Asynclitism in the second stage of labor: prevalence, associations, and outcome

Fetal head asynclitism may affect labor progress, increase the need for obstetrical intervention, and even be associated with difficult or failed instrumental delivery. However, there is limited evidence on the true prevalence and associations of asynclitism when diagnosed by transperineal ultrasoun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM 2021-09, Vol.3 (5), p.100437-100437, Article 100437
Hauptverfasser: Hung, Catherine M.W., Chan, Viola Y.T., Ghi, Tullio, Lau, Wailam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100437
container_issue 5
container_start_page 100437
container_title American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM
container_volume 3
creator Hung, Catherine M.W.
Chan, Viola Y.T.
Ghi, Tullio
Lau, Wailam
description Fetal head asynclitism may affect labor progress, increase the need for obstetrical intervention, and even be associated with difficult or failed instrumental delivery. However, there is limited evidence on the true prevalence and associations of asynclitism when diagnosed by transperineal ultrasound in the second stage of labor. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and outcome of asynclitism in the second stage of labor in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. This is a prospective cohort study involving 92 term nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy in the second stage of labor, recruited from December 2019 to December 2020. Transperineal ultrasound was performed and asynclitism was diagnosed if there was asymmetry of intracranial structures on the transverse plane. To assess the fetal head station, the head perineum distance was measured at rest and on pushing, and the mode of delivery was recorded. Relationship between asynclitism and fetal head position, and between head perineum distance and the mode of delivery, were evaluated with chi-squared tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. The prevalence of asynclitism was 15% (14 of 92), of which 12 were anterior asynclitism and 2 were posterior asynclitism. The prevalence of asynclitism was less common in occiput anterior compared with nonocciput anterior position (6.7% vs 53%, P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100437
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2548599755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2589933321001324</els_id><sourcerecordid>2548599755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b346ab5d51c5ec532a72608c8adfcf611d044f3c42fde58da9e9d01ed57fb2aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWGr_gYtZunBqnvNwIZTiCwrd6DpkkpuaYWZSk7TQf--UceHK1X3wnQPnIHRL8JJgUjy0S9X6XW-XFFMyvjBn5QWaUVHVec0Yu_yzX6NFjC3GI8m5oMUMbVfxNOjOJRf7zA1Z-oIsgvaDyWJSO8i8zTrV-PCY7QMcVQeDhvtMxei1U8n5IY7XSPtD0r6HG3RlVRdh8Tvn6PPl-WP9lm-2r-_r1SbXjNUpbxgvVCOMIFqAFoyqkha40pUyVtuCEIM5t0xzag2IyqgaaoMJGFHahirF5uhu8t0H_32AmGTvooauUwP4Q5RU8ErUdSnEiPIJ1cHHGMDKfXC9CidJsDxXKFs5VSjPFcqpwlH2NMlgjHF0EGTU7pzeuAA6SePd_wY_nEB8XA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548599755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asynclitism in the second stage of labor: prevalence, associations, and outcome</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hung, Catherine M.W. ; Chan, Viola Y.T. ; Ghi, Tullio ; Lau, Wailam</creator><creatorcontrib>Hung, Catherine M.W. ; Chan, Viola Y.T. ; Ghi, Tullio ; Lau, Wailam</creatorcontrib><description>Fetal head asynclitism may affect labor progress, increase the need for obstetrical intervention, and even be associated with difficult or failed instrumental delivery. However, there is limited evidence on the true prevalence and associations of asynclitism when diagnosed by transperineal ultrasound in the second stage of labor. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and outcome of asynclitism in the second stage of labor in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. This is a prospective cohort study involving 92 term nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy in the second stage of labor, recruited from December 2019 to December 2020. Transperineal ultrasound was performed and asynclitism was diagnosed if there was asymmetry of intracranial structures on the transverse plane. To assess the fetal head station, the head perineum distance was measured at rest and on pushing, and the mode of delivery was recorded. Relationship between asynclitism and fetal head position, and between head perineum distance and the mode of delivery, were evaluated with chi-squared tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. The prevalence of asynclitism was 15% (14 of 92), of which 12 were anterior asynclitism and 2 were posterior asynclitism. The prevalence of asynclitism was less common in occiput anterior