Long-term functional outcomes after robot-assisted prostatectomy compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy: Results from a national retrospective cluster study
Despite multiple studies evaluating the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP), there is no definitive conclusion about the added value of RARP. A retrospective cluster study was conducted to evaluate long-term sexual and urinary functioning after RARP and Laparoscopic Radical...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of surgical oncology 2021-10, Vol.47 (10), p.2658-2666 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2666 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2658 |
| container_title | European journal of surgical oncology |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Lindenberg, Melanie (M.A.) Retèl, Valesca (V.P.) Kieffer, Jacobien (J.M.) Wijburg, Carl (C.) Fossion, Laurent (L.M.C.L) van der Poel, Henk (H.G.) van Harten, Wim (W.H.) |
| description | Despite multiple studies evaluating the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP), there is no definitive conclusion about the added value of RARP. A retrospective cluster study was conducted to evaluate long-term sexual and urinary functioning after RARP and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) based on real-world data from 12 Dutch hospitals.
Data was collected from patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2012. A mixed effect model was used to evaluate differences between groups on urinary and sexual functioning (EPIC-26). Additionally, a regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between these functional outcomes and, among others, hospital volume.
1370 (65.1%) patients participated, 907 underwent RARP and 463 LRP, with a median follow-up time of 7.08 years (SD = 0.98). The RARP group showed a statistically and clinically significant better urinary functioning compared to the LRP group (p = 0.002). RARP showed also a shorter procedure time (p= |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.006 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2543452104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0748798321005680</els_id><sourcerecordid>2543452104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-cf59a6fb6da5e441438179a85f3a9ddce7117fd0845c3e57016e0c768424673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuqFDEQhoMonvHoC7iQLN10m3SSTre4kYM3GBDUfcgkFcnQ3WlT6QPzLudhzTCj4MZVhcpXf11-Ql5y1nLG-zfHFo6Y2o51vGV9y1j_iOy4El3TcaUfkx3Tcmj0OIgb8gzxyBgbhR6fkhshuWR8GHfkYZ-Wn02BPNOwLa7EtNiJpq24NANSG-oXzemQSmMRIxbwdM0Jiy3gSppPtIKrzTVdEp1sfSZ0aY3uX-wt_Qa4TQVpyGmmli722itDqeBasXgP1E0bnlti2fzpOXkS7ITw4hpvyfePH37cfW72Xz99uXu_b5xkrDQuqNH24dB7q0DW1cTA9WgHFYQdvXegOdfBs0EqJ0DpejtgTveD7GSvxS15fVGtA__aAIuZIzqYJrtA2tB0SgqpOs5kRbsL6urImCGYNcfZ5pPhzJw9MUdz9sScPTGsN9WTWvTqqr8dZvB_S_6YUIF3FwDqjvcRskEXYXHgY65nMT7F_-n_BlXMosU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2543452104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term functional outcomes after robot-assisted prostatectomy compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy: Results from a national retrospective cluster study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lindenberg, Melanie (M.A.) ; Retèl, Valesca (V.P.) ; Kieffer, Jacobien (J.M.) ; Wijburg, Carl (C.) ; Fossion, Laurent (L.M.C.L) ; van der Poel, Henk (H.G.) ; van Harten, Wim (W.H.)</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindenberg, Melanie (M.A.) ; Retèl, Valesca (V.P.) ; Kieffer, Jacobien (J.M.) ; Wijburg, Carl (C.) ; Fossion, Laurent (L.M.C.L) ; van der Poel, Henk (H.G.) ; van Harten, Wim (W.H.)</creatorcontrib><description>Despite multiple studies evaluating the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP), there is no definitive conclusion about the added value of RARP. A retrospective cluster study was conducted to evaluate long-term sexual and urinary functioning after RARP and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) based on real-world data from 12 Dutch hospitals.
Data was collected from patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2012. A mixed effect model was used to evaluate differences between groups on urinary and sexual functioning (EPIC-26). Additionally, a regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between these functional outcomes and, among others, hospital volume.
