A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Pain Assessment and Management Program for Respite Workers Supporting Children with Disabilities Part One: Pain-Related Knowledge and Perceptions
This parallel group randomized controlled trial tested effectiveness of the Let's Talk About Pain training on respite workers' (RW) pain-related knowledge and feasibility-confidence-skill ratings using between-group and within-group analyses. Fourteen children's respite organizations...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities 2021-07, Vol.126 (4), p.271-288 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 288 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 271 |
| container_title | American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities |
| container_volume | 126 |
| creator | Genik, Lara M Aerts, Elisabeth L Barata, Paula C Barney, Chantel C Lewis, Stephen P Newby-Clark, Ian McMurtry, C. Meghan |
| description | This parallel group randomized controlled trial tested effectiveness of the Let's Talk About Pain training on respite workers' (RW) pain-related knowledge and feasibility-confidence-skill ratings using between-group and within-group analyses. Fourteen children's respite organizations were randomized to pain or control training. Participants (n[subscript intervention] = 66; n[subscript control] = 92) underwent a 3--3.5 hour training and completed measures at pre-, post-, and 4--6 week follow-up. Intention-to-treat (n[subscript intervention] = 65; n[subscript control] = 92) and per-protocol (n[subscript intervention] = 26--38; n[subscript control] = 40--57) analyses were conducted. Pain training participants demonstrated significantly higher pain knowledge and feasibility-confidence-skill ratings post-follow-up versus control group and significant increases in knowledge from pre-post. Significant gains were maintained from post-follow-up. Results represent a promising step towards enhancing pain-related care for children with IDD. [For Part Two, see EJ1304421.] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1352/1944-7558-126.4.271 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544879510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1304420</ericid><sourcerecordid>2544879510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-695e1be93bdadb0b5078472c9144e81fa372daa6b43e4c9644e9859ad07849c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhSMEEqXwCxCSJS5cssSxncTcVtuFFoq6Woo4WpNkduvi2MF2qOC38ePwZtEeOHk8-t68J70se0mLBWWifEsl53ktRJPTslrwRVnTR9nZafv4NFPxNHsWwn1RVIzL6iz7syRbsL0b9G_sycrZ6J0xabz1GgxZ_wQzQdR2T4BsQFuyDAFDGNBGknTkM1jY4_zdeLf3MJCd82SLYdQRyTfnv6MP5Ms0js7Pd1Z32vQeLXnQ8Y5c6ACtNjpqDMnAR3Jj8d1slW_RQExRPln3kCLtcXbcoO9wjNrZ8Dx7sgMT8MW_9zz7-n59u7rMr28-XK2W13nHWBnzSgqkLUrW9tC3RSuKuuF12UnKOTZ0B6wue4Cq5Qx5J6u0lY2Q0B842dXsPHtzvDt692PCENWgQ4fGgEU3BVUKzptaClok9PV_6L2bvE3pZorVyVMkih2pzrsQPO7U6PUA_peihTo0qg59qUN3KjWquEqNJtWrowq97k6K9UfKCs7Lgv0F2dyf4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544371445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Pain Assessment and Management Program for Respite Workers Supporting Children with Disabilities Part One: Pain-Related Knowledge and Perceptions</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Genik, Lara M ; Aerts, Elisabeth L ; Barata, Paula C ; Barney, Chantel C ; Lewis, Stephen P ; Newby-Clark, Ian ; McMurtry, C. Meghan</creator><creatorcontrib>Genik, Lara M ; Aerts, Elisabeth L ; Barata, Paula C ; Barney, Chantel C ; Lewis, Stephen P ; Newby-Clark, Ian ; McMurtry, C. Meghan</creatorcontrib><description>This parallel group randomized controlled trial tested effectiveness of the Let's Talk About Pain training on respite workers' (RW) pain-related knowledge and feasibility-confidence-skill ratings using between-group and within-group analyses. Fourteen children's respite organizations were randomized to pain or control training. Participants (n[subscript intervention] = 66; n[subscript control] = 92) underwent a 3--3.5 hour training and completed measures at pre-, post-, and 4--6 week follow-up. Intention-to-treat (n[subscript intervention] = 65; n[subscript control] = 92) and per-protocol (n[subscript intervention] = 26--38; n[subscript control] = 40--57) analyses were conducted. Pain training participants demonstrated significantly higher pain knowledge and feasibility-confidence-skill ratings post-follow-up versus control group and significant increases in knowledge from pre-post. Significant gains were maintained from post-follow-up. Results represent a promising step towards enhancing pain-related care for children with IDD. [For Part Two, see EJ1304421.