert, gobi, and farmland.•Gobi has the greatest dust emission ability under most wind velocity conditions.•Wind velocity and dust size influence comparing result of dust emission ability. It is unclear which of the land types of sand desert...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catena (Giessen) 2021-06, Vol.201, p.105215, Article 105215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105215 |
container_title | Catena (Giessen) |
container_volume | 201 |
creator | Wang, Ren-De Li, Qing Zhang, Chun-Lai Wang, Zhen-Ting Guo, Zhong-Ling Chang, Chun-Ping Li, Ji-Feng |
description | •The study firstly compares dust emission ability of sand desert, gobi, and farmland.•Gobi has the greatest dust emission ability under most wind velocity conditions.•Wind velocity and dust size influence comparing result of dust emission ability.
It is unclear which of the land types of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland acts as the major source of dust emission in northern China. Based on field observations, this study compared the dust emission ability (E) of the three land types and investigated the principal influencing factors, i.e., horizontal mass flux (Q) and dust emission efficiency (μ). Results showed that E was greatest for sand desert, followed by Gobi and then farmland at low friction velocities (u* < 0.23 m s−1). However, with the increase of u*, the exponential rate of increase of E was fastest for farmland, followed by Gobi and then sand desert. This is because the rates of increase of both Q and μ were fastest for farmland and slowest for sand desert. Consequently, as u* increased the E of both Gobi and farmland gradually exceeded that of sand desert. Gobi was found to have the greatest E under most u* conditions (0.23–0.90 m s−1) because of the overlapping effects of the comparatively strong Q and high μ. The E of farmland exceeded that of Gobi under extreme u* conditions (>0.90 m s−1) owing to its lower Q but faster rate of increase of Q and μ as u* increased. The findings of this study illustrate that the effect of wind velocity and dust size should be taken into accountwhen comparing the E of different land types. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105215 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2551946905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0341816221000746</els_id><sourcerecordid>2551946905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fff1b68fd91aead6c4a0d93ce9284e8376f60078ceab97fd7fa51941e372e5343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEFOwzAQtBBIlMIPOPhYpKbYjpM4FyQUQUGqxAXOlmOvqavULnZaid-TKD1z2t3Z2dHOIHRPyYoSWj7uVlr14NWKEUYHqGC0uEAzKiqWlUJUl2hGck4zQUt2jW5S2hFCeFXQGdo2YX9Q0aXgcbDYHFOPYe9ScgOgWte5_ndcJOUNNpAg9kv8HdUJuvOIF-vQuoclHhlWxX03Ns5jH2K_hehxs3Ve3aIrq7oEd-c6R1-vL5_NW7b5WL83z5tMcSb6zFpL21JYU1MFypSaK2LqXEPNBAeRV6UtCamEBtXWlTWVVQWtOYW8YlDkPJ-jxaR7iOHnCKmXgxsN3fAVhGOSrBj5ZU2Kgconqo4hpQhWHqLbq_grKZFjsHInp2DlGKycgh3OnqYzGGycHESZtAOvwbgIupcmuP8F_gDUaIOm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2551946905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wang, Ren-De ; Li, Qing ; Zhang, Chun-Lai ; Wang, Zhen-Ting ; Guo, Zhong-Ling ; Chang, Chun-Ping ; Li, Ji-Feng</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ren-De ; Li, Qing ; Zhang, Chun-Lai ; Wang, Zhen-Ting ; Guo, Zhong-Ling ; Chang, Chun-Ping ; Li, Ji-Feng</creatorcontrib><description>•The study firstly compares dust emission ability of sand desert, gobi, and farmland.•Gobi has the greatest dust emission ability under most wind velocity conditions.•Wind velocity and dust size influence comparing result of dust emission ability.
