Aerobiological modeling I: A review of predictive models

The present work is the first of two reviews on applied modeling in the field of aerobiology. The aerobiological predictive models for pollen and fungal spores, usually defined as predictive statistical models, will, amongst other objectives, forecast airborne particles' concentration or dynami...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2021-11, Vol.795, p.148783-148783, Article 148783
Hauptverfasser: Vélez-Pereira, Andrés M., De Linares, Concepción, Belmonte, Jordina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 148783
container_issue
container_start_page 148783
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 795
creator Vélez-Pereira, Andrés M.
De Linares, Concepción
Belmonte, Jordina
description The present work is the first of two reviews on applied modeling in the field of aerobiology. The aerobiological predictive models for pollen and fungal spores, usually defined as predictive statistical models, will, amongst other objectives, forecast airborne particles' concentration or dynamical behavior of the particles. These models can be classified into Observation Based Models (OBM), Phenological Based Models (PHM), or OTher Models (OTM). The aim of this review is to show, analyze and discuss the different predictive models used in pollen and spore aerobiological studies. The analysis was performed on published electronic scientific articles from 1998 to 2016 related to the type of model, the taxa and the modelled parameters. From a total of 503 studies, 55.5% used OBM (44.8% on pollen and 10.7% on fungal spores), 38.5% PHM (all on pollen) and 6% OTM (5.4% on pollen and 0.6% on fungal spores). OBM have been used with high frequency to forecast concentration. The most frequent model of OBM was linear regression (18.5% out of 503) on pollen and artificial neural networks (4.6%) on fungal spores. In the PHM, the principal use was to characterize the main pollen season (flowering season) based on the model of growth degree days. Finally, OTM have been used to estimate concentrations at unmonitored areas. Olea (14,5%) on pollen and Alternaria (4,8%) on fungal spores were the taxa most frequently modelled. Daily concentration was the most modelled parameter by OBM (25.2%) and season start day by PHM (35.6%). The PHM approaches include greater model diversity and use fewer independent variables than OBM. In addition, PHM show to be easier to apply than OBM; however, the wide range of criteria to define the parameters to use in PHM (e.g.: pollination start day) makes that each model is used with a lesser frequency than other models. [Display omitted] •Predictive models in aerobiology can be classified: Observational Base Models OBM, Phenological Models PHM, Other Models OTM.•OBM are used with high frequency to forecast concentration and PHM to characterize the main pollen/spore season.•OBM tend to use a computational statistical model that does not require compliance with normality and linearity in the data.•PHM are easy to use but they are less frequently used than OBM due to their variety of starting criteria.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148783
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2550261790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969721038559</els_id><sourcerecordid>2550261790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-baee3653a57e6bb9715172ce7643c75f5c049a58bf3f97c26b875181278fd4713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwG8jIkuBL4pzDFlVQKlVigdlKnEvlKo2LnRbx73EUxMott7z3pO9j7B54AhyKx33itRntSMM5SXkKCeQSZXbBFiCxjIGnxSVbcJ7LuCxKvGY33u95OJSwYLIiZxtje7szuu6jg22pN8Mu2jxFVeTobOgrsl10dNQaPZozzRF_y666uvd09_uX7OPl-X31Gm_f1ptVtY11inKMm5ooK0RWC6SiaUoEAZhqwiLPNIpOaJ6XtZBNl3Ul6rRoJAqQEMpdmyNkS_Yw7x6d_TyRH9XBeE19Xw9kT16lQgRCwJKHKM5R7az3jjp1dOZQu28FXE2u1F79uVKTKzW7Cs1qbgawCdlNORp0YHakR9Va8-_GDwWwddo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550261790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aerobiological modeling I: A review of predictive models</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vélez-Pereira, Andrés M. ; De Linares, Concepción ; Belmonte, Jordina</creator><creatorcontrib>Vélez-Pereira, Andrés M. ; De Linares, Concepción ; Belmonte, Jordina</creatorcontrib><description>The present work is the first of two reviews on applied modeling in the field of aerobiology. The aerobiological predictive models for pollen and fungal spores, usually defined as predictive statistical models, will, amongst other objectives, forecast airborne particles' concentration or dynamical behavior of the particles. These models can be classified into Observation Based Models (OBM), Phenological Based Models (PHM), or OTher Models (OTM). The aim of this review is to show, analyze and discuss the different predictive models used in pollen and spore aerobiological studies. The analysis was performed on published electronic scientific articles from 1998 to 2016 related to the type of model, the taxa and the modelled parameters. From a total of 503 studies, 55.5% used OBM (44.8% on pollen and 10.7% on fungal spores), 