Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications

INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODSData were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2021-08, Vol.87 (2), p.194-198
Hauptverfasser: Kantar, Rami S., Breugem, Corstiaan C., Alfonso, Allyson R., Keith, Kristen, Kassam, Serena, Annan, Beyhan, Chahine, Elsa M., Wasicek, Philip J., Patel, Krishna G., Flores, Roberto L., Hamdan, Usama S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 198
container_issue 2
container_start_page 194
container_title Annals of plastic surgery
container_volume 87
creator Kantar, Rami S.
Breugem, Corstiaan C.
Alfonso, Allyson R.
Keith, Kristen
Kassam, Serena
Annan, Beyhan
Chahine, Elsa M.
Wasicek, Philip J.
Patel, Krishna G.
Flores, Roberto L.
Hamdan, Usama S.
description INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODSData were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses. RESULTSThe total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONSOur study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002604
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2551210538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2551210538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2785-8419b47f3e93f51fe7f83fc0b33ab374cd11dfdfef2e2bccf1f47fd5e87dca0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMoWB__wEWWbkaTyUyTuqtjqwXB4mM9pMmNjWYeJhmlS_-5kQqKF8Ll5Hz3Bk4QOqHkjJIJP3-YLs_In8rHpNhBI1qyccY4EbtoRGghMk4Kto8OQnghhOaiGI_Q5xK8AvsOGl9K7y34gGOHq67pPayhDcnClQMTcSU94Ctw6cZvLvA9hMHFgOe-a_A0ub1UNm6yy8E6bdtnPNODktF2rXR40dpok0jLZKvxoumd3ZrhCO0Z6QIc__RD9DSfPVY32e3d9aKa3mYq56LMREEnq4IbBhNmSmqAG8GMIivG5IrxQmlKtdEGTA75SilDTaJ1CYJrJRN2iE63e3vfvQ0QYt3YoMA52UI3hDovS5pTUjKR0GKLKt-F4MHUvbeN9Juakvo78TolXv9P_Hfso3MxBfnqhg_w9Rqki-stPmY8y0l6RiSRpZP-6AsGd4Y-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2551210538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Kantar, Rami S. ; Breugem, Corstiaan C. ; Alfonso, Allyson R. ; Keith, Kristen ; Kassam, Serena ; Annan, Beyhan ; Chahine, Elsa M. ; Wasicek, Philip J. ; Patel, Krishna G. ; Flores, Roberto L. ; Hamdan, Usama S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kantar, Rami S. ; Breugem, Corstiaan C. ; Alfonso, Allyson R. ; Keith, Kristen ; Kassam, Serena ; Annan, Beyhan ; Chahine, Elsa M. ; Wasicek, Philip J. ; Patel, Krishna G. ; Flores, Roberto L. ; Hamdan, Usama S.</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODSData were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses. RESULTSThe total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONSOur study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2021-08, Vol.87 (2), p.194-198</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2785-8419b47f3e93f51fe7f83fc0b33ab374cd11dfdfef2e2bccf1f47fd5e87dca0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kantar, Rami S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfonso, Allyson R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassam, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annan, Beyhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Elsa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasicek, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Krishna G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Roberto L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdan, Usama S.</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><description>INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODSData were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses. RESULTSThe total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONSOur study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most.</description><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMoWB__wEWWbkaTyUyTuqtjqwXB4mM9pMmNjWYeJhmlS_-5kQqKF8Ll5Hz3Bk4QOqHkjJIJP3-YLs_In8rHpNhBI1qyccY4EbtoRGghMk4Kto8OQnghhOaiGI_Q5xK8AvsOGl9K7y34gGOHq67pPayhDcnClQMTcSU94Ctw6cZvLvA9hMHFgOe-a_A0ub1UNm6yy8E6bdtnPNODktF2rXR40dpok0jLZKvxoumd3ZrhCO0Z6QIc__RD9DSfPVY32e3d9aKa3mYq56LMREEnq4IbBhNmSmqAG8GMIivG5IrxQmlKtdEGTA75SilDTaJ1CYJrJRN2iE63e3vfvQ0QYt3YoMA52UI3hDovS5pTUjKR0GKLKt-F4MHUvbeN9Juakvo78TolXv9P_Hfso3MxBfnqhg_w9Rqki-stPmY8y0l6RiSRpZP-6AsGd4Y-</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Kantar, Rami S.</creator><creator>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creator><creator>Alfonso, Allyson R.</creator><creator>Keith, Kristen</creator><creator>Kassam, Serena</creator><creator>Annan, Beyhan</creator><creator>Chahine, Elsa M.</creator><creator>Wasicek, Philip J.</creator><creator>Patel, Krishna G.</creator><creator>Flores, Roberto L.</creator><creator>Hamdan, Usama S.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications</title><author>Kantar, Rami S. ; Breugem, Corstiaan C. ; Alfonso, Allyson R. ; Keith, Kristen ; Kassam, Serena ; Annan, Beyhan ; Chahine, Elsa M. ; Wasicek, Philip J. ; Patel, Krishna G. ; Flores, Roberto L. ; Hamdan, Usama S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2785-8419b47f3e93f51fe7f83fc0b33ab374cd11dfdfef2e2bccf1f47fd5e87dca0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kantar, Rami S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfonso, Allyson R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassam, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annan, Beyhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Elsa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasicek, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Krishna G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Roberto L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdan, Usama S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kantar, Rami S.</au><au>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</au><au>Alfonso, Allyson R.</au><au>Keith, Kristen</au><au>Kassam, Serena</au><au>Annan, Beyhan</au><au>Chahine, Elsa M.</au><au>Wasicek, Philip J.</au><au>Patel, Krishna G.</au><au>Flores, Roberto L.</au><au>Hamdan, Usama S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>194</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>194-198</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODSData were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses. RESULTSThe total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONSOur study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most.</abstract><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000002604</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-7043
ispartof Annals of plastic surgery, 2021-08, Vol.87 (2), p.194-198
issn 0148-7043
1536-3708
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2551210538
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
title Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A58%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20Barriers%20to%20Comprehensive%20Cleft%20Care%20Delivery:%20Results%20From%20A%20Capacity-Building%20Educational%20Initiative%20and%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Kantar,%20Rami%20S.&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=194-198&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2551210538%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2551210538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true