Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial

Background and purpose Senna laxatives are commonly used for bowel preparation before colonoscopies in Japan. However, this laxative frequently causes complications such as abdominal pain. This study aimed to establish a novel method of bowel preparation, which involved the pre-administration of sup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3141-3151
Hauptverfasser: Ishibashi, Fumiaki, Tanaka, Ryu, Sugihara, Kazuaki, Konda, Kenichi, Sato, Ayako, Kawakami, Tomohiro, Kobayashi, Konomi, Baba, Satoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3151
container_issue 5
container_start_page 3141
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 36
creator Ishibashi, Fumiaki
Tanaka, Ryu
Sugihara, Kazuaki
Konda, Kenichi
Sato, Ayako
Kawakami, Tomohiro
Kobayashi, Konomi
Baba, Satoshi
description Background and purpose Senna laxatives are commonly used for bowel preparation before colonoscopies in Japan. However, this laxative frequently causes complications such as abdominal pain. This study aimed to establish a novel method of bowel preparation, which involved the pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) for three days followed by the same-day administration of low volume PEG. Methods This study was a prospective, multicenter, investigator-blinded, phase 2, randomized control trial. The intake of 13.9 g (120 mL) of PEG or 1 g of a senna laxative for 3 days before the examination was indicated for each group, and 2 L of PEG solution was used for preparation on the examination day. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of bowel cleansing, as assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale. The secondary endpoints were the adenoma detection rate and occurrence of complications. Results A total of 250 patients were initially enrolled. A total of 122 patients from each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the responder rates were the same for the two groups (56.6% vs 50.8%). Additionally, the adenoma detection rate did not differ between the two groups (34.9% vs 41.8%, P  = 0.3795). In contrast, adherence was higher in the PEG group (93.4% vs 82.8%, P  = 0.0101), and the occurrence of complications was lower in the PEG group (1.7% vs 16.4%, P  = 0.0001). Conclusion The novel super-low volume PEG method for bowel preparation was as effective as the conventional method with senna laxatives.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544462294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2544462294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-112643431e33654ce31d60b6c95b14e61bd4d7c773ce1b07cc5e86356a1c97fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERW8vvAALZIkNG1P_54YdqoAiVWoXsLYcZ9K6cuxgJy3hiXhMXO4tSCxYjcfznTMjHYReMvqWUdqcFkqlloRyRuhOs4aoJ2jDpOCEc7Z7ija0FZTwppXH6KSUW1r5lqln6FhIplqp6Qb9vMpAbD_66Muc7exTxGnAZZkgk5Du8V0Kywh4SmGF-WYNEAFfh9WlgH3BtmAYBnCzv4OHpkCMFgf73T7-dOkeAp4yTPZgP6SMqzzFVFya1nfY4mxjn0b_A_o6iXNOIdTndGMLYI7n7G14jo4GGwq8ONQt-vrxw5ezc3Jx-enz2fsL4kSjZsIY11JIwUAIraQDwXpNO-1a1TEJmnW97BvXNMIB62jjnIKdFkpb5tpmsGKL3ux9p5y-LVBmM_riIAQbIS3FcCWl1Jy3sqKv_0Fv05Jjvc7UI1omW173bBHfUy6nUjIMZsp-tHk1jJqHHM0-R1NzNL9zNKqKXh2sl26E_o_kMbgKiD1Q6iheQ_67-z-2vwCQaatw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649149277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Tanaka, Ryu ; Sugihara, Kazuaki ; Konda, Kenichi ; Sato, Ayako ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Baba, Satoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Tanaka, Ryu ; Sugihara, Kazuaki ; Konda, Kenichi ; Sato, Ayako ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Baba, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><description>Background and purpose Senna laxatives are commonly used for bowel preparation before colonoscopies in Japan. However, this laxative frequently causes complications such as abdominal pain. This study aimed to establish a novel method of bowel preparation, which involved the pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) for three days followed by the same-day administration of low volume PEG. Methods This study was a prospective, multicenter, investigator-blinded, phase 2, randomized control trial. The intake of 13.9 g (120 mL) of PEG or 1 g of a senna laxative for 3 days before the examination was indicated for each group, and 2 L of PEG solution was used for preparation on the examination day. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of bowel cleansing, as assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale. The secondary endpoints were the adenoma detection rate and occurrence of complications. Results A total of 250 patients were initially enrolled. A total of 122 patients from each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the responder rates were the same for the two groups (56.6% vs 50.8%). Additionally, the adenoma detection rate did not differ between the two groups (34.9% vs 41.8%, P  = 0.3795). In contrast, adherence was higher in the PEG group (93.4% vs 82.8%, P  = 0.0101), and the occurrence of complications was lower in the PEG group (1.7% vs 16.4%, P  = 0.0001). Conclusion The novel super-low volume PEG method for bowel preparation was as effective as the conventional method with senna laxatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34159460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adenoma ; Cathartics ; Colonoscopy ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Endoscopy ; Enrollments ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Laxatives ; Laxatives - therapeutic use ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Polyethylene glycol ; Polyethylene Glycols ; Proctology ; Prospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surveillance ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3141-3151</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-112643431e33654ce31d60b6c95b14e61bd4d7c773ce1b07cc5e86356a1c97fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-112643431e33654ce31d60b6c95b14e61bd4d7c773ce1b07cc5e86356a1c97fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4065-7958</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159460$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Ryu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugihara, Kazuaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konda, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Konomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baba, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background and purpose Senna laxatives are commonly used for bowel preparation before colonoscopies in Japan. However, this laxative frequently causes complications such as abdominal pain. This study aimed to establish a novel method of bowel preparation, which involved the pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) for three days followed by the same-day administration of low volume PEG. Methods This study was a prospective, multicenter, investigator-blinded, phase 2, randomized control trial. The intake of 13.9 g (120 mL) of PEG or 1 g of a senna laxative for 3 days before the examination was indicated for each group, and 2 L of PEG solution was used for preparation on the examination day. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of bowel cleansing, as assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale. The secondary endpoints were the adenoma detection rate and occurrence of complications. Results A total of 250 patients were initially enrolled. A total of 122 patients from each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the responder rates were the same for the two groups (56.6% vs 50.8%). Additionally, the adenoma detection rate did not differ between the two groups (34.9% vs 41.8%, P  = 0.3795). In contrast, adherence was higher in the PEG group (93.4% vs 82.8%, P  = 0.0101), and the occurrence of complications was lower in the PEG group (1.7% vs 16.4%, P  = 0.0001). Conclusion The novel super-low volume PEG method for bowel preparation was as effective as the conventional method with senna laxatives.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adenoma</subject><subject>Cathartics</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laxatives</subject><subject>Laxatives - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Polyethylene glycol</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERW8vvAALZIkNG1P_54YdqoAiVWoXsLYcZ9K6cuxgJy3hiXhMXO4tSCxYjcfznTMjHYReMvqWUdqcFkqlloRyRuhOs4aoJ2jDpOCEc7Z7ija0FZTwppXH6KSUW1r5lqln6FhIplqp6Qb9vMpAbD_66Muc7exTxGnAZZkgk5Du8V0Kywh4SmGF-WYNEAFfh9WlgH3BtmAYBnCzv4OHpkCMFgf73T7-dOkeAp4yTPZgP6SMqzzFVFya1nfY4mxjn0b_A_o6iXNOIdTndGMLYI7n7G14jo4GGwq8ONQt-vrxw5ezc3Jx-enz2fsL4kSjZsIY11JIwUAIraQDwXpNO-1a1TEJmnW97BvXNMIB62jjnIKdFkpb5tpmsGKL3ux9p5y-LVBmM_riIAQbIS3FcCWl1Jy3sqKv_0Fv05Jjvc7UI1omW173bBHfUy6nUjIMZsp-tHk1jJqHHM0-R1NzNL9zNKqKXh2sl26E_o_kMbgKiD1Q6iheQ_67-z-2vwCQaatw</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creator><creator>Tanaka, Ryu</creator><creator>Sugihara, Kazuaki</creator><creator>Konda, Kenichi</creator><creator>Sato, Ayako</creator><creator>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Konomi</creator><creator>Baba, Satoshi</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-7958</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial</title><author>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Tanaka, Ryu ; Sugihara, Kazuaki ; Konda, Kenichi ; Sato, Ayako ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Baba, Satoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-112643431e33654ce31d60b6c95b14e61bd4d7c773ce1b07cc5e86356a1c97fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adenoma</topic><topic>Cathartics</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laxatives</topic><topic>Laxatives - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Polyethylene glycol</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Ryu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugihara, Kazuaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konda, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Konomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baba, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</au><au>Tanaka, Ryu</au><au>Sugihara, Kazuaki</au><au>Konda, Kenichi</au><au>Sato, Ayako</au><au>Kawakami, Tomohiro</au><au>Kobayashi, Konomi</au><au>Baba, Satoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3141</spage><epage>3151</epage><pages>3141-3151</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background and purpose Senna laxatives are commonly used for bowel preparation before colonoscopies in Japan. However, this laxative frequently causes complications such as abdominal pain. This study aimed to establish a novel method of bowel preparation, which involved the pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) for three days followed by the same-day administration of low volume PEG. Methods This study was a prospective, multicenter, investigator-blinded, phase 2, randomized control trial. The intake of 13.9 g (120 mL) of PEG or 1 g of a senna laxative for 3 days before the examination was indicated for each group, and 2 L of PEG solution was used for preparation on the examination day. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of bowel cleansing, as assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale. The secondary endpoints were the adenoma detection rate and occurrence of complications. Results A total of 250 patients were initially enrolled. A total of 122 patients from each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the responder rates were the same for the two groups (56.6% vs 50.8%). Additionally, the adenoma detection rate did not differ between the two groups (34.9% vs 41.8%, P  = 0.3795). In contrast, adherence was higher in the PEG group (93.4% vs 82.8%, P  = 0.0101), and the occurrence of complications was lower in the PEG group (1.7% vs 16.4%, P  = 0.0001). Conclusion The novel super-low volume PEG method for bowel preparation was as effective as the conventional method with senna laxatives.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34159460</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-7958</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3141-3151
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544462294
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Adenoma
Cathartics
Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy - methods
Endoscopy
Enrollments
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Hepatology
Humans
Laxatives
Laxatives - therapeutic use
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Polyethylene glycol
Polyethylene Glycols
Proctology
Prospective Studies
Surgery
Surveillance
Tumors
title Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T19%3A13%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre-administration%20of%20super-low%20volume%20polyethylene%20glycol%20is%20as%20effective%20as%20senna%20laxative%20as%20bowel%20preparation%20for%20colonoscopy:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20phase%202%20trial&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Ishibashi,%20Fumiaki&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3141&rft.epage=3151&rft.pages=3141-3151&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544462294%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649149277&rft_id=info:pmid/34159460&rfr_iscdi=true