Strategies to improve viability of a circular carbon bioeconomy-A techno-economic review of microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation
•A circular carbon bioeconomy could significantly combat climate change.•Microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation are promising technologies.•Techno-economic critical review of 70 production routes for 11 products.•Microbial electrosynthesis should leverage existing technology such as electro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2021-08, Vol.201, p.117306-117306, Article 117306 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117306 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 117306 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 201 |
creator | Wood, Jamin C. Grové, Johannes Marcellin, Esteban Heffernan, James K. Hu, Shihu Yuan, Zhiguo Virdis, Bernardino |
description | •A circular carbon bioeconomy could significantly combat climate change.•Microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation are promising technologies.•Techno-economic critical review of 70 production routes for 11 products.•Microbial electrosynthesis should leverage existing technology such as electrolysis.•Biogas reforming is an immediate pathway to viability.
A circular carbon bioeconomy has potential to halt atmospheric accumulation of greenhouse gases causing climate change and sustainably produce chemical, agricultural and fuel products. Here, we report application of a simplified technoeconomic assessment to critically review two approaches in this space – microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation. For microbial electrosynthesis, decoupling of surface-dependant abiotic process for electron delivery from volume-dependant biotic carbon fixation, is shown as the only economically viable strategy to scale-up due to comparatively low biofilm electron consumption rate. This is effectively an electrolyser-assisted gas fermentation system. Targeting high-value products, such as protein for human food consumption is one of the few pathways forward for electrolyser-assisted gas fermentation. Alternatively, gas fermentation of reformed biogas presents an interesting and potentially more sustainable implementation pathway to improve economic viability of chemicals. This critical review suggests linking water treatment resource recovery with gas fermentation is attractive for bioplastics and butanol in terms of competitiveness and market demand.
[Display omitted] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117306 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544159526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135421005042</els_id><sourcerecordid>2544159526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-73e5aaba94f0f82a72b159a2d8b0a1f69f36b15e56b7764f9802bcae33025b393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KJDEUhcOgYOvMG7jIcjbVk7_62wyIqCMILnTW4SZ9o2mqEidJt_Qz-NKTply7utzDOQfOR8glZ2vOePdru36HkjCvBRN8zXkvWfeNrPjQj41QajghK8aUbLhs1Rk5z3nLGBNCjivy8VQSFHzxmGmJ1M9vKe6R7j0YP_lyoNFRoNYnu5sgUQvJxECNj2hjiPOhuaIF7WuIzSJ4SxPuPb4fg_VL0XiYKE5oS4r5EMorZp8phA19gUwdphlDgeJj-E5OHUwZf3zeC_L39ub5-k_z8Hh3f3310Fgp29L0ElsAA6NyzA0CemF4O4LYDIYBd93oZFcVbDvT951y48CEsYBSMtEaOcoL8nPprVv_7TAXPftscZogYNxlLVqlamMrumpVi7UOyTmh02_Jz5AOmjN9ZK-3emGvj-z1wr7Gfi8xrDMqjaSz9RgsbnyqIPQm-q8L_gPxJZKu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544159526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategies to improve viability of a circular carbon bioeconomy-A techno-economic review of microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wood, Jamin C. ; Grové, Johannes ; Marcellin, Esteban ; Heffernan, James K. ; Hu, Shihu ; Yuan, Zhiguo ; Virdis, Bernardino</creator><creatorcontrib>Wood, Jamin C. ; Grové, Johannes ; Marcellin, Esteban ; Heffernan, James K. ; Hu, Shihu ; Yuan, Zhiguo ; Virdis, Bernardino</creatorcontrib><description>•A circular carbon bioeconomy could significantly combat climate change.•Microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation are promising technologies.•Techno-economic critical review of 70 production routes for 11 products.•Microbial electrosynthesis should leverage existing technology such as electrolysis.•Biogas reforming is an immediate pathway to viability.
A circular carbon bioeconomy has potential to halt atmospheric accumulation of greenhouse gases causing climate change and sustainably produce chemical, agricultural and fuel products. Here, we report application of a simplified technoeconomic assessment to critically review two approaches in this space – microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation. For microbial electrosynthesis, decoupling of surface-dependant abiotic process for electron delivery from volume-dependant biotic carbon fixation, is shown as the only economically viable strategy to scale-up due to comparatively low biofilm electron consumption rate. This is effectively an electrolyser-assisted gas fermentation system. Targeting high-value products, such as protein for human food consumption is one of the few pathways forward for electrolyser-assisted gas fermentation. Alternatively, gas fermentation of reformed biogas presents an interesting and potentially more sustainable implementation pathway to improve economic viability of chemicals. This critical review suggests linking water treatment resource recovery with gas fermentation is attractive for bioplastics and butanol in terms of competitiveness and market demand.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biogas ; Carbon dioxide ; Circular economy ; Gas fermentation ; Microbial electrosynthesis ; Techno-economic analysis</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2021-08, Vol.201, p.117306-117306, Article 117306</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-73e5aaba94f0f82a72b159a2d8b0a1f69f36b15e56b7764f9802bcae33025b393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-73e5aaba94f0f82a72b159a2d8b0a1f69f36b15e56b7764f9802bcae33025b393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3561-6652 ; 0000-0002-6752-9043 ; 0000-0002-7566-1482 ; 0000-0003-3321-0787 ; 0000-0002-1858-8872</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wood, Jamin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grové, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcellin, Esteban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffernan, James K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Shihu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Zhiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virdis, Bernardino</creatorcontrib><title>Strategies to improve viability of a circular carbon bioeconomy-A techno-economic review of microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><description>•A circular carbon bioeconomy could significantly combat climate change.•Microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation are promising technologies.•Techno-economic critical review of 70 production routes for 11 products.•Microbial electrosynthesis should leverage existing technology such as electrolysis.•Biogas reforming is an immediate pathway to viability.
