Biomechanical Evaluation of Achilles Tendon Midsubstance Repair: The Effects of Anchor Angle and Position

Background The percutaneous knotless repair technique for Achilles tendon ruptures utilizes a Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) device for suturing the proximal tendon and 2 suture anchors for fixing the sutures into the calcaneus. Determining the best position of the suture anchors may opt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot and ankle specialist 2022-02, Vol.15 (1), p.67-75
Hauptverfasser: Stake, Ingrid K., Miles, Jon W., Douglass, Brenton W., Dornan, Grant J., Clanton, Thomas O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 75
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
container_title Foot and ankle specialist
container_volume 15
creator Stake, Ingrid K.
Miles, Jon W.
Douglass, Brenton W.
Dornan, Grant J.
Clanton, Thomas O.
description Background The percutaneous knotless repair technique for Achilles tendon ruptures utilizes a Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) device for suturing the proximal tendon and 2 suture anchors for fixing the sutures into the calcaneus. Determining the best position of the suture anchors may optimize the strength of this repair. Methods Twelve pairs of human ankle cadaveric specimens were randomly assigned to receive suture anchors placed at 45°, 90°, or 135° from the sagittal plane. The anchors were tensioned according to a protocol representing progressive, postoperative rehabilitation. Load, number of loading cycles, displacement, and mode of failure were recorded. Results With the anchors placed at 45°, 90°, and 135°, the ultimate failure loads were mean 265 ± 64 N, 264 ± 75 N, and 279 ± 40 N, and the total number of loading cycles were mean 459 ± 166, 466 ± 158, and 469 ± 110, respectively. The effect of anchor angle on failure load, number of loading cycles, and displacement was not statistically significant. Visually, the anchors at 45° and 90° demonstrated sutures cutting through the bone. Conclusion We found no statistically significant difference in pullout strength between the 3 different anchor angles. Sutures cutting through the bone may be a concern with acute anchor angles. This suggests that a 135° anchor angle may result in a lower risk of tendon elongation with the percutaneous knotless repair technique. Levels of Evidence Cadaveric laboratory study
doi_str_mv 10.1177/19386400211009360
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2543444353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_19386400211009360</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2543444353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-55eb904f5373399a2861d6d43f6d7cab2e4487671bc30256543f62d63312f34e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EouXxA7ggH7mk-BWn4Vaq8pCKQKicI8fZNK6cuNgJEv-ehBYuSJxmtfvNSDsIXVAyoTRJrmnKp1IQwiglJOWSHKDxsIsSyeXhfh6AEToJYUOIJFLIYzTiggoWJ3yMzK1xNehKNUYrixcfynaqNa7BrsQzXRlrIeAVNEW_ejJF6PLQqkYDfoWtMv4GryrAi7IE3YZvT6Mr53tZW8CqKfCLC2YIPENHpbIBzvd6it7uFqv5Q7R8vn-cz5aRZilroziGPCWijHnCeZoqNpW0kIXgpSwSrXIGQkwTmdBcc8JiGQ8XVkjOKSu5AH6Krna5W-_eOwhtVpugwVrVgOtCxnqHEILHvEfpDtXeheChzLbe1Mp_ZpRkQ8PZn4Z7z-U-vstrKH4dP5X2wGQHBLWGbOM63_Tv_pP4BRMOga4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2543444353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanical Evaluation of Achilles Tendon Midsubstance Repair: The Effects of Anchor Angle and Position</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Stake, Ingrid K. ; Miles, Jon W. ; Douglass, Brenton W. ; Dornan, Grant J. ; Clanton, Thomas O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stake, Ingrid K. ; Miles, Jon W. ; Douglass, Brenton W. ; Dornan, Grant J. ; Clanton, Thomas O.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The percutaneous knotless repair technique for Achilles tendon ruptures utilizes a Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) device for suturing the proximal tendon and 2 suture anchors for fixing the sutures into the calcaneus. Determining the best position of the suture anchors may optimize the strength of this repair. Methods Twelve pairs of human ankle cadaveric specimens were randomly assigned to receive suture anchors placed at 45°, 90°, or 135° from the sagittal plane. The anchors were tensioned according to a protocol representing progressive, postoperative rehabilitation. Load, number of loading cycles, displacement, and mode of failure were recorded. Results With the anchors placed at 45°, 90°, and 135°, the ultimate failure loads were mean 265 ± 64 N, 264 ± 75 N, and 279 ± 40 N, and the total number of