Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers

Microplastics (< 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2021-09, Vol.788, p.147698-147698, Article 147698
Hauptverfasser: Fragão, Joana, Bessa, Filipa, Otero, Vanessa, Barbosa, Andrés, Sobral, Paula, Waluda, Claire M., Guímaro, Hugo R., Xavier, José C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147698
container_issue
container_start_page 147698
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 788
creator Fragão, Joana
Bessa, Filipa
Otero, Vanessa
Barbosa, Andrés
Sobral, Paula
Waluda, Claire M.
Guímaro, Hugo R.
Xavier, José C.
description Microplastics (< 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica. [Display omitted] •Anthropogenic particles were found in all three pygoscelid penguin species.•Thirty-five percent were microplastics; these were found in all species.•Fifty-five percent of the analysed particles were identified as cellulose fibres.•Polyethylene were the most common synthetic polymer.•Microplastics were widespread across years and colonies in Antarctic Peninsula.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2542361734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969721027698</els_id><sourcerecordid>2542361734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-335567f8d986c1d8072113134d41e36931553bf48d5191abf35cd5d79495bf8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1vGyEQRVUj1U36G8oxl3WZZVkgNytq00iJemnOiIVZB2sNW8CR-u-L5arXzmVm9D6k9wj5DGwLDMYvh21xoaaK8W3bsx62MMhRq3dkA0rqDlg_vicbxgbV6VHLD-RjKQfWRirYEP8cXE7rYksNrlAbPU31FXO76msD0h5jcHS1ueELFhoi3cVqs2u_vaMvJcQ9XTHuTyE2faFTSEvaN3ChxR7XBXO5IVezXQp--ruvycu3rz_vv3dPPx4e73dPneNa1o5zIUY5K6_V6MArJnsADnzwAyAfNQch-DQPygvQYKeZC-eFl3rQYprVxK_J7cV3zenXCUs1x1AcLouNmE7F9GLo-QiSD40qL9SWvpSMs1lzONr82wAz517Nwfzr1Zx7NZdem3J3UWJL8hYwn3kYHfqQ0VXjU_ivxx8gCYbo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2542361734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Fragão, Joana ; Bessa, Filipa ; Otero, Vanessa ; Barbosa, Andrés ; Sobral, Paula ; Waluda, Claire M. ; Guímaro, Hugo R. ; Xavier, José C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fragão, Joana ; Bessa, Filipa ; Otero, Vanessa ; Barbosa, Andrés ; Sobral, Paula ; Waluda, Claire M. ; Guímaro, Hugo R. ; Xavier, José C.</creatorcontrib><description>Microplastics (&lt; 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica. [Display omitted] •Anthropogenic particles were found in all three pygoscelid penguin species.•Thirty-five percent were microplastics; these were found in all species.•Fifty-five percent of the analysed particles were identified as cellulose fibres.•Polyethylene were the most common synthetic polymer.•Microplastics were widespread across years and colonies in Antarctic Peninsula.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antarctic Peninsula ; Antarctic top predators ; Cellulose ; Microplastics ; Plastic pollution ; Scotia Sea</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2021-09, Vol.788, p.147698-147698, Article 147698</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-335567f8d986c1d8072113134d41e36931553bf48d5191abf35cd5d79495bf8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-335567f8d986c1d8072113134d41e36931553bf48d5191abf35cd5d79495bf8b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fragão, Joana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bessa, Filipa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otero, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobral, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waluda, Claire M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guímaro, Hugo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier, José C.</creatorcontrib><title>Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><description>Microplastics (&lt; 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica. [Display omitted] •Anthropogenic particles were found in all three pygoscelid penguin species.•Thirty-five percent were microplastics; these were found in all species.•Fifty-five percent of the analysed particles were identified as cellulose fibres.•Polyethylene were the most common synthetic polymer.•Microplastics were widespread across years and colonies in Antarctic Peninsula.</description><subject>Antarctic Peninsula</subject><subject>Antarctic top predators</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Microplastics</subject><subject>Plastic pollution</subject><subject>Scotia Sea</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1vGyEQRVUj1U36G8oxl3WZZVkgNytq00iJemnOiIVZB2sNW8CR-u-L5arXzmVm9D6k9wj5DGwLDMYvh21xoaaK8W3bsx62MMhRq3dkA0rqDlg_vicbxgbV6VHLD-RjKQfWRirYEP8cXE7rYksNrlAbPU31FXO76msD0h5jcHS1ueELFhoi3cVqs2u_vaMvJcQ9XTHuTyE2faFTSEvaN3ChxR7XBXO5IVezXQp--ruvycu3rz_vv3dPPx4e73dPneNa1o5zIUY5K6_V6MArJnsADnzwAyAfNQch-DQPygvQYKeZC-eFl3rQYprVxK_J7cV3zenXCUs1x1AcLouNmE7F9GLo-QiSD40qL9SWvpSMs1lzONr82wAz517Nwfzr1Zx7NZdem3J3UWJL8hYwn3kYHfqQ0VXjU_ivxx8gCYbo</recordid><startdate>20210920</startdate><enddate>20210920</enddate><creator>Fragão, Joana</creator><creator>Bessa, Filipa</creator><creator>Otero, Vanessa</creator><creator>Barbosa, Andrés</creator><creator>Sobral, Paula</creator><creator>Waluda, Claire M.</creator><creator>Guímaro, Hugo R.</creator><creator>Xavier, José C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210920</creationdate><title>Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers</title><author>Fragão, Joana ; Bessa, Filipa ; Otero, Vanessa ; Barbosa, Andrés ; Sobral, Paula ; Waluda, Claire M. ; Guímaro, Hugo R. ; Xavier, José C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-335567f8d986c1d8072113134d41e36931553bf48d5191abf35cd5d79495bf8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antarctic Peninsula</topic><topic>Antarctic top predators</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Microplastics</topic><topic>Plastic pollution</topic><topic>Scotia Sea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fragão, Joana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bessa, Filipa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otero, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobral, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waluda, Claire M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guímaro, Hugo R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier, José C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fragão, Joana</au><au>Bessa, Filipa</au><au>Otero, Vanessa</au><au>Barbosa, Andrés</au><au>Sobral, Paula</au><au>Waluda, Claire M.</au><au>Guímaro, Hugo R.</au><au>Xavier, José C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><date>2021-09-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>788</volume><spage>147698</spage><epage>147698</epage><pages>147698-147698</pages><artnum>147698</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Microplastics (&lt; 5 mm in size) are known to be widespread in the marine environment but are still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species: Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica. [Display omitted] •Anthropogenic particles were found in all three pygoscelid penguin species.•Thirty-five percent were microplastics; these were found in all species.•Fifty-five percent of the analysed particles were identified as cellulose fibres.•Polyethylene were the most common synthetic polymer.•Microplastics were widespread across years and colonies in Antarctic Peninsula.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2021-09, Vol.788, p.147698-147698, Article 147698
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2542361734
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Antarctic Peninsula
Antarctic top predators
Cellulose
Microplastics
Plastic pollution
Scotia Sea
title Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A28%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microplastics%20and%20other%20anthropogenic%20particles%20in%20Antarctica:%20Using%20penguins%20as%20biological%20samplers&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Frag%C3%A3o,%20Joana&rft.date=2021-09-20&rft.volume=788&rft.spage=147698&rft.epage=147698&rft.pages=147698-147698&rft.artnum=147698&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2542361734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2542361734&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0048969721027698&rfr_iscdi=true