It is unclear which of the land types of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland acts as the major source of dust emission in northern China. Based on field observations, this study compared the dust emission ability (E) of the three land types and investigated the principal influencing factors, i.e., horizontal mass flux (Q) and dust emission efficiency (μ). Results showed that E was greatest for sand desert, followed by Gobi and then farmland at low friction velocities (u* < 0.23 m s−1). However, with the increase of u*, the exponential rate of increase of E was fastest for farmland, followed by Gobi and then sand desert. This is because the rates of increase of both Q and μ were fastest for farmland and slowest for sand desert. Consequently, as u* increased the E of both Gobi and farmland gradually exceeded that of sand desert. Gobi was found to have the greatest E under most u* conditions (0.23–0.90 m s−1) because of the overlapping effects of the comparatively strong Q and high μ. The E of farmland exceeded that of Gobi under extreme u* conditions (>0.90 m s−1) owing to its lower Q but faster rate of increase of Q and μ as u* increased. The findings of this study illustrate that the effect of wind velocity and dust size should be taken into accountwhen comparing the E of different land types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0341-8162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>agricultural land ; catenas ; China ; desert pavement ; dust ; Dust emission ability ; Dust emission efficiency ; dust emissions ; friction ; Horizontal mass flux ; Land type ; mass transfer ; Northern China ; sand ; wind speed</subject><ispartof>Catena (Giessen), 2021-06, Vol.201, p.105215, Article 105215</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fff1b68fd91aead6c4a0d93ce9284e8376f60078ceab97fd7fa51941e372e5343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fff1b68fd91aead6c4a0d93ce9284e8376f60078ceab97fd7fa51941e372e5343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816221000746$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ren-De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chun-Lai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhen-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Zhong-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chun-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ji-Feng</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China</title><title>Catena (Giessen)</title><description>•The study firstly compares dust emission ability of sand desert, gobi, and farmland.•Gobi has the greatest dust emission ability under most wind velocity conditions.•Wind velocity and dust size influence comparing result of dust emission ability.
It is unclear which of the land types of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland acts as the major source of dust emission in northern China. Based on field observations, this study compared the dust emission ability (E) of the three land types and investigated the principal influencing factors, i.e., horizontal mass flux (Q) and dust emission efficiency (μ). Results showed that E was greatest for sand desert, followed by Gobi and then farmland at low friction velocities (u* < 0.23 m s−1). However, with the increase of u*, the exponential rate of increase of E was fastest for farmland, followed by Gobi and then sand desert. This is because the rates of increase of both Q and μ were fastest for farmland and slowest for sand desert. Consequently, as u* increased the E of both Gobi and farmland gradually exceeded that of sand desert. Gobi was found to have the greatest E under most u* conditions (0.23–0.90 m s−1) because of the overlapping effects of the comparatively strong Q and high μ. The E of farmland exceeded that of Gobi under extreme u* conditions (>0.90 m s−1) owing to its lower Q but faster rate of increase of Q and μ as u* increased. The findings of this study illustrate that the effect of wind velocity and dust size should be taken into accountwhen comparing the E of different land types.</description><subject>agricultural land</subject><subject>catenas</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>desert pavement</subject><subject>dust</subject><subject>Dust emission ability</subject><subject>Dust emission efficiency</subject><subject>dust emissions</subject><subject>friction</subject><subject>Horizontal mass flux</subject><subject>Land type</subject><subject>mass transfer</subject><subject>Northern China</subject><subject>sand</subject><subject>wind