loading cycles were mean 459 ± 166, 466 ± 158, and 469 ± 110, respectively. The effect of anchor angle on failure load, number of loading cycles, and displacement was not statistically significant. Visually, the anchors at 45° and 90° demonstrated sutures cutting through the bone. Conclusion We found no statistically significant difference in pullout strength between the 3 different anchor angles. Sutures cutting through the bone may be a concern with acute anchor angles. This suggests that a 135° anchor angle may result in a lower risk of tendon elongation with the percutaneous knotless repair technique. Levels of Evidence Cadaveric laboratory study</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-6400</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-7636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/19386400211009360</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34142573</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Achilles Tendon - surgery ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cadaver ; Humans ; Suture Anchors ; Suture Techniques ; Sutures</subject><ispartof>Foot and ankle specialist, 2022-02, Vol.15 (1), p.67-75</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-55eb904f5373399a2861d6d43f6d7cab2e4487671bc30256543f62d63312f34e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0048-8897 ; 0000-0001-9831-7484 ; 0000-0001-8410-7718</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/19386400211009360$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19386400211009360$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142573$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stake, Ingrid K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miles, Jon W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglass, Brenton W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dornan, Grant J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clanton, Thomas O.</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanical Evaluation of Achilles Tendon Midsubstance Repair: The Effects of Anchor Angle and Position</title><title>Foot and ankle specialist</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Spec</addtitle><description>Background The percutaneous knotless repair technique for Achilles tendon ruptures utilizes a Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) device for suturing the proximal tendon and 2 suture anchors for fixing the sutures into the calcaneus. Determining the best position of the suture anchors may optimize the strength of this repair. Methods Twelve pairs of human ankle cadaveric specimens were randomly assigned to receive suture anchors placed at 45°, 90°, or 135° from the sagittal plane. The anchors were tensioned according to a protocol representing progressive, postoperative rehabilitation. Load, number of loading cycles, displacement, and mode of failure were recorded. Results With the anchors placed at 45°, 90°, and 135°, the ultimate failure loads were mean 265 ± 64 N, 264 ± 75 N, and 279 ± 40 N, and the total number of loading cycles were mean 459 ± 166, 466 ± 158, and 469 ± 110, respectively. The effect of anchor angle on failure load, number of loading cycles, and displacement was not statistically significant. Visually, the anchors at 45° and 90° demonstrated sutures cutting through the bone. Conclusion We found no statistically significant difference in pullout strength between the 3 different anchor angles. Sutures cutting through the bone may be a concern with acute anchor angles. This suggests that a 135° anchor angle may result in a lower risk of tendon elongation with the percutaneous knotless repair technique. Levels of Evidence Cadaveric laboratory study</description><subject>Achilles Tendon - surgery</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Suture Anchors</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><issn>1938-6400</issn><issn>1938-7636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EouXxA7ggH7mk-BWn4Vaq8pCKQKicI8fZNK6cuNgJEv-ehBYuSJxmtfvNSDsIXVAyoTRJrmnKp1IQwiglJOWSHKDxsIsSyeXhfh6AEToJYUOIJFLIYzTiggoWJ3yMzK1xNehKNUYrixcfynaqNa7BrsQzXRlrIeAVNEW_ejJF6PLQqkYDfoWtMv4GryrAi7IE3YZvT6Mr53tZW8CqKfCLC2YIPENHpbIBzvd6it7uFqv5Q7R8vn-cz5aRZilroziGPCWijHnCeZoqNpW0kIXgpSwSrXIGQkwTmdBcc8JiGQ8XVkjOKSu5AH6Krna5W-_eOwhtVpugwVrVgOtCxnqHEILHvEfpDtXeheChzLbe1Mp_ZpRkQ8PZn4Z7z-U-vstrKH4dP5X2wGQHBLWGbOM63_Tv_pP4BRMOga4</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Stake, Ingrid K.</creator><creator>Miles, Jon W.</creator><creator>Douglass, Brenton W.</creator><creator>Dornan, Grant J.</creator><creator>Clanton, Thomas O.