Distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Borrelia miyamotoi in Ixodes tick populations in Northern Germany, co‐infections with Rickettsiales and assessment of potential influencing factors
To determine Borrelia spp. (Spirochaetales: Spirochaetaceae) prevalence and species distribution in Northern Germany, Ixodes ticks were sampled from April to October in 2018 and 2019 by the flagging method at three locations each in five regions. Analysis by quantitative real‐time PCR of 3150 indivi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical and veterinary entomology 2021-12, Vol.35 (4), p.595-606 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 606 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 595 |
container_title | Medical and veterinary entomology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Knoll, S. Springer, A. Hauck, D. Schunack, B. Pachnicke, S. Fingerle, V. Strube, C. |
description | To determine Borrelia spp. (Spirochaetales: Spirochaetaceae) prevalence and species distribution in Northern Germany, Ixodes ticks were sampled from April to October in 2018 and 2019 by the flagging method at three locations each in five regions. Analysis by quantitative real‐time PCR of 3150 individual ticks revealed an overall prevalence of 30.6%, without significant differences between tick stages (31.7% positive adults, 28.6% positive nymphs). Significant differences were observed in seasonal infection rates, but not between regions, landscape types or sampling years. Analysis of co‐infections with Rickettsiales indicated a negative association between Borrelia and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection. The most frequent Borrelia species differentiated by Reverse Line Blot were B. afzelii and B. garinii/B. bavariensis, followed by B. valaisiana, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. spielmanii and B. lusitaniae. Furthermore, B. miyamotoi was identified in 12.9% of differentiable samples. No effect of region nor landscape type on species composition was found, but significant variations in the distribution at the different sampling sites within a region were observed. The detected monthly fluctuations in prevalence and the differences in intra‐regional Borrelia species distribution underline the importance of long‐term and multi‐location monitoring of Borrelia spp. in ticks as an essential part of public health assessment.
Three thousand one hundred and fifty individual Ixodes ricinus ticks from Northern Germany were screened for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Borrelia miyamotoi, revealing an overall Borrelia prevalence of 30.6%.
Analysis of co‐infections with Rickettsiales indicated a negative association between Borrelia and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection.
Monthly fluctuations in prevalence and intra‐regional variation in Borrelia species distribution underline the importance of long‐term and multi‐location monitoring as an essential part of public health assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/mve.12537 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545989274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2545989274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-e6d8513726fb36599d90fb43bb2312dfb6e4be70fb903e2bb4655253c8aab2643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qFjEUhoMo9rO68AYk4EbB-Zqf-cuy1loLVUFU3A1J5qRNnUnGJGP9dl6C9-SdeCVmnKogmE1CzpMnh_MidJ-SLc3rYPwMW8oq3txAG8rrqmCCVjfRhrBaFKzlH_bQnRgvCaGNYOw22uMlbQlpyg36_szGFKyak_UOe4Of-hBgsBKrOZz3PhgIFsftsMXS9X-ro93J0SdvsXX49IvvIeJk9Uc8-Wke5GKLS-mVD-kCgsMnEEbpdk-w9j--frPOgF6hK5su8Jv8FFKKVg5ZtPwkY4QYR3Bp6WryKZ9yNTvNMIPT1p1jI3XyId5Ft4wcIty73vfRu-fHb49eFGevT06PDs8KzfNsCqj7tqK8YbVReUhC9IIYVXKlGKesN6qGUkGT7wThwJQq66rKU9WtlIrVJd9Hj1bvFPynGWLqRhs1DIN04OfYsaqsRCtYs6AP_0Ev_Rxc7i5ToixbUhOSqccrpYOPMYDppmBHGXYdJd2SbJeT7X4lm9kH18ZZjdD_IX9HmYGDFbiyA-z-b-pevj9elT8BBJWyvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2594480600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Borrelia miyamotoi in Ixodes tick populations in Northern Germany, co‐infections with Rickettsiales and assessment of potential influencing factors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Knoll, S. ; Springer, A. ; Hauck, D. ; Schunack, B. ; Pachnicke, S. ; Fingerle, V. ; Strube, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knoll, S. ; Springer, A. ; Hauck, D. ; Schunack, B. ; Pachnicke, S. ; Fingerle, V. ; Strube, C.</creatorcontrib><description>To determine Borrelia spp. (Spirochaetales: Spirochaetaceae) prevalence and species distribution in Northern Germany, Ixodes ticks were sampled from April to October in 2018 and 2019 by the flagging method at three locations each in five regions. Analysis by quantitative real‐time PCR of 3150 individual ticks revealed an overall prevalence of 30.6%, without significant differences between tick stages (31.7% positive adults, 28.6% positive nymphs). Significant differences were observed in seasonal infection rates, but not between regions, landscape types or sampling years. Analysis of co‐infections with Rickettsiales indicated a negative association between Borrelia and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection. The most frequent Borrelia species differentiated by Reverse Line Blot were B. afzelii and B. garinii/B. bavariensis, followed by B. valaisiana, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. spielmanii and B. lusitaniae. Furthermore, B. miyamotoi was identified in 12.9% of differentiable samples. No effect of region nor landscape type on species composition was found, but significant variations in the distribution at the different sampling sites within a region were observed. The detected monthly fluctuations in prevalence and the differences in intra‐regional Borrelia species distribution underline the importance of long‐term and multi‐location monitoring of Borrelia spp. in ticks as an essential part of public health assessment.