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-7515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7558</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-126.4.271</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities</publisher><subject>Caregiver Training ; Case Studies ; Check Lists ; Children ; Children & youth ; Children with disabilities ; Clinical trials ; Communication Skills ; Daily Living Skills ; Developmental Disabilities ; Effect Size ; Feasibility ; Intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability ; Interpersonal Competence ; Intervention ; Knowledge ; Knowledge Level ; Literature Reviews ; Managerial Occupations ; Opportunities ; Outcomes of Education ; Pain ; Pain management ; Program Effectiveness ; Randomized Controlled Trials ; Recruitment ; Research Assistants ; Respite Care ; Self Efficacy ; Skills ; Support personnel ; Training ; Workers</subject><ispartof>American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2021-07, Vol.126 (4), p.271-288</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Association of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities Jul 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-695e1be93bdadb0b5078472c9144e81fa372daa6b43e4c9644e9859ad07849c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-695e1be93bdadb0b5078472c9144e81fa372daa6b43e4c9644e9859ad07849c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1304420$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Genik, Lara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aerts, Elisabeth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barata, Paula C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barney, Chantel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Stephen P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newby-Clark, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMurtry, C. Meghan</creatorcontrib><title>A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Pain Assessment and Management Program for Respite Workers Supporting Children with Disabilities Part One: Pain-Related Knowledge and Perceptions</title><title>American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities</title><description>This parallel group randomized controlled trial tested effectiveness of the Let's Talk About Pain training on respite workers' (RW) pain-related knowledge and feasibility-confidence-skill ratings using between-group and within-group analyses. Fourteen children's respite organizations were randomized to pain or control training. Participants (n[subscript intervention] = 66; n[subscript control] = 92) underwent a 3--3.5 hour training and completed measures at pre-, post-, and 4--6 week follow-up. Intention-to-treat (n[subscript intervention] = 65; n[subscript control] = 92) and per-protocol (n[subscript intervention] = 26--38; n[subscript control] = 40--57) analyses were conducted. Pain training participants demonstrated significantly higher pain knowledge and feasibility-confidence-skill ratings post-follow-up versus control group and significant increases in knowledge from pre-post. Significant gains were maintained from post-follow-up. Results represent a promising step towards enhancing pain-related care for children with IDD. [For Part Two, see EJ1304421.]</description><subject>Caregiver Training</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Check Lists</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Children with disabilities</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Daily Living Skills</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Managerial Occupations</subject><subject>Opportunities</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Research Assistants</subject><subject>Respite Care</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Support personnel</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>1944-7515</issn><issn>1944-7558</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhSMEEqXwCxCSJS5cssSxncTcVtuFFoq6Woo4WpNkduvi2MF2qOC38ePwZtEeOHk8-t68J70se0mLBWWifEsl53ktRJPTslrwRVnTR9nZafv4NFPxNHsWwn1RVIzL6iz7syRbsL0b9G_sycrZ6J0xabz1GgxZ_wQzQdR2T4BsQFuyDAFDGNBGknTkM1jY4_zdeLf3MJCd82SLYdQRyTfnv6MP5Ms0js7Pd1Z32vQeLXnQ8Y5c6ACtNjpqDMnAR3Jj8d1slW_RQExRPln3kCLtcXbcoO9wjNrZ8Dx7sgMT8MW_9zz7-n59u7rMr28-XK2W13nHWBnzSgqkLUrW9tC3RSuKuuF12UnKOTZ0B6wue4Cq5Qx5J6u0lY2Q0B842dXsPHtzvDt692PCENWgQ4fGgEU3BVUKzptaClok9PV_6L2bvE3pZorVyVMkih2pzrsQPO7U6PUA_peihTo0qg59qUN3KjWquEqNJtWrowq97k6K9UfKCs7Lgv0F2dyf4Q</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Genik, Lara M</creator><creator>Aerts, Elisabeth L</creator><creator>Barata, Paula C</creator><creator>Barney, Chantel C</creator><creator>Lewis, Stephen P</creator><creator>Newby-Clark, Ian</creator><creator>McMurtry, C. Meghan</creator><general>American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities</general><general>American Association of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Pain Assessment and Management Program for Respite Workers Supporting Children with Disabilities Part One: Pain-Related Knowledge and Perceptions</title><author>Genik, Lara M ; Aerts, Elisabeth L ; Barata, Paula C ; Barney, Chantel C ; Lewis, Stephen