Enhanced Recovery After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly implemented to reduce costs, to increase efficiency, and to optimize patient outcomes after a surgical procedure. This study aimed to systematically review the effect of ERAS after primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total k...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2021-10, Vol.103 (20), p.1938-1947
Hauptverfasser: Morrell, Aidan T., Layon, Daniel R., Scott, Michael J., Kates, Stephen L., Golladay, Gregory J., Patel, Nirav K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1947
container_issue 20
container_start_page 1938
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 103
creator Morrell, Aidan T.
Layon, Daniel R.
Scott, Michael J.
Kates, Stephen L.
Golladay, Gregory J.
Patel, Nirav K.
description Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly implemented to reduce costs, to increase efficiency, and to optimize patient outcomes after a surgical procedure. This study aimed to systematically review the effect of ERAS after primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on hospital length of stay, total procedure-related morbidity, and readmission. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and with guidance from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception (1946 for MEDLINE and 1974 for Embase; Cochrane is a composite of multiple databases and thus does not report a standard inception date) until January 15, 2020. Prospective nonrandomized cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing adult patients undergoing elective primary THA or TKA with ERAS or traditional protocols were included. Articles examining outpatient, nonelective, or revision surgical procedures were excluded. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The primary outcome was length of stay. The secondary outcomes included total procedure-related morbidity and readmission. Of the 1,018 references identified (1,017 identified through an electronic search and 1 identified through a manual search), 9 individual studies met inclusion criteria. Data were reported from 7,789 participants, with 2,428 receiving ERAS and 5,361 receiving traditional care. Narrative synthesis was performed instead of meta-analysis, given the presence of moderate to high risk of bias, wide variation of ERAS interventions, and inconsistent methods for assessing and reporting outcomes among included studies. Adherence to ERAS protocols consistently reduced hospital length of stay. Few studies demonstrated reduced total procedure-related morbidity, and there was no significant effect on readmission rates. ERAS likely reduced the length of stay after primary elective THA and TKA, with a more pronounced effect in selected healthier patient populations. We found minimal to no impact on perioperative morbidity or readmission. The quality of existing evidence was limited because of study heterogeneity and a significant risk of bias. Further high-quality research is needed to definitively assess the impact of ERAS on total joint arthroplasty. Therapeutic
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.20.02169
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545603760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2545603760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2949-4063745e29f41df91222ccd713a8978efc92f7ac0b4c81f791843ab9f004f9223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1vGjEQhq2oVUJojr1WPvaydDz2frg3ivLRFClRQ86W8Y7FtssutRcQ_z6mJDmMRvPq0SvNw9hnARMUUHy7_3H_NEGYAIpCn7GRyGWeCVkVH9gIUphpmecX7DLGPwCgFJTn7EIqURRY5iO2uO5WtnNU89_k-h2FA5_6gQJ_DM3apmvRD7bld82G267mvzoiPg3DKvSb1sbh8J1P-dMhDrS2Q-NSya6h_Sf20ds20tXrHrPnm-vF7C6bP9z-nE3nmUOtdKagkKXKCbVXovZaIKJzdSmkrXRZkXcafWkdLJWrhC-1qJS0S-3TH14jyjH7eurdhP7fluJg1k101La2o34bDeYqL0CWacYsO6Eu9DEG8mZzetAIMEeR5ijSIJj_IhP_5bV6u1xT_U6_mUuAOgH7vk2-4t92u6dgVmTbYWXg6LpAmWGqE4AA2THS8gUsOnv3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545603760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhanced Recovery After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Morrell, Aidan T. ; Layon, Daniel R. ; Scott, Michael J. ; Kates, Stephen L. ; Golladay, Gregory J. ; Patel, Nirav K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morrell, Aidan T. ; Layon, Daniel R. ; Scott, Michael J. ; Kates, Stephen L. ; Golladay, Gregory J. ; Patel, Nirav K.</creatorcontrib><description>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly implemented to reduce costs, to increase efficiency, and to optimize patient outcomes after a surgical procedure. This study aimed to systematically review the effect of ERAS after primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on hospital length of stay, total procedure-related morbidity, and readmission. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and with guidance from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception (1946 for MEDLINE and 1974 for Embase; Cochrane is a composite of multiple databases and thus does not report a standard inception date) until January 15, 2020. Prospective nonrandomized cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing adult patients undergoing elective primary THA or TKA with ERAS or traditional protocols were included. Articles examining outpatient, nonelective, or revision surgical procedures were excluded. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The primary outcome was length of stay. The secondary outcomes included total procedure-related morbidity and readmission. Of the 1,018 references identified (1,017 identified through an electronic search and 1 identified through a manual search), 9 individual studies met inclusion criteria. Data were reported from 7,789 participants, with 2,428 receiving ERAS and 5,361 receiving traditional care. Narrative synthesis was performed instead of meta-analysis, given the presence of moderate to high risk of bias, wide variation of ERAS interventions, and inconsistent methods for assessing and reporting outcomes among included studies. Adherence to ERAS protocols consistently reduced hospital length of stay. Few studies demonstrated reduced total procedure-related morbidity, and there was no significant effect on readmission rates. ERAS likely reduced the length of stay after primary elective THA and TKA, with a more pronounced effect in selected healthier patient populations. We found minimal to no impact on perioperative morbidity or readmission. The quality of existing evidence was limited because of study heterogeneity and a significant risk of bias. Further high-quality research is needed to definitively assess the impact of ERAS on total joint arthroplasty. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.20.02169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34166275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ; Humans ; Recovery of Function</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2021-10, Vol.103 (20), p.1938-1947</ispartof><rights>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2949-4063745e29f41df91222ccd713a8978efc92f7ac0b4c81f791843ab9f004f9223</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3643-3505 ; 0000-0001-9240-7614 ; 0000-0001-6659-0945 ; 0000-0003-0005-8694 ; 0000-0002-2479-6459 ; 0000-0003-0956-7559</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166275$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morrell, Aidan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Layon, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kates, Stephen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golladay, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Nirav K.</creatorcontrib><title>Enhanced Recovery After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly implemented to reduce costs, to increase efficiency, and to optimize patient outcomes after a surgical procedure. This study aimed to systematically review the effect of ERAS after primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on hospital length of stay, total procedure-related morbidity, and readmission. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and with guidance from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception (1946 for MEDLINE and 1974 for Embase; Cochrane is a composite of multiple databases and thus does not report a standard inception date) until January 15, 2020. Prospective nonrandomized cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing adult patients undergoing elective primary THA or TKA with ERAS or traditional protocols were included. Articles examining outpatient, nonelective, or revision surgical procedures were excluded. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The primary outcome was length of stay. The secondary outcomes included total procedure-related morbidity and readmission. Of the 1,018 references identified (1,017 identified through an electronic search and 1 identified through a manual search), 9 individual studies met inclusion criteria. Data were reported from 7,789 participants, with 2,428 receiving ERAS and 5,361 receiving traditional care. Narrative synthesis was performed instead of meta-analysis, given the presence of moderate to high risk of bias, wide variation of ERAS interventions, and inconsistent methods for assessing and reporting outcomes among included studies. Adherence to ERAS protocols consistently reduced hospital length of stay. Few studies demonstrated reduced total procedure-related morbidity, and there was no significant effect on readmission rates. ERAS likely reduced the length of stay after primary elective THA and TKA, with a more pronounced effect in selected healthier patient populations. We found minimal to no impact on perioperative morbidity or readmission. The quality of existing evidence was limited because of study heterogeneity and a significant risk of bias. Further high-quality research is needed to definitively assess the impact of ERAS on total joint arthroplasty. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1vGjEQhq2oVUJojr1WPvaydDz2frg3ivLRFClRQ86W8Y7FtssutRcQ_z6mJDmMRvPq0SvNw9hnARMUUHy7_3H_NEGYAIpCn7GRyGWeCVkVH9gIUphpmecX7DLGPwCgFJTn7EIqURRY5iO2uO5WtnNU89_k-h2FA5_6gQJ_DM3apmvRD7bld82G267mvzoiPg3DKvSb1sbh8J1P-dMhDrS2Q-NSya6h_Sf20ds20tXrHrPnm-vF7C6bP9z-nE3nmUOtdKagkKXKCbVXovZaIKJzdSmkrXRZkXcafWkdLJWrhC-1qJS0S-3TH14jyjH7eurdhP7fluJg1k101La2o34bDeYqL0CWacYsO6Eu9DEG8mZzetAIMEeR5ijSIJj_IhP_5bV6u1xT_U6_mUuAOgH7vk2-4t92u6dgVmTbYWXg6LpAmWGqE4AA2THS8gUsOnv3</recordid><startdate>20211020</startdate><enddate>20211020</enddate><creator>Morrell, Aidan T.</creator><creator>Layon, Daniel R.