Three thousand one hundred and fifty individual Ixodes ricinus ticks from Northern Germany were screened for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Borrelia miyamotoi, revealing an overall Borrelia prevalence of 30.6%.
Analysis of co‐infections with Rickettsiales indicated a negative association between Borrelia and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection.
Monthly fluctuations in prevalence and intra‐regional variation in Borrelia species distribution underline the importance of long‐term and multi‐location monitoring as an essential part of public health assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-283X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/mve.12537</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34180074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Borrelia ; Borrelia burgdorferi ; Borrelia burgdorferi Group ; Coinfection - epidemiology ; Coinfection - veterinary ; Geographical distribution ; Germany - epidemiology ; Ixodes ; Ixodes inopinatus ; Ixodes ricinus ; Lyme borreliosis ; Public health ; Rickettsiales ; Sampling ; Species composition ; tick‐borne diseases</subject><ispartof>Medical and veterinary entomology, 2021-12, Vol.35 (4), p.595-606</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Royal Entomological Society.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Medical and Veterinary Entomology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Royal Entomological Society.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-e6d8513726fb36599d90fb43bb2312dfb6e4be70fb903e2bb4655253c8aab2643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-e6d8513726fb36599d90fb43bb2312dfb6e4be70fb903e2bb4655253c8aab2643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9093-1006</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmve.12537$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmve.12537$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knoll, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Springer, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauck, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schunack, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pachnicke, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fingerle, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strube, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Borrelia miyamotoi in Ixodes tick populations in Northern Germany, co‐infections with Rickettsiales and assessment of potential influencing factors</title><title>Medical and veterinary entomology</title><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><description>To determine Borrelia spp. (Spirochaetales: Spirochaetaceae) prevalence and species distribution in Northern Germany, Ixodes ticks were sampled from April to October in 2018 and 2019 by the flagging method at three locations each in five regions. Analysis by quantitative real‐time PCR of 3150 individual ticks revealed an overall prevalence of 30.6%, without significant differences between tick stages (31.7% positive adults, 28.6% positive nymphs). Significant differences were observed in seasonal infection rates, but not between regions, landscape types or sampling years. Analysis of co‐infections with Rickettsiales indicated a negative association between Borrelia and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection. The most frequent Borrelia species differentiated by Reverse Line Blot were B. afzelii and B. garinii/B. bavariensis, followed by B. valaisiana, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. spielmanii and B. lusitaniae. Furthermore, B. miyamotoi was identified in 12.9% of differentiable samples. No effect of region nor landscape type on species composition was found, but significant variations in the distribution at the different sampling sites within a region were observed. The detected monthly fluctuations in prevalence and the differences in intra‐regional Borrelia species distribution underline the importance of long‐term and multi‐location monitoring of Borrelia spp. in ticks as an essential part of public health assessment.
Three thousand one hundred and fifty individual Ixodes ricinus ticks from Northern Germany were screened for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Borrelia miyamotoi, revealing an overall Borrelia prevalence of 30.6%.
Analysis of co‐infections with Rickettsiales indicated a negative association between Borrelia and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection.
Monthly fluctuations in prevalence and intra‐regional variation in Borrelia species distribution underline the importance of long‐term and multi‐location monitoring as an essential part of public health assessment.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Borrelia</subject><subject>Borrelia burgdorferi</subject><subject>Borrelia burgdorferi Group</subject><subject>Coinfection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Coinfection - veterinary</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ixodes</subject><subject>Ixodes inopinatus</subject><subject>Ixodes ricinus</subject><subject>Lyme borreliosis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rickettsiales</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>tick‐borne diseases</subject><issn>0269-283X</issn><issn>1365-2915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qFjEUhoMo9rO68AYk4EbB-Zqf-cuy1loLVUFU3A1J5qRNnUnGJGP9dl6C9-SdeCVmnKogmE1CzpMnh_MidJ-SLc3rYPwMW8oq3txAG8rrqmCCVjfRhrBaFKzlH_bQnRgvCaGNYOw22uMlbQlpyg36_szGFKyak_UOe4Of-hBgsBKrOZz3PhgIFsftsMXS9X-ro93J0SdvsXX49IvvIeJk9Uc8-Wke5GKLS-mVD-kCgsMnEEbpdk-w9j--frPOgF6hK5su8Jv8FFKKVg5ZtPwkY4QYR3Bp6WryKZ9yNTvNMIPT1p1jI3XyId5Ft4wcIty73vfRu-fHb49eFGevT06PDs8KzfNsCqj7tqK8YbVReUhC9IIYVXKlGKesN6qGUkGT7wThwJQq66rKU9WtlIrVJd9Hj1bvFPynGWLqRhs1DIN04OfYsaqsRCtYs6AP_0Ev_Rxc7i5ToixbUhOSqccrpYOPMYDppmBHGXYdJd2SbJeT7X4lm9kH18ZZjdD_IX9HmYGDFbiyA-z-b-pevj9elT8BBJWyvA</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Knoll, S.</creator><creator>Springer, A.</creator><creator>Hauck, D.</creator><creator>Schunack, B.</creator><creator>Pachnicke, S.</creator><creator>Fingerle, V.</creator><creator>Strube, C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-1006</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Borrelia miyamotoi in Ixodes tick populations in Northern Germany, co‐infections with Rickettsiales and assessment of potential influencing factors</title><author>Knoll, S. ; Springer, A. ; Hauck, D. ; Schunack, B. ; Pachnicke, S. ; Fingerle, V. ; Strube, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-e6d8513726fb36599d90fb43bb2312dfb6e4be70fb903e2bb4655253c8aab2643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Borrelia</topic><topic>Borrelia burgdorferi</topic><topic>Borrelia burgdorferi Group</topic><topic>Coinfection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Coinfection - veterinary</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ixodes</topic><topic>Ixodes inopinatus</topic><topic>Ixodes ricinus</topic><topic>Lyme borreliosis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rickettsiales</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>tick‐borne diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knoll, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Springer, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauck, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schunack, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pachnicke, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fingerle, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strube, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knoll, S.</au><au>Springer, A.</au><au>Hauck, D.</au><au>Schunack, B.</au><au>Pachnicke, S.</au><au>Fingerle, V.</au><au>Strube, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Borrelia miyamotoi in Ixodes tick populations in Northern Germany, co‐infections with Rickettsiales and assessment of potential influencing factors</atitle><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>595</spage><epage>606</epage><pages>595-606</pages><issn>0269-283X</issn><eissn>1365-2915</eissn><abstract>To determine Borrelia spp. (Spirochaetales: Spirochaetaceae) prevalence and species distribution in Northern Germany, Ixodes ticks were sampled from April to October in 2018 and 2019 by the flagging method at three locations each in five regions. Analysis by quantitative real‐time PCR of 3150 individual ticks revealed an overall prevalence of 30.6%, without significant differences between tick stages (31.7% positive adults, 28.6% positive nymphs). Significant differences were observed in seasonal infection rates, but not between regions, landscape types or sampling years. Analysis of co‐infections with Rickettsiales indicated a negative association between Borrelia and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection. The most frequent Borrelia species differentiated by Reverse Line Blot were B. afzelii and B. garinii/B. bavariensis, followed by B. valaisiana, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. spielmanii and B. lusitaniae. Furthermore, B. miyamotoi was identified in 12.9% of differentiable samples. No effect of region nor landscape type on species composition was found, but significant variations in the distribution at the different sampling sites within a region were observed. The detected monthly fluctuations in prevalence and the differences in intra‐regional Borrelia species distribution underline the importance of long‐term and multi‐location monitoring of Borrelia spp. in ticks as an essential part of public health assessment.
Three thousand one hundred and fifty individual Ixodes ricinus ticks from Northern Germany were screened for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Borrelia miyamotoi, revealing an overall Borrelia prevalence of 30.6%.
Analysis of co‐infections with Rickettsiales indicated a negative association between Borrelia and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection.
Monthly fluctuations in prevalence and intra‐regional variation in Borrelia species distribution underline the importance of long‐term and multi‐location monitoring as an essential part of public health assessment.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34180074</pmid><doi>10.1111/mve.12537</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-1006</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-283X |
ispartof | Medical and veterinary entomology, 2021-12, Vol.35 (4), p.595-606 |
issn | 0269-283X 1365-2915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545989274 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Animals Borrelia Borrelia burgdorferi Borrelia burgdorferi Group Coinfection - epidemiology Coinfection - veterinary Geographical distribution Germany - epidemiology Ixodes Ixodes inopinatus Ixodes ricinus Lyme borreliosis Public health Rickettsiales Sampling Species composition tick‐borne diseases |
title | Distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Borrelia miyamotoi in Ixodes tick populations in Northern Germany, co‐infections with Rickettsiales and assessment of potential influencing factors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T01%3A37%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20of%20Borrelia%20burgdorferi%20s.l.%20and%20Borrelia%20miyamotoi%20in%20Ixodes%20tick%20populations%20in%20Northern%20Germany,%20co%E2%80%90infections%20with%20Rickettsiales%20and%20assessment%20of%20potential%20influencing%20factors&rft.jtitle=Medical%20and%20veterinary%20entomology&rft.au=Knoll,%20S.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=606&rft.pages=595-606&rft.issn=0269-283X&rft.eissn=1365-2915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/mve.12537&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2545989274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2594480600&rft_id=info:pmid/34180074&rfr_iscdi=true |