A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data
This paper reviews the necessary considerations and available techniques for assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data. Included in this review are the classification system, the sampling scheme, the sample size, spatial autocorrelation, and the assessment techniques. All analysis is based on t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Remote sensing of environment 1991-07, Vol.37 (1), p.35-46 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 46 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 35 |
| container_title | Remote sensing of environment |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Congalton, Russell G. |
| description | This paper reviews the necessary considerations and available techniques for assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data. Included in this review are the classification system, the sampling scheme, the sample size, spatial autocorrelation, and the assessment techniques. All analysis is based on the use of an error matrix or contingency table. Example matrices and results of the analysis are presented. Future trends including the need for assessment of other spatial data are also discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25418855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>003442579190048B</els_id><sourcerecordid>16024016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7711a58fc5bc4a1eaf5f72fc609e5aa86e7da945761d9d20ee839c368599ee913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1EJZaWf9BDDgjBIeBJ7Ni-ILVV-ZBa9QJnazoZg1E2KZ5s0f57km7VI5xGmnned6RHqVPQ70FD90Hr1tSmse5tgHdBa-Pr82dqA96FWjttnqvNE_JCvRT5pTVY72Cjrs-qwveZ_1RTqlCERfL4o5p_coVEu4K0Xy80LLecMuGcp1HWVeHtNPOwr4RH4b7qccYTdZRwEH71OI_V90-X3y6-1Fc3n79enF3VZKGZa-cA0PpE9pYMAmOyyTWJOh3YIvqOXY_BWNdBH_pGM_s2UNt5GwJzgPZYvTn03pXp945ljtssxMOAI087iY014L21_wWh041ZFC6gOYBUJpHCKd6VvMWyj6DjKjmuBuNqMAaID5Lj-RJ7_diPQjikgiNlecraFox3zYJ9PGC8SFlslyiUeSTuc2GaYz_lf__5C1M_kAk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16024016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Congalton, Russell G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Congalton, Russell G.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reviews the necessary considerations and available techniques for assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data. Included in this review are the classification system, the sampling scheme, the sample size, spatial autocorrelation, and the assessment techniques. All analysis is based on the use of an error matrix or contingency table. Example matrices and results of the analysis are presented. Future trends including the need for assessment of other spatial data are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSEEA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing ; Remote sensing</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 1991-07, Vol.37 (1), p.35-46</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7711a58fc5bc4a1eaf5f72fc609e5aa86e7da945761d9d20ee839c368599ee913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7711a58fc5bc4a1eaf5f72fc609e5aa86e7da945761d9d20ee839c368599ee913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5314872$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Congalton, Russell G.</creatorcontrib><title>A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>This paper reviews the necessary considerations and available techniques for assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data. Included in this review are the classification system, the sampling scheme, the sample size, spatial autocorrelation, and the assessment techniques. All analysis is based on the use of an error matrix or contingency table. Example matrices and results of the analysis are presented. Future trends including the need for assessment of other spatial data are also discussed.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1EJZaWf9BDDgjBIeBJ7Ni-ILVV-ZBa9QJnazoZg1E2KZ5s0f57km7VI5xGmnned6RHqVPQ70FD90Hr1tSmse5tgHdBa-Pr82dqA96FWjttnqvNE_JCvRT5pTVY72Cjrs-qwveZ_1RTqlCERfL4o5p_coVEu4K0Xy80LLecMuGcp1HWVeHtNPOwr4RH4b7qccYTdZRwEH71OI_V90-X3y6-1Fc3n79enF3VZKGZa-cA0PpE9pYMAmOyyTWJOh3YIvqOXY_BWNdBH_pGM_s2UNt5GwJzgPZYvTn03pXp945ljtssxMOAI087iY014L21_wWh041ZFC6gOYBUJpHCKd6VvMWyj6DjKjmuBuNqMAaID5Lj-RJ7_diPQjikgiNlecraFox3zYJ9PGC8SFlslyiUeSTuc2GaYz_lf__5C1M_kAk</recordid><startdate>19910701</startdate><enddate>19910701</enddate><creator>Congalton, Russell G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910701</creationdate><title>A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data</title><author>Congalton, Russell G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-7711a58fc5bc4a1eaf5f72fc609e5aa86e7da945761d9d20ee839c368599ee913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Congalton, Russell G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Congalton, Russell G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>1991-07-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>35-46</pages><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><coden>RSEEA7</coden><abstract>This paper reviews the necessary considerations and available techniques for assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data. Included in this review are the classification system, the sampling scheme, the sample size, spatial autocorrelation, and the assessment techniques. All analysis is based on the use of an error matrix or contingency table. Example matrices and results of the analysis are presented. Future trends including the need for assessment of other spatial data are also discussed.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0034-4257 |
| ispartof | Remote sensing of environment, 1991-07, Vol.37 (1), p.35-46 |
| issn | 0034-4257 1879-0704 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25418855 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing Remote sensing |
| title | A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A55%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20assessing%20the%20accuracy%20of%20classifications%20of%20remotely%20sensed%20data&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Congalton,%20Russell%20G.&rft.date=1991-07-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=35-46&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft.coden=RSEEA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16024016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16024016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=003442579190048B&rfr_iscdi=true |