P ; Newby-Clark, Ian ; McMurtry, C. Meghan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-695e1be93bdadb0b5078472c9144e81fa372daa6b43e4c9644e9859ad07849c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Caregiver Training</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Check Lists</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Children with disabilities</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Daily Living Skills</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Managerial Occupations</topic><topic>Opportunities</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Research Assistants</topic><topic>Respite Care</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Support personnel</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Genik, Lara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aerts, Elisabeth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barata, Paula C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barney, Chantel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Stephen P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newby-Clark, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMurtry, C. Meghan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Genik, Lara M</au><au>Aerts, Elisabeth L</au><au>Barata, Paula C</au><au>Barney, Chantel C</au><au>Lewis, Stephen P</au><au>Newby-Clark, Ian</au><au>McMurtry, C. Meghan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1304420</ericid><atitle>A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Pain Assessment and Management Program for Respite Workers Supporting Children with Disabilities Part One: Pain-Related Knowledge and Perceptions</atitle><jtitle>American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>271-288</pages><issn>1944-7515</issn><eissn>1944-7558</eissn><abstract>This parallel group randomized controlled trial tested effectiveness of the Let's Talk About Pain training on respite workers' (RW) pain-related knowledge and feasibility-confidence-skill ratings using between-group and within-group analyses. Fourteen children's respite organizations were randomized to pain or control training. Participants (n[subscript intervention] = 66; n[subscript control] = 92) underwent a 3--3.5 hour training and completed measures at pre-, post-, and 4--6 week follow-up. Intention-to-treat (n[subscript intervention] = 65; n[subscript control] = 92) and per-protocol (n[subscript intervention] = 26--38; n[subscript control] = 40--57) analyses were conducted. Pain training participants demonstrated significantly higher pain knowledge and feasibility-confidence-skill ratings post-follow-up versus control group and significant increases in knowledge from pre-post. Significant gains were maintained from post-follow-up. Results represent a promising step towards enhancing pain-related care for children with IDD. [For Part Two, see EJ1304421.]</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities</pub><doi>10.1352/1944-7558-126.4.271</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1944-7515 |
| ispartof | American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2021-07, Vol.126 (4), p.271-288 |
| issn | 1944-7515 1944-7558 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544879510 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source |
| subjects | Caregiver Training Case Studies Check Lists Children Children & youth Children with disabilities Clinical trials Communication Skills Daily Living Skills Developmental Disabilities Effect Size Feasibility Intellectual disabilities Intellectual Disability Interpersonal Competence Intervention Knowledge Knowledge Level Literature Reviews Managerial Occupations Opportunities Outcomes of Education Pain Pain management Program Effectiveness Randomized Controlled Trials Recruitment Research Assistants Respite Care Self Efficacy Skills Support personnel Training Workers |
| title | A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Pain Assessment and Management Program for Respite Workers Supporting Children with Disabilities Part One: Pain-Related Knowledge and Perceptions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T01%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial%20Evaluating%20a%20Pain%20Assessment%20and%20Management%20Program%20for%20Respite%20Workers%20Supporting%20Children%20with%20Disabilities%20Part%20One:%20Pain-Related%20Knowledge%20and%20Perceptions&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20on%20intellectual%20and%20developmental%20disabilities&rft.au=Genik,%20Lara%20M&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=271-288&rft.issn=1944-7515&rft.eissn=1944-7558&rft_id=info:doi/10.1352/1944-7558-126.4.271&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544879510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544371445&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1304420&rfr_iscdi=true |