Development of a predictive score of axillary lymph node dissection based on targeted axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer diagnosis, affected lymph nodes, and neoadjuvant treatment

To determine predictive factors of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) results in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and subsequent staging using Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD). Case-control study between January 2016 and August 2019. Patients with BC, cN1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical oncology 2021-09, Vol.38, p.101629-101629, Article 101629
Hauptverfasser: Flores-Funes, Diego, Aguilar-Jiménez, José, Martínez-Gálvez, María, Ibáñez-Ibáñez, María José, Carrasco-González, Luis, Gil-Izquierdo, José Ignacio, Chaves-Benito, María Asunción, Ayala-De La Peña, Francisco, Nieto-Olivares, Andrés, Aguayo-Albasini, José Luis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101629
container_issue
container_start_page 101629
container_title Surgical oncology
container_volume 38
creator Flores-Funes, Diego
Aguilar-Jiménez, José
Martínez-Gálvez, María
Ibáñez-Ibáñez, María José
Carrasco-González, Luis
Gil-Izquierdo, José Ignacio
Chaves-Benito, María Asunción
Ayala-De La Peña, Francisco
Nieto-Olivares, Andrés
Aguayo-Albasini, José Luis
description To determine predictive factors of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) results in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and subsequent staging using Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD). Case-control study between January 2016 and August 2019. Patients with BC, cN1 staging, marked with a metallic clip prior to NACT, and subsequently staged with TAD and ALND were included. They were divided into 2 groups: ALND patients with or without metastatic involvement (group 1 and group 2, respectively). We carried out a univariate analysis comparing clinical, radiological, surgical and pathological variables, and a logistic regression, (dependent variable: positive result of ALND; independent variables: number of suspicious lymph nodes in diagnostic ultrasound, positive hormone receptors, HER2 positive, complete clinical-radiological response to NACT, positive TAD, and biopsy of ≤2 nodes in TAD). A score for prediction of a metastatic ALND was proposed, with an internal validation study. 60 patients were included: Group 1: 33 (55.0%); Group 2: 27 (45.0%). Tumor size (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.67; 95%CI 1.02–2.74), number of suspected nodes in ultrasound (OR = 2.20; 95%CI 1.01–4, 77), HER2 positive (OR 0.04; 95%CI 0.003–0.54), clinical-radiological response to NACT (OR = 0.07; 95%CI 0.01–0.75), and positive TAD (OR 15.48; 95%CI 1.68–142.78) were independent predictors of a positive result in ALND. We developed a “positive ALND predictive score”, with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.65), and discrimination (AUC = 0.93; 95% CI 0, 87–0.99), with highest Youden index (0.7) at cut-off point of 17% risk of positive ALND (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 70%). Tumor size, number of suspected nodes, positive HER2, response to NACT, and metastatic TAD are independent predictors of ALND. The predictive score for positive ALND would be a good indicator to safely omit ALND. •TAD is a new technique validated in last years as an axillary re-staging technique.•There may be other factors to predict ALND status: IHC, and clinical NACT response.•Tumor size, LN number, HER2, NACT response and TAD are predictive of ALND results.•A score including said factors has good internal value to predict the ALND results.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101629
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545596092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960740421001183</els_id><sourcerecordid>2545596092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b78e02038d15b0a1c924a9d9d7d92efb088a663744af7631850702147436e0123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEopfCGyBkiQ0LcvFf4mSDhEr5kSqxgbXl2JPWUW4cbOdCn48X66QpBbFg5dHoOzPjc4riOaN7Rln9ZtinJYbJ7jnl7LbF2wfFjjWqLYXg9GGxo21NSyWpPCmepDRQSmvF2ePiREimmGrFrvj1Ho4whvkAUyahJ4bMEZy32R-BJBsi3HZ_-nE08ZqM14f5ikzBAXE-JUAuTKQzCRzBIpt4CRnre8FflJ_IbLLHRYn88PmKdBFMysSayUJE0lxOIfn0mpi-Rw2O-bNu7U6OTBCMG5ajwWszyvN699PiUW_GBM_u3tPi24fzr2efyosvHz-fvbsorWhpLjvVAOVUNI5VHTXMtlya1rVOuZZD39GmMXUtlJSmV7VgTUUVWiuVFDVQxsVp8WqbO8fwfYGU9cEnC_hRPGtJmleyqtDydkVf_oMOYYkTXodU3XCJ4wVScqNsDClF6PUc_QFt04zqNVE96C1kvYast5BR9uJu-NIdwN2LfqeKwNsNAHTj6CHqZNF3i8FGNFa74P-_4QaSTL10</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568243183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a predictive score of axillary lymph node dissection based on targeted axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer diagnosis, affected lymph nodes, and neoadjuvant treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Flores-Funes, Diego ; Aguilar-Jiménez, José ; Martínez-Gálvez, María ; Ibáñez-Ibáñez, María José ; Carrasco-González, Luis ; Gil-Izquierdo, José Ignacio ; Chaves-Benito, María Asunción ; Ayala-De La Peña, Francisco ; Nieto-Olivares, Andrés ; Aguayo-Albasini, José Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Flores-Funes, Diego ; Aguilar-Jiménez, José ; Martínez-Gálvez, María ; Ibáñez-Ibáñez, María José ; Carrasco-González, Luis ; Gil-Izquierdo, José Ignacio ; Chaves-Benito, María Asunción ; Ayala-De La Peña, Francisco ; Nieto-Olivares, Andrés ; Aguayo-Albasini, José Luis</creatorcontrib><description>To determine predictive factors of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) results in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and subsequent staging using Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD). Case-control study between January 2016 and August 2019. Patients with BC, cN1 staging, marked with a metallic clip prior to NACT, and subsequently staged with TAD and ALND were included. They were divided into 2 groups: ALND patients with or without metastatic involvement (group 1 and group 2, respectively). We carried out a univariate analysis comparing clinical, radiological, surgical and pathological variables, and a logistic regression, (dependent variable: positive result of ALND; independent variables: number of suspicious lymph nodes in diagnostic ultrasound, positive hormone receptors, HER2 positive, complete clinical-radiological response to NACT, positive TAD, and biopsy of ≤2 nodes in TAD). A score for prediction of a metastatic ALND was proposed, with an internal validation study. 60 patients were included: Group 1: 33 (55.0%); Group 2: 27 (45.0%). Tumor size (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.67; 95%CI 1.02–2.74), number of suspected nodes in ultrasound (OR = 2.20; 95%CI 1.01–4, 77), HER2 positive (OR 0.04; 95%CI 0.003–0.54), clinical-radiological response to NACT (OR = 0.07; 95%CI 0.01–0.75), and positive TAD (OR 15.48; 95%CI 1.68–142.78) were independent predictors of a positive result in ALND. We developed a “positive ALND predictive score”, with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.65), and discrimination (AUC = 0.93; 95% CI 0, 87–0.99), with highest Youden index (0.7) at cut-off point of 17% risk of positive ALND (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 70%). Tumor size, number of suspected nodes, positive HER2, response to NACT, and metastatic TAD are independent predictors of ALND. The predictive score for positive ALND would be a good indicator to safely omit ALND. •TAD is a new technique validated in last years as an axillary re-staging technique.•There may be other factors to predict ALND status: IHC, and clinical NACT response.•Tumor size, LN number, HER2, NACT response and TAD are predictive of ALND results.•A score including said factors has good internal value to predict the ALND results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101629</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34171793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Axilla ; Axillary lymph node dissection ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Calibration ; Case-Control Studies ; Chemotherapy ; Clipped node biopsy ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Confidence intervals ; Dependent variables ; Dissection ; ErbB-2 protein ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Independent variables ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; Lymph Node Excision - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Lymph nodes ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic system ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Neoadjuvant therapy ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods ; Normal distribution ; Patients ; Predictive score ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Response rates ; Sentinel lymph node biopsy ; Surgery ; Targeted axillary dissection ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Surgical oncology, 2021-09, Vol.38, p.101629-101629, Article 101629</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b78e02038d15b0a1c924a9d9d7d92efb088a663744af7631850702147436e0123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b78e02038d15b0a1c924a9d9d7d92efb088a663744af7631850702147436e0123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101629$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34171793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flores-Funes, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar-Jiménez, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Gálvez, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibáñez-Ibáñez, María José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco-González, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil-Izquierdo, José Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves-Benito, María Asunción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayala-De La Peña, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieto-Olivares, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguayo-Albasini, José Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a predictive score of axillary lymph node dissection based on targeted axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer diagnosis, affected lymph nodes, and neoadjuvant treatment</title><title>Surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>To determine predictive factors of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) results in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and subsequent staging using Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD). Case-control study between January 2016 and August 2019. Patients with BC, cN1 staging, marked with a metallic clip prior to NACT, and subsequently staged with TAD and ALND were included. They were divided into 2 groups: ALND patients with or without metastatic involvement (group 1 and group 2, respectively). We carried out a univariate analysis comparing clinical, radiological, surgical and pathological variables, and a logistic regression, (dependent variable: positive result of ALND; independent variables: number of suspicious lymph nodes in diagnostic ultrasound, positive hormone receptors, HER2 positive, complete clinical-radiological response to NACT, positive TAD, and biopsy of ≤2 nodes in TAD). A score for prediction of a metastatic ALND was proposed, with an internal validation study. 