Prognostic Role of FGFR Alterations and FGFR mRNA Expression in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Undergoing Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy
To examine the disease-specific survival(DSS) after checkpoint inhibitor(CPI) therapy based on FGFR alterations and FGFR mRNA expression levels in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer(mUCa) within a multi-center cohort. Within a cohort of 72 patients with mUCa from five academic centers in Ger...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2021-11, Vol.157, p.93-101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) |
container_volume | 157 |
creator | Tully, Karl H. Jütte, Hendrik Wirtz, Ralph M. Jarczyk, Jonas Santiago-Walker, Ademi Zengerling, Friedemann Breyer, Johannes Sikic, Danijel Kriegmair, Maximilian C. von Hardenberg, Jost Wullich, Bernd Taubert, Helge Weyerer, Veronika Stoehr, Robert Bolenz, Christian Burger, Maximilian Porubsky, Stefan Hartmann, Arndt Roghmann, Florian Erben, Philipp Eckstein, Markus |
description | To examine the disease-specific survival(DSS) after checkpoint inhibitor(CPI) therapy based on FGFR alterations and FGFR mRNA expression levels in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer(mUCa) within a multi-center cohort.
Within a cohort of 72 patients with mUCa from five academic centers in Germany FGFR alterations, as well as FGFR1-4 mRNA expression levels in tumor samples from the primary tumor or metastatic sites. Spearman rank correlations, logistic regression, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and univariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine the impact of different FGFR patterns on the DSS after CPI treatment.
FGFR3 mutations or gene fusions (gene alterations) were detected in 16.9% of all samples. Patients with or without FGFR3 gene alterations did not show different oncological outcomes undergoing CPI treatment.
Low expression of FGFR2 mRNA alone, as well as the combination of either low FGFR2mRNA expression and FGFR3 gene alteration or high FGFR3mRNA expression (P = 0.027), identified a subgroup of patients with unfavorable outcomes, comprising 40% of the total cohort. This trend was also observed in univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis(FGFR3 gene alteration: Hazard ratio(HR) 5.33, 95%Confidence interval(CI)1.76-15.0, P = 0.004; FGFR3mRNA expression:HR 3.04, 95%CI 1.40-7.13, P = 0.005).
Assessment of FGFR mRNA expression identified a high-risk subgroup of patients with mUCa. These patients showing overexpression of FGFR3 mRNA were found to have unfavorable DSS after CPI treatment. Using this approach may be suitable for identifying a patient population with poor response to CPI treatment, which may benefit from early FGFR inhibition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.055 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544164113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429521004854</els_id><sourcerecordid>2544164113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-729bfe36938621fb12badd448a2942feddbd7602621113212f0a4e4e9d1bd40c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcFqGzEQFaWhcZJ-QouOvawjaSVtdCrGxGkgbYKJz0Irzdpy16utJJf63g-vjN1eCwMzzLw3j5mH0AdKppRQebud7mPow_owZYTRKRElxBs0oYI1lVJKvEUTQhSpOFPiEl2ltCWESCmbd-iy5lTUtWwm6PdLDOshpOwtXoYecOjw4mGxxLM-QzTZhyFhM7hTc7f8NsP3v8YIKZUJ9gP-CtmkbI78VQx5A703PZ6bwULEq8FBXAc_rPF8A_b7WMqMH4eNb30OEb9uisZ4uEEXnekTvD_na7Ra3L_Ov1RPzw-P89lTZWspctUw1XZQS1XfSUa7lrLWOMf5nWGKsw6ca10jCStDSmtGWUcMBw7K0dZxYutr9Om0d4zhxx5S1jufLPS9GSDsk2aCcyp5IReoOEFtDClF6PQY_c7Eg6ZEHw3QW302QB8N0ESUEIX38Syxb3fg_rH-frwAPp8AUA796SHqZD2UbzkfwWbtgv-PxB_J6ZsO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544164113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic Role of FGFR Alterations and FGFR mRNA Expression in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Undergoing Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Tully, Karl H. ; Jütte, Hendrik ; Wirtz, Ralph M. ; Jarczyk, Jonas ; Santiago-Walker, Ademi ; Zengerling, Friedemann ; Breyer, Johannes ; Sikic, Danijel ; Kriegmair, Maximilian C. ; von Hardenberg, Jost ; Wullich, Bernd ; Taubert, Helge ; Weyerer, Veronika ; Stoehr, Robert ; Bolenz, Christian ; Burger, Maximilian ; Porubsky, Stefan ; Hartmann, Arndt ; Roghmann, Florian ; Erben, Philipp ; Eckstein, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Tully, Karl H. ; Jütte, Hendrik ; Wirtz, Ralph M. ; Jarczyk, Jonas ; Santiago-Walker, Ademi ; Zengerling, Friedemann ; Breyer, Johannes ; Sikic, Danijel ; Kriegmair, Maximilian C. ; von Hardenberg, Jost ; Wullich, Bernd ; Taubert, Helge ; Weyerer, Veronika ; Stoehr, Robert ; Bolenz, Christian ; Burger, Maximilian ; Porubsky, Stefan ; Hartmann, Arndt ; Roghmann, Florian ; Erben, Philipp ; Eckstein, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the disease-specific survival(DSS) after checkpoint inhibitor(CPI) therapy based on FGFR alterations and FGFR mRNA expression levels in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer(mUCa) within a multi-center cohort.
