Wrong-Patient Orders in Obstetrics

OBJECTIVETo compare rates of wrong-patient orders among patients on obstetric units compared with reproductive-aged women admitted to medical-surgical units. METHODSThis was an observational study conducted in a large health system in New York between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The prim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2021-08, Vol.138 (2), p.229-235
Hauptverfasser: Kern-Goldberger, Adina R., Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard, Fernandes, Yelstin, Applebaum, Jo R., Schechter, Clyde B., Adelman, Jason S., Goffman, Dena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 235
container_issue 2
container_start_page 229
container_title Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)
container_volume 138
creator Kern-Goldberger, Adina R.
Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard
Fernandes, Yelstin
Applebaum, Jo R.
Schechter, Clyde B.
Adelman, Jason S.
Goffman, Dena
description OBJECTIVETo compare rates of wrong-patient orders among patients on obstetric units compared with reproductive-aged women admitted to medical-surgical units. METHODSThis was an observational study conducted in a large health system in New York between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was near-miss wrong-patient orders identified using the National Quality Forum-endorsed Wrong-Patient Retract-and-Reorder measure. All electronic orders placed for eligible patients during the study period were extracted retrospectively from the health system data warehouse, and the unit of analysis was the order session (consecutive orders placed by a single clinician for a patient within 60 minutes). Multilevel logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs comparing the probability of retract-and-reorder events in obstetric and medical-surgical units, overall, and in subgroups defined by clinician type and order timing. RESULTSOverall, 1,329,463 order sessions were placed during the study period, including 676,643 obstetric order sessions (from 45,436 patients) and 652,820 medical-surgical order sessions (from 12,915 patients). The rate of 79.5 retract-and-reorder events per 100,000 order sessions in obstetric units was significantly higher than the rate in the general medical-surgical population of 42.3 per 100,000 order sessions (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.64-2.39). The obstetric retract-and-reorder event rate was significantly higher for attending physicians and house staff compared with advanced practice clinicians. There were no significant differences in error rates between day and night shifts. CONCLUSIONOrder errors occurred more frequently on obstetric units compared with medical-surgical units. Systems strategies shown to decrease these events in other high-risk specialties should be explored in obstetrics to render safer maternity care.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004474
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2550264465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2550264465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3299-3e5e0eea9dbacdb7e37fe1470ee1bc01941ae7dff16abad050643ad6125edbdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wEPx5CU132mOpWgVCutB0VtINrN2dbtbk5TSf-_WCopzGeblmYF5ELqkZEyJ0TfTYj4mf0oILY7QgE40x4zz12M0IIQZrCdCnKKzlN57iCrDB-jqJXbtG350uYY2j4oYIKZR3Y4KnzLkWJfpHJ1Urklw8dOH6Pnu9ml2jxfF_GE2XeCSM2MwBwkEwJngXRm8Bq4roEL3GfUloUZQBzpUFVXOu0AkUYK7oCiTEHzwfIiuD3fXsfvcQMp2VacSmsa10G2SZVISpoRQskfFAS1jl1KEyq5jvXJxZymxeyW2V2L_K_ld23ZN7v_8aDZbiHYJrsnLb1wxSTAjjJJJP-F9ZPgXGEhjQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550264465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wrong-Patient Orders in Obstetrics</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Kern-Goldberger, Adina R. ; Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard ; Fernandes, Yelstin ; Applebaum, Jo R. ; Schechter, Clyde B. ; Adelman, Jason S. ; Goffman, Dena</creator><creatorcontrib>Kern-Goldberger, Adina R. ; Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard ; Fernandes, Yelstin ; Applebaum, Jo R. ; Schechter, Clyde B. ; Adelman, Jason S. ; Goffman, Dena</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVETo compare rates of wrong-patient orders among patients on obstetric units compared with reproductive-aged women admitted to medical-surgical units. METHODSThis was an observational study conducted in a large health system in New York between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was near-miss wrong-patient orders identified using the National Quality Forum-endorsed Wrong-Patient Retract-and-Reorder measure. All electronic orders placed for eligible patients during the study period were extracted retrospectively from the health system data warehouse, and the unit of analysis was the order session (consecutive orders placed by a single clinician for a patient within 60 minutes). Multilevel logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs comparing the probability of retract-and-reorder events in obstetric and medical-surgical units, overall, and in subgroups defined by clinician type and order timing. RESULTSOverall, 1,329,463 order sessions were placed during the study period, including 676,643 obstetric order sessions (from 45,436 patients) and 652,820 medical-surgical order sessions (from 12,915 patients). The rate of 79.5 retract-and-reorder events per 100,000 order sessions in obstetric units was significantly higher than the rate in the general medical-surgical population of 42.3 per 100,000 order sessions (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.64-2.39). The obstetric retract-and-reorder event rate was significantly higher for attending physicians and house staff compared with advanced practice clinicians. There were no significant differences in error rates between day and night shifts. CONCLUSIONOrder errors occurred more frequently on obstetric units compared with medical-surgical units. Systems strategies shown to decrease these events in other high-risk specialties should be explored in obstetrics to render safer maternity care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2021-08, Vol.138 (2), p.229-235</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3299-3e5e0eea9dbacdb7e37fe1470ee1bc01941ae7dff16abad050643ad6125edbdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3299-3e5e0eea9dbacdb7e37fe1470ee1bc01941ae7dff16abad050643ad6125edbdb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7932-1987</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kern-Goldberger, Adina R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Yelstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Applebaum, Jo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schechter, Clyde B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelman, Jason S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goffman, Dena</creatorcontrib><title>Wrong-Patient Orders in Obstetrics</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><description>OBJECTIVETo compare rates of wrong-patient orders among patients on obstetric units compared with reproductive-aged women admitted to medical-surgical units. METHODSThis was an observational study conducted in a large health system in New York between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was near-miss wrong-patient orders identified using the National Quality Forum-endorsed Wrong-Patient Retract-and-Reorder measure. All electronic orders placed for eligible patients during the study period were extracted retrospectively from the health system data warehouse, and the unit of analysis was the order session (consecutive orders placed by a single clinician for a patient within 60 minutes). Multilevel logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs comparing the probability of retract-and-reorder events in obstetric and medical-surgical units, overall, and in subgroups defined by clinician type and order timing. RESULTSOverall, 1,329,463 order sessions were placed during the study period, including 676,643 obstetric order sessions (from 45,436 patients) and 652,820 medical-surgical order sessions (from 12,915 patients). The rate of 79.5 retract-and-reorder events per 100,000 order sessions in obstetric units was significantly higher than the rate in the general medical-surgical population of 42.3 per 100,000 order sessions (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.64-2.39). The obstetric retract-and-reorder event rate was significantly higher for attending physicians and house staff compared with advanced practice clinicians. There were no significant differences in error rates between day and night shifts. CONCLUSIONOrder errors occurred more frequently on obstetric units compared with medical-surgical units. Systems strategies shown to decrease these events in other high-risk specialties should be explored in obstetrics to render safer maternity care.</description><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wEPx5CU132mOpWgVCutB0VtINrN2dbtbk5TSf-_WCopzGeblmYF5ELqkZEyJ0TfTYj4mf0oILY7QgE40x4zz12M0IIQZrCdCnKKzlN57iCrDB-jqJXbtG350uYY2j4oYIKZR3Y4KnzLkWJfpHJ1Urklw8dOH6Pnu9ml2jxfF_GE2XeCSM2MwBwkEwJngXRm8Bq4roEL3GfUloUZQBzpUFVXOu0AkUYK7oCiTEHzwfIiuD3fXsfvcQMp2VacSmsa10G2SZVISpoRQskfFAS1jl1KEyq5jvXJxZymxeyW2V2L_K_ld23ZN7v_8aDZbiHYJrsnLb1wxSTAjjJJJP-F9ZPgXGEhjQA</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Kern-Goldberger, Adina R.</creator><creator>Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard</creator><creator>Fernandes, Yelstin</creator><creator>Applebaum, Jo R.</creator><creator>Schechter, Clyde B.</creator><creator>Adelman, Jason S.</creator><creator>Goffman, Dena</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-1987</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Wrong-Patient Orders in Obstetrics</title><author>Kern-Goldberger, Adina R. ; Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard ; Fernandes, Yelstin ; Applebaum, Jo R. ; Schechter, Clyde B. ; Adelman, Jason S. ; Goffman, Dena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3299-3e5e0eea9dbacdb7e37fe1470ee1bc01941ae7dff16abad050643ad6125edbdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kern-Goldberger, Adina R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Yelstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Applebaum, Jo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schechter, Clyde B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelman, Jason S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goffman, Dena</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kern-Goldberger, Adina R.</au><au>Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard</au><au>Fernandes, Yelstin</au><au>Applebaum, Jo R.</au><au>Schechter, Clyde B.</au><au>Adelman, Jason S.</au><au>Goffman, Dena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wrong-Patient Orders in Obstetrics</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>229-235</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVETo compare rates of wrong-patient orders among patients on obstetric units compared with reproductive-aged women admitted to medical-surgical units. METHODSThis was an observational study conducted in a large health system in New York between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was near-miss wrong-patient orders identified using the National Quality Forum-endorsed Wrong-Patient Retract-and-Reorder measure. All electronic orders placed for eligible patients during the study period were extracted retrospectively from the health system data warehouse, and the unit of analysis was the order session (consecutive orders placed by a single clinician for a patient within 60 minutes). Multilevel logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs comparing the probability of retract-and-reorder events in obstetric and medical-surgical units, overall, and in subgroups defined by clinician type and order timing. RESULTSOverall, 1,329,463 order sessions were placed during the study period, including 676,643 obstetric order sessions (from 45,436 patients) and 652,820 medical-surgical order sessions (from 12,915 patients). The rate of 79.5 retract-and-reorder events per 100,000 order sessions in obstetric units was significantly higher than the rate in the general medical-surgical population of 42.3 per 100,000 order sessions (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.64-2.39). The obstetric retract-and-reorder event rate was significantly higher for attending physicians and house staff compared with advanced practice clinicians. There were no significant differences in error rates between day and night shifts. CONCLUSIONOrder errors occurred more frequently on obstetric units compared with medical-surgical units. Systems strategies shown to decrease these events in other high-risk specialties should be explored in obstetrics to render safer maternity care.</abstract><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><doi>10.1097/AOG.0000000000004474</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-1987</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-7844
ispartof Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2021-08, Vol.138 (2), p.229-235
issn 0029-7844
1873-233X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2550264465
source Journals@Ovid Complete
title Wrong-Patient Orders in Obstetrics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A58%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wrong-Patient%20Orders%20in%20Obstetrics&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=Kern-Goldberger,%20Adina%20R.&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=229-235&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2550264465%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550264465&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true