38.5% PHM (all on pollen) and 6% OTM (5.4% on pollen and 0.6% on fungal spores). OBM have been used with high frequency to forecast concentration. The most frequent model of OBM was linear regression (18.5% out of 503) on pollen and artificial neural networks (4.6%) on fungal spores. In the PHM, the principal use was to characterize the main pollen season (flowering season) based on the model of growth degree days. Finally, OTM have been used to estimate concentrations at unmonitored areas. Olea (14,5%) on pollen and Alternaria (4,8%) on fungal spores were the taxa most frequently modelled. Daily concentration was the most modelled parameter by OBM (25.2%) and season start day by PHM (35.6%). The PHM approaches include greater model diversity and use fewer independent variables than OBM. In addition, PHM show to be easier to apply than OBM; however, the wide range of criteria to define the parameters to use in PHM (e.g.: pollination start day) makes that each model is used with a lesser frequency than other models. [Display omitted] •Predictive models in aerobiology can be classified: Observational Base Models OBM, Phenological Models PHM, Other Models OTM.•OBM are used with high frequency to forecast concentration and PHM to characterize the main pollen/spore season.•OBM tend to use a computational statistical model that does not require compliance with normality and linearity in the data.•PHM are easy to use but they are less frequently used than OBM due to their variety of starting criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aerobiology ; Airborne fungal spores ; Airborne pollen ; Forecasting model ; Phenological model ; Statistical model</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2021-11, Vol.795, p.148783-148783, Article 148783</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-baee3653a57e6bb9715172ce7643c75f5c049a58bf3f97c26b875181278fd4713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-baee3653a57e6bb9715172ce7643c75f5c049a58bf3f97c26b875181278fd4713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721038559$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vélez-Pereira, Andrés M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Linares, Concepción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belmonte, Jordina</creatorcontrib><title>Aerobiological modeling I: A review of predictive models</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><description>The present work is the first of two reviews on applied modeling in the field of aerobiology. The aerobiological predictive models for pollen and fungal spores, usually defined as predictive statistical models, will, amongst other objectives, forecast airborne particles' concentration or dynamical behavior of the particles. These models can be classified into Observation Based Models (OBM), Phenological Based Models (PHM), or OTher Models (OTM). The aim of this review is to show, analyze and discuss the different predictive models used in pollen and spore aerobiological studies. The analysis was performed on published electronic scientific articles from 1998 to 2016 related to the type of model, the taxa and the modelled parameters. From a total of 503 studies, 55.5% used OBM (44.8% on pollen and 10.7% on fungal spores), 38.5% PHM (all on pollen) and 6% OTM (5.4% on pollen and 0.6% on fungal spores). OBM have been used with high frequency to forecast concentration. The most frequent model of OBM was linear regression (18.5% out of 503) on pollen and artificial neural networks (4.6%) on fungal spores. In the PHM, the principal use was to characterize the main pollen season (flowering season) based on the model of growth degree days. Finally, OTM have been used to estimate concentrations at unmonitored areas. Olea (14,5%) on pollen and Alternaria (4,8%) on fungal spores were the taxa most frequently modelled. Daily concentration was the most modelled parameter by OBM (25.2%) and season start day by PHM (35.6%). The PHM approaches include greater model diversity and use fewer independent variables than OBM. In addition, PHM show to be easier to apply than OBM; however, the wide range of criteria to define the parameters to use in PHM (e.g.: pollination start day) makes that each model is used with a lesser frequency than other models. [Display omitted] •Predictive models in aerobiology can be classified: Observational Base Models OBM, Phenological Models PHM, Other Models OTM.•OBM are used with high frequency to forecast concentration and PHM to characterize the main pollen/spore season.•OBM tend to use a computational statistical model that does not require compliance with normality and linearity in the data.•PHM are easy to use but they are less frequently used than OBM due to their variety of starting criteria.