The impact of fertility preservation on the timing of breast cancer treatment, recurrence, and survival
Background Many young women with breast cancer undergo fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. This study examined the impact of FP on breast cancer outcomes. Methods The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 272 women aged 20 to 45 years with newly diagnosed stage 0 to III...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2021-10, Vol.127 (20), p.3872-3880 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3880 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 3872 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Greer, Anna C. Lanes, Andrea Poorvu, Philip D. Kennedy, Patricia Thomas, Ann M. Partridge, Ann H. Ginsburg, Elizabeth S. |
description | Background
Many young women with breast cancer undergo fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. This study examined the impact of FP on breast cancer outcomes.
Methods
The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 272 women aged 20 to 45 years with newly diagnosed stage 0 to III breast cancer who underwent an FP consultation between 2005 and 2017. Among these women, 123 (45.2%) underwent FP (fertility preservation–positive [FP+]). The remaining 149 women did not undergo FP (fertility preservation–negative [FP–]).
Results
The characteristics at enrollment were similar with the exception of ethnicity (FP+, 87.8% White; FP–, 67.8% White; P = .002) and BRCA status (FP+, 27.7% BRCA+; FP–, 15.5% BRCA+; P = .021). The median follow‐up was approximately 4 years. Women who underwent FP had longer times to first treatment (FP+, 37 days; FP–, 31 days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.74; confidence interval [CI], 0.56‐0.99) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 36 days; FP–, 26 days; aHR, 0.41; CI, 0.24‐0.68) and from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 41 days; FP–, 33 days; aHR, 0.58; CI, 0.38‐0.90). Adjusted 3‐ and 5‐year invasive disease–free survival (IDFS) rates were comparable between the 2 groups (3‐year IDFS: FP+, 85.4%; FP–, 79.4%; P = .411; 5‐year IDFS: FP+, 73.7%; FP–, 67.1%; P = .288). Similarly, no difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the 2 groups (3‐year OS: FP+, 95.5%; FP–, 93.5%; P = .854; 5‐year OS: FP+, 84.2%; FP–, 81.4%; P = .700).
Conclusions
FP after a breast cancer diagnosis delays the time to treatment by a small amount, but this delay does not lead to inferior IDFS or OS.
Controlled ovarian stimulation for the purpose of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer delays the initiation of systemic treatment but does not affect recurrence or survival. Fertility preservation provides a safe option for women diagnosed with breast cancer who are facing gonadotoxic treatment regimens and desire future fertility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.33601 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544879607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2576678592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-a5b3c2a1f74c7f1e9292e6f18114f5ad68fc6d40ced9ec4ee2a3a66679d138523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWqsXf4AEvIh0a742u3uU4heIglTwtqTZSY3sR02ylf57U1s9eJAZGGZ4eBhehE4oGVNC2KVutRtzLgndQQNKiiwhVLBdNCCE5Ekq-OsBOvT-Pa4ZS_k-OuCCylhkgObTN8C2WSgdcGewARdsbcMKLxx4cEsVbNfi2CFywTa2na-5mQPlA9aq1eBwiFtooA0j7ED3zkE8j7BqK-x7t7RLVR-hPaNqD8fbOUQvN9fTyV3y8HR7P7l6SDQvOE1UOuOaKWoyoTNDoWAFA2loTqkwqapkbrSsBNFQFaAFAFNcSSmzoqI8TxkfovONd-G6jx58KBvrNdS1aqHrfclSIfKskCSL6Nkf9L3rXRu_i1QWnXlarIUXG0q7znsHplw42yi3Kikp1_GX6_jL7_gjfLpV9rMGql_0J-8I0A3waWtY_aMqJ4-T5430C13XkDI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576678592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of fertility preservation on the timing of breast cancer treatment, recurrence, and survival</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Greer, Anna C. ; Lanes, Andrea ; Poorvu, Philip D. ; Kennedy, Patricia ; Thomas, Ann M. ; Partridge, Ann H. ; Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greer, Anna C. ; Lanes, Andrea ; Poorvu, Philip D. ; Kennedy, Patricia ; Thomas, Ann M. ; Partridge, Ann H. ; Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Many young women with breast cancer undergo fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. This study examined the impact of FP on breast cancer outcomes.
Methods
The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 272 women aged 20 to 45 years with newly diagnosed stage 0 to III breast cancer who underwent an FP consultation between 2005 and 2017. Among these women, 123 (45.2%) underwent FP (fertility preservation–positive [FP+]). The remaining 149 women did not undergo FP (fertility preservation–negative [FP–]).