speed</subject><issn>0341-8162</issn><issn>1872-6887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UEFOwzAQtBBIlMIPOPhYpKbYjpM4FyQUQUGqxAXOlmOvqavULnZaid-TKD1z2t3Z2dHOIHRPyYoSWj7uVlr14NWKEUYHqGC0uEAzKiqWlUJUl2hGck4zQUt2jW5S2hFCeFXQGdo2YX9Q0aXgcbDYHFOPYe9ScgOgWte5_ndcJOUNNpAg9kv8HdUJuvOIF-vQuoclHhlWxX03Ns5jH2K_hehxs3Ve3aIrq7oEd-c6R1-vL5_NW7b5WL83z5tMcSb6zFpL21JYU1MFypSaK2LqXEPNBAeRV6UtCamEBtXWlTWVVQWtOYW8YlDkPJ-jxaR7iOHnCKmXgxsN3fAVhGOSrBj5ZU2Kgconqo4hpQhWHqLbq_grKZFjsHInp2DlGKycgh3OnqYzGGycHESZtAOvwbgIupcmuP8F_gDUaIOm</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Wang, Ren-De</creator><creator>Li, Qing</creator><creator>Zhang, Chun-Lai</creator><creator>Wang, Zhen-Ting</creator><creator>Guo, Zhong-Ling</creator><creator>Chang, Chun-Ping</creator><creator>Li, Ji-Feng</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China</title><author>Wang, Ren-De ; Li, Qing ; Zhang, Chun-Lai ; Wang, Zhen-Ting ; Guo, Zhong-Ling ; Chang, Chun-Ping ; Li, Ji-Feng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fff1b68fd91aead6c4a0d93ce9284e8376f60078ceab97fd7fa51941e372e5343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>agricultural land</topic><topic>catenas</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>desert pavement</topic><topic>dust</topic><topic>Dust emission ability</topic><topic>Dust emission efficiency</topic><topic>dust emissions</topic><topic>friction</topic><topic>Horizontal mass flux</topic><topic>Land type</topic><topic>mass transfer</topic><topic>Northern China</topic><topic>sand</topic><topic>wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ren-De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chun-Lai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhen-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Zhong-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chun-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ji-Feng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catena (Giessen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Ren-De</au><au>Li, Qing</au><au>Zhang, Chun-Lai</au><au>Wang, Zhen-Ting</au><au>Guo, Zhong-Ling</au><au>Chang, Chun-Ping</au><au>Li, Ji-Feng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China</atitle><jtitle>Catena (Giessen)</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>201</volume><spage>105215</spage><pages>105215-</pages><artnum>105215</artnum><issn>0341-8162</issn><eissn>1872-6887</eissn><abstract>•The study firstly compares dust emission ability of sand desert, gobi, and farmland.•Gobi has the greatest dust emission ability under most wind velocity conditions.•Wind velocity and dust size influence comparing result of dust emission ability.
It is unclear which of the land types of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland acts as the major source of dust emission in northern China. Based on field observations, this study compared the dust emission ability (E) of the three land types and investigated the principal influencing factors, i.e., horizontal mass flux (Q) and dust emission efficiency (μ). Results showed that E was greatest for sand desert, followed by Gobi and then farmland at low friction velocities (u* < 0.23 m s−1). However, with the increase of u*, the exponential rate of increase of E was fastest for farmland, followed by Gobi and then sand desert. This is because the rates of increase of both Q and μ were fastest for farmland and slowest for sand desert. Consequently, as u* increased the E of both Gobi and farmland gradually exceeded that of sand desert. Gobi was found to have the greatest E under most u* conditions (0.23–0.90 m s−1) because of the overlapping effects of the comparatively strong Q and high μ. The E of farmland exceeded that of Gobi under extreme u* conditions (>0.90 m s−1) owing to its lower Q but faster rate of increase of Q and μ as u* increased. The findings of this study illustrate that the effect of wind velocity and dust size should be taken into accountwhen comparing the E of different land types.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.catena.2021.105215</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0341-8162 |
ispartof | Catena (Giessen), 2021-06, Vol.201, p.105215, Article 105215 |
issn | 0341-8162 1872-6887 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2551946905 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | agricultural land catenas China desert pavement dust Dust emission ability Dust emission efficiency dust emissions friction Horizontal mass flux Land type mass transfer Northern China sand wind speed |
title | Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A57%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20dust%20emission%20ability%20of%20sand%20desert,%20gravel%20desert%20(Gobi),%20and%20farmland%20in%20northern%20China&rft.jtitle=Catena%20(Giessen)&rft.au=Wang,%20Ren-De&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=201&rft.spage=105215&rft.pages=105215-&rft.artnum=105215&rft.issn=0341-8162&rft.eissn=1872-6887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2551946905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2551946905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0341816221000746&rfr_iscdi=true |