</creator><creator>Scott, Michael J.</creator><creator>Kates, Stephen L.</creator><creator>Golladay, Gregory J.</creator><creator>Patel, Nirav K.</creator><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3643-3505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9240-7614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6659-0945</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0005-8694</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2479-6459</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0956-7559</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211020</creationdate><title>Enhanced Recovery After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review</title><author>Morrell, Aidan T. ; Layon, Daniel R. ; Scott, Michael J. ; Kates, Stephen L. ; Golladay, Gregory J. ; Patel, Nirav K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2949-4063745e29f41df91222ccd713a8978efc92f7ac0b4c81f791843ab9f004f9223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morrell, Aidan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Layon, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kates, Stephen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golladay, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Nirav K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morrell, Aidan T.</au><au>Layon, Daniel R.</au><au>Scott, Michael J.</au><au>Kates, Stephen L.</au><au>Golladay, Gregory J.</au><au>Patel, Nirav K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhanced Recovery After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2021-10-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>1938</spage><epage>1947</epage><pages>1938-1947</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly implemented to reduce costs, to increase efficiency, and to optimize patient outcomes after a surgical procedure. This study aimed to systematically review the effect of ERAS after primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on hospital length of stay, total procedure-related morbidity, and readmission. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and with guidance from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception (1946 for MEDLINE and 1974 for Embase; Cochrane is a composite of multiple databases and thus does not report a standard inception date) until January 15, 2020. Prospective nonrandomized cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing adult patients undergoing elective primary THA or TKA with ERAS or traditional protocols were included. Articles examining outpatient, nonelective, or revision surgical procedures were excluded. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The primary outcome was length of stay. The secondary outcomes included total procedure-related morbidity and readmission. Of the 1,018 references identified (1,017 identified through an electronic search and 1 identified through a manual search), 9 individual studies met inclusion criteria. Data were reported from 7,789 participants, with 2,428 receiving ERAS and 5,361 receiving traditional care. Narrative synthesis was performed instead of meta-analysis, given the presence of moderate to high risk of bias, wide variation of ERAS interventions, and inconsistent methods for assessing and reporting outcomes among included studies. Adherence to ERAS protocols consistently reduced hospital length of stay. Few studies demonstrated reduced total procedure-related morbidity, and there was no significant effect on readmission rates. ERAS likely reduced the length of stay after primary elective THA and TKA, with a more pronounced effect in selected healthier patient populations. We found minimal to no impact on perioperative morbidity or readmission. The quality of existing evidence was limited because of study heterogeneity and a significant risk of bias. Further high-quality research is needed to definitively assess the impact of ERAS on total joint arthroplasty. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>34166275</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.20.02169</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3643-3505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9240-7614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6659-0945</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0005-8694</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2479-6459</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0956-7559</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2021-10, Vol.103 (20), p.1938-1947
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545603760
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Humans
Recovery of Function
title Enhanced Recovery After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A36%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhanced%20Recovery%20After%20Primary%20Total%20Hip%20and%20Knee%20Arthroplasty:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Morrell,%20Aidan%20T.&rft.date=2021-10-20&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=1938&rft.epage=1947&rft.pages=1938-1947&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.20.02169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2545603760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545603760&rft_id=info:pmid/34166275&rfr_iscdi=true