Phenotyping spontaneous locomotor activity in inbred and outbred mouse strains by using Digital Ventilated Cages

Mouse strains differ markedly in all behaviors, independently of their genetic background. We undertook this study to disentangle the diurnal activity and feature key aspects of three non-genetically altered mouse strains widely used in research, C57BL/6NCrl (inbred), BALB/cAnNCrl (inbred) and CRL:C...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lab animal 2021-08, Vol.50 (8), p.215-223
Hauptverfasser: Fuochi, Sara, Rigamonti, Mara, Iannello, Fabio, Raspa, Marcello, Scavizzi, Ferdinando, de Girolamo, Paolo, D’Angelo, Livia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 223
container_issue 8
container_start_page 215
container_title Lab animal
container_volume 50
creator Fuochi, Sara
Rigamonti, Mara
Iannello, Fabio
Raspa, Marcello
Scavizzi, Ferdinando
de Girolamo, Paolo
D’Angelo, Livia
description Mouse strains differ markedly in all behaviors, independently of their genetic background. We undertook this study to disentangle the diurnal activity and feature key aspects of three non-genetically altered mouse strains widely used in research, C57BL/6NCrl (inbred), BALB/cAnNCrl (inbred) and CRL:CD1(ICR) (outbred). With this aim, we conducted a longitudinal analysis of the spontaneous locomotor activity of the mice during a 24-h period for 2 months, in two different periods of the year to reduce the seasonality effect. Mice (males and females) were group-housed in Digital Ventilated Cages (Tecniplast), mimicking standard housing conditions in research settings and avoiding the potential bias provided in terms of locomotor activity by single housing. The recorded locomotor activity was analyzed by relying on different and commonly used circadian metrics (i.e., day and night activity, diurnal activity, responses to lights-on and lights-off phases, acrophase and activity onset and regularity disruption index) to capture key behavioral responses for each strain. Our results clearly demonstrate significant differences in the circadian activity of the three selected strains, when comparing inbred versus outbred as well as inbred strains (C57BL/6NCrl versus BALB/cAnNCrl). Conversely, males and females of the same strain displayed similar motor phenotypes; significant differences were recorded only for C57BL/6NCrl and CRL:CD1(ICR) females, which displayed higher average locomotor activity from prepuberty to adulthood. All strain-specific differences were further confirmed by an unsupervised machine learning approach. Altogether, our data corroborate the concept that each strain behaves under characteristic patterns, which needs to be taken into consideration in the study design to ensure experimental reproducibility and comply with essential animal welfare principles. In this article, the authors compared 24-h spontaneous locomotor activity in three different mouse strains (two inbred strains and one outbred strain) over a period of 2 months by using an automated recording home-cage device. Analysis of different metrics revealed strain-specific spontaneous locomotor patterns.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41684-021-00793-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544158531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A669799872</galeid><sourcerecordid>A669799872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-6f5956e5769f3bc22b6a20573a229f56651f0cdd80345bab53bd3058258776b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtr3TAQhUVJoTdp_0BXgm66caPXSNYy3PQRCCSLtlsh27Kr4Cu5khy4_766cSDQRUAwYvjOYWYOQh8p-UIJby-zoLIVDWG0IURp3pA3aEdBtI0QCs7QjpDaVBzgHTrP-YEQTqkmO7Tc_3EhluPiw4TzEkOxwcU14zn28RBLTNj2xT_6csQ-1NclN2AbBhzX8vQ_VNrhXJL1IePuiNd88rr2ky92xr9dKH62pZJ7O7n8Hr0d7Zzdh-d6gX59-_pz_6O5vft-s7-6bXrBdGnkCBqkAyX1yLuesU5aRkBxy5geQUqgI-mHoSVcQGc74N3ACbQMWqVkx_kF-rz5Lin-XV0u5uBz7-Z5288wEIJCC5xW9NN_6ENcU6jTVQrqEYXg_IWa7OyMD2OsK_cnU3MlpVZat4pVim1Un2LOyY1mSf5g09FQYk5RmS0qU6MyT1EZUkV8E-UKh8mllwFeUf0Dv3iWIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555484433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phenotyping spontaneous locomotor activity in inbred and outbred mouse strains by using Digital Ventilated Cages</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Fuochi, Sara ; Rigamonti, Mara ; Iannello, Fabio ; Raspa, Marcello ; Scavizzi, Ferdinando ; de Girolamo, Paolo ; D’Angelo, Livia</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuochi, Sara ; Rigamonti, Mara ; Iannello, Fabio ; Raspa, Marcello ; Scavizzi, Ferdinando ; de Girolamo, Paolo ; D’Angelo, Livia</creatorcontrib><description>Mouse strains differ markedly in all behaviors, independently of their genetic background. We undertook this study to disentangle the diurnal activity and feature key aspects of three non-genetically altered mouse strains widely used in research, C57BL/6NCrl (inbred), BALB/cAnNCrl (inbred) and CRL:CD1(ICR) (outbred). With this aim, we conducted a longitudinal analysis of the spontaneous locomotor activity of the mice during a 24-h period for 2 months, in two different periods of the year to reduce the seasonality effect. Mice (males and females) were group-housed in Digital Ventilated Cages (Tecniplast), mimicking standard housing conditions in research settings and avoiding the potential bias provided in terms of locomotor activity by single housing. The recorded locomotor activity was analyzed by relying on different and commonly used circadian metrics (i.e., day and night activity, diurnal activity, responses to lights-on and lights-off phases, acrophase and activity onset and regularity disruption index) to capture key behavioral responses for each strain. Our results clearly demonstrate significant differences in the circadian activity of the