Custom‐built constrained uniaxial and rotating hinge total knee replacement in cats: Clinical application, design principles, surgical technique, and clinical outcome
Objective To describe the design principles and evolution, surgical technique, and outcome for custom constrained (uniaxial and rotating hinge) total knee replacement (TKR) in cats. Study design Retrospective case series. Animals Nine cats with traumatic stifle luxation (n = 8) or severe distal femo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary surgery 2021-08, Vol.50 (6), p.1283-1295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1295 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1283 |
container_title | Veterinary surgery |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Fitzpatrick, Noel Miraldo, Diogo C. Meswania, Jay |
description | Objective
To describe the design principles and evolution, surgical technique, and outcome for custom constrained (uniaxial and rotating hinge) total knee replacement (TKR) in cats.
Study design
Retrospective case series.
Animals
Nine cats with traumatic stifle luxation (n = 8) or severe distal femoral deformity (n = 1) were considered suitable candidates.
Methods
Cats that met eligibility criteria and received a custom TKR between 2009 and 2018 by a single surgeon were included in this case series. Three generations of implant were used. Implant positioning was assessed by postoperative orthogonal radiography. Functional outcome was determined by clinical assessment, owner interview, and a feline musculoskeletal pain index questionnaire.
Results
Median clinical follow‐up time was 12 months (range, 4‐41); follow‐up time was increased to 29 months (range, 22‐47) when results of functional questionnaires with owner were included. Median radiographic follow‐up was 12 months (range, 4‐25). One cat had a catastrophic outcome. Three cats had good outcomes, and five cats had excellent outcomes.
Conclusion
Most cats treated with custom‐built TKR achieved good to excellent outcomes.
Clinical significance
Custom TKR is a viable option for the treatment of severe pathologies of the feline stifle. Additional research is required to fully evaluate implant suitability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/vsu.13606 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2548606270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2555992143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3306-a8c759494ae0d64bc25454611f651ee46637666de2189aa6beadbdb0f33a74cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtOHDEQhi0UJCbAIjewxIZI02C33Z4xu2hEIBJSFjyUXcvtrhkMbrvjB4QdR-AYORcnwcwkm0iphassffVX2T9Cnyg5oiWOH2I-okwQsYUmtGF1JRvy4wOaECpoxbiUO-hjjHeEEMk5m6DfixyTH16fX7psbMLau5iCMg56nJ1Rv4yyWLkeB59UMm6Fb8sBOJWrxfcOAAcYrdIwgEvYOKxViid4YY0z-r13HG0pkvFuinuIZuXwGIzTZrQQpzjmsFqDCfStMz8zTNfz9F8Bn5P2A-yh7aWyEfb_5F10_fX0anFeXXw_-7b4clFpxoio1FzPGsklV0B6wTtdN7zhgtKlaCgAF4LNhBA91HQulRIdqL7rO7JkTM247tkuOtzojsGXZWJqBxM1WKsc-Bzbojcv31vPSEEP_kHvfA6ubFeoppGyppwV6vOG0sHHGGDZlucPKjy1lLTvnrXFs3btWWGPN-yjsfD0f7C9ubzedLwB3gOdPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555992143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Custom‐built constrained uniaxial and rotating hinge total knee replacement in cats: Clinical application, design principles, surgical technique, and clinical outcome</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Fitzpatrick, Noel ; Miraldo, Diogo C. ; Meswania, Jay</creator><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Noel ; Miraldo, Diogo C. ; Meswania, Jay</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To describe the design principles and evolution, surgical technique, and outcome for custom constrained (uniaxial and rotating hinge) total knee replacement (TKR) in cats.
Study design
Retrospective case series.
Animals
Nine cats with traumatic stifle luxation (n = 8) or severe distal femoral deformity (n = 1) were considered suitable candidates.
Methods
Cats that met eligibility criteria and received a custom TKR between 2009 and 2018 by a single surgeon were included in this case series. Three generations of implant were used. Implant positioning was assessed by postoperative orthogonal radiography. Functional outcome was determined by clinical assessment, owner interview, and a feline musculoskeletal pain index questionnaire.
Results
Median clinical follow‐up time was 12 months (range, 4‐41); follow‐up time was increased to 29 months (range, 22‐47) when results of functional questionnaires with owner were included. Median radiographic follow‐up was 12 months (range, 4‐25). One cat had a catastrophic outcome. Three cats had good outcomes, and five cats had excellent outcomes.
Conclusion
Most cats treated with custom‐built TKR achieved good to excellent outcomes.
Clinical significance
Custom TKR is a viable option for the treatment of severe pathologies of the feline stifle. Additional research is required to fully evaluate implant suitability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-3499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-950X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13606</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cats ; Clinical outcomes ; Design ; Knee ; Orthopaedic implants ; Pain ; Principles ; Questionnaires ; Radiography ; Rotation ; Surgical techniques</subject><ispartof>Veterinary surgery, 2021-08, Vol.50 (6), p.1283-1295</ispartof><rights>2021 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3306-a8c759494ae0d64bc25454611f651ee46637666de2189aa6beadbdb0f33a74cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3306-a8c759494ae0d64bc25454611f651ee46637666de2189aa6beadbdb0f33a74cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fvsu.13606$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fvsu.13606$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Noel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miraldo, Diogo C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meswania, Jay</creatorcontrib><title>Custom‐built constrained uniaxial and rotating hinge total knee replacement in cats: Clinical application, design principles, surgical technique, and clinical outcome</title><title>Veterinary surgery</title><description>Objective
To describe the design principles and evolution, surgical technique, and outcome for custom constrained (uniaxial and rotating hinge) total knee replacement (TKR) in cats.