A circular carbon bioeconomy has potential to halt atmospheric accumulation of greenhouse gases causing climate change and sustainably produce chemical, agricultural and fuel products. Here, we report application of a simplified technoeconomic assessment to critically review two approaches in this space – microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation. For microbial electrosynthesis, decoupling of surface-dependant abiotic process for electron delivery from volume-dependant biotic carbon fixation, is shown as the only economically viable strategy to scale-up due to comparatively low biofilm electron consumption rate. This is effectively an electrolyser-assisted gas fermentation system. Targeting high-value products, such as protein for human food consumption is one of the few pathways forward for electrolyser-assisted gas fermentation. Alternatively, gas fermentation of reformed biogas presents an interesting and potentially more sustainable implementation pathway to improve economic viability of chemicals. This critical review suggests linking water treatment resource recovery with gas fermentation is attractive for bioplastics and butanol in terms of competitiveness and market demand.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Circular economy</subject><subject>Gas fermentation</subject><subject>Microbial electrosynthesis</subject><subject>Techno-economic analysis</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KJDEUhcOgYOvMG7jIcjbVk7_62wyIqCMILnTW4SZ9o2mqEidJt_Qz-NKTply7utzDOQfOR8glZ2vOePdru36HkjCvBRN8zXkvWfeNrPjQj41QajghK8aUbLhs1Rk5z3nLGBNCjivy8VQSFHzxmGmJ1M9vKe6R7j0YP_lyoNFRoNYnu5sgUQvJxECNj2hjiPOhuaIF7WuIzSJ4SxPuPb4fg_VL0XiYKE5oS4r5EMorZp8phA19gUwdphlDgeJj-E5OHUwZf3zeC_L39ub5-k_z8Hh3f3310Fgp29L0ElsAA6NyzA0CemF4O4LYDIYBd93oZFcVbDvT951y48CEsYBSMtEaOcoL8nPprVv_7TAXPftscZogYNxlLVqlamMrumpVi7UOyTmh02_Jz5AOmjN9ZK-3emGvj-z1wr7Gfi8xrDMqjaSz9RgsbnyqIPQm-q8L_gPxJZKu</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Wood, Jamin C.</creator><creator>Grové, Johannes</creator><creator>Marcellin, Esteban</creator><creator>Heffernan, James K.</creator><creator>Hu, Shihu</creator><creator>Yuan, Zhiguo</creator><creator>Virdis, Bernardino</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3561-6652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6752-9043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7566-1482</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3321-0787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1858-8872</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Strategies to improve viability of a circular carbon bioeconomy-A techno-economic review of microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation</title><author>Wood, Jamin C. ; Grové, Johannes ; Marcellin, Esteban ; Heffernan, James K. ; Hu, Shihu ; Yuan, Zhiguo ; Virdis, Bernardino</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-73e5aaba94f0f82a72b159a2d8b0a1f69f36b15e56b7764f9802bcae33025b393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Circular economy</topic><topic>Gas fermentation</topic><topic>Microbial electrosynthesis</topic><topic>Techno-economic analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wood, Jamin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grové, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcellin, Esteban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffernan, James K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Shihu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Zhiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virdis, Bernardino</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wood, Jamin C.</au><au>Grové, Johannes</au><au>Marcellin, Esteban</au><au>Heffernan, James K.</au><au>Hu, Shihu</au><au>Yuan, Zhiguo</au><au>Virdis, Bernardino</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategies to improve viability of a circular carbon bioeconomy-A techno-economic review of microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>201</volume><spage>117306</spage><epage>117306</epage><pages>117306-117306</pages><artnum>117306</artnum><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>•A circular carbon bioeconomy could significantly combat climate change.•Microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation are promising technologies.•Techno-economic critical review of 70 production routes for 11 products.•Microbial electrosynthesis should leverage existing technology such as electrolysis.•Biogas reforming is an immediate pathway to viability.
A circular carbon bioeconomy has potential to halt atmospheric accumulation of greenhouse gases causing climate change and sustainably produce chemical, agricultural and fuel products. Here, we report application of a simplified technoeconomic assessment to critically review two approaches in this space – microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation. For microbial electrosynthesis, decoupling of surface-dependant abiotic process for electron delivery from volume-dependant biotic carbon fixation, is shown as the only economically viable strategy to scale-up due to comparatively low biofilm electron consumption rate. This is effectively an electrolyser-assisted gas fermentation system. Targeting high-value products, such as protein for human food consumption is one of the few pathways forward for electrolyser-assisted gas fermentation. Alternatively, gas fermentation of reformed biogas presents an interesting and potentially more sustainable implementation pathway to improve economic viability of chemicals. This critical review suggests linking water treatment resource recovery with gas fermentation is attractive for bioplastics and butanol in terms of competitiveness and market demand.
[Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2021.117306</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3561-6652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6752-9043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7566-1482</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3321-0787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1858-8872</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2021-08, Vol.201, p.117306-117306, Article 117306 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544159526 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biogas Carbon dioxide Circular economy Gas fermentation Microbial electrosynthesis Techno-economic analysis |
title | Strategies to improve viability of a circular carbon bioeconomy-A techno-economic review of microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T04%3A29%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategies%20to%20improve%20viability%20of%20a%20circular%20carbon%20bioeconomy-A%20techno-economic%20review%20of%20microbial%20electrosynthesis%20and%20gas%20fermentation&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Wood,%20Jamin%20C.&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=201&rft.spage=117306&rft.epage=117306&rft.pages=117306-117306&rft.artnum=117306&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544159526%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544159526&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0043135421005042&rfr_iscdi=true |