Results
The characteristics at enrollment were similar with the exception of ethnicity (FP+, 87.8% White; FP–, 67.8% White; P = .002) and BRCA status (FP+, 27.7% BRCA+; FP–, 15.5% BRCA+; P = .021). The median follow‐up was approximately 4 years. Women who underwent FP had longer times to first treatment (FP+, 37 days; FP–, 31 days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.74; confidence interval [CI], 0.56‐0.99) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 36 days; FP–, 26 days; aHR, 0.41; CI, 0.24‐0.68) and from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 41 days; FP–, 33 days; aHR, 0.58; CI, 0.38‐0.90). Adjusted 3‐ and 5‐year invasive disease–free survival (IDFS) rates were comparable between the 2 groups (3‐year IDFS: FP+, 85.4%; FP–, 79.4%; P = .411; 5‐year IDFS: FP+, 73.7%; FP–, 67.1%; P = .288). Similarly, no difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the 2 groups (3‐year OS: FP+, 95.5%; FP–, 93.5%; P = .854; 5‐year OS: FP+, 84.2%; FP–, 81.4%; P = .700).
Conclusions
FP after a breast cancer diagnosis delays the time to treatment by a small amount, but this delay does not lead to inferior IDFS or OS.
Controlled ovarian stimulation for the purpose of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer delays the initiation of systemic treatment but does not affect recurrence or survival. Fertility preservation provides a safe option for women diagnosed with breast cancer who are facing gonadotoxic treatment regimens and desire future fertility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33601</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34161610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Confidence intervals ; Female ; Fertility ; Fertility Preservation ; Humans ; Invasiveness ; Middle Aged ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Oncology ; oocyte cryopreservation ; Preservation ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival ; survivorship ; treatment outcomes ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2021-10, Vol.127 (20), p.3872-3880</ispartof><rights>2021 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2021 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-a5b3c2a1f74c7f1e9292e6f18114f5ad68fc6d40ced9ec4ee2a3a66679d138523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-a5b3c2a1f74c7f1e9292e6f18114f5ad68fc6d40ced9ec4ee2a3a66679d138523</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5097-4917 ; 0000-0002-4722-4824</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.33601$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.33601$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34161610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greer, Anna C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanes, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poorvu, Philip D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Ann H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of fertility preservation on the timing of breast cancer treatment, recurrence, and survival</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background
Many young women with breast cancer undergo fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. This study examined the impact of FP on breast cancer outcomes.
Methods
The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 272 women aged 20 to 45 years with newly diagnosed stage 0 to III breast cancer who underwent an FP consultation between 2005 and 2017. Among these women, 123 (45.2%) underwent FP (fertility preservation–positive [FP+]). The remaining 149 women did not undergo FP (fertility preservation–negative [FP–]).
Results
The characteristics at enrollment were similar with the exception of ethnicity (FP+, 87.8% White; FP–, 67.8% White; P = .002) and BRCA status (FP+, 27.7% BRCA+; FP–, 15.5% BRCA+; P = .021). The median follow‐up was approximately 4 years. Women who underwent FP had longer times to first treatment (FP+, 37 days; FP–, 31 days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.74; confidence interval [CI], 0.56‐0.99) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 36 days; FP–, 26 days; aHR, 0.41; CI, 0.24‐0.68) and from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 41 days; FP–, 33 days; aHR, 0.58; CI, 0.38‐0.90). Adjusted 3‐ and 5‐year invasive disease–free survival (IDFS) rates were comparable between the 2 groups (3‐year IDFS: FP+, 85.4%; FP–, 79.4%; P = .411; 5‐year IDFS: FP+, 73.7%; FP–, 67.1%; P = .288). Similarly, no difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the 2 groups (3‐year OS: FP+, 95.5%; FP–, 93.5%; P = .854; 5‐year OS: FP+, 84.2%; FP–, 81.4%; P = .700).
Conclusions
FP after a breast cancer diagnosis delays the time to treatment by a small amount, but this delay does not lead to inferior IDFS or OS.