Study design
Retrospective case series.
Animals
Nine cats with traumatic stifle luxation (n = 8) or severe distal femoral deformity (n = 1) were considered suitable candidates.
Methods
Cats that met eligibility criteria and received a custom TKR between 2009 and 2018 by a single surgeon were included in this case series. Three generations of implant were used. Implant positioning was assessed by postoperative orthogonal radiography. Functional outcome was determined by clinical assessment, owner interview, and a feline musculoskeletal pain index questionnaire.
Results
Median clinical follow‐up time was 12 months (range, 4‐41); follow‐up time was increased to 29 months (range, 22‐47) when results of functional questionnaires with owner were included. Median radiographic follow‐up was 12 months (range, 4‐25). One cat had a catastrophic outcome. Three cats had good outcomes, and five cats had excellent outcomes.
Conclusion
Most cats treated with custom‐built TKR achieved good to excellent outcomes.
Clinical significance
Custom TKR is a viable option for the treatment of severe pathologies of the feline stifle. Additional research is required to fully evaluate implant suitability.</description><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Orthopaedic implants</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><issn>0161-3499</issn><issn>1532-950X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtOHDEQhi0UJCbAIjewxIZI02C33Z4xu2hEIBJSFjyUXcvtrhkMbrvjB4QdR-AYORcnwcwkm0iphassffVX2T9Cnyg5oiWOH2I-okwQsYUmtGF1JRvy4wOaECpoxbiUO-hjjHeEEMk5m6DfixyTH16fX7psbMLau5iCMg56nJ1Rv4yyWLkeB59UMm6Fb8sBOJWrxfcOAAcYrdIwgEvYOKxViid4YY0z-r13HG0pkvFuinuIZuXwGIzTZrQQpzjmsFqDCfStMz8zTNfz9F8Bn5P2A-yh7aWyEfb_5F10_fX0anFeXXw_-7b4clFpxoio1FzPGsklV0B6wTtdN7zhgtKlaCgAF4LNhBA91HQulRIdqL7rO7JkTM247tkuOtzojsGXZWJqBxM1WKsc-Bzbojcv31vPSEEP_kHvfA6ubFeoppGyppwV6vOG0sHHGGDZlucPKjy1lLTvnrXFs3btWWGPN-yjsfD0f7C9ubzedLwB3gOdPg</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Fitzpatrick, Noel</creator><creator>Miraldo, Diogo C.</creator><creator>Meswania, Jay</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Custom‐built constrained uniaxial and rotating hinge total knee replacement in cats: Clinical application, design principles, surgical technique, and clinical outcome</title><author>Fitzpatrick, Noel ; Miraldo, Diogo C. ; Meswania, Jay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3306-a8c759494ae0d64bc25454611f651ee46637666de2189aa6beadbdb0f33a74cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Orthopaedic implants</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Noel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miraldo, Diogo C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meswania, Jay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fitzpatrick, Noel</au><au>Miraldo, Diogo C.</au><au>Meswania, Jay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Custom‐built constrained uniaxial and rotating hinge total knee replacement in cats: Clinical application, design principles, surgical technique, and clinical outcome</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1283</spage><epage>1295</epage><pages>1283-1295</pages><issn>0161-3499</issn><eissn>1532-950X</eissn><abstract>Objective
To describe the design principles and evolution, surgical technique, and outcome for custom constrained (uniaxial and rotating hinge) total knee replacement (TKR) in cats.
Study design
Retrospective case series.
Animals
Nine cats with traumatic stifle luxation (n = 8) or severe distal femoral deformity (n = 1) were considered suitable candidates.
Methods
Cats that met eligibility criteria and received a custom TKR between 2009 and 2018 by a single surgeon were included in this case series. Three generations of implant were used. Implant positioning was assessed by postoperative orthogonal radiography. Functional outcome was determined by clinical assessment, owner interview, and a feline musculoskeletal pain index questionnaire.
Results
Median clinical follow‐up time was 12 months (range, 4‐41); follow‐up time was increased to 29 months (range, 22‐47) when results of functional questionnaires with owner were included. Median radiographic follow‐up was 12 months (range, 4‐25). One cat had a catastrophic outcome. Three cats had good outcomes, and five cats had excellent outcomes.
Conclusion
Most cats treated with custom‐built TKR achieved good to excellent outcomes.
Clinical significance
Custom TKR is a viable option for the treatment of severe pathologies of the feline stifle. Additional research is required to fully evaluate implant suitability.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/vsu.13606</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-3499 |
ispartof | Veterinary surgery, 2021-08, Vol.50 (6), p.1283-1295 |
issn | 0161-3499 1532-950X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2548606270 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Cats Clinical outcomes Design Knee Orthopaedic implants Pain Principles Questionnaires Radiography Rotation Surgical techniques |
title | Custom‐built constrained uniaxial and rotating hinge total knee replacement in cats: Clinical application, design principles, surgical technique, and clinical outcome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A43%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Custom%E2%80%90built%20constrained%20uniaxial%20and%20rotating%20hinge%20total%20knee%20replacement%20in%20cats:%20Clinical%20application,%20design%20principles,%20surgical%20technique,%20and%20clinical%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20surgery&rft.au=Fitzpatrick,%20Noel&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1283&rft.epage=1295&rft.pages=1283-1295&rft.issn=0161-3499&rft.eissn=1532-950X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vsu.13606&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2555992143%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555992143&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |