Estimation of causal effect in integrating randomized clinical trial and observational data – An example application to cardiovascular outcome trial

Safety evaluation of drug development is a comprehensive process across the product lifecycle. While a randomized clinical trial (RCT) can provide high-quality data to assess the efficacy and safety of a new intervention, the pre-marketing trials are limited in statistical power to detect causal ele...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary clinical trials 2021-08, Vol.107, p.106492-106492, Article 106492
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Yafei, Lin, Li-An, Starkopf, Liis, Chen, Jie, Wang, William W.B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106492
container_issue
container_start_page 106492
container_title Contemporary clinical trials
container_volume 107
creator Zhang, Yafei
Lin, Li-An
Starkopf, Liis
Chen, Jie
Wang, William W.B.
description Safety evaluation of drug development is a comprehensive process across the product lifecycle. While a randomized clinical trial (RCT) can provide high-quality data to assess the efficacy and safety of a new intervention, the pre-marketing trials are limited in statistical power to detect causal elevation of rare but potentially serious adverse events. On the other hand, real-world data (RWD) sources play a critical role in further understanding the safety profile of the new intervention. Bringing together the breadth and strength of RWD and RCT data, we can maximize the utility of RWD and answer broader questions. In this manuscript, we propose a three-step statistical framework to corroborate findings from both RCT and RWD for evaluating important safety concerns identified in the pre-marketing setting. By the proposed approach, we first match the observational study to RCT, then the causal estimation is validated via the matched observational study with the target RCT by targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) method, and lastly the evidence from RCT and RWD can be combined in an integrative analysis. A potential application to cardiovascular outcome trials for type 2 diabetes mellitus is illustrated. Finally, simulation results suggest that the heterogeneity of patient population from RCT and RWD can lead to varying degrees of treatment effect estimation and the proposed approach may be able to mitigate such difference in the integrative analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106492
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545994178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1551714421002287</els_id><sourcerecordid>2545994178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-2f59c04b919fc5a746dae4e3b1045028dda5f881da3d4d1dd503c062469327883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctOwzAQjBBIlMIHcPORS4qfaSJOVcVLqsQFzpZrbypXSRxspwJO_AMSH8iX4Dackaz1rndmVt7JskuCZwST4no70zrOKKYk1QWv6FE2IUJUOcUMHx9yks8J56fZWQhbjFkhCjHJvm9DtK2K1nXI1UirIagGQV2Djsh26UTY-NTvNsirzrjWfoBBurGd1QkZvU0xNZBbB_C7g1J6MSoq9PP5hRYdgjfV9g0g1fdNIh1mRZdmeWPdTgU9NMojN0TtWhgVz7OTWjUBLv7uafZyd_u8fMhXT_ePy8Uq14zhmNNaVBrzdUWqWgs154VRwIGtCeYC09IYJeqyJEYxww0xRmCmcUF5UTE6L0s2za5G3d671wFClK0NGppGdeCGIKngoqo4me-hZIRq70LwUMvep835d0mw3HsgtzJ5IPceyNGDxLkZOZD-sLPgZdAWOg3G-rRgaZz9h_0LZQKS5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545994178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation of causal effect in integrating randomized clinical trial and observational data – An example application to cardiovascular outcome trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Yafei ; Lin, Li-An ; Starkopf, Liis ; Chen, Jie ; Wang, William W.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yafei ; Lin, Li-An ; Starkopf, Liis ; Chen, Jie ; Wang, William W.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Safety evaluation of drug development is a comprehensive process across the product lifecycle. While a randomized clinical trial (RCT) can provide high-quality data to assess the efficacy and safety of a new intervention, the pre-marketing trials are limited in statistical power to detect causal elevation of rare but potentially serious adverse events. On the other hand, real-world data (RWD) sources play a critical role in further understanding the safety profile of the new intervention. Bringing together the breadth and strength of RWD and RCT data, we can maximize the utility of RWD and answer broader questions. In this manuscript, we propose a three-step statistical framework to corroborate findings from both RCT and RWD for evaluating important safety concerns identified in the pre-marketing setting. By the proposed approach, we first match the observational study to RCT, then the causal estimation is validated via the matched observational study with the target RCT by targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) method, and lastly the evidence from RCT and RWD can be combined in an integrative analysis. A potential application to cardiovascular outcome trials for type 2 diabetes mellitus is illustrated. Finally, simulation results suggest that the heterogeneity of patient population from RCT and RWD can lead to varying degrees of treatment effect estimation and the proposed approach may be able to mitigate such difference in the integrative analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-7144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular outcome trials ; Matching ; Randomized clinical trial ; Real-world data ; Targeted learning</subject><ispartof>Contemporary clinical trials, 2021-08, Vol.107, p.106492-106492, Article 106492</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-2f59c04b919fc5a746dae4e3b1045028dda5f881da3d4d1dd503c062469327883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-2f59c04b919fc5a746dae4e3b1045028dda5f881da3d4d1dd503c062469327883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106492$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yafei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Li-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starkopf, Liis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, William W.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation of causal effect in integrating randomized clinical trial and observational data – An example application to cardiovascular outcome trial</title><title>Contemporary clinical trials</title><description>Safety evaluation of drug development is a comprehensive process across the product lifecycle. While a randomized clinical trial (RCT) can provide high-quality data to assess the efficacy and safety of a new intervention, the pre-marketing trials are limited in statistical power to detect causal elevation of rare but potentially serious adverse events. On the other hand, real-world data (RWD) sources play a critical role in further understanding the safety profile of the new intervention. Bringing together the breadth and strength of RWD and RCT data, we can maximize the utility of RWD and answer broader questions. In this manuscript, we propose a three-step statistical framework to corroborate findings from both RCT and RWD for evaluating important safety concerns identified in the pre-marketing setting. By the proposed approach, we first match the observational study to RCT, then the causal estimation is validated via the matched observational study with the target RCT by targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) method, and lastly the evidence from RCT and RWD can be combined in an integrative analysis. A potential application to cardiovascular outcome trials for type 2 diabetes mellitus is illustrated. Finally, simulation results suggest that the heterogeneity of patient population from RCT and RWD can lead to varying degrees of treatment effect estimation and the proposed approach may be able to mitigate such difference in the integrative analysis.</description><subject>Cardiovascular outcome trials</subject><subject>Matching</subject><subject>Randomized clinical trial</subject><subject>Real-world data</subject><subject>Targeted learning</subject><issn>1551-7144</issn><issn>1559-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UctOwzAQjBBIlMIHcPORS4qfaSJOVcVLqsQFzpZrbypXSRxspwJO_AMSH8iX4Dackaz1rndmVt7JskuCZwST4no70zrOKKYk1QWv6FE2IUJUOcUMHx9yks8J56fZWQhbjFkhCjHJvm9DtK2K1nXI1UirIagGQV2Djsh26UTY-NTvNsirzrjWfoBBurGd1QkZvU0xNZBbB_C7g1J6MSoq9PP5hRYdgjfV9g0g1fdNIh1mRZdmeWPdTgU9NMojN0TtWhgVz7OTWjUBLv7uafZyd_u8fMhXT_ePy8Uq14zhmNNaVBrzdUWqWgs154VRwIGtCeYC09IYJeqyJEYxww0xRmCmcUF5UTE6L0s2za5G3d671wFClK0NGppGdeCGIKngoqo4me-hZIRq70LwUMvep835d0mw3HsgtzJ5IPceyNGDxLkZOZD-sLPgZdAWOg3G-rRgaZz9h_0LZQKS5g</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Zhang, Yafei</creator><creator>Lin, Li-An</creator><creator>Starkopf, Liis</creator><creator>Chen, Jie</creator><creator>Wang, William W.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Estimation of causal effect in integrating randomized clinical trial and observational data – An example application to cardiovascular outcome trial</title><author>Zhang, Yafei ; Lin, Li-An ; Starkopf, Liis ; Chen, Jie ; Wang, William W.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-2f59c04b919fc5a746dae4e3b1045028dda5f881da3d4d1dd503c062469327883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular outcome trials</topic><topic>Matching</topic><topic>Randomized clinical trial</topic><topic>Real-world data</topic><topic>Targeted learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yafei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Li-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starkopf, Liis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, William W.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contemporary clinical trials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Yafei</au><au>Lin, Li-An</au><au>Starkopf, Liis</au><au>Chen, Jie</au><au>Wang, William W.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation of causal effect in integrating randomized clinical trial and observational data – An example application to cardiovascular outcome trial</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary clinical trials</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>107</volume><spage>106492</spage><epage>106492</epage><pages>106492-106492</pages><artnum>106492</artnum><issn>1551-7144</issn><eissn>1559-2030</eissn><abstract>Safety evaluation of drug development is a comprehensive process across the product lifecycle. While a randomized clinical trial (RCT) can provide high-quality data to assess the efficacy and safety of a new intervention, the pre-marketing trials are limited in statistical power to detect causal elevation of rare but potentially serious adverse events. On the other hand, real-world data (RWD) sources play a critical role in further understanding the safety profile of the new intervention. Bringing together the breadth and strength of RWD and RCT data, we can maximize the utility of RWD and answer broader questions. In this manuscript, we propose a three-step statistical framework to corroborate findings from both RCT and RWD for evaluating important safety concerns identified in the pre-marketing setting. By the proposed approach, we first match the observational study to RCT, then the causal estimation is validated via the matched observational study with the target RCT by targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) method, and lastly the evidence from RCT and RWD can be combined in an integrative analysis. A potential application to cardiovascular outcome trials for type 2 diabetes mellitus is illustrated. Finally, simulation results suggest that the heterogeneity of patient population from RCT and RWD can lead to varying degrees of treatment effect estimation and the proposed approach may be able to mitigate such difference in the integrative analysis.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cct.2021.106492</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-7144
ispartof Contemporary clinical trials, 2021-08, Vol.107, p.106492-106492, Article 106492
issn 1551-7144
1559-2030
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545994178
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cardiovascular outcome trials
Matching
Randomized clinical trial
Real-world data
Targeted learning
title Estimation of causal effect in integrating randomized clinical trial and observational data – An example application to cardiovascular outcome trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A17%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20of%20causal%20effect%20in%20integrating%20randomized%20clinical%20trial%20and%20observational%20data%20%E2%80%93%20An%20example%20application%20to%20cardiovascular%20outcome%20trial&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20clinical%20trials&rft.au=Zhang,%20Yafei&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=107&rft.spage=106492&rft.epage=106492&rft.pages=106492-106492&rft.artnum=106492&rft.issn=1551-7144&rft.eissn=1559-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106492&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2545994178%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545994178&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1551714421002287&rfr_iscdi=true