Within a cohort of 72 patients with mUCa from five academic centers in Germany FGFR alterations, as well as FGFR1-4 mRNA expression levels in tumor samples from the primary tumor or metastatic sites. Spearman rank correlations, logistic regression, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and univariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine the impact of different FGFR patterns on the DSS after CPI treatment.
FGFR3 mutations or gene fusions (gene alterations) were detected in 16.9% of all samples. Patients with or without FGFR3 gene alterations did not show different oncological outcomes undergoing CPI treatment.
Low expression of FGFR2 mRNA alone, as well as the combination of either low FGFR2mRNA expression and FGFR3 gene alteration or high FGFR3mRNA expression (P = 0.027), identified a subgroup of patients with unfavorable outcomes, comprising 40% of the total cohort. This trend was also observed in univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis(FGFR3 gene alteration: Hazard ratio(HR) 5.33, 95%Confidence interval(CI)1.76-15.0, P = 0.004; FGFR3mRNA expression:HR 3.04, 95%CI 1.40-7.13, P = 0.005).
Assessment of FGFR mRNA expression identified a high-risk subgroup of patients with mUCa. These patients showing overexpression of FGFR3 mRNA were found to have unfavorable DSS after CPI treatment. Using this approach may be suitable for identifying a patient population with poor response to CPI treatment, which may benefit from early FGFR inhibition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34153367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - secondary ; Female ; Gene Expression ; Gene Fusion ; Humans ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Mutation ; Nivolumab - therapeutic use ; Pilot Projects ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1 - genetics ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1 - metabolism ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2 - genetics ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2 - metabolism ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3 - genetics ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3 - metabolism ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4 - genetics ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4 - metabolism ; Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor - genetics ; Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor - metabolism ; RNA, Messenger - metabolism ; Survival Rate ; Urologic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Urologic Neoplasms - genetics ; Urologic Neoplasms - metabolism ; Urologic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2021-11, Vol.157, p.93-101</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-729bfe36938621fb12badd448a2942feddbd7602621113212f0a4e4e9d1bd40c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-729bfe36938621fb12badd448a2942feddbd7602621113212f0a4e4e9d1bd40c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34153367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tully, Karl H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jütte, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Ralph M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarczyk, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiago-Walker, Ademi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zengerling, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breyer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikic, Danijel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriegmair, Maximilian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Hardenberg, Jost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wullich, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taubert, Helge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weyerer, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoehr, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolenz, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porubsky, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roghmann, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erben, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckstein, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic Role of FGFR Alterations and FGFR mRNA Expression in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Undergoing Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>To examine the disease-specific survival(DSS) after checkpoint inhibitor(CPI) therapy based on FGFR alterations and FGFR mRNA expression levels in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer(mUCa) within a multi-center cohort.
Within a cohort of 72 patients with mUCa from five academic centers in Germany FGFR alterations, as well as FGFR1-4 mRNA expression levels in tumor samples from the primary tumor or metastatic sites. Spearman rank correlations, logistic regression, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and univariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine the impact of different FGFR patterns on the DSS after CPI treatment.