60 patients were included: Group 1: 33 (55.0%); Group 2: 27 (45.0%). Tumor size (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.67; 95%CI 1.02–2.74), number of suspected nodes in ultrasound (OR = 2.20; 95%CI 1.01–4, 77), HER2 positive (OR 0.04; 95%CI 0.003–0.54), clinical-radiological response to NACT (OR = 0.07; 95%CI 0.01–0.75), and positive TAD (OR 15.48; 95%CI 1.68–142.78) were independent predictors of a positive result in ALND. We developed a “positive ALND predictive score”, with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.65), and discrimination (AUC = 0.93; 95% CI 0, 87–0.99), with highest Youden index (0.7) at cut-off point of 17% risk of positive ALND (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 70%). Tumor size, number of suspected nodes, positive HER2, response to NACT, and metastatic TAD are independent predictors of ALND. The predictive score for positive ALND would be a good indicator to safely omit ALND. •TAD is a new technique validated in last years as an axillary re-staging technique.•There may be other factors to predict ALND status: IHC, and clinical NACT response.•Tumor size, LN number, HER2, NACT response and TAD are predictive of ALND results.•A score including said factors has good internal value to predict the ALND results.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Axillary lymph node dissection</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clipped node biopsy</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Dependent variables</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>ErbB-2 protein</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant therapy</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Predictive score</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Sentinel lymph node biopsy</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Targeted axillary dissection</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0960-7404</issn><issn>1879-3320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEopfCGyBkiQ0LcvFf4mSDhEr5kSqxgbXl2JPWUW4cbOdCn48X66QpBbFg5dHoOzPjc4riOaN7Rln9ZtinJYbJ7jnl7LbF2wfFjjWqLYXg9GGxo21NSyWpPCmepDRQSmvF2ePiREimmGrFrvj1Ho4whvkAUyahJ4bMEZy32R-BJBsi3HZ_-nE08ZqM14f5ikzBAXE-JUAuTKQzCRzBIpt4CRnre8FflJ_IbLLHRYn88PmKdBFMysSayUJE0lxOIfn0mpi-Rw2O-bNu7U6OTBCMG5ajwWszyvN699PiUW_GBM_u3tPi24fzr2efyosvHz-fvbsorWhpLjvVAOVUNI5VHTXMtlya1rVOuZZD39GmMXUtlJSmV7VgTUUVWiuVFDVQxsVp8WqbO8fwfYGU9cEnC_hRPGtJmleyqtDydkVf_oMOYYkTXodU3XCJ4wVScqNsDClF6PUc_QFt04zqNVE96C1kvYast5BR9uJu-NIdwN2LfqeKwNsNAHTj6CHqZNF3i8FGNFa74P-_4QaSTL10</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Flores-Funes, Diego</creator><creator>Aguilar-Jiménez, José</creator><creator>Martínez-Gálvez, María</creator><creator>Ibáñez-Ibáñez, María José</creator><creator>Carrasco-González, Luis</creator><creator>Gil-Izquierdo, José Ignacio</creator><creator>Chaves-Benito, María Asunción</creator><creator>Ayala-De La Peña, Francisco</creator><creator>Nieto-Olivares, Andrés</creator><creator>Aguayo-Albasini, José Luis</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Development of a predictive score of axillary lymph node dissection based on targeted axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer diagnosis, affected lymph nodes, and neoadjuvant treatment</title><author>Flores-Funes, Diego ; Aguilar-Jiménez, José ; Martínez-Gálvez, María ; Ibáñez-Ibáñez, María José ; Carrasco-González, Luis ; Gil-Izquierdo, José Ignacio ; Chaves-Benito, María Asunción ; Ayala-De La Peña, Francisco ; Nieto-Olivares, Andrés ; Aguayo-Albasini, José Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b78e02038d15b0a1c924a9d9d7d92efb088a663744af7631850702147436e0123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Axillary lymph node dissection</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clipped node biopsy</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Dependent variables</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>ErbB-2 protein</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant therapy</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Predictive score</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Sentinel lymph node biopsy</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Targeted axillary dissection</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flores-Funes, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar-Jiménez, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Gálvez, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibáñez-Ibáñez, María José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco-González, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil-Izquierdo, José Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves-Benito, María Asunción</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayala-De La