Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China

•The study firstly compares dust emission ability of sand desert, gobi, and farmland.•Gobi has the greatest dust emission ability under most wind velocity conditions.•Wind velocity and dust size influence comparing result of dust emission ability. It is unclear which of the land types of sand desert...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catena (Giessen) 2021-06, Vol.201, p.105215, Article 105215
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Ren-De, Li, Qing, Zhang, Chun-Lai, Wang, Zhen-Ting, Guo, Zhong-Ling, Chang, Chun-Ping, Li, Ji-Feng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105215
container_title Catena (Giessen)
container_volume 201
creator Wang, Ren-De
Li, Qing
Zhang, Chun-Lai
Wang, Zhen-Ting
Guo, Zhong-Ling
Chang, Chun-Ping
Li, Ji-Feng
description •The study firstly compares dust emission ability of sand desert, gobi, and farmland.•Gobi has the greatest dust emission ability under most wind velocity conditions.•Wind velocity and dust size influence comparing result of dust emission ability. It is unclear which of the land types of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland acts as the major source of dust emission in northern China. Based on field observations, this study compared the dust emission ability (E) of the three land types and investigated the principal influencing factors, i.e., horizontal mass flux (Q) and dust emission efficiency (μ). Results showed that E was greatest for sand desert, followed by Gobi and then farmland at low friction velocities (u* < 0.23 m s−1). However, with the increase of u*, the exponential rate of increase of E was fastest for farmland, followed by Gobi and then sand desert. This is because the rates of increase of both Q and μ were fastest for farmland and slowest for sand desert. Consequently, as u* increased the E of both Gobi and farmland gradually exceeded that of sand desert. Gobi was found to have the greatest E under most u* conditions (0.23–0.90 m s−1) because of the overlapping effects of the comparatively strong Q and high μ. The E of farmland exceeded that of Gobi under extreme u* conditions (>0.90 m s−1) owing to its lower Q but faster rate of increase of Q and μ as u* increased. The findings of this study illustrate that the effect of wind velocity and dust size should be taken into accountwhen comparing the E of different land types.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105215
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2551946905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0341816221000746</els_id><sourcerecordid>2551946905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fff1b68fd91aead6c4a0d93ce9284e8376f60078ceab97fd7fa51941e372e5343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEFOwzAQtBBIlMIPOPhYpKbYjpM4FyQUQUGqxAXOlmOvqavULnZaid-TKD1z2t3Z2dHOIHRPyYoSWj7uVlr14NWKEUYHqGC0uEAzKiqWlUJUl2hGck4zQUt2jW5S2hFCeFXQGdo2YX9Q0aXgcbDYHFOPYe9ScgOgWte5_ndcJOUNNpAg9kv8HdUJuvOIF-vQuoclHhlWxX03Ns5jH2K_hehxs3Ve3aIrq7oEd-c6R1-vL5_NW7b5WL83z5tMcSb6zFpL21JYU1MFypSaK2LqXEPNBAeRV6UtCamEBtXWlTWVVQWtOYW8YlDkPJ-jxaR7iOHnCKmXgxsN3fAVhGOSrBj5ZU2Kgconqo4hpQhWHqLbq_grKZFjsHInp2DlGKycgh3OnqYzGGycHESZtAOvwbgIupcmuP8F_gDUaIOm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2551946905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wang, Ren-De ; Li, Qing ; Zhang, Chun-Lai ; Wang, Zhen-Ting ; Guo, Zhong-Ling ; Chang, Chun-Ping ; Li, Ji-Feng</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ren-De ; Li, Qing ; Zhang, Chun-Lai ; Wang, Zhen-Ting ; Guo, Zhong-Ling ; Chang, Chun-Ping ; Li, Ji-Feng</creatorcontrib><description>•The study firstly compares dust emission ability of sand desert, gobi, and farmland.•Gobi has the greatest dust emission ability under most wind velocity conditions.•Wind velocity and dust size influence comparing result of dust emission ability. It is unclear which of the land types of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland acts as the major source of dust emission in northern China. Based on field observations, this study compared the dust emission ability (E) of the three land types and investigated the principal influencing factors, i.e., horizontal mass flux (Q) and dust emission efficiency (μ). Results showed that E was greatest for sand desert, followed by Gobi and then farmland at low friction velocities (u* &lt; 0.23 m s−1). However, with the increase of u*, the exponential rate of increase of E was fastest for farmland, followed by Gobi and then sand desert. This is because the rates of increase of both