FGFR3 mutations or gene fusions (gene alterations) were detected in 16.9% of all samples. Patients with or without FGFR3 gene alterations did not show different oncological outcomes undergoing CPI treatment.
Low expression of FGFR2 mRNA alone, as well as the combination of either low FGFR2mRNA expression and FGFR3 gene alteration or high FGFR3mRNA expression (P = 0.027), identified a subgroup of patients with unfavorable outcomes, comprising 40% of the total cohort. This trend was also observed in univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis(FGFR3 gene alteration: Hazard ratio(HR) 5.33, 95%Confidence interval(CI)1.76-15.0, P = 0.004; FGFR3mRNA expression:HR 3.04, 95%CI 1.40-7.13, P = 0.005).
Assessment of FGFR mRNA expression identified a high-risk subgroup of patients with mUCa. These patients showing overexpression of FGFR3 mRNA were found to have unfavorable DSS after CPI treatment. Using this approach may be suitable for identifying a patient population with poor response to CPI treatment, which may benefit from early FGFR inhibition.</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Gene Fusion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Nivolumab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1 - genetics</subject><subject>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1 - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2 - genetics</subject><subject>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3 - genetics</subject><subject>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3 - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4 - genetics</subject><subject>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4 - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor - genetics</subject><subject>Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor - metabolism</subject><subject>RNA, Messenger - metabolism</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcFqGzEQFaWhcZJ-QouOvawjaSVtdCrGxGkgbYKJz0Irzdpy16utJJf63g-vjN1eCwMzzLw3j5mH0AdKppRQebud7mPow_owZYTRKRElxBs0oYI1lVJKvEUTQhSpOFPiEl2ltCWESCmbd-iy5lTUtWwm6PdLDOshpOwtXoYecOjw4mGxxLM-QzTZhyFhM7hTc7f8NsP3v8YIKZUJ9gP-CtmkbI78VQx5A703PZ6bwULEq8FBXAc_rPF8A_b7WMqMH4eNb30OEb9uisZ4uEEXnekTvD_na7Ra3L_Ov1RPzw-P89lTZWspctUw1XZQS1XfSUa7lrLWOMf5nWGKsw6ca10jCStDSmtGWUcMBw7K0dZxYutr9Om0d4zhxx5S1jufLPS9GSDsk2aCcyp5IReoOEFtDClF6PQY_c7Eg6ZEHw3QW302QB8N0ESUEIX38Syxb3fg_rH-frwAPp8AUA796SHqZD2UbzkfwWbtgv-PxB_J6ZsO</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Tully, Karl H.</creator><creator>Jütte, Hendrik</creator><creator>Wirtz, Ralph M.</creator><creator>Jarczyk, Jonas</creator><creator>Santiago-Walker, Ademi</creator><creator>Zengerling, Friedemann</creator><creator>Breyer, Johannes</creator><creator>Sikic, Danijel</creator><creator>Kriegmair, Maximilian C.</creator><creator>von Hardenberg, Jost</creator><creator>Wullich, Bernd</creator><creator>Taubert, Helge</creator><creator>Weyerer, Veronika</creator><creator>Stoehr, Robert</creator><creator>Bolenz, Christian</creator><creator>Burger, Maximilian</creator><creator>Porubsky, Stefan</creator><creator>Hartmann, Arndt</creator><creator>Roghmann, Florian</creator><creator>Erben, Philipp</creator><creator>Eckstein, Markus</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Prognostic Role of FGFR Alterations and FGFR mRNA Expression in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Undergoing Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy</title><author>Tully, Karl H. ; Jütte, Hendrik ; Wirtz, Ralph M. ; Jarczyk, Jonas ; Santiago-Walker, Ademi ; Zengerling, Friedemann ; Breyer, Johannes ; Sikic, Danijel ; Kriegmair, Maximilian C. ; von Hardenberg, Jost ; Wullich, Bernd ; Taubert, Helge ; Weyerer, Veronika ; Stoehr, Robert ; Bolenz, Christian ; Burger, Maximilian ; Porubsky, Stefan ; Hartmann, Arndt ; Roghmann, Florian ; Erben, Philipp ; Eckstein, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-729bfe36938621fb12badd448a2942feddbd7602621113212f0a4e4e9d1bd40c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Gene Fusion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Nivolumab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1 - genetics</topic><topic>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1 - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2 - genetics</topic><topic>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3 - genetics</topic><topic>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3 - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4 - genetics</topic><topic>Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4 - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor - genetics</topic><topic>Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor - metabolism</topic><topic>RNA, Messenger - metabolism</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tully, Karl H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jütte, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Ralph M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarczyk, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiago-Walker, Ademi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zengerling, Friedemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breyer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikic, Danijel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriegmair, Maximilian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Hardenberg, Jost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wullich, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taubert, Helge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weyerer, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoehr, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolenz, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porubsky, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Arndt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roghmann, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erben, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckstein, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tully, Karl H.