Peña, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieto-Olivares, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguayo-Albasini, José Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flores-Funes, Diego</au><au>Aguilar-Jiménez, José</au><au>Martínez-Gálvez, María</au><au>Ibáñez-Ibáñez, María José</au><au>Carrasco-González, Luis</au><au>Gil-Izquierdo, José Ignacio</au><au>Chaves-Benito, María Asunción</au><au>Ayala-De La Peña, Francisco</au><au>Nieto-Olivares, Andrés</au><au>Aguayo-Albasini, José Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a predictive score of axillary lymph node dissection based on targeted axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer diagnosis, affected lymph nodes, and neoadjuvant treatment</atitle><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>38</volume><spage>101629</spage><epage>101629</epage><pages>101629-101629</pages><artnum>101629</artnum><issn>0960-7404</issn><eissn>1879-3320</eissn><abstract>To determine predictive factors of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) results in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and subsequent staging using Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD). Case-control study between January 2016 and August 2019. Patients with BC, cN1 staging, marked with a metallic clip prior to NACT, and subsequently staged with TAD and ALND were included. They were divided into 2 groups: ALND patients with or without metastatic involvement (group 1 and group 2, respectively). We carried out a univariate analysis comparing clinical, radiological, surgical and pathological variables, and a logistic regression, (dependent variable: positive result of ALND; independent variables: number of suspicious lymph nodes in diagnostic ultrasound, positive hormone receptors, HER2 positive, complete clinical-radiological response to NACT, positive TAD, and biopsy of ≤2 nodes in TAD). A score for prediction of a metastatic ALND was proposed, with an internal validation study. 60 patients were included: Group 1: 33 (55.0%); Group 2: 27 (45.0%). Tumor size (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.67; 95%CI 1.02–2.74), number of suspected nodes in ultrasound (OR = 2.20; 95%CI 1.01–4, 77), HER2 positive (OR 0.04; 95%CI 0.003–0.54), clinical-radiological response to NACT (OR = 0.07; 95%CI 0.01–0.75), and positive TAD (OR 15.48; 95%CI 1.68–142.78) were independent predictors of a positive result in ALND. We developed a “positive ALND predictive score”, with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.65), and discrimination (AUC = 0.93; 95% CI 0, 87–0.99), with highest Youden index (0.7) at cut-off point of 17% risk of positive ALND (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 70%). Tumor size, number of suspected nodes, positive HER2, response to NACT, and metastatic TAD are independent predictors of ALND. The predictive score for positive ALND would be a good indicator to safely omit ALND. •TAD is a new technique validated in last years as an axillary re-staging technique.•There may be other factors to predict ALND status: IHC, and clinical NACT response.•Tumor size, LN number, HER2, NACT response and TAD are predictive of ALND results.•A score including said factors has good internal value to predict the ALND results.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34171793</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101629</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7404
ispartof Surgical oncology, 2021-09, Vol.38, p.101629-101629, Article 101629
issn 0960-7404
1879-3320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545596092
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Axilla
Axillary lymph node dissection
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Calibration
Case-Control Studies
Chemotherapy
Clipped node biopsy
Combined Modality Therapy
Confidence intervals
Dependent variables
Dissection
ErbB-2 protein
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Independent variables
Lymph Node Excision - methods
Lymph Node Excision - statistics & numerical data
Lymph nodes
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic system
Metastases
Metastasis
Middle Aged
Multivariate analysis
Neoadjuvant therapy
Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods
Normal distribution
Patients
Predictive score
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Response rates
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Surgery
Targeted axillary dissection
Tumors
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
Variables
title Development of a predictive score of axillary lymph node dissection based on targeted axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer diagnosis, affected lymph nodes, and neoadjuvant treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A14%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20predictive%20score%20of%20axillary%20lymph%20node%20dissection%20based%20on%20targeted%20axillary%20dissection%20in%20patients%20with%20breast%20cancer%20diagnosis,%20affected%20lymph%20nodes,%20and%20neoadjuvant%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Flores-Funes,%20Diego&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=38&rft.spage=101629&rft.epage=101629&rft.pages=101629-101629&rft.artnum=101629&rft.issn=0960-7404&rft.eissn=1879-3320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101629&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2545596092%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568243183&rft_id=info:pmid/34171793&rft_els_id=S0960740421001183&rfr_iscdi=true