compared with nonocciput anterior position (6.7% vs 53%, P&lt;.01). Women with asynclitism were associated with smaller delta head perineum distance (head perineum distance at rest minus that at pushing) than women without asynclitism (median [interquartile range], 0.68 cm [0.85 cm] vs 0.91 cm [0.71 cm]; P=.01). Eventually, there was a trend of more operative deliveries in women with asynclitism (43%, or 6 of 14 women) than in women without asynclitism (27%, or 21 of 78 women), although this difference was not statistically significant (P=.22). The prevalence of asynclitism at transperineal ultrasound was rather common in nulliparous women at second stage of labor and seemed more commonly associated with nonocciput anterior position.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2589-9333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2589-9333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>asynclitism ; intrapartum sonography ; second stage of labor</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology MFM, 2021-09, Vol.3 (5), p.100437-100437, Article 100437</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b346ab5d51c5ec532a72608c8adfcf611d044f3c42fde58da9e9d01ed57fb2aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b346ab5d51c5ec532a72608c8adfcf611d044f3c42fde58da9e9d01ed57fb2aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8131-8974 ; 0000-0002-0452-8983</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hung, Catherine M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Viola Y.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghi, Tullio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Wailam</creatorcontrib><title>Asynclitism in the second stage of labor: prevalence, associations, and outcome</title><title>American journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology MFM</title><description>Fetal head asynclitism may affect labor progress, increase the need for obstetrical intervention, and even be associated with difficult or failed instrumental delivery. However, there is limited evidence on the true prevalence and associations of asynclitism when diagnosed by transperineal ultrasound in the second stage of labor. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and outcome of asynclitism in the second stage of labor in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. This is a prospective cohort study involving 92 term nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy in the second stage of labor, recruited from December 2019 to December 2020. Transperineal ultrasound was performed and asynclitism was diagnosed if there was asymmetry of intracranial structures on the transverse plane. To assess the fetal head station, the head perineum distance was measured at rest and on pushing, and the mode of delivery was recorded. Relationship between asynclitism and fetal head position, and between head perineum distance and the mode of delivery, were evaluated with chi-squared tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. The prevalence of asynclitism was 15% (14 of 92), of which 12 were anterior asynclitism and 2 were posterior asynclitism. The prevalence of asynclitism was less common in occiput anterior compared with nonocciput anterior position (6.7% vs 53%, P&lt;.01). Women with asynclitism were associated with smaller delta head perineum distance (head perineum distance at rest minus that at pushing) than women without asynclitism (median [interquartile range], 0.68 cm [0.85 cm] vs 0.91 cm [0.71 cm]; P=.01). Eventually, there was a trend of more operative deliveries in women with asynclitism (43%, or 6 of 14 women) than in women without asynclitism (27%, or 21 of 78 women), although this difference was not statistically significant (P=.22). The prevalence of asynclitism at transperineal ultrasound was rather common in nulliparous women at second stage of labor and seemed more commonly associated with nonocciput anterior position.</description><subject>asynclitism</subject><subject>intrapartum sonography</subject><subject>second stage of labor</subject><issn>2589-9333</issn><issn>2589-9333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWGr_gYtZunBqnvNwIZTiCwrd6DpkkpuaYWZSk7TQf--UceHK1X3wnQPnIHRL8JJgUjy0S9X6XW-XFFMyvjBn5QWaUVHVec0Yu_yzX6NFjC3GI8m5oMUMbVfxNOjOJRf7zA1Z-oIsgvaDyWJSO8i8zTrV-PCY7QMcVQeDhvtMxei1U8n5IY7XSPtD0r6HG3RlVRdh8Tvn6PPl-WP9lm-2r-_r1SbXjNUpbxgvVCOMIFqAFoyqkha40pUyVtuCEIM5t0xzag2IyqgaaoMJGFHahirF5uhu8t0H_32AmGTvooauUwP4Q5RU8ErUdSnEiPIJ1cHHGMDKfXC9CidJsDxXKFs5VSjPFcqpwlH2NMlgjHF0EGTU7pzeuAA6SePd_wY_nEB8XA</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Hung, Catherine M.W.</creator><creator>Chan, Viola Y.T.