Artificial intelligence-based automated laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical phase recognition and analysis

Background Artificial intelligence and computer vision have revolutionized laparoscopic surgical video analysis. However, there is no multi-center study focused on deep learning-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy phases recognizing. This work aims to apply artificial intelligence in recognizing and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3160-3168
Hauptverfasser: Cheng, Ke, You, Jiaying, Wu, Shangdi, Chen, Zixin, Zhou, Zijian, Guan, Jingye, Peng, Bing, Wang, Xin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3168
container_issue 5
container_start_page 3160
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 36
creator Cheng, Ke
You, Jiaying
Wu, Shangdi
Chen, Zixin
Zhou, Zijian
Guan, Jingye
Peng, Bing
Wang, Xin
description Background Artificial intelligence and computer vision have revolutionized laparoscopic surgical video analysis. However, there is no multi-center study focused on deep learning-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy phases recognizing. This work aims to apply artificial intelligence in recognizing and analyzing phases in laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos from multiple centers. Methods This observational cohort-study included 163 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos collected from four medical centers. Videos were labeled by surgeons and a deep-learning model was developed based on 90 videos. Thereafter, the performance of the model was tested in additional ten videos by comparing it with the annotated ground truth of the surgeon. Deep-learning models were trained to identify laparoscopic cholecystectomy phases. The performance of models was measured using precision, recall, F1 score, and overall accuracy. With a high overall accuracy of the model, additional 63 videos as an analysis set were analyzed by the model to identify different phases. Results Mean concordance correlation coefficient for annotations of the surgeons across all operative phases was 92.38%. Also, the overall phase recognition accuracy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the model was 91.05%. In the analysis set, there was an average surgery time of 2195 ± 896 s, with a huge individual variance of different surgical phases. Notably, laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis cases had prolonged overall durations, and the surgeon would spend more time in mobilizing the hepatocystic triangle phase. Conclusion A deep-learning model based on multiple centers data can identify phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a high degree of accuracy. With continued refinements, artificial intelligence could be utilized in huge data surgery analysis to achieve clinically relevant future applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-021-08619-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2549207997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2649144201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-713990b5b79de647e9fadc99bf5934ae63c9e259cfd88a9e9e3fc29cb06a300f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS1URLeFL8ABReqFi8v4T5KdY1UBrVSpFzhbzmSydZWNg50c9ttj2EKlHnqypfm95_F7QnxUcKkA2i8ZwDZWglYSto1Cad6IjbJGS63V9kRsAA1I3aI9FWc5P0LhUdXvxKmx2ihomo0Yr9IShkDBj1WYFh7HsOOJWHY-c1_5dYl7v5Tb6GefYqY4B6roIY5Mh7wwlfmhymvaBSoW80ORVYkp7qawhDhVfioukx8POeT34u3gx8wfns5z8fPb1x_XN_Lu_vvt9dWdJGvVIltlEKGruxZ7bmzLOPieELuhRmM9N4aQdY009NutR0Y2A2mkDhpvAAZzLj4ffecUf62cF7cPmcrf_MRxzU7XFjW0iG1BL16gj3FNZd9CNSUtazWoQukjRSWCnHhwcwp7nw5OgfvThTt24UoX7m8XzhTRpyfrtdtz_1_yL_wCmCOQy2jacXp--xXb37cyluk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649144201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Artificial intelligence-based automated laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical phase recognition and analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Cheng, Ke ; You, Jiaying ; Wu, Shangdi ; Chen, Zixin ; Zhou, Zijian ; Guan, Jingye ; Peng, Bing ; Wang, Xin</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Ke ; You, Jiaying ; Wu, Shangdi ; Chen, Zixin ; Zhou, Zijian ; Guan, Jingye ; Peng, Bing ; Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>Background Artificial intelligence and computer vision have revolutionized laparoscopic surgical video analysis. However, there is no multi-center study focused on deep learning-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy phases recognizing. This work aims to apply artificial intelligence in recognizing and analyzing phases in laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos from multiple centers. Methods This observational cohort-study included 163 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos collected from four medical centers. Videos were labeled by surgeons and a deep-learning model was developed based on 90 videos. Thereafter, the performance of the model was tested in additional ten videos by comparing it with the annotated ground truth of the surgeon. Deep-learning models were trained to identify laparoscopic cholecystectomy phases. The performance of models was measured using precision, recall, F1 score, and overall accuracy. With a high overall accuracy of the model, additional 63 videos as an analysis set were analyzed by the model to identify different phases. Results Mean concordance correlation coefficient for annotations of the surgeons across all operative phases was 92.38%. Also, the overall phase recognition accuracy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the model was 91.05%. In the analysis set, there was an average surgery time of 2195 ± 896 s, with a huge individual variance of different surgical phases. Notably, laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis cases had prolonged overall durations, and the surgeon would spend more time in mobilizing the hepatocystic triangle phase. Conclusion A deep-learning model based on multiple centers data can identify phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a high degree of accuracy. With continued refinements, artificial intelligence could be utilized in huge data surgery analysis to achieve clinically relevant future applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08619-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34231066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Accuracy ; Artificial Intelligence ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; Computer vision ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Proctology ; Surgeons ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3160-3168</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-713990b5b79de647e9fadc99bf5934ae63c9e259cfd88a9e9e3fc29cb06a300f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-713990b5b79de647e9fadc99bf5934ae63c9e259cfd88a9e9e3fc29cb06a300f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-021-08619-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-021-08619-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34231066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Jiaying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shangdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zijian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Jingye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><title>Artificial intelligence-based automated laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical phase recognition and analysis</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Artificial intelligence and computer vision have revolutionized laparoscopic surgical video analysis. However, there is no multi-center study focused on deep learning-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy phases recognizing. This work aims to apply artificial intelligence in recognizing and analyzing phases in laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos from multiple centers. Methods This observational cohort-study included 163 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos collected from four medical centers. Videos were labeled by surgeons and a deep-learning model was developed based on 90 videos. Thereafter, the performance of the model was tested in additional ten videos by comparing it with the annotated ground truth of the surgeon. Deep-learning models were trained to identify laparoscopic cholecystectomy phases. The performance of models was measured using precision, recall, F1 score, and overall accuracy. With a high overall accuracy of the model, additional 63 videos as an analysis set were analyzed by the model to identify different phases. Results Mean concordance correlation coefficient for annotations of the surgeons across all operative phases was 92.38%. Also, the overall phase recognition accuracy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the model was 91.05%. In the analysis set, there was an average surgery time of 2195 ± 896 s, with a huge individual variance of different surgical phases. Notably, laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis cases had prolonged overall durations, and the surgeon would spend more time in mobilizing the hepatocystic triangle phase. Conclusion A deep-learning model based on multiple centers data can identify phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a high degree of accuracy. With continued refinements, artificial intelligence could be utilized in huge data surgery analysis to achieve clinically relevant future applications.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS1URLeFL8ABReqFi8v4T5KdY1UBrVSpFzhbzmSydZWNg50c9ttj2EKlHnqypfm95_F7QnxUcKkA2i8ZwDZWglYSto1Cad6IjbJGS63V9kRsAA1I3aI9FWc5P0LhUdXvxKmx2ihomo0Yr9IShkDBj1WYFh7HsOOJWHY-c1_5dYl7v5Tb6GefYqY4B6roIY5Mh7wwlfmhymvaBSoW80ORVYkp7qawhDhVfioukx8POeT34u3gx8wfns5z8fPb1x_XN_Lu_vvt9dWdJGvVIltlEKGruxZ7bmzLOPieELuhRmM9N4aQdY009NutR0Y2A2mkDhpvAAZzLj4ffecUf62cF7cPmcrf_MRxzU7XFjW0iG1BL16gj3FNZd9CNSUtazWoQukjRSWCnHhwcwp7nw5OgfvThTt24UoX7m8XzhTRpyfrtdtz_1_yL_wCmCOQy2jacXp--xXb37cyluk</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Cheng, Ke</creator><creator>You, Jiaying</creator><creator>Wu, Shangdi</creator><creator>Chen, Zixin</creator><creator>Zhou, Zijian</creator><creator>Guan, Jingye</creator><creator>Peng, Bing</creator><creator>Wang, Xin</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Artificial intelligence-based automated laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical phase recognition and analysis</title><author>Cheng, Ke ; You, Jiaying ; Wu, Shangdi ; Chen, Zixin ; Zhou, Zijian ; Guan, Jingye ; Peng, Bing ; Wang, Xin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-713990b5b79de647e9fadc99bf5934ae63c9e259cfd88a9e9e3fc29cb06a300f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Jiaying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shangdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zijian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Jingye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Ke</au><au>You, Jiaying</au><au>Wu, Shangdi</au><au>Chen, Zixin</au><au>Zhou, Zijian</au><au>Guan, Jingye</au><au>Peng, Bing</au><au>Wang, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Artificial intelligence-based automated laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical phase recognition and analysis</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3160</spage><epage>3168</epage><pages>3160-3168</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background Artificial intelligence and computer vision have revolutionized laparoscopic surgical video analysis. However, there is no multi-center study focused on deep learning-based laparoscopic cholecystectomy phases recognizing. This work aims to apply artificial intelligence in recognizing and analyzing phases in laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos from multiple centers. Methods This observational cohort-study included 163 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos collected from four medical centers. Videos were labeled by surgeons and a deep-learning model was developed based on 90 videos. Thereafter, the performance of the model was tested in additional ten videos by comparing it with the annotated ground truth of the surgeon. Deep-learning models were trained to identify laparoscopic cholecystectomy phases. The performance of models was measured using precision, recall, F1 score, and overall accuracy. With a high overall accuracy of the model, additional 63 videos as an analysis set were analyzed by the model to identify different phases. Results Mean concordance correlation coefficient for annotations of the surgeons across all operative phases was 92.38%. Also, the overall phase recognition accuracy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the model was 91.05%. In the analysis set, there was an average surgery time of 2195 ± 896 s, with a huge individual variance of different surgical phases. Notably, laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis cases had prolonged overall durations, and the surgeon would spend more time in mobilizing the hepatocystic triangle phase. Conclusion A deep-learning model based on multiple centers data can identify phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a high degree of accuracy. With continued refinements, artificial intelligence could be utilized in huge data surgery analysis to achieve clinically relevant future applications.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34231066</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-021-08619-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3160-3168
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2549207997
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Accuracy
Artificial Intelligence
Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Computer vision
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Hepatology
Humans
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Proctology
Surgeons
Surgery
title Artificial intelligence-based automated laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical phase recognition and analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A21%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial%20intelligence-based%20automated%20laparoscopic%20cholecystectomy%20surgical%20phase%20recognition%20and%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Cheng,%20Ke&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3160&rft.epage=3168&rft.pages=3160-3168&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-021-08619-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649144201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649144201&rft_id=info:pmid/34231066&rfr_iscdi=true