three selected strains, when comparing inbred versus outbred as well as inbred strains (C57BL/6NCrl versus BALB/cAnNCrl). Conversely, males and females of the same strain displayed similar motor phenotypes; significant differences were recorded only for C57BL/6NCrl and CRL:CD1(ICR) females, which displayed higher average locomotor activity from prepuberty to adulthood. All strain-specific differences were further confirmed by an unsupervised machine learning approach. Altogether, our data corroborate the concept that each strain behaves under characteristic patterns, which needs to be taken into consideration in the study design to ensure experimental reproducibility and comply with essential animal welfare principles. In this article, the authors compared 24-h spontaneous locomotor activity in three different mouse strains (two inbred strains and one outbred strain) over a period of 2 months by using an automated recording home-cage device. Analysis of different metrics revealed strain-specific spontaneous locomotor patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-7355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-4475</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41684-021-00793-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>631/1647/2198/1760 ; 631/1647/48 ; Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animal Models ; Animal models in research ; Behavior ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Life Sciences ; Mice ; Phenotype ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><ispartof>Lab animal, 2021-08, Vol.50 (8), p.215-223</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-6f5956e5769f3bc22b6a20573a229f56651f0cdd80345bab53bd3058258776b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-6f5956e5769f3bc22b6a20573a229f56651f0cdd80345bab53bd3058258776b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3913-4458 ; 0000-0001-5050-642X ; 0000-0002-4483-6753</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41684-021-00793-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41684-021-00793-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuochi, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iannello, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raspa, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scavizzi, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Girolamo, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Angelo, Livia</creatorcontrib><title>Phenotyping spontaneous locomotor activity in inbred and outbred mouse strains by using Digital Ventilated Cages</title><title>Lab animal</title><addtitle>Lab Anim</addtitle><description>Mouse strains differ markedly in all behaviors, independently of their genetic background. We undertook this study to disentangle the diurnal activity and feature key aspects of three non-genetically altered mouse strains widely used in research, C57BL/6NCrl (inbred), BALB/cAnNCrl (inbred) and CRL:CD1(ICR) (outbred). With this aim, we conducted a longitudinal analysis of the spontaneous locomotor activity of the mice during a 24-h period for 2 months, in two different periods of the year to reduce the seasonality effect. Mice (males and females) were group-housed in Digital Ventilated Cages (Tecniplast), mimicking standard housing conditions in research settings and avoiding the potential bias provided in terms of locomotor activity by single housing. The recorded locomotor activity was analyzed by relying on different and commonly used circadian metrics (i.e., day and night activity, diurnal activity, responses to lights-on and lights-off phases, acrophase and activity onset and regularity disruption index) to capture key behavioral responses for each strain. Our results clearly demonstrate significant differences in the circadian activity of the three selected strains, when comparing inbred versus outbred as well as inbred strains (C57BL/6NCrl versus BALB/cAnNCrl). Conversely, males and females of the same strain displayed similar motor phenotypes; significant differences were recorded only for C57BL/6NCrl and CRL:CD1(ICR) females, which displayed higher average locomotor activity from prepuberty to adulthood. All strain-specific differences were further confirmed by an unsupervised machine learning approach. Altogether, our data corroborate the concept that each strain behaves under characteristic patterns, which needs to be taken into consideration in the study design to ensure experimental reproducibility and comply with essential animal welfare principles. In this article, the authors compared 24-h spontaneous locomotor activity in three different mouse strains (two inbred strains and one outbred strain) over a period of 2 months by using an automated recording home-cage device. Analysis of different metrics revealed strain-specific spontaneous locomotor patterns.</description><subject>631/1647/2198/1760</subject><subject>631/1647/48</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Models</subject><subject>Animal models in research</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><issn>0093-7355</issn><issn>1548-4475</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtr3TAQhUVJoTdp_0BXgm66caPXSNYy3PQRCCSLtlsh27Kr4Cu5khy4_766cSDQRUAwYvjOYWYOQh8p-UIJby-zoLIVDWG0IURp3pA3aEdBtI0QCs7QjpDaVBzgHTrP-YEQTqkmO7Tc_3EhluPiw4TzEkOxwcU14zn28RBLTNj2xT_6csQ-1NclN2AbBhzX8vQ_VNrhXJL1IePuiNd88rr2ky92xr9dKH62pZJ7O7n8Hr0d7Zzdh-d6gX59-_pz_6O5vft-s7-6bXrBdGnkCBqkAyX1yLuesU5aRkBxy5geQUqgI-mHoSVcQGc74N3ACbQMWqVkx_kF-rz5Lin-XV0u5uBz7-Z5288wEIJCC5xW9NN_6ENcU6jTVQrqEYXg_IWa7OyMD2OsK_cnU3MlpVZat4pVim1Un2LOyY1mSf5g09FQYk5RmS0qU6MyT1EZUkV8E-UKh8mllwFeUf0Dv3iWIQ</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Fuochi, Sara</creator><creator>Rigamonti, Mara</creator><creator>Iannello, Fabio</creator><creator>Raspa, Marcello</creator><creator>Scavizzi, Ferdinando</creator><creator>de