</au><au>Jütte, Hendrik</au><au>Wirtz, Ralph M.</au><au>Jarczyk, Jonas</au><au>Santiago-Walker, Ademi</au><au>Zengerling, Friedemann</au><au>Breyer, Johannes</au><au>Sikic, Danijel</au><au>Kriegmair, Maximilian C.</au><au>von Hardenberg, Jost</au><au>Wullich, Bernd</au><au>Taubert, Helge</au><au>Weyerer, Veronika</au><au>Stoehr, Robert</au><au>Bolenz, Christian</au><au>Burger, Maximilian</au><au>Porubsky, Stefan</au><au>Hartmann, Arndt</au><au>Roghmann, Florian</au><au>Erben, Philipp</au><au>Eckstein, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic Role of FGFR Alterations and FGFR mRNA Expression in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Undergoing Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>157</volume><spage>93</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>93-101</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>To examine the disease-specific survival(DSS) after checkpoint inhibitor(CPI) therapy based on FGFR alterations and FGFR mRNA expression levels in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer(mUCa) within a multi-center cohort.
Within a cohort of 72 patients with mUCa from five academic centers in Germany FGFR alterations, as well as FGFR1-4 mRNA expression levels in tumor samples from the primary tumor or metastatic sites. Spearman rank correlations, logistic regression, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and univariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine the impact of different FGFR patterns on the DSS after CPI treatment.
FGFR3 mutations or gene fusions (gene alterations) were detected in 16.9% of all samples. Patients with or without FGFR3 gene alterations did not show different oncological outcomes undergoing CPI treatment.
Low expression of FGFR2 mRNA alone, as well as the combination of either low FGFR2mRNA expression and FGFR3 gene alteration or high FGFR3mRNA expression (P = 0.027), identified a subgroup of patients with unfavorable outcomes, comprising 40% of the total cohort. This trend was also observed in univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis(FGFR3 gene alteration: Hazard ratio(HR) 5.33, 95%Confidence interval(CI)1.76-15.0, P = 0.004; FGFR3mRNA expression:HR 3.04, 95%CI 1.40-7.13, P = 0.005).
Assessment of FGFR mRNA expression identified a high-risk subgroup of patients with mUCa. These patients showing overexpression of FGFR3 mRNA were found to have unfavorable DSS after CPI treatment. Using this approach may be suitable for identifying a patient population with poor response to CPI treatment, which may benefit from early FGFR inhibition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34153367</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.055</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-4295 |
ispartof | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2021-11, Vol.157, p.93-101 |
issn | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544164113 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - metabolism Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - secondary Female Gene Expression Gene Fusion Humans Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use Kaplan-Meier Estimate Male Mutation Nivolumab - therapeutic use Pilot Projects Prognosis Proportional Hazards Models Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1 - genetics Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1 - metabolism Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2 - genetics Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2 - metabolism Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3 - genetics Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3 - metabolism Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4 - genetics Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4 - metabolism Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor - genetics Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor - metabolism RNA, Messenger - metabolism Survival Rate Urologic Neoplasms - drug therapy Urologic Neoplasms - genetics Urologic Neoplasms - metabolism Urologic Neoplasms - pathology |
title | Prognostic Role of FGFR Alterations and FGFR mRNA Expression in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Undergoing Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A47%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20Role%20of%20FGFR%20Alterations%20and%20FGFR%20mRNA%20Expression%20in%20Metastatic%20Urothelial%20Cancer%20Undergoing%20Checkpoint%20Inhibitor%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Tully,%20Karl%20H.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=157&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=93-101&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544164113%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544164113&rft_id=info:pmid/34153367&rft_els_id=S0090429521004854&rfr_iscdi=true |