</creator><creator>Ghi, Tullio</creator><creator>Lau, Wailam</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8131-8974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0452-8983</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Asynclitism in the second stage of labor: prevalence, associations, and outcome</title><author>Hung, Catherine M.W. ; Chan, Viola Y.T. ; Ghi, Tullio ; Lau, Wailam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b346ab5d51c5ec532a72608c8adfcf611d044f3c42fde58da9e9d01ed57fb2aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>asynclitism</topic><topic>intrapartum sonography</topic><topic>second stage of labor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hung, Catherine M.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Viola Y.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghi, Tullio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Wailam</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology MFM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hung, Catherine M.W.</au><au>Chan, Viola Y.T.</au><au>Ghi, Tullio</au><au>Lau, Wailam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asynclitism in the second stage of labor: prevalence, associations, and outcome</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology MFM</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>100437</spage><epage>100437</epage><pages>100437-100437</pages><artnum>100437</artnum><issn>2589-9333</issn><eissn>2589-9333</eissn><abstract>Fetal head asynclitism may affect labor progress, increase the need for obstetrical intervention, and even be associated with difficult or failed instrumental delivery. However, there is limited evidence on the true prevalence and associations of asynclitism when diagnosed by transperineal ultrasound in the second stage of labor. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and outcome of asynclitism in the second stage of labor in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. This is a prospective cohort study involving 92 term nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy in the second stage of labor, recruited from December 2019 to December 2020. Transperineal ultrasound was performed and asynclitism was diagnosed if there was asymmetry of intracranial structures on the transverse plane. To assess the fetal head station, the head perineum distance was measured at rest and on pushing, and the mode of delivery was recorded. Relationship between asynclitism and fetal head position, and between head perineum distance and the mode of delivery, were evaluated with chi-squared tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. The prevalence of asynclitism was 15% (14 of 92), of which 12 were anterior asynclitism and 2 were posterior asynclitism. The prevalence of asynclitism was less common in occiput anterior compared with nonocciput anterior position (6.7% vs 53%, P&lt;.01). Women with asynclitism were associated with smaller delta head perineum distance (head perineum distance at rest minus that at pushing) than women without asynclitism (median [interquartile range], 0.68 cm [0.85 cm] vs 0.91 cm [0.71 cm]; P=.01). Eventually, there was a trend of more operative deliveries in women with asynclitism (43%, or 6 of 14 women) than in women without asynclitism (27%, or 21 of 78 women), although this difference was not statistically significant (P=.22). The prevalence of asynclitism at transperineal ultrasound was rather common in nulliparous women at second stage of labor and seemed more commonly associated with nonocciput anterior position.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100437</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8131-8974</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0452-8983</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2589-9333
ispartof American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2021-09, Vol.3 (5), p.100437-100437, Article 100437
issn 2589-9333
2589-9333
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2548599755
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects asynclitism
intrapartum sonography
second stage of labor
title Asynclitism in the second stage of labor: prevalence, associations, and outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T14%3A22%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asynclitism%20in%20the%20second%20stage%20of%20labor:%20prevalence,%20associations,%20and%20outcome&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20MFM&rft.au=Hung,%20Catherine%20M.W.&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=100437&rft.epage=100437&rft.pages=100437-100437&rft.artnum=100437&rft.issn=2589-9333&rft.eissn=2589-9333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100437&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548599755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548599755&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S2589933321001324&rfr_iscdi=true