Usefulness of Procalcitonin in Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot Study

Introduction. Infected diabetic foot is the leading cause of hospital admissions for people with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) causes high morbidity and significant mortality. Current diagnostic tests for DFO are either expensive, invasive, or of low diagnostic yield. Objectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wounds (King of Prussia, Pa.) Pa.), 2021-07, Vol.33 (7), p.192-196
Hauptverfasser: Vangaveti, Venkat, Heyes, Oliver, Jhamb, Shaurya, Haleagrahara, Nagaraja, Malabu, Usman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 196
container_issue 7
container_start_page 192
container_title Wounds (King of Prussia, Pa.)
container_volume 33
creator Vangaveti, Venkat
Heyes, Oliver
Jhamb, Shaurya
Haleagrahara, Nagaraja
Malabu, Usman
description Introduction. Infected diabetic foot is the leading cause of hospital admissions for people with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) causes high morbidity and significant mortality. Current diagnostic tests for DFO are either expensive, invasive, or of low diagnostic yield. Objective. The objective of the study was to determine whether serum levels of procalcitonin (PCT), an inflammatory marker, differ between DFO and diabetic foot ulcers without osteomyelitis (ie, cellulitis) as controls. The authors also aimed to assess the usefulness of PCT in diagnosing DFO. Methods. A case-control study was designed comparing DFO with diabetic foot cellulitis as the control. Patients were classified as having osteomyelitis and cellulitis based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot diagnostic criteria. Serum inflammatory markers PCT, adiponectin, C-reactive protein-1, osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteopontin (OPN), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were analyzed in patients with DFO and controls. Results. The median serum procalcitonin was significantly higher in the DFO group 108.5 pg/mL (range, 65.0–124.0 pg/mL) compared with 57.0 pg/mL (range, 37.2–77.0 pg/mL) controls (P = .02). Procalcitonin had a sensitivity of 79% compared with 50%, 63%, 66%, and 75% for adiponectin, OPG, OPN, and IL-6, respectively. Procalcitonin had a specificity of 70% compared with 50%, 71%, 70%, and 64%. Receiver operator characteristic curves showed a value of area under the curve of 0.73 and 0.77 for PCT and IL-6 compared with 0.4, 0.6, and 0.6 for adiponectin, OPG, and OPN, respectively. Conclusions. In this study, procalcitonin was a useful diagnostic test for DFOs and provided distinct diagnostic discrimination between DFO from cellulitis. It may serve as a useful marker for diagnosing DFO. Further studies in a larger population are needed to verify the findings.
doi_str_mv 10.25270/wnds/2021.192196
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2550263194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2550263194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c193t-adf09f87d2317cf29fed1db94792e326a0e5cd0128c8831db9db0c44eff323c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF2WbqbNax5xV6pVodCC7TpM8yiRdFLnZpD5985Y4cA9nHM5iw-hR0pmLGclmf80BuaMMDqjklFZXKEJlYJnQyeuB0-EyEopilt0B_BFCM8JJxO024N1XWgsAI4Ob9uo66B9io1v8KAXXx-bCL45jvZgk9d4FWPCG0g2nnobfPLwjBd468MQf6bO9PfoxtUB7MP_naL96nW3fM_Wm7eP5WKdaSp5ymrjiHRVaRinpXZMOmuoOUhRSmY5K2pic20IZZWuKj425kC0ENY5zrgu-RQ9XXbPbfzuLCR18qBtCHVjYweK5TlhBR85TBG9vOo2ArTWqXPrT3XbK0rUH0E1ElQjQXUhyH8BKWlluQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550263194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usefulness of Procalcitonin in Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot Study</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Vangaveti, Venkat ; Heyes, Oliver ; Jhamb, Shaurya ; Haleagrahara, Nagaraja ; Malabu, Usman</creator><creatorcontrib>Vangaveti, Venkat ; Heyes, Oliver ; Jhamb, Shaurya ; Haleagrahara, Nagaraja ; Malabu, Usman</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction. Infected diabetic foot is the leading cause of hospital admissions for people with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) causes high morbidity and significant mortality. Current diagnostic tests for DFO are either expensive, invasive, or of low diagnostic yield. Objective. The objective of the study was to determine whether serum levels of procalcitonin (PCT), an inflammatory marker, differ between DFO and diabetic foot ulcers without osteomyelitis (ie, cellulitis) as controls. The authors also aimed to assess the usefulness of PCT in diagnosing DFO. Methods. A case-control study was designed comparing DFO with diabetic foot cellulitis as the control. Patients were classified as having osteomyelitis and cellulitis based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot diagnostic criteria. Serum inflammatory markers PCT, adiponectin, C-reactive protein-1, osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteopontin (OPN), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were analyzed in patients with DFO and controls. Results. The median serum procalcitonin was significantly higher in the DFO group 108.5 pg/mL (range, 65.0–124.0 pg/mL) compared with 57.0 pg/mL (range, 37.2–77.0 pg/mL) controls (P = .02). Procalcitonin had a sensitivity of 79% compared with 50%, 63%, 66%, and 75% for adiponectin, OPG, OPN, and IL-6, respectively. Procalcitonin had a specificity of 70% compared with 50%, 71%, 70%, and 64%. Receiver operator characteristic curves showed a value of area under the curve of 0.73 and 0.77 for PCT and IL-6 compared with 0.4, 0.6, and 0.6 for adiponectin, OPG, and OPN, respectively. Conclusions. In this study, procalcitonin was a useful diagnostic test for DFOs and provided distinct diagnostic discrimination between DFO from cellulitis. It may serve as a useful marker for diagnosing DFO. Further studies in a larger population are needed to verify the findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-7946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-2704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25270/wnds/2021.192196</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Wounds (King of Prussia, Pa.), 2021-07, Vol.33 (7), p.192-196</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c193t-adf09f87d2317cf29fed1db94792e326a0e5cd0128c8831db9db0c44eff323c73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vangaveti, Venkat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyes, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhamb, Shaurya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haleagrahara, Nagaraja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malabu, Usman</creatorcontrib><title>Usefulness of Procalcitonin in Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot Study</title><title>Wounds (King of Prussia, Pa.)</title><description>Introduction. Infected diabetic foot is the leading cause of hospital admissions for people with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) causes high morbidity and significant mortality. Current diagnostic tests for DFO are either expensive, invasive, or of low diagnostic yield. Objective. The objective of the study was to determine whether serum levels of procalcitonin (PCT), an inflammatory marker, differ between DFO and diabetic foot ulcers without osteomyelitis (ie, cellulitis) as controls. The authors also aimed to assess the usefulness of PCT in diagnosing DFO. Methods. A case-control study was designed comparing DFO with diabetic foot cellulitis as the control. Patients were classified as having osteomyelitis and cellulitis based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot diagnostic criteria. Serum inflammatory markers PCT, adiponectin, C-reactive protein-1, osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteopontin (OPN), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were analyzed in patients with DFO and controls. Results. The median serum procalcitonin was significantly higher in the DFO group 108.5 pg/mL (range, 65.0–124.0 pg/mL) compared with 57.0 pg/mL (range, 37.2–77.0 pg/mL) controls (P = .02). Procalcitonin had a sensitivity of 79% compared with 50%, 63%, 66%, and 75% for adiponectin, OPG, OPN, and IL-6, respectively. Procalcitonin had a specificity of 70% compared with 50%, 71%, 70%, and 64%. Receiver operator characteristic curves showed a value of area under the curve of 0.73 and 0.77 for PCT and IL-6 compared with 0.4, 0.6, and 0.6 for adiponectin, OPG, and OPN, respectively. Conclusions. In this study, procalcitonin was a useful diagnostic test for DFOs and provided distinct diagnostic discrimination between DFO from cellulitis. It may serve as a useful marker for diagnosing DFO. Further studies in a larger population are needed to verify the findings.