</description><subject>Aerobiology</subject><subject>Airborne fungal spores</subject><subject>Airborne pollen</subject><subject>Forecasting model</subject><subject>Phenological model</subject><subject>Statistical model</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwG8jIkuBL4pzDFlVQKlVigdlKnEvlKo2LnRbx73EUxMott7z3pO9j7B54AhyKx33itRntSMM5SXkKCeQSZXbBFiCxjIGnxSVbcJ7LuCxKvGY33u95OJSwYLIiZxtje7szuu6jg22pN8Mu2jxFVeTobOgrsl10dNQaPZozzRF_y666uvd09_uX7OPl-X31Gm_f1ptVtY11inKMm5ooK0RWC6SiaUoEAZhqwiLPNIpOaJ6XtZBNl3Ul6rRoJAqQEMpdmyNkS_Yw7x6d_TyRH9XBeE19Xw9kT16lQgRCwJKHKM5R7az3jjp1dOZQu28FXE2u1F79uVKTKzW7Cs1qbgawCdlNORp0YHakR9Va8-_GDwWwddo</recordid><startdate>20211115</startdate><enddate>20211115</enddate><creator>Vélez-Pereira, Andrés M.</creator><creator>De Linares, Concepción</creator><creator>Belmonte, Jordina</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211115</creationdate><title>Aerobiological modeling I: A review of predictive models</title><author>Vélez-Pereira, Andrés M. ; De Linares, Concepción ; Belmonte, Jordina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-baee3653a57e6bb9715172ce7643c75f5c049a58bf3f97c26b875181278fd4713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aerobiology</topic><topic>Airborne fungal spores</topic><topic>Airborne pollen</topic><topic>Forecasting model</topic><topic>Phenological model</topic><topic>Statistical model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vélez-Pereira, Andrés M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Linares, Concepción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belmonte, Jordina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vélez-Pereira, Andrés M.</au><au>De Linares, Concepción</au><au>Belmonte, Jordina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aerobiological modeling I: A review of predictive models</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><date>2021-11-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>795</volume><spage>148783</spage><epage>148783</epage><pages>148783-148783</pages><artnum>148783</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>The present work is the first of two reviews on applied modeling in the field of aerobiology. The aerobiological predictive models for pollen and fungal spores, usually defined as predictive statistical models, will, amongst other objectives, forecast airborne particles' concentration or dynamical behavior of the particles. These models can be classified into Observation Based Models (OBM), Phenological Based Models (PHM), or OTher Models (OTM). The aim of this review is to show, analyze and discuss the different predictive models used in pollen and spore aerobiological studies. The analysis was performed on published electronic scientific articles from 1998 to 2016 related to the type of model, the taxa and the modelled parameters. From a total of 503 studies, 55.5% used OBM (44.8% on pollen and 10.7% on fungal spores), 38.5% PHM (all on pollen) and 6% OTM (5.4% on pollen and 0.6% on fungal spores). OBM have been used with high frequency to forecast concentration. The most frequent model of OBM was linear regression (18.5% out of 503) on pollen and artificial neural networks (4.6%) on fungal spores. In the PHM, the principal use was to characterize the main pollen season (flowering season) based on the model of growth degree days. Finally, OTM have been used to estimate concentrations at unmonitored areas. Olea (14,5%) on pollen and Alternaria (4,8%) on fungal spores were the taxa most frequently modelled. Daily concentration was the most modelled parameter by OBM (25.2%) and season start day by PHM (35.6%). The PHM approaches include greater model diversity and use fewer independent variables than OBM. In addition, PHM show to be easier to apply than OBM; however, the wide range of criteria to define the parameters to use in PHM (e.g.: pollination start day) makes that each model is used with a lesser frequency than other models. [Display omitted] •Predictive models in aerobiology can be classified: Observational Base Models OBM, Phenological Models PHM, Other Models OTM.•OBM are used with high frequency to forecast concentration and PHM to characterize the main pollen/spore season.•OBM tend to use a computational statistical model that does not require compliance with normality and linearity in the data.•PHM are easy to use but they are less frequently used than OBM due to their variety of starting criteria.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148783</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2021-11, Vol.795, p.148783-148783, Article 148783
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2550261790
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aerobiology
Airborne fungal spores
Airborne pollen
Forecasting model
Phenological model
Statistical model
title Aerobiological modeling I: A review of predictive models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A16%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aerobiological%20modeling%20I:%20A%20review%20of%20predictive%20models&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=V%C3%A9lez-Pereira,%20Andr%C3%A9s%20M.&rft.date=2021-11-15&rft.volume=795&rft.spage=148783&rft.epage=148783&rft.pages=148783-148783&rft.artnum=148783&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2550261790%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550261790&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0048969721038559&rfr_iscdi=true