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-8897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-7484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8410-7718</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Biomechanical Evaluation of Achilles Tendon Midsubstance Repair: The Effects of Anchor Angle and Position</title><author>Stake, Ingrid K. ; Miles, Jon W. ; Douglass, Brenton W. ; Dornan, Grant J. ; Clanton, Thomas O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-55eb904f5373399a2861d6d43f6d7cab2e4487671bc30256543f62d63312f34e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Achilles Tendon - surgery</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Suture Anchors</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stake, Ingrid K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miles, Jon W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglass, Brenton W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dornan, Grant J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clanton, Thomas O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot and ankle specialist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stake, Ingrid K.</au><au>Miles, Jon W.</au><au>Douglass, Brenton W.</au><au>Dornan, Grant J.</au><au>Clanton, Thomas O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanical Evaluation of Achilles Tendon Midsubstance Repair: The Effects of Anchor Angle and Position</atitle><jtitle>Foot and ankle specialist</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Spec</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>67-75</pages><issn>1938-6400</issn><eissn>1938-7636</eissn><abstract>Background The percutaneous knotless repair technique for Achilles tendon ruptures utilizes a Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) device for suturing the proximal tendon and 2 suture anchors for fixing the sutures into the calcaneus. Determining the best position of the suture anchors may optimize the strength of this repair. Methods Twelve pairs of human ankle cadaveric specimens were randomly assigned to receive suture anchors placed at 45°, 90°, or 135° from the sagittal plane. The anchors were tensioned according to a protocol representing progressive, postoperative rehabilitation. Load, number of loading cycles, displacement, and mode of failure were recorded. Results With the anchors placed at 45°, 90°, and 135°, the ultimate failure loads were mean 265 ± 64 N, 264 ± 75 N, and 279 ± 40 N, and the total number of loading cycles were mean 459 ± 166, 466 ± 158, and 469 ± 110, respectively. The effect of anchor angle on failure load, number of loading cycles, and displacement was not statistically significant. Visually, the anchors at 45° and 90° demonstrated sutures cutting through the bone. Conclusion We found no statistically significant difference in pullout strength between the 3 different anchor angles. Sutures cutting through the bone may be a concern with acute anchor angles. This suggests that a 135° anchor angle may result in a lower risk of tendon elongation with the percutaneous knotless repair technique. Levels of Evidence Cadaveric laboratory study</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34142573</pmid><doi>10.1177/19386400211009360</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-8897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-7484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8410-7718</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1938-6400
ispartof Foot and ankle specialist, 2022-02, Vol.15 (1), p.67-75
issn 1938-6400
1938-7636
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2543444353
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Achilles Tendon - surgery
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cadaver
Humans
Suture Anchors
Suture Techniques
Sutures
title Biomechanical Evaluation of Achilles Tendon Midsubstance Repair: The Effects of Anchor Angle and Position
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T21%3A40%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical%20Evaluation%20of%20Achilles%20Tendon%20Midsubstance%20Repair:%20The%20Effects%20of%20Anchor%20Angle%20and%20Position&rft.jtitle=Foot%20and%20ankle%20specialist&rft.au=Stake,%20Ingrid%20K.&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=67-75&rft.issn=1938-6400&rft.eissn=1938-7636&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/19386400211009360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2543444353%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2543444353&rft_id=info:pmid/34142573&rft_sage_id=10.1177_19386400211009360&rfr_iscdi=true