Girolamo, Paolo</creator><creator>D’Angelo, Livia</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3913-4458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5050-642X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4483-6753</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Phenotyping spontaneous locomotor activity in inbred and outbred mouse strains by using Digital Ventilated Cages</title><author>Fuochi, Sara ; Rigamonti, Mara ; Iannello, Fabio ; Raspa, Marcello ; Scavizzi, Ferdinando ; de Girolamo, Paolo ; D’Angelo, Livia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-6f5956e5769f3bc22b6a20573a229f56651f0cdd80345bab53bd3058258776b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>631/1647/2198/1760</topic><topic>631/1647/48</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Models</topic><topic>Animal models in research</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuochi, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigamonti, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iannello, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raspa, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scavizzi, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Girolamo, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Angelo, Livia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lab animal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuochi, Sara</au><au>Rigamonti, Mara</au><au>Iannello, Fabio</au><au>Raspa, Marcello</au><au>Scavizzi, Ferdinando</au><au>de Girolamo, Paolo</au><au>D’Angelo, Livia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phenotyping spontaneous locomotor activity in inbred and outbred mouse strains by using Digital Ventilated Cages</atitle><jtitle>Lab animal</jtitle><stitle>Lab Anim</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>215-223</pages><issn>0093-7355</issn><eissn>1548-4475</eissn><abstract>Mouse strains differ markedly in all behaviors, independently of their genetic background. We undertook this study to disentangle the diurnal activity and feature key aspects of three non-genetically altered mouse strains widely used in research, C57BL/6NCrl (inbred), BALB/cAnNCrl (inbred) and CRL:CD1(ICR) (outbred). With this aim, we conducted a longitudinal analysis of the spontaneous locomotor activity of the mice during a 24-h period for 2 months, in two different periods of the year to reduce the seasonality effect. Mice (males and females) were group-housed in Digital Ventilated Cages (Tecniplast), mimicking standard housing conditions in research settings and avoiding the potential bias provided in terms of locomotor activity by single housing. The recorded locomotor activity was analyzed by relying on different and commonly used circadian metrics (i.e., day and night activity, diurnal activity, responses to lights-on and lights-off phases, acrophase and activity onset and regularity disruption index) to capture key behavioral responses for each strain. Our results clearly demonstrate significant differences in the circadian activity of the three selected strains, when comparing inbred versus outbred as well as inbred strains (C57BL/6NCrl versus BALB/cAnNCrl). Conversely, males and females of the same strain displayed similar motor phenotypes; significant differences were recorded only for C57BL/6NCrl and CRL:CD1(ICR) females, which displayed higher average locomotor activity from prepuberty to adulthood. All strain-specific differences were further confirmed by an unsupervised machine learning approach. Altogether, our data corroborate the concept that each strain behaves under characteristic patterns, which needs to be taken into consideration in the study design to ensure experimental reproducibility and comply with essential animal welfare principles. In this article, the authors compared 24-h spontaneous locomotor activity in three different mouse strains (two inbred strains and one outbred strain) over a period of 2 months by using an automated recording home-cage device. Analysis of different metrics revealed strain-specific spontaneous locomotor patterns.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><doi>10.1038/s41684-021-00793-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3913-4458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5050-642X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4483-6753</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-7355
ispartof Lab animal, 2021-08, Vol.50 (8), p.215-223
issn 0093-7355
1548-4475
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2544158531
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects 631/1647/2198/1760
631/1647/48
Analysis
Animal behavior
Animal Models
Animal models in research
Behavior
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Life Sciences
Mice
Phenotype
Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science
title Phenotyping spontaneous locomotor activity in inbred and outbred mouse strains by using Digital Ventilated Cages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A56%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phenotyping%20spontaneous%20locomotor%20activity%20in%20inbred%20and%20outbred%20mouse%20strains%20by%20using%20Digital%20Ventilated%20Cages&rft.jtitle=Lab%20animal&rft.au=Fuochi,%20Sara&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=215-223&rft.issn=0093-7355&rft.eissn=1548-4475&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41684-021-00793-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA669799872%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555484433&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A669799872&rfr_iscdi=true