1370 (65.1%) patients participated, 907 underwent RARP and 463 LRP, with a median follow-up time of 7.08 years (SD = 0.98). The RARP group showed a statistically and clinically significant better urinary functioning compared to the LRP group (p = 0.002). RARP showed also a shorter procedure time (p=<0.001), reduced blood loss (p=<0.001), and a higher chance of neurovascular bundle preservation (39.8% vs 29.1%; p=<0.01).
RARP resulted in better long-term urinary function compared to LRP. Based on the results from this study, guidelines concerning the preferred surgery type and the position on reimbursement may change, especially when RARP proves to be cost-effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34140189</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Blood Vessels ; Erectile Dysfunction - etiology ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hormones - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Laparoscopic prostatectomy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Operative Time ; Organ Sparing Treatments ; Patient-reported outcomes ; Peripheral Nerves ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Robot-assisted prostatectomy ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Sexual functioning ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Urinary functioning ; Urinary Incontinence - etiology</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2021-10, Vol.47 (10), p.2658-2666</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-cf59a6fb6da5e441438179a85f3a9ddce7117fd0845c3e57016e0c768424673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-cf59a6fb6da5e441438179a85f3a9ddce7117fd0845c3e57016e0c768424673</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9580-0489 ; 0000-0001-7522-1009</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798321005680$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140189$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindenberg, Melanie (M.A.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retèl, Valesca (V.P.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieffer, Jacobien (J.M.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijburg, Carl (C.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fossion, Laurent (L.M.C.L)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Poel, Henk (H.G.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Harten, Wim (W.H.)</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term functional outcomes after robot-assisted prostatectomy compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy: Results from a national retrospective cluster study</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Despite multiple studies evaluating the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP), there is no definitive conclusion about the added value of RARP. A retrospective cluster study was conducted to evaluate long-term sexual and urinary functioning after RARP and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) based on real-world data from 12 Dutch hospitals.
Data was collected from patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2012. A mixed effect model was used to evaluate differences between groups on urinary and sexual functioning (EPIC-26). Additionally, a regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between these functional outcomes and, among others, hospital volume.
1370 (65.1%) patients participated, 907 underwent RARP and 463 LRP, with a median follow-up time of 7.08 years (SD = 0.98). The RARP group showed a statistically and clinically significant better urinary functioning compared to the LRP group (p = 0.002). RARP showed also a shorter procedure time (p=<0.001), reduced blood loss (p=<0.001), and a higher chance of neurovascular bundle preservation (39.8% vs 29.1%; p=<0.01).
RARP resulted in better long-term urinary function compared to LRP. Based on the results from this study, guidelines concerning the preferred surgery type and the position on reimbursement may change, especially when RARP proves to be cost-effective.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical</subject><subject>Blood Vessels</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction - etiology</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hormones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopic prostatectomy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Organ Sparing Treatments</subject><subject>Patient-reported outcomes</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robot-assisted prostatectomy</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sexual functioning</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Urinary functioning</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - etiology</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuqFDEQhoMonvHoC7iQLN10m3SSTre4kYM3GBDUfcgkFcnQ3WlT6QPzLudhzTCj4MZVhcpXf11-Ql5y1nLG-zfHFo6Y2o51vGV9y1j_iOy4El3TcaUfkx3Tcmj0OIgb8gzxyBgbhR6fkhshuWR8GHfkYZ-Wn02BPNOwLa7EtNiJpq24NANSG-oXzemQSmMRIxbwdM0Jiy3gSppPtIKrzTVdEp1sfSZ0aY3uX-wt_Qa4TQVpyGmmli722itDqeBasXgP1E0bnlti2fzpOXkS7ITw4hpvyfePH37cfW72Xz99uXu_b5xkrDQuqNH24dB7q0DW1cTA9WgHFYQdvXegOdfBs0EqJ0DpejtgTveD7GSvxS15fVGtA__aAIuZIzqYJrtA2tB0SgqpOs5kRbsL6urImCGYNcfZ5pPhzJw9MUdz9sScPTGsN9WTWvTqqr8dZvB_S_6YUIF3FwDqjvcRskEXYXHgY65nMT7F_-n_BlXMosU</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Lindenberg, Melanie (M.A.)</creator><creator>Retèl, Valesca (V.P.)</creator><creator>Kieffer, Jacobien (J.M.)</creator><creator>Wijburg, Carl (C.)</creator><creator>Fossion, Laurent (L.M.C.L)</creator><creator>van der Poel, Henk (H.G.)</creator><creator>van Harten, Wim (W.H.)