</description><issn>1044-7946</issn><issn>1943-2704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF2WbqbNax5xV6pVodCC7TpM8yiRdFLnZpD5985Y4cA9nHM5iw-hR0pmLGclmf80BuaMMDqjklFZXKEJlYJnQyeuB0-EyEopilt0B_BFCM8JJxO024N1XWgsAI4Ob9uo66B9io1v8KAXXx-bCL45jvZgk9d4FWPCG0g2nnobfPLwjBd468MQf6bO9PfoxtUB7MP_naL96nW3fM_Wm7eP5WKdaSp5ymrjiHRVaRinpXZMOmuoOUhRSmY5K2pic20IZZWuKj425kC0ENY5zrgu-RQ9XXbPbfzuLCR18qBtCHVjYweK5TlhBR85TBG9vOo2ArTWqXPrT3XbK0rUH0E1ElQjQXUhyH8BKWlluQ</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Vangaveti, Venkat</creator><creator>Heyes, Oliver</creator><creator>Jhamb, Shaurya</creator><creator>Haleagrahara, Nagaraja</creator><creator>Malabu, Usman</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Usefulness of Procalcitonin in Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot Study</title><author>Vangaveti, Venkat ; Heyes, Oliver ; Jhamb, Shaurya ; Haleagrahara, Nagaraja ; Malabu, Usman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c193t-adf09f87d2317cf29fed1db94792e326a0e5cd0128c8831db9db0c44eff323c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vangaveti, Venkat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyes, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhamb, Shaurya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haleagrahara, Nagaraja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malabu, Usman</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wounds (King of Prussia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vangaveti, Venkat</au><au>Heyes, Oliver</au><au>Jhamb, Shaurya</au><au>Haleagrahara, Nagaraja</au><au>Malabu, Usman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usefulness of Procalcitonin in Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot Study</atitle><jtitle>Wounds (King of Prussia, Pa.)</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>196</epage><pages>192-196</pages><issn>1044-7946</issn><eissn>1943-2704</eissn><abstract>Introduction. Infected diabetic foot is the leading cause of hospital admissions for people with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) causes high morbidity and significant mortality. Current diagnostic tests for DFO are either expensive, invasive, or of low diagnostic yield. Objective. The objective of the study was to determine whether serum levels of procalcitonin (PCT), an inflammatory marker, differ between DFO and diabetic foot ulcers without osteomyelitis (ie, cellulitis) as controls. The authors also aimed to assess the usefulness of PCT in diagnosing DFO. Methods. A case-control study was designed comparing DFO with diabetic foot cellulitis as the control. Patients were classified as having osteomyelitis and cellulitis based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot diagnostic criteria. Serum inflammatory markers PCT, adiponectin, C-reactive protein-1, osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteopontin (OPN), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were analyzed in patients with DFO and controls. Results. The median serum procalcitonin was significantly higher in the DFO group 108.5 pg/mL (range, 65.0–124.0 pg/mL) compared with 57.0 pg/mL (range, 37.2–77.0 pg/mL) controls (P = .02). Procalcitonin had a sensitivity of 79% compared with 50%, 63%, 66%, and 75% for adiponectin, OPG, OPN, and IL-6, respectively. Procalcitonin had a specificity of 70% compared with 50%, 71%, 70%, and 64%. Receiver operator characteristic curves showed a value of area under the curve of 0.73 and 0.77 for PCT and IL-6 compared with 0.4, 0.6, and 0.6 for adiponectin, OPG, and OPN, respectively. Conclusions. In this study, procalcitonin was a useful diagnostic test for DFOs and provided distinct diagnostic discrimination between DFO from cellulitis. It may serve as a useful marker for diagnosing DFO. Further studies in a larger population are needed to verify the findings.</abstract><doi>10.25270/wnds/2021.192196</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1044-7946
ispartof Wounds (King of Prussia, Pa.), 2021-07, Vol.33 (7), p.192-196
issn 1044-7946
1943-2704
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2550263194
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Usefulness of Procalcitonin in Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A30%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usefulness%20of%20Procalcitonin%20in%20Diagnosing%20Diabetic%20Foot%20Osteomyelitis:%20A%20Pilot%20Study&rft.jtitle=Wounds%20(King%20of%20Prussia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Vangaveti,%20Venkat&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=196&rft.pages=192-196&rft.issn=1044-7946&rft.eissn=1943-2704&rft_id=info:doi/10.25270/wnds/2021.192196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2550263194%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550263194&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true