Controlled ovarian stimulation for the purpose of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer delays the initiation of systemic treatment but does not affect recurrence or survival. Fertility preservation provides a safe option for women diagnosed with breast cancer who are facing gonadotoxic treatment regimens and desire future fertility.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>oocyte cryopreservation</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>survivorship</subject><subject>treatment outcomes</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWqsXf4AEvIh0a742u3uU4heIglTwtqTZSY3sR02ylf57U1s9eJAZGGZ4eBhehE4oGVNC2KVutRtzLgndQQNKiiwhVLBdNCCE5Ekq-OsBOvT-Pa4ZS_k-OuCCylhkgObTN8C2WSgdcGewARdsbcMKLxx4cEsVbNfi2CFywTa2na-5mQPlA9aq1eBwiFtooA0j7ED3zkE8j7BqK-x7t7RLVR-hPaNqD8fbOUQvN9fTyV3y8HR7P7l6SDQvOE1UOuOaKWoyoTNDoWAFA2loTqkwqapkbrSsBNFQFaAFAFNcSSmzoqI8TxkfovONd-G6jx58KBvrNdS1aqHrfclSIfKskCSL6Nkf9L3rXRu_i1QWnXlarIUXG0q7znsHplw42yi3Kikp1_GX6_jL7_gjfLpV9rMGql_0J-8I0A3waWtY_aMqJ4-T5430C13XkDI</recordid><startdate>20211015</startdate><enddate>20211015</enddate><creator>Greer, Anna C.</creator><creator>Lanes, Andrea</creator><creator>Poorvu, Philip D.</creator><creator>Kennedy, Patricia</creator><creator>Thomas, Ann M.</creator><creator>Partridge, Ann H.</creator><creator>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5097-4917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4722-4824</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211015</creationdate><title>The impact of fertility preservation on the timing of breast cancer treatment, recurrence, and survival</title><author>Greer, Anna C. ; Lanes, Andrea ; Poorvu, Philip D. ; Kennedy, Patricia ; Thomas, Ann M. ; Partridge, Ann H. ; Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-a5b3c2a1f74c7f1e9292e6f18114f5ad68fc6d40ced9ec4ee2a3a66679d138523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>oocyte cryopreservation</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>survivorship</topic><topic>treatment outcomes</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greer, Anna C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanes, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poorvu, Philip D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Ann H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greer, Anna C.</au><au>Lanes, Andrea</au><au>Poorvu, Philip D.</au><au>Kennedy, Patricia</au><au>Thomas, Ann M.</au><au>Partridge, Ann H.</au><au>Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of fertility preservation on the timing of breast cancer treatment, recurrence, and survival</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-10-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>3872</spage><epage>3880</epage><pages>3872-3880</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background
Many young women with breast cancer undergo fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. This study examined the impact of FP on breast cancer outcomes.
Methods
The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 272 women aged 20 to 45 years with newly diagnosed stage 0 to III breast cancer who underwent an FP consultation between 2005 and 2017. Among these women, 123 (45.2%) underwent FP (fertility preservation–positive [FP+]). The remaining 149 women did not undergo FP (fertility preservation–negative [FP–]).
Results
The characteristics at enrollment were similar with the exception of ethnicity (FP+, 87.8% White; FP–, 67.8% White; P = .002) and BRCA status (FP+, 27.7% BRCA+; FP–, 15.5% BRCA+; P = .021). The median follow‐up was approximately 4 years. Women who underwent FP had longer times to first treatment (FP+, 37 days; FP–, 31 days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.74; confidence interval [CI], 0.56‐0.99) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 36 days; FP–, 26 days; aHR, 0.41; CI, 0.24‐0.68) and from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 41 days; FP–, 33 days; aHR, 0.58; CI, 0.38‐0.90). Adjusted 3‐ and 5‐year invasive disease–free survival (IDFS) rates were comparable between the 2 groups (3‐year IDFS: FP+, 85.4%; FP–, 79.4%; P = .411; 5‐year IDFS: FP+, 73.7%; FP–, 67.1%; P = .288). Similarly, no difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the 2 groups (3‐year OS: FP+, 95.5%; FP–, 93.5%; P = .854; 5‐year OS: FP+, 84.2%; FP–, 81.4%; P = .700).
Conclusions
FP after a breast cancer diagnosis delays the time to treatment by a small amount, but this delay does not lead to inferior IDFS or OS.
Controlled ovarian stimulation for the purpose of fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer delays the initiation of systemic treatment but does not affect recurrence or survival. Fertility preservation provides a safe option for women diagnosed with breast cancer who are facing gonadotoxic treatment regimens and desire future fertility.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34161610</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.33601</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5097-4917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4722-4824</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2021-10, Vol.127 (20), p.3872-3880 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544879607 |
source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy Cancer therapies Chemotherapy Chemotherapy, Adjuvant Confidence intervals Female Fertility Fertility Preservation Humans Invasiveness Middle Aged Minority & ethnic groups Neoadjuvant Therapy Oncology oocyte cryopreservation Preservation Retrospective Studies Survival survivorship treatment outcomes Young Adult |
title | The impact of fertility preservation on the timing of breast cancer treatment, recurrence, and survival |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A37%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20fertility%20preservation%20on%20the%20timing%20of%20breast%20cancer%20treatment,%20recurrence,%20and%20survival&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Greer,%20Anna%20C.&rft.date=2021-10-15&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=3872&rft.epage=3880&rft.pages=3872-3880&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.33601&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2576678592%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576678592&rft_id=info:pmid/34161610&rfr_iscdi=true |