Q and μ were fastest for farmland and slowest for sand desert. Consequently, as u* increased the E of both Gobi and farmland gradually exceeded that of sand desert. Gobi was found to have the greatest E under most u* conditions (0.23–0.90 m s−1) because of the overlapping effects of the comparatively strong Q and high μ. The E of farmland exceeded that of Gobi under extreme u* conditions (&gt;0.90 m s−1) owing to its lower Q but faster rate of increase of Q and μ as u* increased. The findings of this study illustrate that the effect of wind velocity and dust size should be taken into accountwhen comparing the E of different land types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0341-8162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>agricultural land ; catenas ; China ; desert pavement ; dust ; Dust emission ability ; Dust emission efficiency ; dust emissions ; friction ; Horizontal mass flux ; Land type ; mass transfer ; Northern China ; sand ; wind speed</subject><ispartof>Catena (Giessen), 2021-06, Vol.201, p.105215, Article 105215</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fff1b68fd91aead6c4a0d93ce9284e8376f60078ceab97fd7fa51941e372e5343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fff1b68fd91aead6c4a0d93ce9284e8376f60078ceab97fd7fa51941e372e5343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816221000746$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ren-De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chun-Lai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhen-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Zhong-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chun-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ji-Feng</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China</title><title>Catena (Giessen)</title><description>•The study firstly compares dust emission ability of sand desert, gobi, and farmland.•Gobi has the greatest dust emission ability under most wind velocity conditions.•Wind velocity and dust size influence comparing result of dust emission ability. It is unclear which of the land types of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland acts as the major source of dust emission in northern China. Based on field observations, this study compared the dust emission ability (E) of the three land types and investigated the principal influencing factors, i.e., horizontal mass flux (Q) and dust emission efficiency (μ). Results showed that E was greatest for sand desert, followed by Gobi and then farmland at low friction velocities (u* &lt; 0.23 m s−1). However, with the increase of u*, the exponential rate of increase of E was fastest for farmland, followed by Gobi and then sand desert. This is because the rates of increase of both Q and μ were fastest for farmland and slowest for sand desert. Consequently, as u* increased the E of both Gobi and farmland gradually exceeded that of sand desert. Gobi was found to have the greatest E under most u* conditions (0.23–0.90 m s−1) because of the overlapping effects of the comparatively strong Q and high μ. The E of farmland exceeded that of Gobi under extreme u* conditions (&gt;0.90 m s−1) owing to its lower Q but faster rate of increase of Q and μ as u* increased. The findings of this study illustrate that the effect of wind velocity and dust size should be taken into accountwhen comparing the E of different land types.</description><subject>agricultural land</subject><subject>catenas</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>desert pavement</subject><subject>dust</subject><subject>Dust emission ability</subject><subject>Dust emission efficiency</subject><subject>dust emissions</subject><subject>friction</subject><subject>Horizontal mass flux</subject><subject>Land type</subject><subject>mass transfer</subject><subject>Northern China</subject><subject>sand</subject><subject>wind speed</subject><issn>0341-8162</issn><issn>1872-6887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UEFOwzAQtBBIlMIPOPhYpKbYjpM4FyQUQUGqxAXOlmOvqavULnZaid-TKD1z2t3Z2dHOIHRPyYoSWj7uVlr14NWKEUYHqGC0uEAzKiqWlUJUl2hGck4zQUt2jW5S2hFCeFXQGdo2YX9Q0aXgcbDYHFOPYe9ScgOgWte5_ndcJOUNNpAg9kv8HdUJuvOIF-vQuoclHhlWxX03Ns5jH2K_hehxs3Ve3aIrq7oEd-c6R1-vL5_NW7b5WL83z5tMcSb6zFpL21JYU1MFypSaK2LqXEPNBAeRV6UtCamEBtXWlTWVVQWtOYW8YlDkPJ-jxaR7iOHnCKmXgxsN3fAVhGOSrBj5ZU2Kgconqo4hpQhWHqLbq_grKZFjsHInp2DlGKycgh3OnqYzGGycHESZtAOvwbgIupcmuP8F_gDUaIOm</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Wang, Ren-De</creator><creator>Li, Qing</creator><creator>Zhang, Chun-Lai</creator><creator>Wang, Zhen-Ting</creator><creator>Guo, Zhong-Ling</creator><creator>Chang, Chun-Ping</creator><creator>Li, Ji-Feng</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China</title><author>Wang, Ren-De ; Li, Qing ; Zhang, Chun-Lai ; Wang, Zhen-Ting ; Guo, Zhong-Ling ; Chang, Chun-Ping ; Li, Ji-Feng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-fff1b68fd91aead6c4a0d93ce9284e8376f60078ceab97fd7fa51941e372e5343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>agricultural land</topic><topic>catenas</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>desert pavement</topic><topic>dust</topic><topic>Dust emission ability</topic><topic>Dust emission efficiency</topic><topic>dust emissions</topic><topic>friction</topic><topic>Horizontal mass flux</topic><topic>Land type</topic><topic>mass transfer</topic><topic>Northern China</topic><topic>sand</topic><topic>wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ren-De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chun-Lai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhen-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Zhong-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chun-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ji-Feng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catena (Giessen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Ren-De</au><au>Li, Qing</au><au>Zhang, Chun-Lai</au><au>Wang, Zhen-Ting</au><au>Guo, Zhong-Ling</au><au>Chang, Chun-Ping</au><au>Li, Ji-Feng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China</atitle><jtitle>Catena (Giessen)</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>201</volume><spage>105215</spage><pages>105215-</pages><artnum>105215</artnum><issn>0341-8162</issn><eissn>1872-6887</eissn><abstract>•The study firstly compares dust emission ability of sand desert, gobi, and farmland.•Gobi has the greatest dust emission ability under most wind velocity conditions.•Wind velocity and dust size influence comparing result of dust emission ability. It is unclear which of the land types of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland acts as the major source of dust emission in northern China. Based on field observations, this study compared the dust emission ability (E) of the three land types and investigated the principal influencing factors, i.e., horizontal mass flux (Q) and dust emission efficiency (μ). Results showed that E was greatest for sand desert, followed by Gobi and then farmland at low friction velocities (u* &lt; 0.23 m s−1). However, with the increase of u*, the exponential rate of increase of E was fastest for farmland, followed by Gobi and then sand desert. This is because the rates of increase of both Q and μ were fastest for farmland and slowest for sand desert. Consequently, as u* increased the E of both Gobi and farmland gradually exceeded that of sand desert. Gobi was found to have the greatest E under most u* conditions (0.23–0.90 m s−1) because of the overlapping effects of the comparatively strong Q and high μ. The E of farmland exceeded that of Gobi under extreme u* conditions (&gt;0.90 m s−1) owing to its lower Q but faster rate of increase of Q and μ as u* increased. The findings of this study illustrate that the effect of wind velocity and dust size should be taken into accountwhen comparing the E of different land types.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.catena.2021.105215</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0341-8162
ispartof Catena (Giessen), 2021-06, Vol.201, p.105215, Article 105215
issn 0341-8162
1872-6887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2551946905
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects agricultural land
catenas
China
desert pavement
dust
Dust emission ability
Dust emission efficiency
dust emissions
friction
Horizontal mass flux
Land type
mass transfer
Northern China
sand
wind speed
title Comparison of dust emission ability of sand desert, gravel desert (Gobi), and farmland in northern China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A57%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20dust%20emission%20ability%20of%20sand%20desert,%20gravel%20desert%20(Gobi),%20and%20farmland%20in%20northern%20China&rft.jtitle=Catena%20(Giessen)&rft.au=Wang,%20Ren-De&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=201&rft.spage=105215&rft.pages=105215-&rft.artnum=105215&rft.issn=0341-8162&rft.eissn=1872-6887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2551946905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2551946905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0341816221000746&rfr_iscdi=true