</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-0489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7522-1009</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Long-term functional outcomes after robot-assisted prostatectomy compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy: Results from a national retrospective cluster study</title><author>Lindenberg, Melanie (M.A.) ; Retèl, Valesca (V.P.) ; Kieffer, Jacobien (J.M.) ; Wijburg, Carl (C.) ; Fossion, Laurent (L.M.C.L) ; van der Poel, Henk (H.G.) ; van Harten, Wim (W.H.)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-cf59a6fb6da5e441438179a85f3a9ddce7117fd0845c3e57016e0c768424673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical</topic><topic>Blood Vessels</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction - etiology</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hormones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopic prostatectomy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Organ Sparing Treatments</topic><topic>Patient-reported outcomes</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robot-assisted prostatectomy</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sexual functioning</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Urinary functioning</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindenberg, Melanie (M.A.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retèl, Valesca (V.P.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieffer, Jacobien (J.M.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijburg, Carl (C.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fossion, Laurent (L.M.C.L)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Poel, Henk (H.G.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Harten, Wim (W.H.)</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindenberg, Melanie (M.A.)</au><au>Retèl, Valesca (V.P.)</au><au>Kieffer, Jacobien (J.M.)</au><au>Wijburg, Carl (C.)</au><au>Fossion, Laurent (L.M.C.L)</au><au>van der Poel, Henk (H.G.)</au><au>van Harten, Wim (W.H.)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term functional outcomes after robot-assisted prostatectomy compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy: Results from a national retrospective cluster study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2658</spage><epage>2666</epage><pages>2658-2666</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><abstract>Despite multiple studies evaluating the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP), there is no definitive conclusion about the added value of RARP. A retrospective cluster study was conducted to evaluate long-term sexual and urinary functioning after RARP and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) based on real-world data from 12 Dutch hospitals.
Data was collected from patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2012. A mixed effect model was used to evaluate differences between groups on urinary and sexual functioning (EPIC-26). Additionally, a regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between these functional outcomes and, among others, hospital volume.
1370 (65.1%) patients participated, 907 underwent RARP and 463 LRP, with a median follow-up time of 7.08 years (SD = 0.98). The RARP group showed a statistically and clinically significant better urinary functioning compared to the LRP group (p = 0.002). RARP showed also a shorter procedure time (p=<0.001), reduced blood loss (p=<0.001), and a higher chance of neurovascular bundle preservation (39.8% vs 29.1%; p=<0.01).
RARP resulted in better long-term urinary function compared to LRP. Based on the results from this study, guidelines concerning the preferred surgery type and the position on reimbursement may change, especially when RARP proves to be cost-effective.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34140189</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.006</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-0489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7522-1009</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0748-7983 |
| ispartof | European journal of surgical oncology, 2021-10, Vol.47 (10), p.2658-2666 |
| issn | 0748-7983 1532-2157 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2543452104 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Blood Loss, Surgical Blood Vessels Erectile Dysfunction - etiology Follow-Up Studies Hormones - therapeutic use Humans Laparoscopic prostatectomy Laparoscopy - adverse effects Male Middle Aged Netherlands Operative Time Organ Sparing Treatments Patient-reported outcomes Peripheral Nerves Postoperative Complications - etiology Prostatectomy - adverse effects Prostatectomy - methods Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery Quality of Life Retrospective Studies Robot-assisted prostatectomy Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Sexual functioning Surveys and Questionnaires Time Factors Urinary functioning Urinary Incontinence - etiology |
| title | Long-term functional outcomes after robot-assisted prostatectomy compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy: Results from a national retrospective cluster study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T18%3A12%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20functional%20outcomes%20after%20robot-assisted%20prostatectomy%20compared%20to%20laparoscopic%20prostatectomy:%20Results%20from%20a%20national%20retrospective%20cluster%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Lindenberg,%20Melanie%20(M.A.)&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2658&rft.epage=2666&rft.pages=2658-2666&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2543452104%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2543452104&rft_id=info:pmid/34140189&rft_els_id=S0748798321005680&rfr_iscdi=true |