Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications
INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODSData were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of plastic surgery 2021-08, Vol.87 (2), p.194-198 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 198 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 194 |
container_title | Annals of plastic surgery |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Kantar, Rami S. Breugem, Corstiaan C. Alfonso, Allyson R. Keith, Kristen Kassam, Serena Annan, Beyhan Chahine, Elsa M. Wasicek, Philip J. Patel, Krishna G. Flores, Roberto L. Hamdan, Usama S. |
description | INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODSData were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses. RESULTSThe total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONSOur study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002604 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2551210538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2551210538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2785-8419b47f3e93f51fe7f83fc0b33ab374cd11dfdfef2e2bccf1f47fd5e87dca0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMoWB__wEWWbkaTyUyTuqtjqwXB4mM9pMmNjWYeJhmlS_-5kQqKF8Ll5Hz3Bk4QOqHkjJIJP3-YLs_In8rHpNhBI1qyccY4EbtoRGghMk4Kto8OQnghhOaiGI_Q5xK8AvsOGl9K7y34gGOHq67pPayhDcnClQMTcSU94Ctw6cZvLvA9hMHFgOe-a_A0ub1UNm6yy8E6bdtnPNODktF2rXR40dpok0jLZKvxoumd3ZrhCO0Z6QIc__RD9DSfPVY32e3d9aKa3mYq56LMREEnq4IbBhNmSmqAG8GMIivG5IrxQmlKtdEGTA75SilDTaJ1CYJrJRN2iE63e3vfvQ0QYt3YoMA52UI3hDovS5pTUjKR0GKLKt-F4MHUvbeN9Juakvo78TolXv9P_Hfso3MxBfnqhg_w9Rqki-stPmY8y0l6RiSRpZP-6AsGd4Y-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2551210538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Kantar, Rami S. ; Breugem, Corstiaan C. ; Alfonso, Allyson R. ; Keith, Kristen ; Kassam, Serena ; Annan, Beyhan ; Chahine, Elsa M. ; Wasicek, Philip J. ; Patel, Krishna G. ; Flores, Roberto L. ; Hamdan, Usama S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kantar, Rami S. ; Breugem, Corstiaan C. ; Alfonso, Allyson R. ; Keith, Kristen ; Kassam, Serena ; Annan, Beyhan ; Chahine, Elsa M. ; Wasicek, Philip J. ; Patel, Krishna G. ; Flores, Roberto L. ; Hamdan, Usama S.</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODSData were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses. RESULTSThe total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONSOur study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2021-08, Vol.87 (2), p.194-198</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2785-8419b47f3e93f51fe7f83fc0b33ab374cd11dfdfef2e2bccf1f47fd5e87dca0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kantar, Rami S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfonso, Allyson R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassam, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annan, Beyhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Elsa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasicek, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Krishna G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Roberto L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdan, Usama S.</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><description>INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODSData were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses. RESULTSThe total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONSOur study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most.</description><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMoWB__wEWWbkaTyUyTuqtjqwXB4mM9pMmNjWYeJhmlS_-5kQqKF8Ll5Hz3Bk4QOqHkjJIJP3-YLs_In8rHpNhBI1qyccY4EbtoRGghMk4Kto8OQnghhOaiGI_Q5xK8AvsOGl9K7y34gGOHq67pPayhDcnClQMTcSU94Ctw6cZvLvA9hMHFgOe-a_A0ub1UNm6yy8E6bdtnPNODktF2rXR40dpok0jLZKvxoumd3ZrhCO0Z6QIc__RD9DSfPVY32e3d9aKa3mYq56LMREEnq4IbBhNmSmqAG8GMIivG5IrxQmlKtdEGTA75SilDTaJ1CYJrJRN2iE63e3vfvQ0QYt3YoMA52UI3hDovS5pTUjKR0GKLKt-F4MHUvbeN9Juakvo78TolXv9P_Hfso3MxBfnqhg_w9Rqki-stPmY8y0l6RiSRpZP-6AsGd4Y-</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Kantar, Rami S.</creator><creator>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creator><creator>Alfonso, Allyson R.</creator><creator>Keith, Kristen</creator><creator>Kassam, Serena</creator><creator>Annan, Beyhan</creator><creator>Chahine, Elsa M.</creator><creator>Wasicek, Philip J.</creator><creator>Patel, Krishna G.</creator><creator>Flores, Roberto L.</creator><creator>Hamdan, Usama S.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications</title><author>Kantar, Rami S. ; Breugem, Corstiaan C. ; Alfonso, Allyson R. ; Keith, Kristen ; Kassam, Serena ; Annan, Beyhan ; Chahine, Elsa M. ; Wasicek, Philip J. ; Patel, Krishna G. ; Flores, Roberto L. ; Hamdan, Usama S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2785-8419b47f3e93f51fe7f83fc0b33ab374cd11dfdfef2e2bccf1f47fd5e87dca0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kantar, Rami S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfonso, Allyson R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassam, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annan, Beyhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Elsa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasicek, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Krishna G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Roberto L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamdan, Usama S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kantar, Rami S.</au><au>Breugem, Corstiaan C.</au><au>Alfonso, Allyson R.</au><au>Keith, Kristen</au><au>Kassam, Serena</au><au>Annan, Beyhan</au><au>Chahine, Elsa M.</au><au>Wasicek, Philip J.</au><au>Patel, Krishna G.</au><au>Flores, Roberto L.</au><au>Hamdan, Usama S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>194</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>194-198</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTIONWe analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODSData were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses. RESULTSThe total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONSOur study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most.</abstract><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000002604</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-7043 |
ispartof | Annals of plastic surgery, 2021-08, Vol.87 (2), p.194-198 |
issn | 0148-7043 1536-3708 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2551210538 |
source | Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload |
title | Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A58%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20Barriers%20to%20Comprehensive%20Cleft%20Care%20Delivery:%20Results%20From%20A%20Capacity-Building%20Educational%20Initiative%20and%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Kantar,%20Rami%20S.&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=194-198&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2551210538%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2551210538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |