Nutrition within the household: 18th through early 20th century female and male statures
When other measures for material conditions are scarce or unreliable, the use of height is now common to evaluate economic conditions during economic development. However, throughout US economic development, height data by gender have been slow to emerge. Throughout the late 19th and early 20th cent...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biosocial science 2022-07, Vol.54 (4), p.583-604 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 604 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 583 |
| container_title | Journal of biosocial science |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Carson, Scott Alan |
| description | When other measures for material conditions are scarce or unreliable, the use of height is now common to evaluate economic conditions during economic development. However, throughout US economic development, height data by gender have been slow to emerge. Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, female and male statures remained constant. Agricultural workers had taller statures than workers in other occupations, and the female agricultural height premium was over twice that of males. For both females and males, individuals with fairer complexions were taller than their darker complexioned counterparts. Gender collectively had the greatest explanatory effect associated with stature, followed by age and nativity. Socioeconomic status and birth period had the smallest collective effects with stature. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0021932021000250 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545607853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2545607853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-bf4e677d1a34e2d43deeb48619dc1fb46c1235a46b88d4801ddf7ed083429abd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj09LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8BL16qk39N4k0WV4VFDyp4K2kztV267dqkyH57s-rJy8zj9x7DG0LOGVwxYPr6BYAzK3iakKSCAzJjMreZVtYektnezvb-MTkJYQ3ABFg1I-9PUxzb2A49_Wpj0_Y0NkibYQrYDJ2_oczEJrFxmD4aim7sdpRDQhX2cRp3tMaN65C63tMfEaJLHMMpOapdF_Dsb8_J2_LudfGQrZ7vHxe3q2yb6sWsrCXmWnvmhETupfCIpTQ5s75idSnzinGhnMxLY7w0wLyvNXowQnLrSi_m5PL37nYcPicMsdi0ocKucz2mLwqupMpBGyVS9OJfdD1MY5_aFdwwMFpYIcQ3N5NiLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2810873933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutrition within the household: 18th through early 20th century female and male statures</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Carson, Scott Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Carson, Scott Alan</creatorcontrib><description>When other measures for material conditions are scarce or unreliable, the use of height is now common to evaluate economic conditions during economic development. However, throughout US economic development, height data by gender have been slow to emerge. Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, female and male statures remained constant. Agricultural workers had taller statures than workers in other occupations, and the female agricultural height premium was over twice that of males. For both females and males, individuals with fairer complexions were taller than their darker complexioned counterparts. Gender collectively had the greatest explanatory effect associated with stature, followed by age and nativity. Socioeconomic status and birth period had the smallest collective effects with stature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021932021000250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>20th century ; Agriculture ; Anemia ; Calories ; Dental caries ; Economic conditions ; Economic development ; Enamel ; Family income ; Farmworkers ; Females ; Gender ; Height ; Households ; Industrial development ; Males ; Mortality ; Nutrition ; Occupations ; Prisons ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomic status ; Voting rights ; Womens health ; Womens suffrage</subject><ispartof>Journal of biosocial science, 2022-07, Vol.54 (4), p.583-604</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27342,27922,27923,33772</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carson, Scott Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Nutrition within the household: 18th through early 20th century female and male statures</title><title>Journal of biosocial science</title><description>When other measures for material conditions are scarce or unreliable, the use of height is now common to evaluate economic conditions during economic development. However, throughout US economic development, height data by gender have been slow to emerge. Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, female and male statures remained constant. Agricultural workers had taller statures than workers in other occupations, and the female agricultural height premium was over twice that of males. For both females and males, individuals with fairer complexions were taller than their darker complexioned counterparts. Gender collectively had the greatest explanatory effect associated with stature, followed by age and nativity. Socioeconomic status and birth period had the smallest collective effects with stature.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Anemia</subject><subject>Calories</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Farmworkers</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Womens suffrage</subject><issn>0021-9320</issn><issn>1469-7599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj09LxDAQxYMouK5-AG8BL16qk39N4k0WV4VFDyp4K2kztV267dqkyH57s-rJy8zj9x7DG0LOGVwxYPr6BYAzK3iakKSCAzJjMreZVtYektnezvb-MTkJYQ3ABFg1I-9PUxzb2A49_Wpj0_Y0NkibYQrYDJ2_oczEJrFxmD4aim7sdpRDQhX2cRp3tMaN65C63tMfEaJLHMMpOapdF_Dsb8_J2_LudfGQrZ7vHxe3q2yb6sWsrCXmWnvmhETupfCIpTQ5s75idSnzinGhnMxLY7w0wLyvNXowQnLrSi_m5PL37nYcPicMsdi0ocKucz2mLwqupMpBGyVS9OJfdD1MY5_aFdwwMFpYIcQ3N5NiLg</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Carson, Scott Alan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Nutrition within the household: 18th through early 20th century female and male statures</title><author>Carson, Scott Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-bf4e677d1a34e2d43deeb48619dc1fb46c1235a46b88d4801ddf7ed083429abd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Anemia</topic><topic>Calories</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Farmworkers</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Womens suffrage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carson, Scott Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biosocial science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carson, Scott Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutrition within the household: 18th through early 20th century female and male statures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biosocial science</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>604</epage><pages>583-604</pages><issn>0021-9320</issn><eissn>1469-7599</eissn><abstract>When other measures for material conditions are scarce or unreliable, the use of height is now common to evaluate economic conditions during economic development. However, throughout US economic development, height data by gender have been slow to emerge. Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, female and male statures remained constant. Agricultural workers had taller statures than workers in other occupations, and the female agricultural height premium was over twice that of males. For both females and males, individuals with fairer complexions were taller than their darker complexioned counterparts. Gender collectively had the greatest explanatory effect associated with stature, followed by age and nativity. Socioeconomic status and birth period had the smallest collective effects with stature.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021932021000250</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9320 |
| ispartof | Journal of biosocial science, 2022-07, Vol.54 (4), p.583-604 |
| issn | 0021-9320 1469-7599 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545607853 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | 20th century Agriculture Anemia Calories Dental caries Economic conditions Economic development Enamel Family income Farmworkers Females Gender Height Households Industrial development Males Mortality Nutrition Occupations Prisons Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomic status Voting rights Womens health Womens suffrage |
| title | Nutrition within the household: 18th through early 20th century female and male statures |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A12%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutrition%20within%20the%20household:%2018th%20through%20early%2020th%20century%20female%20and%20male%20statures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biosocial%20science&rft.au=Carson,%20Scott%20Alan&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=604&rft.pages=583-604&rft.issn=0021-9320&rft.eissn=1469-7599&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021932021000250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2545607853%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2810873933&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |