Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial
Background and purpose Senna laxatives are commonly used for bowel preparation before colonoscopies in Japan. However, this laxative frequently causes complications such as abdominal pain. This study aimed to establish a novel method of bowel preparation, which involved the pre-administration of sup...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3141-3151 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3151 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 3141 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Ishibashi, Fumiaki Tanaka, Ryu Sugihara, Kazuaki Konda, Kenichi Sato, Ayako Kawakami, Tomohiro Kobayashi, Konomi Baba, Satoshi |
description | Background and purpose
Senna laxatives are commonly used for bowel preparation before colonoscopies in Japan. However, this laxative frequently causes complications such as abdominal pain. This study aimed to establish a novel method of bowel preparation, which involved the pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) for three days followed by the same-day administration of low volume PEG.
Methods
This study was a prospective, multicenter, investigator-blinded, phase 2, randomized control trial. The intake of 13.9 g (120 mL) of PEG or 1 g of a senna laxative for 3 days before the examination was indicated for each group, and 2 L of PEG solution was used for preparation on the examination day. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of bowel cleansing, as assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale. The secondary endpoints were the adenoma detection rate and occurrence of complications.
Results
A total of 250 patients were initially enrolled. A total of 122 patients from each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the responder rates were the same for the two groups (56.6% vs 50.8%). Additionally, the adenoma detection rate did not differ between the two groups (34.9% vs 41.8%,
P
= 0.3795). In contrast, adherence was higher in the PEG group (93.4% vs 82.8%,
P
= 0.0101), and the occurrence of complications was lower in the PEG group (1.7% vs 16.4%,
P
= 0.0001).
Conclusion
The novel super-low volume PEG method for bowel preparation was as effective as the conventional method with senna laxatives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544462294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2544462294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-112643431e33654ce31d60b6c95b14e61bd4d7c773ce1b07cc5e86356a1c97fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERW8vvAALZIkNG1P_54YdqoAiVWoXsLYcZ9K6cuxgJy3hiXhMXO4tSCxYjcfznTMjHYReMvqWUdqcFkqlloRyRuhOs4aoJ2jDpOCEc7Z7ija0FZTwppXH6KSUW1r5lqln6FhIplqp6Qb9vMpAbD_66Muc7exTxGnAZZkgk5Du8V0Kywh4SmGF-WYNEAFfh9WlgH3BtmAYBnCzv4OHpkCMFgf73T7-dOkeAp4yTPZgP6SMqzzFVFya1nfY4mxjn0b_A_o6iXNOIdTndGMLYI7n7G14jo4GGwq8ONQt-vrxw5ezc3Jx-enz2fsL4kSjZsIY11JIwUAIraQDwXpNO-1a1TEJmnW97BvXNMIB62jjnIKdFkpb5tpmsGKL3ux9p5y-LVBmM_riIAQbIS3FcCWl1Jy3sqKv_0Fv05Jjvc7UI1omW173bBHfUy6nUjIMZsp-tHk1jJqHHM0-R1NzNL9zNKqKXh2sl26E_o_kMbgKiD1Q6iheQ_67-z-2vwCQaatw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649149277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Tanaka, Ryu ; Sugihara, Kazuaki ; Konda, Kenichi ; Sato, Ayako ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Baba, Satoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Tanaka, Ryu ; Sugihara, Kazuaki ; Konda, Kenichi ; Sato, Ayako ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Baba, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><description>Background and purpose
Senna laxatives are commonly used for bowel preparation before colonoscopies in Japan. However, this laxative frequently causes complications such as abdominal pain. This study aimed to establish a novel method of bowel preparation, which involved the pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) for three days followed by the same-day administration of low volume PEG.
Methods
This study was a prospective, multicenter, investigator-blinded, phase 2, randomized control trial. The intake of 13.9 g (120 mL) of PEG or 1 g of a senna laxative for 3 days before the examination was indicated for each group, and 2 L of PEG solution was used for preparation on the examination day. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of bowel cleansing, as assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale. The secondary endpoints were the adenoma detection rate and occurrence of complications.
Results
A total of 250 patients were initially enrolled. A total of 122 patients from each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the responder rates were the same for the two groups (56.6% vs 50.8%). Additionally, the adenoma detection rate did not differ between the two groups (34.9% vs 41.8%,
P
= 0.3795). In contrast, adherence was higher in the PEG group (93.4% vs 82.8%,
P
= 0.0101), and the occurrence of complications was lower in the PEG group (1.7% vs 16.4%,
P
= 0.0001).
Conclusion
The novel super-low volume PEG method for bowel preparation was as effective as the conventional method with senna laxatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34159460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adenoma ; Cathartics ; Colonoscopy ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Endoscopy ; Enrollments ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Laxatives ; Laxatives - therapeutic use ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Polyethylene glycol ; Polyethylene Glycols ; Proctology ; Prospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surveillance ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3141-3151</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-112643431e33654ce31d60b6c95b14e61bd4d7c773ce1b07cc5e86356a1c97fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-112643431e33654ce31d60b6c95b14e61bd4d7c773ce1b07cc5e86356a1c97fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4065-7958</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159460$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Ryu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugihara, Kazuaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konda, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Konomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baba, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background and purpose
Senna laxatives are commonly used for bowel preparation before colonoscopies in Japan. However, this laxative frequently causes complications such as abdominal pain. This study aimed to establish a novel method of bowel preparation, which involved the pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) for three days followed by the same-day administration of low volume PEG.
Methods
This study was a prospective, multicenter, investigator-blinded, phase 2, randomized control trial. The intake of 13.9 g (120 mL) of PEG or 1 g of a senna laxative for 3 days before the examination was indicated for each group, and 2 L of PEG solution was used for preparation on the examination day. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of bowel cleansing, as assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale. The secondary endpoints were the adenoma detection rate and occurrence of complications.
Results
A total of 250 patients were initially enrolled. A total of 122 patients from each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the responder rates were the same for the two groups (56.6% vs 50.8%). Additionally, the adenoma detection rate did not differ between the two groups (34.9% vs 41.8%,
P
= 0.3795). In contrast, adherence was higher in the PEG group (93.4% vs 82.8%,
P
= 0.0101), and the occurrence of complications was lower in the PEG group (1.7% vs 16.4%,
P
= 0.0001).
Conclusion
The novel super-low volume PEG method for bowel preparation was as effective as the conventional method with senna laxatives.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adenoma</subject><subject>Cathartics</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laxatives</subject><subject>Laxatives - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Polyethylene glycol</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERW8vvAALZIkNG1P_54YdqoAiVWoXsLYcZ9K6cuxgJy3hiXhMXO4tSCxYjcfznTMjHYReMvqWUdqcFkqlloRyRuhOs4aoJ2jDpOCEc7Z7ija0FZTwppXH6KSUW1r5lqln6FhIplqp6Qb9vMpAbD_66Muc7exTxGnAZZkgk5Du8V0Kywh4SmGF-WYNEAFfh9WlgH3BtmAYBnCzv4OHpkCMFgf73T7-dOkeAp4yTPZgP6SMqzzFVFya1nfY4mxjn0b_A_o6iXNOIdTndGMLYI7n7G14jo4GGwq8ONQt-vrxw5ezc3Jx-enz2fsL4kSjZsIY11JIwUAIraQDwXpNO-1a1TEJmnW97BvXNMIB62jjnIKdFkpb5tpmsGKL3ux9p5y-LVBmM_riIAQbIS3FcCWl1Jy3sqKv_0Fv05Jjvc7UI1omW173bBHfUy6nUjIMZsp-tHk1jJqHHM0-R1NzNL9zNKqKXh2sl26E_o_kMbgKiD1Q6iheQ_67-z-2vwCQaatw</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creator><creator>Tanaka, Ryu</creator><creator>Sugihara, Kazuaki</creator><creator>Konda, Kenichi</creator><creator>Sato, Ayako</creator><creator>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Konomi</creator><creator>Baba, Satoshi</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-7958</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial</title><author>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Tanaka, Ryu ; Sugihara, Kazuaki ; Konda, Kenichi ; Sato, Ayako ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Baba, Satoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-112643431e33654ce31d60b6c95b14e61bd4d7c773ce1b07cc5e86356a1c97fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adenoma</topic><topic>Cathartics</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laxatives</topic><topic>Laxatives - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Polyethylene glycol</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Ryu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugihara, Kazuaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konda, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Konomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baba, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</au><au>Tanaka, Ryu</au><au>Sugihara, Kazuaki</au><au>Konda, Kenichi</au><au>Sato, Ayako</au><au>Kawakami, Tomohiro</au><au>Kobayashi, Konomi</au><au>Baba, Satoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3141</spage><epage>3151</epage><pages>3141-3151</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background and purpose
Senna laxatives are commonly used for bowel preparation before colonoscopies in Japan. However, this laxative frequently causes complications such as abdominal pain. This study aimed to establish a novel method of bowel preparation, which involved the pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) for three days followed by the same-day administration of low volume PEG.
Methods
This study was a prospective, multicenter, investigator-blinded, phase 2, randomized control trial. The intake of 13.9 g (120 mL) of PEG or 1 g of a senna laxative for 3 days before the examination was indicated for each group, and 2 L of PEG solution was used for preparation on the examination day. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of bowel cleansing, as assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale. The secondary endpoints were the adenoma detection rate and occurrence of complications.
Results
A total of 250 patients were initially enrolled. A total of 122 patients from each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the responder rates were the same for the two groups (56.6% vs 50.8%). Additionally, the adenoma detection rate did not differ between the two groups (34.9% vs 41.8%,
P
= 0.3795). In contrast, adherence was higher in the PEG group (93.4% vs 82.8%,
P
= 0.0101), and the occurrence of complications was lower in the PEG group (1.7% vs 16.4%,
P
= 0.0001).
Conclusion
The novel super-low volume PEG method for bowel preparation was as effective as the conventional method with senna laxatives.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34159460</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-7958</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.3141-3151 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544462294 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Adenoma Cathartics Colonoscopy Colonoscopy - methods Endoscopy Enrollments Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Humans Laxatives Laxatives - therapeutic use Medicine Medicine & Public Health Polyethylene glycol Polyethylene Glycols Proctology Prospective Studies Surgery Surveillance Tumors |
title | Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T19%3A13%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre-administration%20of%20super-low%20volume%20polyethylene%20glycol%20is%20as%20effective%20as%20senna%20laxative%20as%20bowel%20preparation%20for%20colonoscopy:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20phase%202%20trial&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Ishibashi,%20Fumiaki&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3141&rft.epage=3151&rft.pages=3141-3151&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-021-08617-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544462294%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649149277&rft_id=info:pmid/34159460&rfr_iscdi=true |